DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Protection Commission Overview Vision: Environmental Excellence in a Changing World.
Advertisements

1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
CE/Geol/ChE 174 Hazardous Materials The Federal - State Relationship Christopher Vais
The Arsenic Rule Waste Disposal Options. Impacts on Disposal Alternatives Concentration of contaminants in the waste stream Concentration of contaminants.
U.S. EPA Regulations Review Update: Subpart W NESHAPS (40 CFR 61) Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR Part 192) Andrea Cherepy, Phil Egidi, Reid.
1 Long-Term Stewardship of Uranium Mills in the United States – Regulatory Issues Keith McConnell, Deputy Director for Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery.
NRC LICENSE APPLICATION PROCESS
1 Presented By: Matthew Duchesne Office of Environmental Compliance Office of Environmental Management Department of Energy 2010 Long-Term Surveillance.
1AEA The Atomic Energy Act (AEA) The Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Professor Bernie Engel ASM 336 September 13, 2004.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
NUCP 2311 Radioactive Waste Management Legislation 1.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Update on progress with development of DS459
PROCESSES AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER ON WHETHER OR NOT TO AMEND AGREEMENT STATE STATUS Uranium Working Group August 2, 2012.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
Landfill acceptance criteria: justification and background Heijo Scharff FEAD Workshop Implementation of the Landfill Directive Budapest, Hungary, 11 May.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
OAS Meeting August 2012 Jennifer Opila (CO) and David Allard (PA)
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
New Mexico Uranium Exploration & Mining BLM Uranium Workshop August 12, 2008 Salt Lake City, Utah Holland Shepherd, Program Manager Mining Act Reclamation.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Jennifer Opila, Radioactive Materials Unit Leader State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
Web Resources Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Environmental Law.
“ OVERALL DECISION MAKING IN PLANNING FOR REMEDIATION OF URANIUM MINES” Presentation to the Senior Regulator’s meeting at the 56 th IAEA General Conference.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCE PHASEOUT ISSUES TED KOSS
EM's Challenge1 Introduction EM’s Challenge: Integrating Major Regulatory Requirements.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Draft Year: 1976 (drafted as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act.) Amendment years: 1984(HSWA, Hazardous.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Draft Year: 1976 Amendment years: 1989 National/ Internatinal: National Law Sean Petersen, per:3.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Office of Legacy Management Land Transfer and Reuse November 2006 Steven R. Schiesswohl Senior Realty Officer, Office of Legacy Management.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
AIR ASBESTOS CLIMATE CHANGE LAND & CLEANUP PESTICIDES TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASTE WATER By Topic (on EPA website)
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2016 Meeting – Park City, UT
Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
Updating the NRC’s Alternative Disposal Request Guidance Document
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ENV 320 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
TENORM in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Assessing the Risk
EPA Work in TENORM Philip Egidi U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
October 23, 2015 LLW Forum Meeting Chicago, IL Melanie Wong,
NRC’s Low-Level Radioactive Waste Program
Regulation of TENORM from Oil and Gas Operations
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
NRC Perspective of Radiological Byproducts for Oil and Gas Operations
NRC Oversight on Storage of Special Nuclear Material
Exempt and Low Activity Radioactive Waste Disposal
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2019 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Presentation transcript:

DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (6608J) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC URANIUM MILL TAILINGS RADIATION CONTROL ACT STANDARDS UPDATE

Pg 2 Existing Regulations 40 CFR Part 192  Regulations issued under authority of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Section 206--Section 275 of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA)  EPA develops standards  Utilized by NRC and its Agreement States, and DOE  Regulations applied to byproduct material from conventional mills, In Situ Leach/Recovery (ISL/ISR) facilities, and heap leach facilities Existing Regulations 40 CFR Part 192 Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

Existing Regulations 40 CFR Part 192  AEA “Title I” specific inactive (and abandoned mills)  Tailings contaminated soil and buildings  AEA “Title II” mills in operation in 1978 or which might be licensed in the future by NRC (or Agreement States) Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

Existing Regulations 40 CFR Part 192  Standards must generally conform with requirements of Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (now the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)) for non-radiological hazards  Statute allows the Agency discretion in setting standards for controlling radiological hazards Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

 Many standards for mill tailings impoundments cross- reference RCRA Subtitle C requirements for hazardous waste facilities  Radon emission standards  Limits on groundwater concentrations of hazardous substances including radionuclides  Remediation standards for contaminated soils/buildings  Monitoring, corrective action, post-closure monitoring Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings Existing Regulations 40 CFR Part 192

Pg 6  Over 25 years since originally finalized, 15 years since last update for groundwater protection  Lack explicit provisions for ISL/ISR facilities, now principal means of uranium recovery in U.S., and for heap leach facilities  Changes in EPA protective standards for hazardous substances in groundwater and drinking water  Changes in economics of extraction & site remediation Reasons for Review Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

Pg 7  Changes in dose and risk factors for radiation/radon, Principal scenarios for exposure Subsistence and cultural lifestyles of affected communities Potential impacts on children’s health  Potential for uranium extraction in different geographic locations than those considered in risk assessments in original standards Reasons for Review Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

Pg 8  EPA Work Group is conducting analysis of standards in regulations  Work Group comparison of existing rule standards with History of performance of Title I and II facilities Implementation of standards by regulatory agencies Impacts on Tribes, environmental justice communities, children’s health, general public Changes in EPA standards, new Executive Orders, new statutes, other national and international protectiveness standards Review Process

 Should the review determine a need for new standards EPA will take into consideration:  How to balance environmental compliance costs and benefits Public health, environmental protection and safety benefits Impacts on implementing agencies Impacts on industry Economic and societal impacts

Review Process  Input from:  Federal Agency Coordination  Industry  States  Tribes – EJ  Environmental and other NGO’s  General Public

Pg 11  Interactive Internet Site – Discussion Forum Site for public input on discussion topics for this review Calendar of events Library of relevant documents  address for additional public input: Review Process

Pg 12 Thank You !