SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS of the FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR Southern Variant (FVS-Sn) Nathan D. Herring Dr. Philip J. Radtke Virginia Tech Department of Forestry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site and Stocking and Other Related Measurements.
Advertisements

FVS, State - Transition Model Assumptions, and Yield tables – an Application in National Forest Planning Eric Henderson Analyst, Hiawatha National Forest,
Forecasting Using the Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation
Predicting Sapling Recruitment Following Partial Cutting in the Acadian Forest: Using Long-Term Data to Assess the Performance of FVS-NE David Ray 1, Chad.
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Regression Analysis Module 3. Regression Regression is the attempt to explain the variation in a dependent variable using the variation in independent.
Regression Analysis Once a linear relationship is defined, the independent variable can be used to forecast the dependent variable. Y ^ = bo + bX bo is.
Probabilistic & Statistical Techniques Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester
3rd Forest vegetation Simulator Conference Fort Collins CO, February Inventory-based sensitivity analysis of the large tree diameter growth.
LECTURE 3 Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Some Terms Y =  o +  1 X Regression of Y on X Regress Y on X X called independent variable or predictor variable or covariate or factor Which factors.
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
Chapter 13 Multiple Regression
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
1-1 Regression Models  Population Deterministic Regression Model Y i =  0 +  1 X i u Y i only depends on the value of X i and no other factor can affect.
Chapter 10 Simple Regression.
Chapter 12 Simple Regression
Chapter 12 Multiple Regression
Simulating growth impacts of Swiss needle cast in Douglas-fir: The blood, sweat and tears behind the ORGANON growth multiplier Sean M. Garber April 26,
Chapter Topics Types of Regression Models
© 2000 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap Forecasting Using the Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Correlation 1. Correlation - degree to which variables are associated or covary. (Changes in the value of one tends to be associated with changes in the.
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
Acorns are a valuable food resource for many wildlife species.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 13-1 Chapter 13 Introduction to Multiple Regression Statistics for Managers.
Correlation & Regression
Correlation and Linear Regression
Objectives of Multiple Regression
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
Elements of Multiple Regression Analysis: Two Independent Variables Yong Sept
3 CHAPTER Cost Behavior 3-1.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WILDLIFE BIOLOGY DATA Bret A. Collier 1 and T. Wayne Schwertner 2 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas A&M University,
Combining historic growth and climate data to predict growth response to climate change in balsam fir in the Acadian Forest region Elizabeth McGarrigle.
OPIM 303-Lecture #8 Jose M. Cruz Assistant Professor.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Suborna Shekhor Ahmed Department of Forest Resources Management Faculty of Forestry, UBC Western Mensurationists Conference Missoula, MT June 20 to 22,
Lecture 8 Simple Linear Regression (cont.). Section Objectives: Statistical model for linear regression Data for simple linear regression Estimation.
Lecture 5 Model Evaluation. Elements of Model evaluation l Goodness of fit l Prediction Error l Bias l Outliers and patterns in residuals.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
ITEC6310 Research Methods in Information Technology Instructor: Prof. Z. Yang Course Website: c6310.htm Office:
Chapter 16 Data Analysis: Testing for Associations.
Sensitivity and Importance Analysis Risk Analysis for Water Resources Planning and Management Institute for Water Resources 2008.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Lecture 10 Chapter 23. Inference for regression. Objectives (PSLS Chapter 23) Inference for regression (NHST Regression Inference Award)[B level award]
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
Modeling regional variation in the self-thinning boundary line Aaron Weiskittel Sean Garber Hailemariam Temesgen.
USING THE FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR TO MODEL STAND DYNAMICS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF CHANGING CLIMATE Climate-FVS Version 0.1 Developed by : Nicholas.
Nonlinear Logistic Regression of Susceptibility to Windthrow Seminar 7 Likelihood Methods in Forest Ecology October 9 th – 20 th, 2006.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
and Other Related Measurements
Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression
ln(CR) = HAB + b1BA + b2BA2 + b3ln(BA)
Regression Analysis.
Fundamentals of regression analysis
CHAPTER 29: Multiple Regression*
CHAPTER 26: Inference for Regression
Simple Linear Regression
CORRELATION AND MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Presentation transcript:

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS of the FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR Southern Variant (FVS-Sn) Nathan D. Herring Dr. Philip J. Radtke Virginia Tech Department of Forestry

Preview Introduction Introduction Objectives Objectives Methods Methods Results Results Future Work Future Work

Introduction Growth and Yield prediction - a critical need for southern U.S., especially Appalachian mixed forests Growth and Yield prediction - a critical need for southern U.S., especially Appalachian mixed forests  Area contains vast forest resources  High economic and biological potential Modeling issues for southern U.S. forests Modeling issues for southern U.S. forests  Wide range of sites, species composition, and canopy structure  Wide geographic/physiographic range  Array of management prescriptions

Introduction Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS)  Comprehensive and powerful G & Y model  Developed, distributed, and supported by the U.S. Forest Service  Age independent, individual tree model Donnelly, et al The Southern Variant…   FVS Southern Variant (FVS-Sn)   Relatively recent development   Covers 90 species in 13 southern states  Complex model  challenge for testing and validation

Project Objectives Comprehensive evaluation of FVS-Sn Comprehensive evaluation of FVS-Sn –Southern Research Station and Virginia Tech Forestry Evaluation includes: Evaluation includes:  Sensitivities of model coefficients and inputs  Stand level comparisons to independent data  Confidence intervals & calibration  Recommendations and adaptations

Objectives Sensitivities of model coefficients and inputs to stand-level basal area per acre increment Sensitivities of model coefficients and inputs to stand-level basal area per acre increment –Sensitivity indices  Stand level BA increment explained by each model parameter –Error budget  Ranks sensitivity indices and groupings –Response surface analysis  Direction and magnitude of sensitivities –Framework for further testing  Other forest types in S. Appalachians

Methods Sensitivity Analysis (SA) Sensitivity Analysis (SA) –Examine relationships between model inputs & outputs –Hold all model quantities constant, but vary one quantity (+/-) to see how it affects the output  Computationally intensive –Efficient algorithms for sampling from parameter space  LHS, FAST, etc…  Computationally efficient

Methods Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) – Sample from coefficient distributions –Different values of each parameter drawn for each model run SA SA –Large tree sub-model –Tree list  typical S. App. upland mixed hardwoods  28 species sampled from 1,300 acre VT forest –Initial test: n = 5000 model runs –One observation for each FVS-Sn model run

Methods Batch mode FVS-Sn Batch mode FVS-Sn –Model coefficients entered at runtime –Total of 2700 parameters… “in theory”  90 species x 30 parameters for each species  28 species x 30 = 840… (750 parameters) Coefficient or Parameter Predictor or Variable ln(dds) = b 0 + b 1 (lndbh) + b 2 (dbh 2 ) + …

Methods Response Surface Response Surface  Response (Y)  10-year stand level BA increment  Different value for each parameter in each model run  Multiple linear regression Sensitivity Index (SI) Sensitivity Index (SI) Y = f (750 parameters)

SI’s grouped by FVS-Sn parameter ln(dds) equation, 30 parameters ln(dds) equation, 30 parameters Summed across all 28 species in tree list Summed across all 28 species in tree list Many parameters have little influence on the response Many parameters have little influence on the response Intercept sensitivity ≈1/3 rd Intercept sensitivity ≈1/3 rd FVS Parameter Parameter Sensitivity INTERCEPT26.42 LNCRWN21.95 LNDBHC14.81 HREL7.52 ISOIWN4.36 Other4.52 Total79.58

SI’s grouped by Species Only 7 of the 28 species have SI > 1.00 Only 7 of the 28 species have SI > species account for ≈3/4 th of total sensitivity 3 species account for ≈3/4 th of total sensitivity Other species: A. rubrum, L. tulipifera, P. serotina, and O. arbereum Other species: A. rubrum, L. tulipifera, P. serotina, and O. arbereum Species Sensitivity Q. prinus28.29 P. rigida21.15 Q. coccinea10.56 P. strobus10.22 T. canadensis3.68 Q. velutina1.83 Q. alba1.07 Other2.79 Total79.58

Species Sensitivity and Dominance Species Basal area per acre (ft 2 ) SISI Rank Q. prinus Q. coccinea Q. alba Q. velutina P. strobus P. rigida T. canadensis Other Total

Species Sensitivity Index FVS-Sn species sensitivities vs. basal area per acre Species SI/BAPA Q. prinus 0.85 Q. coccinea 0.64 Q. alba 0.08 Q. velutina 0.26 P. strobus 1.95 P. rigida 6.44 T. canadensis1.37 Other0.12

FVS Parameter Total Model Parameter SI INTERCEPT26.42 LNCRWN21.95 LNDBHC14.81 HREL7.52 ISOIWN4.36 other parameters4.52 Total79.58 Species SISI/BAPA Response Surface Coefficient Coefficient/ BAPA Q. prinus Q. coccinea Q. alba Q. velutina P. strobus P. rigida T. canadensis Other Total26.42 Parameter SI by species

FVS Parameter Total Model Parameter SI INTERCEPT26.42 LNCRWN21.95 LNDBHC14.81 HREL7.52 ISOIWN4.36 other parameters4.52 Total79.58 Species SISI/BAPA Response Surface Coefficient Coefficient/ BAPA Q. prinus Q. coccinea Q. alba Q. velutina P. strobus P. rigida T. canadensis Other Total21.95 Parameter SI by species

Influential Parameters by Species

Findings Initial test – large tree sub-model, one tree list Initial test – large tree sub-model, one tree list Error budget Error budget –Model sensitivity  Only a few parameters/species significantly influence model  Proportionally greater influence of softwoods Response surface Response surface –Parameter relationship to response  Positive response surface coefficients  Nature of ln(dds) equation Insightful findings so far, but nothing conclusive

Future Work Incorporate background and density-dependent mortality into SA Incorporate background and density-dependent mortality into SA –Information of distributions difficult to obtain  Background  Logistic regression from FIA data  Density-dep.  BA max and SDI max from literature Additional tests – increase n, new datasets Additional tests – increase n, new datasets SA results will guide: SA results will guide: 1.Model validation against independent data (FIA) 2.Calibration and recommendations 3.Testing of additional forest types and species compositions

Acknowledgements FMSC Staff FMSC Staff Dennis Donnelly Dennis Donnelly Forest Service SRS * Forest Service SRS * Virginia Tech * Virginia Tech * * Cooperative Agreement # SRS 05-CA