L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAIR accelerator R&D Oliver Kester GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung Darmstadt and IAP Goethe-Universität Frankfurt.
Advertisements

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Beam Cooling at HESR in the FAIR Project 12 th September 2011 Dieter Prasuhn.
FAIR Synchrotrons SIS100/300
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck et al.,
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities B. Zwicker, Bunch.
BIW `06, May 1st 2006 Beam Diagnostics Challenges in the FAIR project at GSI The FAIR project - a Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research Planning of.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities 1 P. Forck et al.,
CCC Meeting Cryogenic Current Comparator in the FAIR Project Overview of FAIR / current status Beam diagnostics work package Tasks and installation locations.
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
Proton Linac, Workshop, December 3 rd - 4 th, 2007 The FAIR Proton Linac Outline Requirements to Proton Linac Source, RFQ, DTL, RF Beam Dynamics.
Characterization of Fast Orbit Feedback System Om Singh, APS, ANL NSLS-2 Beam Stability Workshop BNL, April 18-20, 2007.
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
Research in Particle Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology of the Collaboration IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich & JINR A.N. Parfenov for the Collaboration.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
9 September 2009 Beam Loss Monitoring with Optical Fibers for Particle Accelerators Joint QUASAR and THz Group Workshop.
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
Paris 5 September 2005 HHH Status progress W. Scandale CERN Accelerator Technology Department CARE-HHH Network: coordinators: F. Ruggiero and W. Scandale.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, T. Giacomini,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
State Scientific Center of Russian Federation Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics ( ITEP )
International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons at Darmstadt Construction of FAIR Phase-1 December 2005 J. Eschke, GSI Construction.
M. Steck, RUPAC 2006, Novosibirsk Cooling of Rare Isotope Beams in the ESR Cooling by: Stochastic cooling (pre-cooling) Electron cooling (final cooling)
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Hao Zhang University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities Peter Forck, JUAS.
L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities Peter Forck (GSI),
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
CR: status and activities at BINP I.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk O.Dolinskyy, GSI,Darmstadt , MAC, GSI, Darmstadt.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH GSI visitation W. Barth W. Barth, WAO 2014, Mainz/Germany.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
Beam Diagnostics for the FAIR Proton LINAC RFQ Workshop at GSI
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
GSI IPMs.
Instrumentation for Accelerators Technologies for the HL-LHC
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Cryogenic Current Comparator for FAIR Transfer lines
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Physics Design on Injector I
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
Presentation transcript:

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Beam Diagnostics Challenges and Innovations for FAIR Peter Forck and Andreas Peters for the Beam Diagnostics Group Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt F acility for A nti-Proton and I on R esearch Outline of the talk:  Demands and boundaries for beam diagnostics  Examples of recent development  Conclusion

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR The FAIR Facility UNILAC & SIS as injector after upgrade p-LINAC: high current 70 mA, 70 MeV SIS100: Supercond. 100 Tm, 1-10 GeV/u high current operation p to U design: p:4*10 13, U 28+ : 5*10 11 SIS300: 300 Tm, stretcher or accel. up to 30 GeV/u CR: stochastic cooling of RIB and pbar RESR: accumulation of pbar, decel. of RIB NESR: versatile experimental. ring for stable, RIB, pbar cooling, gas-target, e-A collider HESR: storage and acc. of pbar to 14 GeV/u HEBT: for fast & slow extraction and low & high currents.

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Demand and Boundaries for Diagnostics  Common realization: Same design for all synchrotrons and storage rings  saves man-power and cost, required for maintenance  Exceptional large dynamic range: High currents up to and down to single particles for RIBs  Precise beam alignment: Small acceptance in synchrotrons and HEBT, large space charge  feedback (closed orbit, tune chromaticity etc.) and ABS required  Beam loss: Due super-conducting magnets low loss budget  feedback&ABS  High radiation: Charge changing losses and slow extraction  radiation hard electronics and shielding  Compactness and UHV: low insertion space, materials for 5* mbar  dedicated mechanical designs  Interface to control system: Modern and versatile, capable to accept various front-end systems  Parallel operation: Complex operation scheme  flexible and reliable data acquisition and analysis.

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR The Synchrotron and Storage Ring Diagnostics DeviceMeasurementApplicationRemark & Status DCCTdc-currentStored current, 1μA < I < 1ACommercial (Bergoz) GMR-DCCTdc-currentStored current, I > 100 mANovel principle CCCdc-currentStored current, 10 nA<I<1μAR&D phase ACCTPulsed currentInjection efficiency, interlockGSI-design FCT or WCMBunch structureMaching, bunch gymnasticsCommercial (?) BPMBeam centerClosed orbit & feedback Turn-by-turn, lattice functions Careful investigations Novel baseband proc. Exciter+BPMBeam centerBTF, PLL tune trackingDesign not started Quad-BPMQuad.-momentQuadrupolar-BTF, machingDesign not started SchottkyLongi.+transv.Δp/p, cooling, tune, chroma.Adoption of GSI design IPMBeam profileEmittance, cooling, matchingNovel design, complex BLMBeam lossMatching, halo, interlockVersatile use, not started Gird/ScreenBeam profileFirst-turnStandard

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Current Measurement: GMR as Magnetic Sensor ‘Known bug’: high current + low frequency bunches  Disturbance of DCCT-feedback: Possible solution: New DCCT from Bergoz  Test in winter Possible solution: Magnetic sensor based on G iant M agnetic R esistance (used e.g. in hard-drives) Saturation field: 10 mT Linear range: 0 to ±7 mT Field-concentrator: Vitrovac © torus with 2 gaps Status: Test in 2007 R&D: GSI, Uni-Kassel. DCCT at GSI: I  1 A, rf  2 MHz Wrong, but un-avoidable resonance SIS DCCT/ACCT with 270 mm diameter

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR BPM Layout for Cryogenic Installation Specification:  Accuracy: 100 μm on turn-by-turn  kHz (via ‘k-modulation’)  Sensitivity: as high as possible, pre-amp: 120 dB dynamics  Bandwidth: 0.1 to 100 MHz  FEM calculations. Foreseen design for SIS100/300:  Elliptical shape for beam impedance  Metalized ceramics expected mechanical stability of  50 μm after many cryo-cycles  material considerations. Example: Metalized Al 2 O 3

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR BPM Layout: Detailed Finite Element Calculation Model of BPM for S-parameter CST-Studio ® calculations: Position x(f) =K(f) * ΔU/ΣU + offset(f) Results:  Optimized separation rings (thickness 1.5mm) double the sensitivity  Optimized guard rings between planes suppress the offset  Flat frequency response.

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Novel Approach: BPM Baseband Digitalization Peculiarity: Bunch formation, varying rf 0.5 to 5 MHz Tunnel: ampl./att. 120 dB dynamics Digital baseband processing:  Digitalization: 125MSa/s, 14bit e.g. by Libera from I-Tech  Sample-synchronous processing with Xilinx FPGA  256MB RAM, 1.25Gbit interface  Algorithm design for FPGA  noise reduction  integration-gate, no-Gaussian  baseline reconstruction  Planned for closed orbit feedback Results at SIS18:  100 μm for bunch-by-bunch EU-FP6 Collaboration: GSI, CERN, FZ-Jülich, Uni-Darmstadt, I-Tech bunches = 300 turns Δx max =0.5 mm, Δx σ =0.08 mm

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Transverse Profile by I onization P rofile M onitor IPM: High performance device for turn-by-turn readout and 0.1 mm resolution required for high current studies at SIS18/100/300, cooling studies at storage rings. e - or ions detection:  E-field (E  ±50 V/mm, 1% in-homogeneity)  B-field for guidance (B  30 mT, 1% in-homo)  MCP (100x40 mm 2 ) High resolution mode with 100 μm:  CCD readout Turn-by-turn mode with 1 μs time resolution:  100 photo-detectors R&D: GSI, FZ-Jülich, MSL-Stockholm, ITEP, NPI-Uni-Moscow under INTAS&EU-FP6. Clearance: 175x175 mm 2 Status: Test winter 2006 at COSY (without magnet).

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Novel Photo-Detectors for IPM: Si-Photomultiplier Turn-by-turn readout  injection matching  fast emittance changes Specification: One turn  1 μs, 1 mm resolution. Novel photo-detectors: Silicon-Photomultiplier (developed by B. Dolgoshein et al., Moscow). Test-device: 576 avalanche photo-diodes on 1mm 2 biased above break-down Result: Single-photo amplification, but acting as analogue detector. R&D: ITEP-Moscow (incl. electronics)

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Large aperture magnets for IPM Electro-magnet design: Length: 2.04 m, max. trans. size: 1.7 m Permanent-magnet design: Length 2.03 m, main dipole 132 mm, corrector 57 mm, gap 370 mm, trans. 520 mm Main dipole, E-field box Horiz. IPM Vert. IPM Corr. dipole Space charge of bunches influences e - trajectory:  guidance of e - to MCP: B=30 mT, ΔB/B<1%  Magnet design with large 480x480 mm 2 aperture, correctors and  2 m total insertion. Both types fulfill the requirements, but PM is more compact. R&D: ITEP&MSU-Moscow, see Poster P.44 by V. Skachkov.

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR The Transport-Line Diagnostics DeviceMeasurementExtr.ApplicationRemark &Status Reso. Trans.Pulsed-currentFastTransmission, interlockGSI-design CCCdc-currentSlow Transmission, interlock  For high current Novel principle Particle Det.dc-currentSlow Transmission,  For low current GSI-design FCTPulsed- currentFastBunch structureCommercial (?) BPMBeam centerFastPosition, ABS Like for rings, baseband processing SEM-GridProfileFast Profile  low current Adoption of GSI-design MWPCProfileSlowProfileAdoption of GSI-design ScreenProfileF&S Profile  low current Material investigations IPM or BIFProfileF&S Profile  high current R&D started BLMBeam lossF&SMatching, interlockLike for Rings

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Current Determination with nA Resolution  Prototype tested at GSI in the 90ies  Improvement: Nb instead Pb for the flux transducer less temperature drift  reached 0.25 nA/√Hz  8 1 kHz  R&D: GSI, DESY and Uni-Jena. GSI prototype in 1997:  HEBT: slow extraction  online transmission control  Rings: low stored current e.g. RIB. Cryogenic Current Comparators:

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR B eam I nduced F luorescence for intense Profiles At RIB plasma-physics targets beam intensity melts intercepting material:  non-intercepting method required  compact installation in front of target. Test of Beam Induced Fluorescence with N 2 : Installation of hor&vert. BIF Monitor:

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Results of Beam Induced Fluorescence Image from 2x MeV/u p= mbar, 20 shot average, mounted  2 m behind-beam dump: E kin dependence for signal & background at beam- dump: ‘Single photo 390 nm < < 470 nm  Signal proportional energy loss  Background prop. E 2  shielding required  Suited for FAIR with >10 11 ions per pulse.

L. Groening, Sept. 15th, 2003 GSI-Palaver, Dec. 10 th, 2003, A dedicated proton accelerator for p-physics at the future GSI facilities P. Forck, A. Peters (GSI) at RuPAC 2006 Beam Diagnostics for FAIR Conclusion The new FAIR facility requires significant R&D for diagnostics:  Common layout for large dynamic range: Form single particles to per pulse  High current operation: Precise beam alignment with low beam losses, novel non-destructive devices required  Interface to control system: Versatile architecture at distributed locations, suited for parallel operation  Production and installation: Modern & cost-efficient solutions required. Thanks to the collaborators from: CERN, DESY, FZ-Jülich, I-Tech (Slovenia), ITEP-Moscow, MSL-Stockholm, Universities Darmstadt, Jena, Kassel and Moscow. Thanks for funding by: CARE-HIPPI, CARE-HHH, EU-FP6 DIRAC-PHASE 1, EU-FP6 DIRAC Secondary Beams, INTAS.