Social Cognitive Theory Pertemuan 17 Matakuliah: L0194 – Psikologi Kepribadian Tahun: 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Albert Bandura Social-Cognitive Theory Psy 435 Theories of Personality © Victor Savicki.
Advertisements

Building Confidence in young people
Chapter I Introduction: The Nature of Leadership Matakuliah: A Kepemimpinan Tahun: 2008 / 2009.
Albert Bandura: Social / Observational Learning
Dollard and Miller Chapter 10
1 Section Two Theory and Concepts. 2 Chapter 4 Social Cognitive Theory.
Attitude Pertemuan 14 Matakuliah: J0384 – Perilaku Konsumen Tahun: Ganjil 2007/2008.
LEARNING THEORY OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING. Observational learning is learning through observation. Observational learning is learning through observation.
Texas Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference Norma S. Guerra, PhD NCSP, LSSP.
Dollard and Miller Prominent researchers in 40’s, 50’s
Chapter 4 Learning: Theories and Program Design
Career Counseling and Krumboltz’s Social Learning Theory Looking at the “triadic reciprocal interaction system”
Elizabeth C. Rodriguez Jessica Pettyjohn Chapter 11 Week 10.
Self-efficacy “People strive to exercise control over events that affect their lives” “People strive to exercise control over events that affect their.
Self Efficacy.
Bandura’s Self-Efficacy
The Social-Cognitive Perspective
Introduction to Theories of Communication Effects: Social Learning Theory A service of the Communication Science & Research Resource Group.
Chapter 3: Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory Albert Bandura (1925- )
Albert Bandura Social Cognitive Theory: No Trial Learning.
Made by team Slovakia: Anna Maslíková Katarína Fúrová Veronika Piknová
SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY. Social Cognitive Theory TRIADIC RECIPROCAL CAUSATION Albert Bandura (1986) PersonBehavior Environment.
BANDURA'S SOCIAL- COGNITIVE THEORY
Cognitive Units. Social Cognitive Theory F Social & cognitive emphasis F Active person –Behavior guided by cognitive representations of events & their.
Theories of Personality Bandura
Personality Social Cognitive approach. Social Cognitive- Bandura understanding personality involves considering the situation and thoughts before, during,
Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning.
Cluster 9 Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning Anita Woolfolk’s Educational Psychology Social Learning Social Cognitive Theories Constructivist.
Albert Bandura Biography Born in the province of Alberta, Canada. Attended the University of British Columbia, Vancouver Took psychology because.
AP Psychology SOCIAL-COGNITIVE THEORIES.  Social-cognitive perspective emphasized the interaction of cognitive, behavioral, environmental and learning.
Human Learning & Memory Siena Heights University Chapter 6 Dr. S.Talbot.
Mindful Shift Chapter 12. “Of all species on earth, we human have the capacity of mind change: we change our minds and that of others”
1 Health Psychology Chapter 3: Seeking Health Care (Health Behavior Models) Mansfield University Dr. Craig, Instructor.
Chapter Nine Social Cognitive Theory. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 9-2 Overview The Triadic Reciprocal Causation Model Self-Control,
Social Cognitive Learning Theory. What factors influence learning? Environmental –examples Cognitive –examples.
Social Cognitive View Integrates Social Learning and Cognitive Theories Reciprocal determinism Self-regulation Expectancy values & self-efficacy Attribution.
A2 Psychology of Sport Self confidence Booklet 4 Skills Working as a team Complete green group tasks Working as an individual Complete yellow individual.
Social Cognitive Theory Pertemuan 9 & 10 Matakuliah: Psikologi Sosial dan Intervensi Psikologi Tahun: 2009/2010.
Learning Theories. Constructivism Definition: By reflecting on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world we live in. Learning is.
BEHAVIORAL THEORIES  Classical Conditioning  Operant Conditioning  Social-Cognitive Theory.
The Social-Cognitive Perspective. Social-Cognitive Perspective Perspective stating that understanding personality involves considering the situation and.
The Learning Theories Behaviorism- belief that the proper subject matter of psychology is objectively observable behavior and nothing else. Social Learning.
ALBERT BANDURA (1925/..)  Bandura has been responsible for groundbreaking contributions to many fields of psychology  Influential in the transition.
Brunning Chapter 6 Beliefs About Self.
Chapter 9: Social Cognitive Theory Created by: Leslie De la Fuente.
Career Counseling: A Holistic Approach CHAPTER 2: THEORIES OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT PART 2 ©2016. CENGAGE LEARNING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Social Learning Theory or Social Cognitive Theory.
Social Cognitive Theory
+ Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory By Katie & Matt.
Learning Approach to Personality
Cognition and Learning in Educational Settings Fall Quarter 2007
BANDURA'S SOCIAL- COGNITIVE THEORY
PERSONAL/SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION (CONSTRUCTIVISM)
Social Cognitive Theory
Cognitive Motivation: Competence & Control - Module 12: PART 2 -
PHED 3 Sport Psychology Self-Efficacy
model of Interpersonal support
Rotter & Mischel Cognitive Social Learning Theory Pertemuan 26
Sarah Radvansky Natalie Clay Nikki Knight Tishanna Jackson
College Access and Success: A Developmental Approach
Understanding Behavior and Performance In Organizations
Our Journey Framing…The elusive nature of an important behaviour.
Major Theories of Personality: Nature and Nurture
LearnIg TheorIes bandura: Socıal CognItıve Theory
Social Cognitive Learning Theory
Understanding individual ethical behaviour
Building Confidence in young people
Social Cognitive Learning Theory
Social Cognitive approach
Presentation transcript:

Social Cognitive Theory Pertemuan 17 Matakuliah: L0194 – Psikologi Kepribadian Tahun: 2010

Bina Nusantara Who Is Albert Bandura?

Bina Nusantara Learning Humans are quite flexible and capable of learning multitude of attitudes, skills, and behavior Direct Experience & Vicarious Learning/ Observational Learning Enactive Learning

Bina Nusantara Observational Learning Learn through observing the behavior of other people Reinforcement is not essential to learning The core is Modeling

Bina Nusantara Modeling Adding & subtracting from the observed behavior and generalizing from one observation to another Involves cognitive process (more than just mimicry or imitating)  symbolically representing information and storing it for use in the future time Who is the model? ^ Characteristics of models are important ^ Characteristics of observer ^ The consequences of behavior being modeled

Bina Nusantara Proses: - Attention sering dilihat, menarik, konsekuensi yg valuabe - Representation simbolik dalam otak, infancy, verbal n non verbal - Behavioral production to produce.. We ask: How, what, Am I? - Motivation facilitating the performances

Bina Nusantara Enactive Learning Complex human behavior can be learned when people think about and evaluate the consequences of their behavior Fungsi konsekuensi respons: –Info efek perilaku untuk pandu aksi berikutnya –Motivate our anticipatory behavior –Reinforce behavior

Bina Nusantara Triadic Reciprocal Causation Human action is a result of an interaction among: Behavior PersonEnvironment

Bina Nusantara “chance favors only the prepared mind” Chance Encounter –Unintended meeting of person unfamiliar each other –Not uncontrollable Fortuitous Event –Maslow with Bertha Goodman –Bandura with Psychology

Bina Nusantara Human Agency People are self regulating, proactive, self reflective, self organizing and have power to influence their own action to produce desire consequences It’s not: possess homunculus and react automatically It is: active process of exploring, manipulating, influencing the environment to attain desired outcomes

Bina Nusantara Human Agency (Continue…) 4 core feature: a. intentionality expectation/ prediction and proactive commitment b. Forethought set goals, anticipate likely outcomes of their actions c. Self-reactiveness plan & contemplate future behavior and monitoring d. Self-reflectiveness Examine their own function  Self Efficacy

Bina Nusantara Self Efficacy “people’s beliefs in their capability to exercise some measure of control over their own functioning and over environmental events” Efficacy expectation ≠ outcomes expectation

Bina Nusantara Self Efficacy (continue…) Self Efficacy vs Responsiveness of environment: Efficacy Env. LowHigh LowApathy Resignation helplesness Try to change env (protest, social activism) Or seek responsive env. HighDepressed (tasks are too difficult) Successfull

Bina Nusantara Self Efficacy (continue…) 4 sources: 1.Mastery experiences (most influencial sources) Past performance 2.Social Modeling Vicarious learning by other people 3.Social Persuasion The person must belive the persuader 4.Physical & emotional states Relax & reduce of anxiety

Bina Nusantara Self Efficacy (Continue…) Proxy Agency Relying on others who had more potential Cud weaken personal & collective efficacy Collective Efficacy People’s shared beliefs in their collective power to produce desired results

Bina Nusantara Self Regulation High level of Self Efficacy + confident in their reliance on proxies + possess solid collective efficacy  capacity to regulate their own behavior

Bina Nusantara Proses Self Regulation Possess limited ability to manipulate the external factors People are capable of monitoring their own behavior & evaluating it in terms of both proximate & distant goals Behavior, stem from reciprocal influence of both

Bina Nusantara Self Regulation (continue…) External Factors –Provide a standard for evaluating our own behavior –Provide the means for reinforcement Internal Factors –Self Observation –Judgemental process (depend on personal standards, referential performances, valuation of activity, performance attribution –Self reaction

Bina Nusantara Self regulation through moral agency Doing no harm to people Proactively helping people Selective activation Disengangement of internal control

Bina Nusantara Proses Redefine the behavior –Cognitive restructuring –Such as: moral justification, palliative comparison, euphemistic labels Disregard or distort the consequences of behavior –Minimize the consequences –Disregard the consequences –Distort the consequences Dehumanize or blame the victims Displace or Diffuse responsibility