District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Finley Elementary “Believe, Achieve and Succeed” Governor’s Educator Excellence Award Program Texas Educator Excellence Grant Cycle 2.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
National Trail Local School District 3 year-District Improvement Plan April 2009.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2013/2014 Merriam Cherry Street.
Supporting HQT Plans: Shawn Hawkins Teacher Quality Coordinator Richard Lawrence Director, Office of Title II, III & System Support Robert Mellace Troops.
Webcast April 22, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Sequoyah Elementary School August 7, 2014.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Scenic Hills Elementary School 2014 Annual Title I Parent Meeting Presented by: Herronda Harley, Professional Learning Coach September 25, 2014.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Frank Borman Elementary Denton ISD.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Grandview High School March 9-10, 2009.
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
March 15, :00pm Daryton A. Ramsey Educator Quality Grant Administrator.
JANUARY 12,  My Voice Staff Survey Results: % in agreement StatementSEP 10 JUN 11 I feel valued for my unique skills and talents5042 School is.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Carol Revels, Senior Administrator.  Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in the following areas occur: Technology, Accountable Talk, ELA Instructional.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Annual Title I Parent Involvement Meeting Panter Elementary School September 17, 1:30 p.m. Media Center.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
QEIA Monitoring Regular Application Schools April 29, 2010 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association QEIA Northern and.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Welcome Family and Community
Accreditation External Review
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Washington Reading Corps Site Applicants
Focus / Priority School Updates
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
February 21-22, 2018.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

District Awards for Teacher Excellence A presentation to the ACISD Board of Trustees 4/17/08

Grant Requirements Develop a district award plan with goals to improve student academic improvement and/or growth. Develop an awards system consistent with district goals that address target campuses Establish performance measures consistent with district goals

Funding District grant amounts based on district’s average daily attendance for school year. Original projected award: $147,702 Current projected award: $177,845.00

Funding At least 60% of the funds must go to award classroom teachers who positively impact student academic improvement and/or growth. These are called “Part 1 funds.” $177,845 x.6 = $106,707

Funding Up to 40% of the funds may be used for other activities, including awards to staff members other than classroom teachers, stipends, recruitment and retention, professional development, and improving data quality/capacity: These are called “Part 2 funds.” $ 177,845 x.4 = $71,138

Award Amounts Grant guidelines “highly suggest” that Part 1 awards be at least $3,000 per teacher. Grant guidelines specify that the lowest allowable award under Part 1 is $1,000.

Grant Option – Targeted Campus Rockport Fulton Middle School

DATE Planning Team Four district representatives Eleven RFMS representatives – all assigned a campus constituency group for feedback and communication Met nine times between January and April, for approximately 30 hours, to develop plan

District Goals Goal 1: All students are expected to show academic growth and success through strong instructional programs. Goal 2: All students will be taught by highly qualified and student-centered teachers and professionals.

DATE Award Plan Goal #1 Rockport-Fulton Middle School will provide engaging, student- centered instructional programs, nurturing learning environments, and highly effective classroom teachers to ensure that all students demonstrate academic, emotional, and social growth.

DATE Award Plan Goal #2 Rockport-Fulton Middle School will recruit and retain highly qualified teachers and staff who consistently and effectively implement district initiatives, engage in departmental, grade level, and school-wide cooperation and collaboration, and pursue opportunities for faculty and staff leadership.

Award Plan Highlights Includes all staff members on campus Includes grade level, group, and individual performance measures Includes measures based on set passing rates, increase in passing rates, and value-added scores

Includes measures associated with attendance, discipline, “no pass, no play” eligibility, and campus accountability rating Includes job specific measures for elective teachers, cafeteria staff, and custodians Award Plan Highlights

Includes Professional Development/Progress Monitoring days for core area teachers Includes funds to support increased capacity to collect, analyze, and utilize data to improve instruction and achievement. Award Plan Highlights

Award Opportunities – Part 1 Classroom Teachers Position Potential Award 7 th ELA$3,600 Math$3,100 6 th & 8 th ELA, Science, Social Studies, Sp. Ed. $2,600 Electives$1,700 ISS$1,650

Award Opportunities – Part 2 Other Staff Position Potential Award Cafeteria & Custodians $500 Paraprofessionals $1,000 Counselors, Librarian, Nurse, Diagnostician $1,500 Assistant Principals $3,000 Principal $4,500

Matching Funds Requirement Matching funds may be cash or in-kind Year 1 = 15% of original estimate $147,702 x 15% = $22,155 Year 2 = 25% Year 3 = 35% ACISD options include Money to increase award amounts Payroll costs Professional development Costs associated with teacher mentoring & retention x x Year 2 = 15% Year 3 = 15%

ACISD Funding Commitment “New Money” costs for D.A.T.E. plan –Payroll costs = $12,242 –Award supplements = $26,950 – Total = $39,192

DATE Timeline August 25, 2008 – Implement award plan 2008 – 2009 – Collect data, monitor progress September – October, 2009 – Qualifying staff members receive first year award payments.

Questions or comments?