Preliminary SWOT Orbit Design Study R. Steven Nerem, Ryan Woolley, George Born, James Choe Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research, University of Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using GRACE Satellite Acceleration Data to Recover Arctic Ocean Tides Bryan Killett 1, John Wahr 1, Shailen D. Desai 2, Dah-Ning Yuan 2, Mike Watkins 2,
Advertisements

Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Satellite Mission
ECCO-2 and NASA Satellite Missions Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory January 22-23, ECCO-2 Meeting.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado ASEN 5070 OD Accuracy Assessment OD Overlap Example Effects of eliminating parameters.
Instruments used in gravity prospecting
Some Basic Concepts of Remote Sensing
Satellite Orbits Satellite Meteorology/Climatology Professor Menglin Jin.
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
Spatial-Temporal Parametric Model with Covariance Structure based on Multiple Satellite Altimetry for Predicting and Interpolating Sea Surface Heights.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
Ron Kwok Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Critically Needed: Continued 3-day RADARSAT coverage of the Western Arctic Ocean.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2013 Lecture 2.
MODIS Regional and Global Cloud Variability Brent C. Maddux 1,2 Steve Platnick 3, Steven A. Ackerman 1,2, Paul Menzel 1, Kathy Strabala 1, Richard Frey.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
Climate and Global Change Notes 6-1 Satellite Fundamentals Types of Orbit Lower Earth Orbits (LEO) Polar Orbits Medium Earth Orbits (MEO) Highly Elliptical.
Initial Results on the Cross- Calibration of QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 Scatterometers David G. Long Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham.
Satellites and Sensors
Resonances and GOCE orbit selection J. Kloko č ník (1), A. Bezd ě k (1), J. Kostelecký (2), R. Floberghagen (3), Ch. Gruber (1) (1)Astron. Inst. Czech.
SWOT spatio-temporal errors from in-situ measurements S. Biancamaria (1), N. Mognard (1), Y. Oudin (1), M. Durand (2), E. Rodriguez (3), E. Clark (4),
Hosted by: Lee-Lueng Fu, Hydrosphere Mapper Doug Alsdorf, WATER Funding from CNES, JPL, and NASA Welcome to a Joint Meeting of Ocean Sciences and Surface.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 8 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Satellite Altimetry - possibilities and limitations
John T. Gunn, AVDS Manager Earth & Space Research 1910 Fairview Ave. E., Suite 210 Seattle, WA Ph: ; 1 st Joint GOSUD/SAMOS.
Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 8 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
1 Applications of Remote Sensing: SeaWiFS and MODIS Ocean Color Outline  Physical principles behind the remote sensing of ocean color parameters  Satellite.
Mapping Ocean Surface Topography With a Synthetic-Aperture Interferometry Radar: A Global Hydrosphere Mapper Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena,
A SATELLITE CONSTELLATION TO OBSERVE THE SPECTRAL RADIANCE SHELL OF EARTH Stanley Q. Kidder and Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute for Research.
2007 OSTST meeting Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) F. Lefevre (CLS) Long period errors observed at Envisat crossovers and possible impact of tides.
Remote Sensing Data Acquisition. 1. Major Remote Sensing Systems.
On the Use of Geostationary Satellites for Remote Sensing in the High Latitudes Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Xuanji Wang 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Jun Li.
1 GNSS-R concept extended by a fine orbit tuning Jaroslav KLOKOČNÍK a, Aleš BEZDĚK a, Jan KOSTELECKÝ b,c a Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
Sea ice thickness from CryoSat – A new data set for operational ice services? Christian Haas German CryoSat Office AWI.
Space platform and Orbits Introduction to Remote Sensing Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung.
GPS Segments / Components
SWOT spatio-temporal errors from in-situ measurements S. Biancamaria (1), N. Mognard (1), Y. Oudin (1), M. Durand (2), E. Rodriguez (3), E. Clark (4),
GISMO Simulation Status Objective Radar and geometry parameters Airborne platform upgrade Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling.
Developing the configuration trade space for space-based DWLs: vertical and horizontal coverage G. D. Emmitt, S. A. Wood and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates.
MISR Geo-registration Overview Brian E. Rheingans Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology AMS Short Course on Exploring and Using.
SWOT: A HIGH-RESOLUTION WIDE-SWATH ALTIMETRY MISSION
1 Daily OI Analysis for Sea Surface Temperature NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA,
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Combining Altimeter-derived Currents With Aquarius Salinity To Study The Marine Freshwater Budget Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Yi Chao.
ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Mission Orbits, Constellation Design
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
October 2005 Ahmedabad 3rd Indo-French Workshop on MEGHA-TROPIQUES 2 SATELLITE ALTITUDE AND REPEAT CYCLE Michel Capderou (LMD / IPSL Paris)
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
Satellite Climatology - Orbits Geostationary orbits Sun synchroneous orbits Precessing orbit Discussion.
Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Wide-Swath Ocean Sciences and Hydrology Meeting 31 October 2006 Orbit Selection.
Potential for estimation of river discharge through assimilation of wide swath satellite altimetry into a river hydrodynamics model Kostas Andreadis 1,
Space-based studies of low-latitude ionospheric forcing originating in the lower atmosphere Thomas J. Immel, Scott L. England Space Sciences Laboratory,
Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Look Angle Determination
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
Sensitivity of Orbit Predictions to Density Variability
HMA Product Metadata Workshop
Blending multiple-source wind data including SMOS, SMAP and AMSR-2 new products Joe TENERELLI, Fabrice COLLARD OceanDataLab, Brest, France.
The Earth-Moon System Moon Mass x 1022 kg
Satellite Meteorology
5th Workshop on "SMART Cable Systems: Latest Developments and Designing the Wet Demonstrator Project" (Dubai, UAE, April 2016) Contribution of.
The Earth-Moon System Moon Mass x 1022 kg
BASIC ORBIT MECHANICS.
Objectives and Requirements of SWOT for Observing the Oceanic Mesoscale Variability (based on a workshop held at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, April.
Coastal Altimetry Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary SWOT Orbit Design Study R. Steven Nerem, Ryan Woolley, George Born, James Choe Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research, University of Colorado Richard Ray NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Ernesto Rodriguez Jet Propulsion Laboratory

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 2 Orbit Design Considerations Latitudinal coverage (orbit inclination) Temporal Sampling Spatial Sampling Tidal Aliasing Starting Point: –15-25 day repeat – km altitude –Near 78° inclination Other Considerations: –Calibration/Validation –Multiple Orbit/Mission Phases –Orbit Maintenance Final Orbit Design Derived from Science Requirements

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 3 ~60 km ~10 km km Sensor Swath Pattern ~3.5° ~0.6°

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 4 15-Day Orbit Coverage Gaps 3° N 0°0° 3° S 60 km 400 km

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 5 22-Day Orbit Coverage 2° N 0°0° 2° S

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 6 Repeat Period vs Equatorial Spacing

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 7 ~130 km total swath width Repeat Period vs Coverage (i = 78°)

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 8 15-Day Repeat, 1-Day Subcycle Base Interval ~25° or ~3000 km Day

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 9 14-Day Repeat, 3-Day Subcycle Base Interval ~25° or ~3000 km Day

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, 3-Day Subcycle Base Interval ~25° or ~3000 km Day

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 11 3-Day Repeat Base Interval ~25° or ~3000 km Day

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 12 1-Day Repeating Ground Track

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 13 3-Day Repeating Groundtrack

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 14 4-Day Repeating Groundtrack

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat – 3 Day Subcycle

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat – 3 Day Subcycle

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat – 3 Day Subcycle

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 18 Possible Orbit Altitudes: i = 78° Repeat Length (days) + Repeat Orbit at Subcycle

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Subcycles Repeat Length (days)

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 20 Properties of Repeat Track Orbits Complete exactly N orbits in C days –N is an integer, C is not (except for SS orbits) Altitude precisely determined by i, N, and C Ground track forms a grid on Earth’s surface, one point fixes the whole grid Grid “denser” for increasing C Sub-cycle length is a complex function of N and C

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 21 Candidate Orbits Repeat Length # of Orbits to Repeat Equatorial Spacing

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 22 Tidal Aliasing This initial analysis does not consider possible benefits of swath coverage (tidal solutions using swath “crossover” measurements) Tidal aliasing frequencies completely determined by orbit repeat period (function of altitude and inclination) Desirable characteristics: –Good separation of major tide constituents aliasing frequencies –Alias frequencies should not be close to one cycle per year –Tides should not alias to very long periods (<< 1 year)

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 23 Four main solar diurnal tides are separated in frequency by 1 cpy. The precession rate of the satellite orbit plane determines which frequency is aliased to zero. To avoid unfavorable aliasing generally requires a precession rate ≤ –2°/d (cf. Topex), which limits satellite inclination. We must trade off inclination and aliasing. Aliasing Near Diurnal Solar Tides

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 24 Tidal Alias Frequencies: i = 75°

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 25 Tidal Alias Frequencies: i = 77°

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 26 Tidal Alias Frequencies: i = 80°

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 27 Tidal Alias Frequencies: i = 85°

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 28 Average Tidal Frequency Separation

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 29 Average Tidal Frequency Separation

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 30 Tidal Aliasing: i = 78° X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 31 Candidate Orbits Minimal Tidal Aliasing

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Subcycles

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 33 How Does This Analysis Change for SWOT? Many measurement locations have 2 or more ascending/descending passes. Most measurement locations are “cross over” points.

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research day repeat latitude 32.0° Case 1: One ascending arc per repeat cycle Example Sampling of Tides by SWOT Nominal alias period 818 d 111 d 68 d 285 d 160 d 89 d 48 d 80 d 143 d

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research day repeat latitude 32.0° Case 2: Two ascending arcs per repeat cycle Added sampling helps lunar tides, but not solar. Example Sampling of Tides by SWOT Nominal alias period 818 d 111 d 68 d 285 d 160 d 89 d 48 d 80 d 143 d

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research day repeat latitude 32.0° Case 3: Two ascending arcs + two descending arcs per repeat cycle Added sampling helps solar diurnal tides, but not solar semidiurnals. Example Sampling of Tides by SWOT Nominal alias period 818 d 111 d 68 d 285 d 160 d 89 d 48 d 80 d 143 d

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research day repeat latitude 60.0° Case 3b: Two ascending arcs + two descending arcs per repeat cycle Nominal alias period 818 d 111 d 68 d 285 d 160 d 89 d 48 d 80 d 143 d Added sampling helps solar tides, depending on latitude. Example Sampling of Tides by SWOT

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 38 Nadir vs Swath Sampling of the Tides Additional sampling within a repeat period generally solves aliasing issues of lunar tides. At most latitudes, additional sampling of solar tides does not help resolve semidiurnal tides. For some sea level studies, additional sampling will help mitigate solar tide-model errors, depending on data processing strategies. For tide model improvement studies, swath altimetry provides only marginal improvement for the solar tides over what is offered from conventional nadir altimetry. Therefore, Nadir-type aliasing studies generally apply to SWOT - for solar tides. Most lunar tides will not alias to long periods, so we can neglect them during orbit design (but it’s easy to check M2, O1, etc.).

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 39 Coverage Analysis 3 Cases studied to get representative coverage for different latitude bands: –Mid-latitude to high-latitude: Aghulas current region (Gulf Stream is similar) –Equatorial: Amazon River –High-latitude: Lena River Plots of number of visits within a cycle, for 10 day and 4 day sampling periods Histograms of temporal revisits within a cycle (i.e., no revisits between cycles considered)

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Aghulas

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research days of 22-Day Repeat, Aghulas

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 42 4-Days of 22-Day Repeat, Aghulas

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Aghulas

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Amazon

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Days of 22-Day Repeat, Amazon

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 46 4-Days of 22-Day Repeat, Amazon

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Amazon

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Lena

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Days of 22-Day Repeat, Lena

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 50 4 Days of 22-Day Repeat, Lena

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat, Lena

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research Day Repeat

University of Colorado at Boulder Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research 53 1-Day (3-D) Questions?