Instrumental Conditioning Also called Operant Conditioning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operant Conditioning Skinner, positive & negative reinforcement, response cost, punishment and schedules of reinforcement.
Advertisements

Lectures 14: Instrumental Conditioning (Basic Issues) Learning, Psychology 5310 Spring, 2015 Professor Delamater.
Operant Conditioning Learning = Behavior + Consequences.
Warm up Does punishment really work with teens? If so, when is it most effective? Is there anything that might be more effective than punishment? What?
Learning – Operant Conditioning AP Psychology Chapter 6.
Establishing a Desirable Behavior by Using Escape and Avoidance Conditioning Chapter 13.
Chapter 13, Unit 4 Psychology.  While CC is useful for explaining learned behaviour, there are many other learned behaviours that CC cannot explain,
Instrumental Learning A general class of behaviors inferring that learning has taken place.
Operant Conditioning. I. Operant Conditioning A type of learning that occurs when we receive rewards or punishments for our behavior A type of learning.
Lecture 21: Avoidance Learning & Punishment Learning, Psychology 5310 Spring, 2015 Professor Delamater.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Learning Chapter 5.
Negative Reinforcement
Operant Conditioning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg.
OPERANT CONDITIONING DEF: a form of learning in which responses come to be controlled by their consequences.
Learning the Consequences of Behavior
Psych of Learning.  Famous for “puzzle box” experiments of animal learning.  Examined animal intelligence by testing animal learning (change in behavior).
Learning.
Learning. What is Learning? The process of acquiring new and relatively enduring information Any relatively permanent change in behavior brought about.
Chapter 10 Aversive Control: Avoidance and Punishment.
Operant Conditioning Unit 4 - AoS 2 - Learning. Trial and Error Learning An organism’s attempts to learn or solve a problem by trying alternative possibilities.
Chapter 5: Learning Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
OPERANT CONDITIONING Changing Behavior Through Reinforcement and Punishment.
B.F. SKINNER - "Skinner box": -many responses -little time and effort -easily recorded -RESPONSE RATE is the Dependent Variable.
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 6: Learning.
Operant Conditioning Unit 4 - AoS 2 - Learning. Trial and Error Learning An organism’s attempts to learn or solve a problem by trying alternative possibilities.
OPERANT CONDITIONING.  Many of the behaviours in animals and humans cannot be explained in terms of classical conditioning.  Many complex behaviours.
Operant Conditioning  B.F. Skinner ( ) elaborated Thorndike’s Law of Effect developed behavioral technology.
Chapter 5 Learning. chapter 5 What is Learning? Occurs whenever experience or practice results in a relatively permanent change in behavior.
Classical Conditioning Review An individual receives frequent injections of drugs, which are administered in a small examination room at a clinic. The.
Classical & Operant Conditioning. 1.Classical Conditioning A.Pavlov's Conditioning Experiments Experiment on salivation turns into research on learning.
Chapter 6 Introduction to Operant Conditioning.  What is it?  How does it differ from Classical Conditioning?  Major concepts –Operant Behaviors –
Operant Conditioning E.L. Thorndike and B.F. Skinner.
Unit 4: Learning “Operant Conditioning”. Behaviorism To a Behaviorist: Everything you know, everything you are is the result of human behavior. Psychology.
LEARNING: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS Operant Conditioning.
Operant Conditioning A type of learning in which behavior is strengthened if followed by reinforcement or diminished if followed by punishment.
PSY402 Theories of Learning Chapter 6 – Appetitive Conditioning.
OPERANT CONDITIONING. Learning in which a certain action is reinforced or punished, resulting in corresponding increases or decreases in behavior.
Operant Conditioning I
Learning: Operant Conditioning. Operant Conditioning  Suppose your dog is wandering around the neighborhood, sniffing trees, checking out garbage cans,
Operant Conditioning. Operant Conditioning – A form of learning in which voluntary responses come to be controlled by their consequences. What does this.
B. F. Skinner Radial Behaviorism B.F. Skinner ( ) 1925: Hamilton College (NY): degree in English, no courses in psychology Read about Pavlov’s.
Operant conditioning (Skinner – 1938, 1956)
Edwin Thorndike’s “Puzzle box”. Thorndike’s Law of Effect Your text’s paraphrase (p. 226): The law of effect states that behaviors leading to a satisfying.
Unit 5: Learning (Behaviorism)
Operant Conditioning: Skinner’s Radical Behaviorism.
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D. 1 Basic Principles of Operant Conditioning Chapter 6.

Operant Conditioning (Mod. 19)  B.F. Skinner ( ) elaborated Thorndike’s Law of Effect developed behavioral technology.
PSY402 Theories of Learning Chapter 4 – Appetitive Conditioning.
Operant Conditioning Type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that behavior. Another form of learning.
CHS AP Psychology Unit 6: Learning (Behaviorism) Essential Task 6.3: Predict the effects of operant conditioning with specific attention to (primary, secondary,
Edward Thorndike Acquisition of Goal-directed responses. Law of Effect - behavior occurs in a random, trial-and-error fashion. Consequences of a behavior.

Trial and error learning Thorndike’s puzzle box. Trial and error learning This type of learning occurs when an organism attempts to learn by undertaking.
Trial and error learning Thorndike 1898, 1911
Operant Conditioning. A type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that behavior. The frequency will.
Operant Conditioning Module 15. Operant Conditioning A type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that.
Instrumental Conditioning
Learning: Principles and Applications
Learning.
Instrumental Learning and Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning.
Operant Conditioning.
Learning (Behaviorism)
Operant Conditioning Unit 4 - AoS 2 - Learning.
UNIT 4 BRAIN, BEHAVIOUR & EXPERIENCE
Thorndike Interested in studying animal intelligence
Operant Conditioning.
Learning (Behaviorism)
Thorndike Interested in studying animal intelligence
Presentation transcript:

Instrumental Conditioning Also called Operant Conditioning

Pavlovian Conditioning = Stimulus learning Instrumental Conditioning = Response learning Instrumental behavior = behavior that occurs because it was previously instrumental in producing certain consequences Also called ‘goal-directed’ behavior

Early work in this area done by Thorndike (late 1800s)  put cats in puzzle boxes  the cats had to manipulate a latch to open the door, escape and get food  initially the cats would thrash about randomly until they accidentally opened the door  then the latency to escape and get food would decrease over successive trials

The behavior, or response, is instrumental in, or responsible for, the outcome (i.e., escaping and getting food). Thus, this type of learning became known as ‘instrumental conditioning’

Thorndike interpreted the results of his experiment as reflecting the learning of an S-R association Thorndike believed the cats learned an association between the stimuli inside the puzzle box and the escape response The consequence of the successful response – escaping the box – strengthened the association between the box stimuli and that response On the basis of his work, Thorndike formulated the law of effect

Law of effect  this law states that if a response in the presence of a stimulus is followed by a satisfying event, the association between the stimulus (S) and the response (R) is strengthened  if the response is followed by an annoying event, the S-R association is weakened  according to the law of effect, animals learn an association between the response and the stimuli present at the time of the response – the consequence of the response is not one of the elements in the association  the satisfying or annoying consequence simply serves to strengthen or weaken the association between the response and the stimulus situation

Modern approaches to the study of Instrumental Conditioning Discrete-Trial Procedures  involves a single response performed only at a certain time  rat is put in start arm and runs to goal arm where it receives food  only single action (or response sequence) and reward is given  then rat removed from the apparatus  after ITI the animal is placed in the start arm again for another trial  each response is a discrete action. The speed and onset of the behavior is determined by the subject. The experimenter determines when the subject may begin the action (usually by putting the rat in the start arm)

Modern approaches to the study of Instrumental Conditioning Free-Operant Procedures  more like what you will do in the lab with bar-pressing  here the experimenter decides which behavior is correct but the subject determines when the behavior will be executed  your rats will be put in an operant chamber and allowed to respond at their own pace  subjects can make the response and receive reward more than once  an operant response (such as a bar-press) is defined in terms of the effect that it has on the environment – the critical thing is not the muscles involved in the behavior but the way in which the behavior ‘operates’ on the environment

Cumulative Recorder

Cumulative Record  way of presenting data in free-operant procedures  one response builds on the previous response Response Measures  with discrete-trial procedures can measure speed, and latency to make the response  with free-operant procedures can measure rate of responding (#BP/min)

Studies can also combine elements of both discrete-trial and free-operant procedures For ex., L tells subject when to respond and the subject can then respond at its own pace Responses are freely emitted by the subject, but some control by the experimenter

Magazine Training and Shaping  in order for instrumental conditioning to occur, the subject must make the desired response prior to receiving the reward  how do we train rats to make the response (i.e., bar-press)?  the preliminary phase is called magazine training the food-delivery device is called the food magazine when food is delivered the device makes a noise after enough pairings of this noise with food delivery, the rat will go to the food cup when it hears the noise

Magazine Training and Shaping  after magazine training, the animal is ready to learn the instrumental response  we ‘teach’ the response through a process called response shaping  shaping involves: reinforcement of successive approximations to the required response and nonreinforcement of earlier response forms

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures There are 4 basic types of instrumental conditioning These 4 types are categorized according to: 1. Nature of the outcome controlled by the behavior a. Appetitive stimulus – pleasant outcome (food) b. Aversive stimulus – unpleasant outcome (shock) 2. Relationship or contingency between the response and the outcome a. Positive contingency – R produces O b. Negative contingency – R eliminates/prevents O

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures

1. Positive reinforcement – also called reward training response produces an appetitive outcome that is not as likely to occur otherwise positive contingency between the response and an appetitive stimulus example, rat bar-press for food result: response increases

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures 2. Punishment positive contingency between the response and an aversive stimulus if the subject performs the response, it receives the aversive outcome if the subject does not perform the response, it does not receive the aversive outcome example, shock a rat whenever it makes a BP or mother scold child for playing in the street result: response decreases

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures 3. Negative reinforcement negative contingency between the response and an aversive stimulus the response terminates or prevents the delivery of an aversive stimulus example, put a rat in a box and give him continuous shocks. The rat could jump over a barrier to turn off or escape the shock. this is called an escape procedure subjects can also avoid an aversive stimulus that is scheduled to occur

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures 3. Negative reinforcement (Escape/Avoidance) example, students can study before an exam to avoid getting a bad grade example, a rat may be scheduled to receive a shock at the end of a warning stimulus. If he makes a certain response (BP or jump over a barrier) before the warning stimulus is over, he avoids getting shocked result: response increases

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures 4. Omission Training negative contingency between the response and an appetitive stimulus the response prevents the delivery of a pleasant event if the subject does not make the response, the reward is delivered example, a child is told to go to his room when he does something bad example, suspending someone’s driver’s license for impaired driving result: response decreases

Instrumental Conditioning Procedures 4. Omission Training usually with omission training, the subject can receive the reward for engaging in other behaviors sometimes referred to as DRO Differential Reinforcement of Other behaviors