Workshop Presentation for Homedale, Owyhee County & Homedale Highway District for Homedale, Owyhee County & Homedale Highway District Corridor Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meridian Road Interchange Rebuild ITD Board Meeting June 18, 2009.
Advertisements

Workshop Presentation for Canyon County October 21-22, 2009.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
September 24, 2012 Genesee County Road Commission Dye & Court Roundabout Dye Road and Court Street Roundabout Construction John Daly, Manager-Director.
US 52 Corridor Study Public Meeting November 15, 2010.
S.R. 1 Intersection Improvement Project Wells County Public Library, Bluffton, IN 6:00 p.m. Presentation Thursday, April 24, 2014.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
May 14, st Street and 2 nd Street Couplet Traffic Modification Project.
T.H. 23 / South Saratoga Street Reduced Conflict Intersection and Pedestrian Overpass Project Project hearing October 14, 2014 City Council Presenters.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4 th, 2015.
Miller Road Feasibility Study & Reconstruction Project Information and Kick-off Meeting Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc. ROWE INC. Genesee.
Workshop Presentation for Canyon County Jurisdictions for Canyon County Jurisdictions Corridor Management Plan.
Barbara Ivanov Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Freight Systems Division Director Washington State Freight Mobility Plan Truck Freight.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Kern Motorist Aid Authority Services And Operations.
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
T.H. 23 / SOUTH SARATOGA STREET REDUCED CONFLICT INTERSECTION AND PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS PROJECT PROJECT HEARING June 10, 2014 City Council Presenters Glenn.
Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Traffic Flow Parameters Surface Street Application.
Better Roads. Better World. Green, Accessible, Intelligent Transport (GAIT) Dr. Hediye Tüydeş Yaman Assoc.Prof. Middle East Technical University.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho Workforce Development Council February 24, 2010.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Edward L. Fischer P.E..  Ed, it was hard to read slides from back of room with this background.  Can I change it? Nancy Brickman.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
Lexington Road Corridor Transportation Plan Public Meeting #1 October 7, 2014 Welcome!! And Thank You for Coming Out.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Project Management Team Meeting #3
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presentation transcript:

Workshop Presentation for Homedale, Owyhee County & Homedale Highway District for Homedale, Owyhee County & Homedale Highway District Corridor Management Plan

Why are we here tonight? To talk with you about Idaho 19. To share what we have learned so far. To hear about your experiences on ID 19 to help identify future improvements - a mostly rural roadway that travels nearly 15.3 miles from the Oregon State Line to Caldwell. Corridor Management Plan

What is a corridor plan? A near-term (10-year) plan. Analysis of future travel demand and performance in the corridor. Evaluation of problems and needs. Identification of corridor improvement priorities. Our objective is to continue to provide a roadway that is both safe and efficient. Corridor Management Plan

Major Stakeholders Idaho Transportation Department Schools, business, major employers Canyon and Owyhee counties Caldwell, Greenleaf, Wilder, Homedale Canyon Highway District No. 4, Golden Gate Highway District and Homedale Highway District Corridor Management Plan

Travel Shed Population Growth Corridor Management Plan

Travel Shed Population (Source: Idaho Economics, 2008) Corridor Management Plan Zip Code Areas Rates of Change Caldwell Subtotal 42,542 60,313 75,514 89, % Greenleaf 1,210 1,503 1,970 2, % Wilder 3,811 4,549 5,963 7, % Canyon ID 19 Total 47,563 66,365 83,447 99, % Canyon Co Total 133, , , , % Homedale 4,245 4,404 4,817 5, % Owyhee Co Total 10,693 11,246 12,709 14, %

Transportation Concerns  Right of Way Preservation  Access Management  Confusing Caldwell Terminus  Identification of Highway with Main street (Greenleaf, Wilder, Homedale)  Shoulder Widths / Auxiliary Lanes  Role of Railroad Spur  Pedestrian / Cyclist Safety Corridor Management Plan

Idaho Transportation Department’s Concerns  SAFETY &  EFFICIENCY Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? ( Key Problem Areas)  Safety – Vehicle Key Intersections ID 19)  Oregon Line - Johnstone Rd – 16 (scattered) Old Dump IS (clustered) – 10 for total of 26  Johnstown Rd – Mainstreet 12 (scattered) rd IS)  Wilder – 8 (U.S. 95 6)  Travis – 1  Greenleaf – 13 (Friends 3)  Notus – Weitz 12  Simplot Gate District – 19 +  Farmway Road – 14 +  Centennial Way & Paynter– 30 + (Source: ITD - 5 year period) Corridor Management Plan

Crash Cluster from Oregon Line to Johnstone St. (W. Idaho), Homedale

Corridor Management Plan Crash Cluster for Idaho Street for Homedale, ID

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) ID 19 Inter- Section With US 95 & Mercer Dr. (Concentrated Crash Locations) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) Peckham Road Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) Greenleaf “Main Street” (Concentrated Crash Locations) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) Simplot Gateway District Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) ID 19 Industrial / Commercial District in W. Caldwell Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? (Key Problem Areas) Centennial Way / Paynter / Downtown Couplet And Main St. Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Crash Concerns - Oregon Line to US 95 Average Rate** Mile Posts: – Oregon Line to Johnstone Rd Crash Rate Above Statewide Average of 1.48 Miles Posts: – Johnstone Rd to 3 rd St. West Crash Rate Above Statewide Average of 1.02 Mile Posts: 4.56 – – 3 rd St. West to US 95 Crash Rates*** – 0.97, 0.73, & 0.53 Above Statewide Averages of 0.43 & 0.53 * Note: Accident rates are average annual, based on the most recent 5 year period. **Comparison to “Average” is based on comparable highways (2 lane widths) serving rural communities. ***Based on 3 segment codes – ALL OVER THE STATE-WIDE AVERAGE Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Commercial Vehicle Traffic  Oregon Line to Johnstone Rd – 62 vehicles / day  Johnstone Rd – 3 rd Street – 62 vehicles / day  3 rd Street to Main – 140 vehicles / day  Main to 2 nd Street E. – 168 vehicles / day  2 nd Street E. to U.S. 95 – 174 vehicles / day 1.2% Average Daily Commercial Traffic Between Oregon Line and U.S. 95 Jct Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Commercial Vehicle Traffic  Commercial traffic peaks at 690 average daily traffic in September or… 8.49% Average Daily Traffic At Caldwell Corridor Management Plan

Corridor Management Plan Key Problem Areas Traffic Volume – ADT (Average Daily Traffic) SegmentYearsAv. Vehicles / DayLevel of Service Oregon Line to Johnston Rd AAAA Oregon Line to Johnston Rd ,000 8,350 CCCC Johnston to 4 th W ABAB Wilder – Greenleaf ,800 7,250 BBBB Greenleaf City ,500 12,500 CCCC Greenleaf – Caldwell W. City Limits ,000 10,125 AAAA Caldwell CL - Mainstreet ,000 27,250 ABAB

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? – Road Capacity Bottlenecks Result in Congestion  …a reduction in Level of Service (LOS) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Roadway Capacity  For most segments (including three and two lane sections) we are well under capacity of the roadway today (when we compare current volumes to existing capacity) but ID 19 users will experience a decline in level of service (LOS) after 15 years. Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Speed Concerns  Speed studies show we drive an average of 10% over the posted limits, however... Average speed is just above the posted limit (60 mph) Corridor Management Plan

WHERE WILL WE BE TOMORROW? Why is Access Management Important to ID 19 Users?  Improve safety.  Maintain a functional highway – efficiently move traffic to and through your communities.  Safe and functional highways is one more reason why the ID 19 travel shed should continue to be a good place to live and do business.  Planning can help to balance public and private interest. Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE W E TODAY? Access Points Per Mile  Nationwide and Statewide Studies Reveal…  An increase of 10 – 20 access points per mile on major arterials increases crash rate by 30%.  Idaho Statewide data indicate that 37% of all crashes occur at intersections, driveways and alleys.  Well managed arterials have 40% - 50% fewer crashes. Corridor Management Plan

WHERE ARE WE TODAY? - Access Points Per Mile Corridor Management Plan CountyCity / Unincor- porated Miles# Access Points# Access Points / Mile CanyonUn-Inc CanyonGreenleaf CanyonUn-Inc CanyonCaldwell CanyonCaldwell OwyheeUn-Inc OwyheeHomedale OwyheeHomedale OwyheeHomedale

Why is Access Management Important to Idaho Transportation Department?  Our Mission: Your mobility.  To maintain a efficient high speed linkages from Activity Centers in Canyon & Owyhee Counties to other places within Idaho.  To improve safety – remove unsafe features or add features which will improve both safety and functionality of Idaho 19.  Both of these can be more affordable with careful access management. Corridor Management Plan

NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR… Funding Challenge: Idaho’s state and local transportation agencies need an additional $240 million each year to meet our increasing transportation needs. Without the revenue increase, we will not have the funds needed to: Improve highway safety Maintain or improve highway efficiency Match federal highway funds Corridor Management Plan

NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR… Funding challenge: Idaho is the 4 th -fastest growing state in the nation. Idaho’s population is expected to increase by 35% between 2000 and 2020, nearly twice the national average growth rate. That means more cars, trucks and drivers – and more demand for better roads and bridges. Corridor Management Plan

NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR… Funding challenge: State revenue is not keeping pace: Idaho’s fuel tax has not increased since Statewide vehicle registration fees have not increased since Highway construction & maintenance materials costs are soaring. Corridor Management Plan

Stay Tuned and Involved: For information, visit itd.idaho.gov, go to Projects, Southwest Idaho, Idaho 19 Corridor Study. Questions, comments or suggestions: For more information, call ITD Office of Communications at Corridor Management Plan

What’s Next…  BASED ON YOUR FEEDBACK…  Narrow the list of the needed improvements.  Bring policy and physical improvements to local stakeholders’ Task Force for plan review.  Take recommended plan elements to:  Local Planning and Zoning Commissions  Local Government (County, Highway District, Cities)  Idaho Transportation Board (ITD) Corridor Management Plan

Thank you for attending  ITD appreciates your comments and will consider them in the draft corridor plan.  Please take time to examine the exhibits and discuss your concerns with us… and  Take the time to mark-up the map of the Idaho 19 Canyon County area Corridor Management Plan