South Carolina’s Prison System Report to the Sentencing Reform Oversight Committee Bryan P. Stirling, Acting Director November 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Presented by: Elana M. Parker, M.Ed., M.L.A.P. Reentry Coordinator/Public Health Liaison Alabama Prisoner Reentry Initiative and Family Reintegration.
New Directions in Prosecution
1 Budget Reduction Proposals James McDonough Secretary Florida Department of Corrections.
Mission Critical Funding Needs January 31, 2007 Jon Ozmint, Director Department of Corrections.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” - MLK.
" The Impact of Criminal Justice Policies and Practices on Minorities" 2009.
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
“Justice Reinvestment through Policy Analysis in South Carolina” South Carolina State Senator Gerald Malloy 1.
1 The Importance of Successful Reentry to Jail Population Growth Presented by: Allen J. Beck, Chief Corrections Statistics Program Bureau of Justice Statistics.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Harri-Ann Ellis April 28 th, 2011 Meth and More Conference.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Substance Abuse Treatment and Corrections
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
Percentage with COMPAS Percentage of Parolees with Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) that have Medium-High.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
BY: ABBY SWANSON CRIMINOLOGY 516 Corrections in Virginia.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Community Corrections Campus
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
May 18, 2009 Montebello Unified School District Presentation By: Debbie Nelson, Director.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
1 A Presentation to Senate Judiciary B And Judiciary C Committees February 15, 2000 Kari Belvin, Senate Fiscal Services Chris Keaton, Legislative Fiscal.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative (MPRI) Creating safer neighborhoods and better citizens.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

South Carolina’s Prison System Report to the Sentencing Reform Oversight Committee Bryan P. Stirling, Acting Director November 18, 2013

2 SCDC Institution Levels and Population Count Level I (Minimum Security): 8 Institutions Level II (Medium Security): 9 Institutions Level III (Maximum Security): 6 Institutions Female: 3 Institutions Agency Total:26 Institutions* * Within the past 12 months Watkins Pre- Release was closed for housing and repurposed as office space, and a wing at Stevenson CI was closed and the institution was merged with Walden CI. Institutional Count Total (as of November 18, 2013) = 21,933

3 Utilized Capacity on November 13, 2013

4 Average Daily Population Statistics Fiscal Years SCDC’s Average Daily Population*: - Between June 2001 and June 2013 increased by 1,126 (5.4%) - Between June 2012 and June 2013 decreased by 624 (2.7%) By law, SCDC must provide security, housing, clothing, food, and healthcare. To prepare inmates for reentry into community, SCDC provides education, work, and addiction treatment programs. *Facilities and Authorized Absences.

5 SCDC Average Monthly Facility Count

6 Actual SCDC Population June 2, 2010 – S.1154 Date of Implementation * The Prison Population Is Moving In The Opposite Direction From What Was Projected By Applied Research Services, Inc. * The high average monthly jurisdictional count for CY 2013 occurred in January High Average Jurisdictional Count CY 1998 – CY 2013 (To Date)

7 Annual Admissions to SCDC Fiscal Years

8 Monthly Admissions to SCDC September 2011 – October 2013

9 Admissions and Releases FY

10 Annual Violent and Non-Violent Admissions Fiscal Years

11 Violent vs. Non-Violent Population

12 SCDC Population Profile as of June 30, 2013

13 SCDC Inmates As Of November 15, 2013 Who Have A Gang Affiliation (2,227 Inmates Make Up The 2,356 Memberships) GANGSMEMBERS BLOODS834 FOLK NATION726 FIVE PERCENTERS349 CRIPS174 WHITE SUPREMACY59 ARYAN BROTHERHOOD33 BLACK GANGSTER DISCIPLES19 INSANE GANGSTER DISCIPLES16 SATANIC CULTS14 SATANISM13 SURENOS10 ARYAN NATIONS9 ALL Others100 TOTAL2,356

14 All YOA Admissions FY 2008 – FY 2013

15 Yearly Violent and Non-Violent Burglary 2 nd Degree YOA Admissions, FY 2008 – FY % Drop in Non-Violent Burglary 2 nd Degree YOA Admissions between FY 2010 and FY 2013

16 SCDC Population Profile as of June 30, 2013

17 Inmates Age 55 and Older in SCDC Population as of June 30,

18 Increasing Demands from More Difficult and More Service-Intensive Inmates More Truth-in-Sentencing (TIS) inmates (ineligible for parole and required to serve 85% of their sentence): –In June 2000, 3,915 inmates (18% of population) –In June 2013, 11,133 inmates (50% of population) –(These inmates have few incentives to reduce negative behaviors.) 13,935 violent offenders (63% of population) 3,034 mentally ill inmates (14% of population) More than half (56%) of the population have medical problems Almost half (48%) cannot read at 9th grade level 8,448 chemically dependent inmates (38% of population)

19 Recidivism Rates of Inmates Released During Fiscal Years 2003 – 2010* *Inmates released in FY 2010 and followed for three years, i.e., through FY 2013.

20 South Carolina Violent Crime Rates, 1975 – 2011* *Source: South Carolina Department of Public Safety. Rates are number of crimes per 10,000 population.

21 South Carolina Property Crime Rates, 1975 – 2011* *Source: South Carolina Department of Public Safety. Rates are number of crimes per 10,000 population.

22 FY 2012 Expenditures (Total = $415.6 Million)

23 FY 2013 Expenditures (Total = $424.6 Million)

24 Young Offender Parole & Re-Entry Services Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) GENERAL INFORMATION  Historically, the recidivism rate for Youthful Offenders released from SCDC has exceeded 50%.  SCDC implemented a new community supervision service called Intensive Supervision during FY  ISS is based on the nationally recognized Intensive Aftercare Program (IAP) Model that utilizes evidence-based practices proven to:  Ensure the successful reentry of Youthful Offenders back into the community;  Assist in the reduction of recidivism;  Improve family and individual functioning;  Ensure community safety;  Reduce victimization.  Through ISS, an Intensive Supervision Officer (ISO) works in the community and is assigned to each Youthful Offender upon admission at SCDC.  ISOs act in a proactive manner in the life of each offender under his/her supervision and manage a caseload of no more than twenty (20) individuals.

25 Young Offender Parole & Re-Entry Services Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) ISO GUIDELINES ISO Level of Supervision While an Offender is Incarcerated  Face-to-face visits, one per month.  Completes two onsite residential assessments to ensure suitable placement.  Completes a GRAD 90 Risk/Asset Assessment, which addresses both the risks (mental health issues, substance abuse, sociability concerns, career development) and assets (individual strengths, positive leisure time, family/mentor support, workforce readiness) that have proven prominent to the lives of the Youthful Offender population.  Completes an individualized Case Management Plan (CMP) that incorporates Restorative Justice practices and develops objectives for offenders that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely. Examples of objectives include employment, educational placement (vocational or GED), drug testing, substance abuse counseling, mental health services, and parenting skills.  Develops a Community Reentry Team (CRT) that meets regularly to develop resources to assist the offender when reentering society.

26 Young Offender Parole & Re-Entry Services Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) ISO Level of Supervision While an Offender is under Parole Supervision in the Community  Face-to-face visits in the community (day, evening and week-end).  First week: three (3)  Second week, onward: one (1) per week, four (4) per month  Ensures that parole conditions are met, to include payment of restitution to crime victims.  Utilizes a series of Graduate Responses (i.e., community service, electronic monitoring, reduce curfew, etc.) to address Technical Violations (i.e., absconding, exceeding curfew, failure of random drug test, etc.).  Utilizes a series of Incentives (i.e., academic recognition, certificate of achievement, extend curfew, etc.) to encourage positive behavior.  Implements then reviews individualized Case Management Plan (CMP) monthly with CRT, updating as offender needs change.

27 Young Offender Parole & Re-Entry Services Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) DATA (Current)  Total of 876 offenders are assigned to 49 ISOs  474 (54%) of assigned offenders are on IS parole  402 (46%) of assigned offenders remain in SCDC institutions  A total of 645 Grad-90 Assessments have been completed  Total of 449 random drug tests have been performed on offenders on IS parole  278 (62%) of offenders have passed these random drug tests  171 (38%) of offenders have failed these random drug tests  Total of 207 (44%) offenders in the community are gainfully employed  Total of 110 offenders in the community are enrolled in GED classes

28 Young Offender Parole & Re-Entry Services Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) DATA (cont.)  Total of 23 offenders in the community are enrolled in Higher Education  Total of 46 offenders in the community are enrolled in Alternative Education  Total of 70 offenders in the community are involved in Competency Development Programs (not education)  Total of 135 Incentives have been used  388 Graduate Responses have been issued/used  Total of $5, has been paid in restitution to victims  Total of 400 Technical Violations have occurred  Total of 8 (1.7%) of paroled offenders have been returned to SCDC custody for violations

29 Centralized and expanded the male pre-release program at Manning CI. Increased the number of inmates from 200 to 600 and the length of the program from 90 days to 180 days to better prepare inmates for release and transition back into the community. Closed one and a half Level 1 (Minimum Security) institutions. Implemented the new Intensive Supervision Services (ISS) program for Youthful Offenders. This was done using the model begun by the Department of Juvenile Justice to reduce recidivism among these young offenders by providing intensive supervision in the community and assisting in their transition from prison to the community. Recent Accomplishments

30 Developed and implemented a new paroling authority for Youthful Offenders – the Intensive Supervision Administrative Releasing Authority (ISARA). ISARA was developed to increase offender accountability, enhance public safety and incorporate the victim and community, as well as the offender, as active participants in the paroling process. Developed, tested, validated, and implemented a new evidence-based risk/needs assessment instrument for Youthful Offenders. The Global Risk Assessment Device (GRAD-90) was designed specifically for Youthful Offenders incarcerated at SCDC. It is being used to evaluate the risks and service needs of Youthful Offenders returning to their communities under intensive supervision. This risk/needs assessment instrument is currently being adapted for use with female offenders at SCDC, and, eventually, with the rest of the inmate population. The substance abuse treatment program for Youthful Offenders has been expanded from one to three institutions. Recent Accomplishments (cont.):

31 Recent Accomplishments (cont.): During FY 2011, agency budget deficits were eliminated for the first time in three years; employee furloughs have been avoided since then. Overall recidivism rates have declined in each of the last three years. The most recent 3-year return-to-prison rate is 27.5 percent. The average daily inmate population has decreased by 1,259 between FY 2011 and FY (From 23,939 in FY 2011 to 22,680 in FY 2013)