HPRP Outcomes Cindy Cavanaugh, SHRA July 27, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crisis Shelter Program GOALS To stabilize youth and families in crisis To develop stable living conditions for youth To engage families in the resolution.
Advertisements

County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services
Housing First: Where it Works
Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Department of Community Development May 13, 2009.
March 6, 2013 Suzanne Wagner, Housing Innovations 1.
2012 Point-In-Time Count (PIT), Housing Inventory Chart (HIC), and a Tool for Determining Unmet Need Utah State Community Services Office May 9, 2012.
Point-in-Time Count/Survey & Homeless Needs Assessment.
1 Overview of the HUD-VASH Program and the Housing First Model.
HMIS Homeless Management Information System. MISSION To provide standardized and timely information to improve access to housing and services, and strengthen.
2012 Kitsap Homeless Point-In-Time Count Results.
MONTEREY COUNTY HOMELESS CENSUS AND SURVEY 2009 Prepared by The Coalition of Homeless Service Providers Monterey County, CA.
HOMELESS PREVENTION & RAPID REHOUSING PROGRAM
HOW TO MAKE HOMELESS POINT-IN-TIME (PIT) COUNT MORE SUCCESSFUL The Second Annual Nebraska-Western Iowa Symposium on Homelessness Homeless in the Heartland.
 Serenity House › Coordinated Intake › Case Manager’s Tool › Funder Reports › HPRP Requirement › Tracking Performance › Living up to a guiding principle.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) NH Department of Health and Human Services.
General HMIS Resources Housing Inventory Count (HIC) And VA Programs.
HPRP WEBINAR SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 The Indiana Homeless Prevention & Rapid Re-housing program.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Indiana HPRP Training 1. TRAINERS: ANDREA WHITE & HOWARD BURCHMAN IHCDA STAFF: RODNEY STOCKMENT, KIRK WHEELER, KELLI BARKER &
OCTOBER 24, 2012 PRESENTED BY RENEE LAMBERJACK, RESEARCH & EVALUATION ASSISTANT Annual Homeless Assessment Report Presentation to Safe Harbors Partners.
1.  Over 12,000 individuals live in Poverty.  12% of students in the school system receive Free and Reduced Meals  Almost 1,000 eligible students do.
Maine DHHS Subsidy Programs Who Qualifies? How to Apply? Sheldon Wheeler, Maine DHHS Chester Barnes, Maine DHHS Virginia Dill, Shalom House.
Safe Harbors Quarterly Partner’s Meeting November 17, Building.
Department of Human Services Family Services Administration (FSA) Homeless Prevention Services RFA No. DHS-FSA-HPS-2015 Pre-application Conference: June.
Ending Family Homelessness The Basics National Alliance to End Homelessness Conference Seattle, Washington February 7, 2008 Sue Marshall The Community.
2010 Point-in-Time Homeless Count Training for Survey Volunteers.
SSVF Homelessness Prevention
2011 Point-in-Time Homeless Count Training for Survey Volunteers.
Federal and State Funding Shifts to Rapid Re-Housing: The Positive Impact on Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing Programs Audio Conference sponsored.
Annual Point-in-Time Count of Homelessness in Vermont January 30, 2013 TRAINING GUIDE.
MODULE 5: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Indiana HPRP Training 1.
CalWORKS Housing Support Program 2014/2015.  Tuolumne County’s population estimate for 2013 was 53,874  Total area is 2, 274 square miles and the majority.
HPRP: HMIS Requirements HPRP data entry and reporting review 1hmismn.org.
Think Change Be Change Lead Change CT PIT 2013 Program Staff Training January 2013 Training PowerPoint Provided by CCEH CT Coalition to End Homelessness.
Homelessness in Delaware: Summary of the 2011 Point-in-Time Study.
HOMELESS SERVICES: A new approach Ed Gemerchak, LISW Assoc. Director, Men’s Shelter Services.
2014 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) Data Standards for ESG Presented by Melissa Mikel September
Conducting Better Point-in-Time Counts of Homeless Persons Erin Wilson Abt Associates Inc. Washington, DC July 9, 2007.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
Housing cures homelessness A summary of lessons learned from the National Conference on Ending Homelessness July 29-31, 2014.
ENROLLING Clients in Programs Updated April 2011.
Homelessness Prevention Screening Using the Screener Implications of the Threshold Score.
The 2007 Annual Homeless Assessment Report: A Report to Congress on Homelessness in America Paul Dornan, Office of PD&R, HUD Jill Khadduri, Abt Associates.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
HPRP Lessons Cindy Cavanaugh, SHRA Megan Kurteff-Schatz, MKS July 27, 2011.
2010 Florida HMIS Conference 1. Using HMIS to Inform Performance Measurement Outcomes Objective: –Enhance awareness and understanding on using HMIS to.
Housing, Homelessness & Healing An update on Ten Year Plans to End Chronic Homelessness In Winston-Salem and Asheville.
Supportive Housing: Community and Economic Impacts
RACINE COC DATA SNAPSHOT February 21, EMERGENCY SHELTER USAGE
Brap & Shelter Plus Care Programs. BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program.
Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The First Annual Homeless Assessment Report.
Discharge Destinations A Guide For Choosing the Correct Destination Option in HMIS.
EVALUATION OF THE HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND RAPID RE-HOUSING PROGRAM Human Services Agency – Planning Unit Anne Paprocki Goldman School of Public Policy.
Accessing Housing Resources through the LME Understanding Shelter Plus Care Program.
Homeless Connect event
2017 HMIS Data Standards Update
BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program
2017 HIC & PIT January 26, 2017.
Point-in-Time January 24, 2017
Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes,
Minnesota’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)
2017 State of Homelessness.
Without a Home in [COUNTY/REGION NAME]
Shelter Count Training
System Performance Measure Reports
System Performance Measures (SPMs) and Longitudinal System Analysis (LSA) Data Quality 2018.
GR Area Coalition to End Homelessness
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program
CES 101: Making the Connections for Reentry Housing
Presentation transcript:

HPRP Outcomes Cindy Cavanaugh, SHRA July 27, 2011

 APR highlights ◦ Year 1 = Oct 2009 thru Sept 2009  June 2011 updates  Corresponds to HUD’s 2-1-AHAR and HPRP Year 1 Summary ◦ National Comparisons, but individual programs vary widely ◦ y.pdf y.pdf ◦ ssmentReport.pdf ssmentReport.pdf  Additional Sacramento data elements

Exhibit 6-2: Persons Assisted with HPRP by Program Type & Household Type Total Persons Total All Persons Persons in Households without Children Persons in Households with Children #%#%#% Adults2, % %1, % Children2, %00.0%2, % Missing Age1172.7%00.0%361.0% Total4,384100%788100%3,478100% Total Persons Homeless Prevention All Persons Persons in Households without Children Persons in Households with Children #%#%#% Adults1, % %1, % Children1, %00.0%1, % Missing Age812.5%00.0%250.9% Total3, % %2, % Total Persons Homeless Assistance All Persons Persons in Households without Children Persons in Households with Children #%#%#% Adults % % % Children %00.0% % Missing Age363.0%00.0%111.5% Total1, % % %

ss Definitions ParticipantsPersons Households (HH)Individual or Family Household EligibleReceived assessment score with eligibility to receive HPRP Services ServedEnrolled in HPRP HousedReceived Financial assistance in housing ExitedExited program, (small number did not received financial assistance in housing) HomelessLiterally homeless, in place not fit for human habitation, emergency shelter HousedRent housing unit in name Staying with family or friends

Exhibit 6-4a: Sacramento HPRP Year 1, Living Arrangement the Night Before HPRP Program Entry, National Comparison Residence TypeSacramentoNational Total Already Homeless33.6%13.6% Place not meant for human habitation8.0%3.4% Emergency shelter25.6%10.2% Total from "Housing"63.9%81.8% Rented or owned housing unit45.4%66.4% Staying with family13.9%10.7% Staying with friend45.0%4.7% Total from Institutional Settings0.2%1.1% Psychiatric facility, substance abuse center or hospital0.0%0.5% Jail, prison, or juvenile detention0.0%0.4% Foster care home0.2%0.1% Total from Other Situation2.4%3.4% Hotel, motel (no voucher) or "other"2.4%3.4%

Exhibit 6-10: Destination of Persons Exiting HPRP by Program Type DestinationTotal Homeless Assistance Homelessne ss Prevention %% Permanent Housing Destination Living Independently Owned by Client1.2%0.4%1.5% Rental by Client91.6%86.6%93.3% PSH for Homeless Persons 0.1%0.4%0.0% With Family or Friends Living with Family, Permanent Tenure 0.0%0.1%0.0% Living with Friends, Permanent Tenure 0.2%0.1%0.2% % of Leavers in Permanent Housing 93.1%87.8%95.0% Other Housing Destinations Staying with Family or Friends, Temporary Tenure 2.0%0.4%3.6% Homeless1.8%5.8%0.4% Institutional Setting0.3%0.6%0.2% Other (Missing data, don't know, deceased) 2.8%5.4%1.9%

HomelessPrev in PlacePrev Re HousingTotal HH HH #Average $HH #Average $HH#Average $HH#Average $ Rent Arrears5$469548$1,382186$1,377739$1,374 Rent Deposit729$60917$695601$7611,347$688 Utility Arrears116$335304$251208$289628$291 Utility Deposit76$16523$20064$214163$225 Monthly Rental Assistance 791 $ $ $598 2,135 $589 Total Rental Assistance $2,004$1,818$2,057$1,976 Total Utility Assistance0 $ $0 1 $88 1 Total Financial Assistance 824$2,528576$3,222832$2,9032,232$2,847 Sacramento HPRP June 2011Direct Financial Assistance Provided by Program Type

Check-In After Exit Based on Phone and/or Mail Survey as of June 2011 – In Same Housing or Not? – Income Change? Households Reached at 3-months Homeless At EntryPrevention At Entry All Households #% of leavers #%#% 17123%25335%42437%

Homeless At Entry Prevention At Entry All Households In Same Housing 12875%20681%33479% Not in Same Housing 4325%4719%9021% Of Those Not in Same Housing Experienced Homelessness 53%42%9 Couch surfed 116%177%287% Prison or Jail 00%0 0 Total Experienced Unstable Housing 1621%218%379%

HMIS Returns to Homelessness Defined as either entry into HMIS after exiting HPRP or by self-report in follow up survey Household Type Total HH of Type Served Time After Exit% Returning to Homelessness All months.8% HH without Children5706 months4.2% HH With Children8956 months2.4% All HH10579 months4.5%

2011 Point-In-Time Count