Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Measurement of forest structures within intensively managed forestlands. Stuart Farber & Geoff Kaberle Timber Products.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riparian Thinning: Logic Paths for Silvicultural Prescriptions
Advertisements

Research, Citizen Involvement, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Jack Sullivan Science Services Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Indiana Bat Habitat Conservation Plan PA State Lands
Thinning intensity studies and growth modeling of Montana mixed conifer forests at the University of Montana’s Lubrecht Experimental Forest Thomas Perry.
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
Missouri’s Forest Resource Assessment - An Overview for NASF - Lisa Allen State Forester Missouri Department of Conservation.
Developing Silviculture Practices through Large-scale Studies: Some Perspective from the West-side Paul D. Anderson Land and Watershed Management Program.
Forest Wildlife Richard H. Yahner, Carolyn G. Mahan, and Amanda D. Rodewald.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
Implementing the Northern Spotted Owl Conservation Strategy for the Klickitat HCP Planning Unit Scott D. McLeod Washington State Department of Natural.
A Career in Forestry? Opportunities in BC Resource Management.
Thanks for joining us. We’ll be starting soon. To join the teleconference, dial , passcode # To download handouts : Click the Handouts.
“The conservation objective in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is to provide forested habitat capable of supporting sustainable populations of all forest.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Wildlife Management Principles. Goals What are some goals related to the management of wildlife habitats?
Stand Structure and Ecological Restoration Charles W. Denton Ecological Restoration Institute John D. Bailey, Associate Professor of Forestry, Associate.
VARIABLE RETENTION HARVESTING ON POTLATCH FORESTS.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
High-Tech Forestry: Using the Landscape Management System On Your Tree Farm Family Forest Field Day Saturday September 18, 2004 Kevin Zobrist, UW College.
Managing for wildlife on private forests in Washington Presented as part of the Coached Forest Management Planning course for WSU extension and WA- DNR.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
Effect of silvicultural and prescribed fire treatments on coarse woody debris dynamics in a sierran old growth mixed-conifer forest. Jim Innes and Malcolm.
Sustainable Forest Management on the Yakama Reservation.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Working in the Urbanizing Landscape: Changing Roles for Natural Resource Professionals Oregon Department of Forestry “Stewardship in Forestry”
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Stimson Lumber Company’s Fee Land Management System
What The Northwest Forest Plan says about 80+ year old trees.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Chapter 13: Forests, Parks an Landscapes. Modern Conflicts over Forestland and Forest Resources In recent decades forest conservation has become an international.
Landscape Modeling for the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon Prepared by Carolina Hooper Vegetation Modeling Lead Oregon State Office 4/23/13.
Opportunities for Restoring Second Growth Ecosystems in Staney Creek: Scientific Principles.
Commonly referred to as MIS.  From the 1982 planning regulations 36 CFR (a)(1)- “… certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the.
North Coast Forest Conservation Program Northern Spotted Owl Status Overview Madison Thomson (707)
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Chapter 5 Sound Management 1. Sound Management Defined Sound management is a program of production designed to obtain the greatest net return from the.
Montana Forest Stewardship “Empowerment of Forest Owners through Personal Involvement”
Application Landscape Ecology in Forest Management: A Glass Half Empty? Thomas Spies USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
FN Cultural Heritage Resources The WLP must specify a strategy for conserving and protecting “cultural heritage resources” that are the focus of a traditional.
An Ecosystem Management Approach to Riparian Zones Joy O’Keefe Clemson University.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
Careers in the Environmental Science Industry Objective 5.01: Remember careers in the environmental science industry.
Development and Implementation of a Red Alder Tree Farm Program Western Hardwood Association Annual Meeting June, 2005.
Managing Tree Species Diversity for Forest Resilience and Adaptability Andy MacKinnon - Research Ecologist -Coast Area Provincial Ecologists Nanaimo BC.
Old Growth Forests. Old Growth forests are diverse places, with young and very old trees, decay and new growth, canopy gaps, uprooted tree, large logs,
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
CANADA: A COUNTRY OF FORESTS. Canada is known for its forests: million hectares covers half of Canada’s total land area almost 57% is considered.
Forestry. Tree terms Saw log- 6-8 inches for soft wood, inches for hardwoods.
FOREST PLAN REVISION Release of Draft Topic Papers INYO NATIONAL FOREST MAY - JUNE 2013.
Oregon Department of Forestry Kevin Birch Planning Coordinator Use of Criteria & Indicators and Sustainable Forest Management at Different Scales Oregon.
Forest Practices Around North Bay
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Southern Interior Forest Region Soils Plant Ecology Hydrology Geomorphology Silvicultural Systems Wildlife Ecology Forest Science Program Research, Consultation,
Understanding drivers and patterns of forest management in the region * A Snapshot of the Chequamegon-Nicolet.
Experimental gaps and biodiversity responses in the Vermont Forest Ecosystem Management Demonstration Project Bill Keeton Graduate student contributors:
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Essential Standard 5.00: Understand the environmental science industry (water, soils, wildlife and forestry).
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
FOR 350 Silviculture. What is silviculture? The art and science of controlling the establishment, composition, structure, and growth of a forest stand.
Deer Management, Forest Management & Cooperatives
Forests, Parks and Landscapes
FOR 350 Silviculture.
Landscapes: Forests, Parks and Wilderness
Shelterwood and clearcut
Single Tree Selection.
Kirk Hanson (360)
Environmental Science
Forest Management Plan
Presentation transcript:

Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Measurement of forest structures within intensively managed forestlands. Stuart Farber & Geoff Kaberle Timber Products Company 130 Phillipe Lane PO Box 766 Yreka CA

Timber Products Company  Family owned business based in Springfield, Oregon  Manufacturing facilities in California, Oregon, Mississippi, Michigan, Georgia  Industry leader in manufacturing and distribution in hardwood and composite panels  Timberland ownership includes 125,000 acres in California.

Timber Products Company N Mt Shasta City Yreka Scott River Oregon California Klamath River Trinity River California Cascades

Timber Products Company Overview of Presentation  History of “New Forestry”  Timber Products development and implementation of Bioforestry Program.  Timber Products monitoring of Bioforestry Program  Timber Products methods and metrics used for assessment

Timber Products Company New Forestry ? “A kinder, gentler forestry. Is it the answer?” Evergreen Magazine 1989

Timber Products Company New Forestry? “Maintaining stable populations of all species by managing for each species individually is an impossible task. However, biodiversity can be promoted by maintaining the habitat - forest structures - in which the species are found” Dr. Chadwick Oliver Professor, College of Forest Resources University of Washington (Oregon Department of Forestry, An easy guide for structure based forest management, 1998)

Timber Products Company Chapter 7: Variable Retention Harvest Systems Major topics discussed: How to provide structural enrichment of forest stands and landscapes? What to retain? How much to retain? What spatial pattern for retention? Considerations for wind, fire, insects, diseases?

Timber Products Company Timber Products Bioforestry Why?  Maintain ability to manage forestland for the long-term  Maintain landscapes of suitable habitat for Northern spotted owl through our Spotted Owl Management Plan.  Create complex forest stands and landscapes that will maintain viable populations of early, mid, and mature forest wildlife species.

Timber Products Company California Cascades, Northern California Radio Telemetry of Northern spotted owl

Timber Products Company Timber Products Bioforestry Establishment of policy in Formalized Existing Efforts 2.Provided Structured Guidelines 3.Documented Policy 4.Set Minimum Standards 5.Provided for Unstructured Application

Timber Products Company Timber Products Bioforestry Overview of Guidelines  Species Diversity  Structural Diversity  Large Woody Debris  Riparian LWD and Snag Retention  Tree Species Seedling Diversity  Adaptive Management

Timber Products Company Timber Products Bioforestry Compliance and Effectiveness Monitoring Completed in 2000  Forest Resource Inventory Field Data Collection  Global Positioning Systems (GPS)  Entry into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and relational database.

Timber Products Company Number Number Silvicultural Method of Units of Acres Clearcut Shelterwood Removal Step Commercial Thinning281,414.2 Totals902,526.6 Bioforestry Results: Acres by Silviculture

Timber Products Company Number Number Timber Harvest Year of Units of Acres < Totals Bioforestry Results: Clearcut Silviculture by Year

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP SIS(6) Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry: Representative of tree size and species mix

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP ( SIS(6) Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry: Retention of hard and soft snags.

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP SIS(6) Beaver Creek Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry retention of down large woody debris

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP ( SIS(6) Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry: Wind, Fire, Disease

Timber Products Company Timber Products Bioforestry Why Monitor?  Describe and document policy within stands under active timber management  Describe distribution of Bioforestry stands.  Describe size, quantity, and condition of Bioforestry stands.

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: What is the appropriate scale? Tree/Snag/Log Habitat Retention Area Harvest Unit Section Small Timber Harvest Plan Planning Watershed Watershed Ecosystem Large

Timber Products Company Willow Creek Mountain THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California Bioforestry Results: Section 25 T46N R04W Stand = ac. Retention = 0.73 ac. % Retention = 3.1%

Timber Products Company Willow Creek Mountain THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California GIS Bioforestry stand located at Section 25 T46N R04W Stand = ac. Retention = 0.73 ac. % Retention = 3.1% N

Timber Products Company West Dorris THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California Bioforestry in Section 34 T47N R4W Stand = 24.6 ac. Retention = 1.2 ac. % Retention = 4.9%

Timber Products Company West Dorris THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California Bioforestry in Section 26 T47N R4W Stand = 24.6 ac. Retention = 1.2 ac. % Retention = 4.9% N

Timber Products Company West Dorris THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California Stand = 17.7 ac. Retention = 0.77 % Retention = 4.4% Bioforestry Retention in Section 4 T46N R4W

Timber Products Company West Dorris THP ( SIS(6) California Cascades, Northern California Stand = 17.7 ac. Retention = 0.77 % Retention = 4.4% Bioforestry Retention in Section 4 T46N R4W N

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP ( SIS(6) Beaver Creek Watershed Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry Stand in Section 27 T48N R09W Stand = 26.2 ac. Retention = 0.6 ac. % Retention = 2.3%

Timber Products Company Wards Gap THP ( SIS(6) Beaver Creek Watershed Klamath River, Northern California Bioforestry Stand in Section 27 T48N R09W Stand = 26.2 ac. Retention = 0.6 ac. % Retention = 2.3% % Retention = 5.0% % Retention = 2.9%

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: What is the appropriate scale? Tree/Snag/Log Habitat Retention Area Harvest Unit Section Small Timber Harvest Plan Planning Watershed Watershed Ecosystem Large

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Planning Watershed scale Balance of various wildlife guilds habitat use Data can be collected and analyzed for planning watershed Some regulatory and legal support for planning watershed Compliance monitoring can be reviewed at THP level

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Individual Retention Areas < 1/20th = 26(16%)  1/20th = 134(84%) n = 160

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Individual Stands <2% Retention = 48% >2% Retention = 52% n = 48 Number of Stands

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Planning Watersheds Number of Watersheds <2% Retention = 40% >2% Retention = 60% n = 15

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Ecosystems

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Species distribution

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Diameter distribution Trees per acre over11’’dbh

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: LWD Loading by Stand Trees per acre over11’’dbh Number of Stands n = 48

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Snag distribution by Stand Number of Stands

Timber Products Company Bioforestry Results: Representation of pre-harvest distributions An Example:BasalRelative (Willow Creek Mtn)TPAAreaQMD8Density Pre-harvest Condition Retention Area Condition Another Example: (Wards Gap) Pre-harvest Condition Retention Area Condition

Timber Products Company Significant sampling and data analysis questions? Are there field sampling methodologies that would be both statistically valid and quicker? What are the appropriate data metrics (ie. Qmd, BA) for assessing these forest stands? At what scale do biometricians feel assessment should take place? Which statistical methods would be most appropriate for measurement and comparison of Bioforestry stands?

Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Future Plans and Monitoring Compliance Monitoring Adaptive Management feedback in Policy development on Planting, Spraying, PCT, Burning, Site Preparation, Access of firewood cutting. Effectiveness Monitoring Wildlife use focusing on neotropical migrants, small mammals and amphibians Trend Monitoring Forest growth and decay of retention areas including effects of shade, water uptake,disease, etc.