DR N. MPOFU-HAMADZIRIPI ACADEMY OF TEACHING AND LEARNING 21 March 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Peer-Assessment. students comment on and judge their colleagues work.
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Performance Management
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Building professional relationships with colleagues to share teaching insights and to coordinate learning activities for students Domain D3.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
Evaluating Teaching and Learning Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast 1.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Realities. Registration Provisional Registration (PRT) Valid for 5 years Subject to Confirmation (STC) Valid for 3 years Full Registration Valid for 5.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
Example claims for approaches to the support of learning and teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn fostering student development.
1 Peer Review of Teaching K.P. Kwan & J. Jones, EDU etkpkwan etjjones x 6287 x6320 EDU Seminar 7 May 1999 (Friday)
1 Continuing Professional Development Workshop Developing your HEA Portfolio Paul Dennison Learning and Teaching Symposium 2007.
Positive Outcomes of PBL Dr. Jenny Chung Department of Rehabilitation Sciences.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching Ginny Saich & Ruth Watkins (DAICE)
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
Assessment in the early years © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.
Lecture 23.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
LECTURE 2 - DTLLS Assessment. Research into the impact of assessment tells us that students learn best when assessment is:  Evenly timed  Represents.
Developing Training Programmes for Qualified Teachers to Teach in Prisons CP MT-GRUNDTVIG-G11 Teaching Practice Observation Module 11.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Introduction to the Framework Unit 1 - Getting Ready for the Unit
The Mentorship Model Nipissing University, Brantford Campus.
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Exploring Evidence.
Assessment for learning
March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Brad Fox Paula Vincent March, 2010.
THE NEED TO TRAIN THE TRAINERS. Who University lecturers /academics Teaching assistants (such as research students who do tutoring etc) Senior academics.
Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
1. Assessment Mobile phones Be HERE Bags / laptops / office work away from table Have an open mind Ask questions Listen to learn Be honest Confidentiality.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Applying for an OLT Citation 2016 INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING October 2015 DR ALISON KUIPER, SENIOR LECTURER.
PROFILING AT STRATHGARVE PRIMARY. PROFILING  As teachers – through personal example and setting standards in our questioning and provision of feedback.
What is assessment for learning?
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Assessment and Learning in Practice Settings (ALPS) © Structuring observational assessment to promote learning in practice 12.
Addressing quality assurance and professional development for online teachers Kirsteen Donaghy.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
UCA Professional Recognition Scheme: Associate Fellow (AFHEA)
Learning for All & LTFS UWE LTFS Aims: Enhance student learning Recognise and promote excellence in learning and teaching Identify, showcase and disseminate.
Improving Performance Through Feedback Anita R. Webb, PhD JPS Family Medicine Residency Fort Worth, Texas.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Performance Management
Developing a Personal Professional Development Plan
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
The UKPSF and the HEA Fellowship scheme
Why apply? To formalise an opportunity to reflect on your L&T practice
The TEAP Portfolio Award and the EAP Teacher Competencies
Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.)
Critic or critical friend? The case for peer observation of teaching
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Professional Development
HEA Fellowship Workshop
Presentation transcript:

DR N. MPOFU-HAMADZIRIPI ACADEMY OF TEACHING AND LEARNING 21 March 2013

1. What is Peer Assessment? Peer assessment of teaching in universities involves academic colleagues giving and receiving feedback on their teaching practices (Harris et al. 2008). Peer assessment is a process that provides feedback to lecturers on teaching and learning. Lecture observation by a peer within the same faculty/school Peer assessment of teaching should be an objective assessment of a colleague’s teaching by a fellow colleague. It can be highly sensitive as it has a bearing on tenure, promotion or bonus

2. Who is a Peer Assessor? Oxford Dictionary of Current English (3 rd edition): A peer is “a person of the same age, status, or ability as another specified person”. In academic circles, your peer is your equal, your contemporary or your fellow academics. In short, a peer is another academic in the same teaching department as you.

3. Attributes of a Peer Assessor a level of teaching expertise and judgement; a commitment to maintain confidentiality; sensitivity to the different contexts and career needs of others; the ability to maintain an open and friendly approach, focussed on the other person’s needs rather than their own expertise; and the ability to give honest feedback in constructive and positive ways.

4. Why Peer Assessment? 1. Has the enhancement of teaching and learning as its primary purpose. 2. Is a fundamental tool for the evaluation and development of teaching, complementing feedback collected from students. 3. Recognises university teachers’ shared professional responsibilities for monitoring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. 4. Acknowledges and capitalises on the educative expertise and judgement of university teachers in their fields. 5. Provides feedback that affirms good practice as well as suggests areas in which development might be helpful. (Lees et al. 2008)

5. Benefits of Peer Assessment Feedback on teaching for developmental purposes; Evidence for use in promotion and/or tenure; Affirmation of good teaching practice; Broader knowledge of the curriculum being taught by peers; Insights into how colleagues teach and ideas for teaching e.g. innovative teaching methods; Opportunities to develop skills in teaching.

5. Benefits of Peer Assessment (cont.) Observing someone else’s teaching can provide you with the opportunity to reflect on your own teaching and your role in the teaching-learning process. It can afford you the opportunity to improve your own teaching after observing how others do it.

6. Concerns of Staff to Peer Assessment It is not easy to have your colleague come and observe your lecture Fear that peer assessment may be a judgement of their teaching which may have negative implications for their tenure/promotion or general standing in their department Subjectivity – need for honesty Centralist tendency – fear to give divergent thoughts Organizational culture

7. Prerequisites for Effective Peer Assessment For peer assessment to be effective there is need for: an objective and constructive approach professionalism trust sensitivity to the reviewed collegiality confidentiality by the reviewer as well as the departmental Chairperson and Dean.

8. Processes of Peer Assessment i. Observing teaching Should be informed by criteria that encompass what constitutes good teaching practice, e.g. o Approaches to teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn o Development of curricula and resources that reflect a command of the field o Respect and support for the development of students as individuals. ii. Writing feedback iii. Giving and receiving verbal and written feedback

9. The Feedback Process – For the Assessor Central to effective feedback is a focus on the reviewee’s professional development. Give feedback as soon as possible Feedback must be confidential Focus on the behavior/teaching of the person and not on the person Be specific Be aware of the balance between positive and negative feedback; focus on the positive aspects first Give the assessee an opportunity to say something about their lecture

9. The Feedback Process – For the Assessee The information from the assessor is for your benefit - take it in a positive way - avoid being defensive or offended by the assessor’s comments.

10. Points to Ponder for the Assessee What aspects of my teaching do I need to improve? What do I need to do to improve on this aspect? Who might be able to assist me? How will I know that I have improved?

11. Conclusion The spirit of the peer assessment should be developmental. That is to say, the purpose of the peer assessment process is to assist in the improvement of teaching and learning.