Department of Modern and Classical Languages Departmental Strengthening 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Updating the Plan on a Page for Updating the.
Advertisements

ED EL 335 Class Notes Day 1—Course Introduction. Vision Statement After completing EdEl 335, pre-service teachers will have a vision and understanding.
INSTRUCTORS, FACULTY AND COMMITTEES MUST PLAN WHERE WE WANT THE STUDENT TO GO. THE COURSE OUTLINE GUIDES THE STUDENT ON WHERE TO GO AND HOW.
Campus Improvement Plans
Using Rubrics for Evaluating Student Learning. Purpose To review the development of rubrics for the purpose of assessment To share an example of how a.
Using Rubrics for Evaluating Student Learning Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
Mathematics 191 Research Seminar in Mathematical Modeling 28 March 2005 Rapid Modeling and Tractability.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Getting Started. Decide which type of assessment –Input assessment –Process assessment –Outcomes assessment –Impact assessment.
Top Ten Ways To Write a Good Proposal… That Won’t Get Funded.
1 Module BASICS OF PLANNING. 2 Content Overview Planning principles Gantt charts.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Unit 2: Setting a Program Vision CERT Program Manager.
The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) is the national association for language education professionals from all levels of instruction.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Collaborative Data Teams
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
2008 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Developing an eLearning Strategy at a Nigerian University By Jerome Terpase Dooga, Christopher Tony.
Examining Monitoring Data
Venue: M038 Date: Monday May 30,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.5 Guidelines on: I ASSESSMENT DATA REPORT FORMAT. II COURSE ASSESSMENT CHART.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
Timberlane Regional School District
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Learning Goal: To better understand the PLC process and how it works at Strathmore Secondary College.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
September 11, Assessment Primer A. Defining the Assessment Loop B. Establishing Departmental-level learning goals and objectives C. Assessment Terminology.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Collaborative Teams Why we need them. School Improvement Plan (SIP) Puts the schools vision and mission into action Identifies needs or areas for improvement.
BUILDING A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY Adapted from "Professional Learning Communities at Work"- Richard and Rebecca Dufour and Robert Eaker Delsea.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Anne Hanley Director of Graduate Studies Department of History Northern Illinois University The Teaching Portfolio for Ph.D Candidacy Examinations.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
The EC Network of European national and regional funding authorities for RD&D in the field of H&FC The HYCO Action Groups: a tool to arrive at Trans-National.
Scoring Rubrics: Validity and Reliability Barbara M. Moskal Colorado School of Mines.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Writing Program Workshop 9/29/2004 Sequencing Assignments Dr. Felicia Jean Steele Department of English
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Chapter.10 HOW TO PLAN A LESSON. FORMAT OF A LESSON PLAN 1. Goal(s)-general An overall purpose or goal that you will attempt to accomplish by the end.
A Critical Friend: Peer Review of Teaching at AUS Daniel Kirk Daniel Kirk: Oct 2007.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
Making Grant Writing Successful Dara O’Neil Georgia Institute of Technology 26 October 2000.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
SEC 480 assist Expect Success/sec480assistdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
What It Is and How It Works
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Institution Name.
Julie A. Lombardi, P.E.D. Wellness and Sport Sciences Department
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Managing Organizational Change
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Data Workshop for Emmaus Seminar
Tri-College Teagle Foundation Systematic Improvement Grant Retreat: Sustainable Department-Level Assessment of Student Learning September 11, 2009.
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

Department of Modern and Classical Languages Departmental Strengthening 2007

Goals 1.To acquaint faculty with the 2003/2004 planning workshop outcomes; 2.To articulate the Vision of the MCL Department; 3.To rearticulate language courses with ACTFL Guidelines; 4.To regularize course outline formats; 5.To draft an evaluation scheme and rubrics for language courses; 6.To establish guidelines and norms for evaluation of student performance.

Activities 1.Review of the 2003/2004 planning workshop outcomes. 2.Formulation of a Vision Statement for the MCL Department. 3.Articulation of language courses and ACTFL levels and guidelines. 4.Development of a template for syllabi and course outlines. 5.Development of evaluation guides and appropriate rubrics for the assessment of student’s language proficiency. 6.Establishment. of norms and guidelines for evaluating student performance in language courses.

Timeline (To be established for every activity in the plan.)

Resources 1.Copies of materials produced at the 2003 planning workshop. 2.Copies of the Mission and Goals of the Department. 3.Course descriptions, course syllabi and ACTFL Guidelines. 4.Copies of syllabi and course outlines. 5.Copies of course descriptions. 6.Copies of existing rubrics and language assessment guides. 7.Schemes and guides for assessment of student performance.

Cost In house / In kind materials estimated at $ (The cost is minimal. Only basic stationery and duplicating items will be needed. All materials will be obtained from existing departmental stores already budgeted under MCL recurrent operations.)

Expected Outcomes 1.All Department members will have access to electronic copies of the 2003 workshop outcomes and will be familiar with the work done so far. 2.A ten year Vision Statement consistent with the Mission and Goals of the Department. 3.A logical sequence of language courses closely articulated with current ACTFL levels of language proficiency as stated in the ACTFL Guidelines. 4.A template for the construction of course outlines and syllabi. 5.An evaluation scheme with appropriate rubrics which will describe the language profile of the student in every language skill and at every proficiency level consistent with ACTFL Guidelines and in terms of language functions and outcomes. 6.An agreed upon template for the distribution of marks in language courses. 7.Guidelines for the development, administration, marking and grading of exit (final examinations).

Assumptions 1.In kind support is available from the MCL Department; 2.The commitment of department personnel; 3.A willingness to dialogue professionally and arrive at consensus; 4.The participation of all department members 5.The participation of all members of the department and the support of everyONE.

Owners 1.Leadership: V. Soady 2.Partners: All members of the MCL Department. (Although it is expected that the entire department will feel common ownership of the plan, individuals and small groups will need to assume responsibility for specific activities of the plan, as necessary.)

Conclusion 1.T hanks to you all for your cooperation. 2.“ I have a vision; I see a light….” 3.“ Somnio ergo sum.” (I dream therefore I am.) 4.“ Together we can make it happen.”