Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Infinite Campus Elementary Parent Portal
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Using Student Ratings to Improve Program Quality and Student Learning Dr. Randi Hagen, Flagler College Dr. Sarah Logan, Angelo State University Dr. William.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: A Diagnostic Guide for Improvement Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: Adjunct Workshop Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott Fall 2009 Semester.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
Implications of Web-based Learning for Student Evaluation of University Teaching Chuck DziubanSteve Sorg Research Initiative for Teaching Center for Distributed.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
TTU Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument.
Increasing Online Survey Response Rates April 7, 2015 Institute for Faculty Development.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
Assessment Overview: Part 1. Overview Overview of IDEA Data – Not other college assessments like AACP surveys, experiential results, dashboards, etc.
IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Math TLC Tutor Lab Overview: All sections of Math 010 and 110 are taught in a single, dedicated, technology-enhanced classroom that is adjacent to a.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200, COMM200, GEOG200, PA200, POL200, or SOC200 Lecture Section 001, Fall, 2014 Room 120 Integrated.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Demonstration: Course Management and Learning Software: My Lab Products Sue C. Spaulding UNC Charlotte Department of Psychology Teaching and Learning with.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and SACS University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
The QSEN Corner Newsletter: Evidence Based Practice Patient Centered Care Teamwork & Collaboration Informatics Safety QI.
Standardized Testing (1) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
University Writing Project Faculty Feedback
IDEA Making an Old Enemy Your Friend. MYTH or REALITY?  IDEA is a for-profit corporation.
Business Discipline Breakout Session Summer 2000 ION Conference Facilitated By: Marcy Satterwhite.
CFI Team Presentation February 26, Presenters Laura van Keulen, AP Data & Technology Alex Moore, English.
Blackboard Learn Assessment and Feedback Ulster E-Learning Conference 20 th January 2011 Alan Masson & Fiona McCloy Access and Distributed Learning, University.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
The role of course evals in faculty reviews: One perspective John Petraitis CAFE March 25, 2011.
1 My Experiences as Faculty Member and Researcher Dr. Kalim Qureshi.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Welcome to 5 th Grade Mrs. Rydzel’s Class. About Our Class: I strongly believe that parents and teachers working together will give each student the best.
WELCOME SUNSHINE ROOM FAMILIES!!! Please sign in on the sheet by the door, grab one of each of the papers there and find your child’s seat. There is an.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
Data-Guided Faculty Development Planning University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Data-Informed Faculty Development Planning Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
IDEA Student Ratings System Loyola University September 9 & 10, 2015 Jake Glover, PhD Senior Education Officer.
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
Faculty Information Form Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Identifying Assessments
Using IDEA for Assessment Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
New Faculty Orientation Institutional Research and Accountability Sarah Logan August 18, 2011.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
HEALTHY YOUTH SURVEY 2016 SURVEY COORDINATOR TRAINING.
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
Schoolwide Systems Review: Module 3.0 Gather Cohort 7 Middle Schools.
USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012.
August 08 Montgomery College 1 Institutional Effectiveness Facilities Master Plan Middle States Review College Area Review Outcomes Assessment Academic.
Standards-Based Grading Olympic Middle School School Board Presentation August 25, 2009.
The Promotion and Tenure Process at Alabama State University.
Making an Old Enemy Your Friend
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
Interpreting IDEA Results: Getting the Most from Course Evaluations
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Issaquah Online Learning Apex
Portfolio Development
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010

What is IDEA? INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT

IDEA E VALUATION C OMPONENTS : Faculty Information Form Student Survey – Diagnostic Form Individualized Diagnostic Report

F ACULTY I NFORMATION F ORM (FIF)

F ACULTY I NFORMATION F ORM (FIF) IDEA O BJECTIVES

F ACULTY I NFORMATION F ORM (FIF) IDEA O BJECTIVES : 3-5 “Essential” or “Important” should reflect most significant aspects of course WU has specific IDEA objectives set in advance for each course

F ACULTY I NFORMATION F ORM (FIF) C ONTEXTUAL Q UESTIONS There are 6 Contextual Questions at the bottom of front page and the top of back page: Please take a moment to fill in this information. The IDEA Center uses this information to improve the interpretation of student ratings.

D IAGNOSTIC S TUDENT S URVEY L ONG F ORM

D IAGNOSTIC S TUDENT S URVEY S PECIFIC TEACHING BEHAVIORS … – Teaching Methods are Items: 1-20 … INFLUENCE CERTAIN TYPES OF STUDENT PROGRESS … – IDEA Learning Objectives are Items: … UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. – Course Management/Content are Items: – Student Characteristics are Items: 36-39, 43 Other Data – Summary Measures are Items: – Experimental Questions are Items: – Extra Questions are Items: 48-67

D IAGNOSTIC S TUDENT S URVEY F ALSE A SSUMPTIONS Effective Instructors employ all 20 teaching methods The 20 Teaching Methods Items are used to make an overall judgment about teaching effectiveness Students should make significant progress on all 12 learning IDEA objectives

D IAGNOSTIC S TUDENT S URVEY B EST P RACTICES Overall: Students need to be informed about the survey and the IDEA objectives should be discussed throughout the course.

What Does Your IDEA Report Mean? What were my students’ perceptions of the course and their learning? 1.Overall, how effectively was this class taught? 2.How do I compare with other teachers? 3.Was I more successful in facilitating progress on some IDEA objectives than on others? What might I do to improve my teaching?

Info on Page 1 Number of students responding Average scores – raw & adjusted Converted scores Comparison to data bases Sample DF

Impact of Response Rates Number responding <10Unreliable 10-14Marginal reliability 15-24Fairly reliable 25-39Reliable >40Highly reliable Representativeness of Results <50%inadequate to assure representativeness 50-64%may not be representative 65-74%probably representative 75% +representative Sample DF

Adjusted Scores Level Playing Field Fr/Soph/Gen Ed classes – Students with lower motivation – Adjusted scores > raw scores Jr/Sr/Grad classes – Students are more motivated & better work habits – Adjusted scores < raw scores Sample DF

Adjusted Scores Student Work Habits (#43) Student Motivation (#39) Class Size (Enrollment, FIF) Student Effort (multiple items) Course Difficulty (multiple items) Sample DF

Impact of Extraneous Factors Gaining Factual Knowledge – Average Progress Ratings Work Habits (Item 43) Student Motivation (Item 39) Low Avg. Avg. High Avg. High Low Low Avg Average High Avg High Technical Report 12, page 40

Converted Scores 5-point ratings converted to T-scores with “50” being the middle Not percentiles Gray area (45-55T) represents 40% of faculty Sample DF

Comparative Information All classes in IDEA database – 128 institutions – Updated only periodically IDEA discipline database – Most recent 5 yrs – Updated annually on Sept 1 – Minimum of 400 classes Institution (WU) database – all classes – Most recent 5 yrs – Updated annually on Sept 1 – Minimum of 400 classes Sample DF

Example IDEA Database All ClassesIDEA Discipline DatabaseInstitution All Classes = 63T4.6 = 58T4.6 = 55T

Info on Page 2 Student ratings of learning on Essential and Important IDEA objectives Description of course and students Sample DF

Calculating “Progress on Relevant IDEA Objectives” Essential objectives have double weight of Important objectives Gaining factual…4.5 X 2 = 9.0 Learning fundamental…4.4 X 2 = 8.8 Learning to apply…4.2 X 2 = 8.4 Learning how to find…3.2 X 1 = /7 = 4.2 Sample DF

Info on Pages 3 & 4 Page 3 Improving teaching effectiveness What might you do differently Page 4 Statistical details Sample DF

Personal Comments IDEA results can spike up or down Grades do not influence IDEA results Knowledge Base in IDEA Center website has great info about teaching & learning and understanding the report – – Item #3 in Web Resources for Teaching in Faculty Forum under Faculty in WU home page Sample DF

IDEA E VALUATION P ROCESS How and When do you Receive the IDEA Evaluations? – You will receive a packet in your mailbox or via approximately 2 weeks before your course ends.

IDEA E VALUATION P ROCESS What is the Hard Copy Procedure? – Select a student to proctor the evaluations. They will hand out and collect the Diagnostic and Comment forms. – Take your FIF out of the packet and… Write Your Name, Course Number and Time/Day information on the Board for the students Tell the Student/Proctor where you will be and… Leave the room

IDEA E VALUATION P ROCESS When the Student comes out of the classroom – Ask them to place your FIF into the envelope – Direct the Student to the Nearest attended Workstation or Drop-off Box – You are Not Allowed to Handle the Packet after the Students have Completed the Evaluations. Do not let the Student leave your Evaluation Packet on an unattended desk

IDEA E VALUATION P ROCESS What’s Next: – All IDEA Evaluations are sent to New Castle for processing – IDEA Evaluations are grouped: By College By Instructor (alpha-order)

IDEA E VALUATION P ROCESS Then: – They are packaged and sent to IDEA Center. – Results returned from IDEA Center within 14 days – Distribute results to the Deans within 3 days – Deans and Program Coordinators review and send you the Individual IDEA Reports – You can discuss your IDEA Report with your Program Coordinator or Faculty Development & Support