Copyright © 1995-2004 Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels
Advertisements

SNDT Women's University Introduction to Evaluation and Assessments  Presented by Kathleen (Kat) Miller, Senior Consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton  4.
Training Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation Kelly Arthur Richard Gage-Little Dale Munson Evaluation Strategies for Instructional Designers.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
Evaluating Training Programs Level 5: Return on Investment Kelly Arthur Richard Gage-Little Dale Munson.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.
Kirkpatrick.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Your Training: Kirkpatrick’s 4 Levels Left Click to move to next slide and begin next audio. PRESS the F5 key to begin.
Effective Training: Strategies, Systems and Practices, 2 nd Edition Chapter Eight Evaluation of Training.
Evaluation of Training
OS 352 3/13/08 I. Reminder: Exercise 3 due Thurs. after break. II. Coaching & feedback (continued) III. Greenwald article IV. Training V. Development.
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.
S.M.Israr Training Evaluation By Dr Syed Israr Aga Khan university Karachi, Pakistan.
Evaluating Training Programs. How can training programs be evaluated? Measures used in evaluating training programs Measures used in evaluating training.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
The Effectiveness of Supplemental Online vs. Traditional Tutorials on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement Ponlak Pantahachart Faculty.
Measuring (and Driving) the Value of Training Bruce Winner, Los Rios CCD – Government Training Academy Bruce blogs to the training community at -
+ Training Evaluation Plan Increasing transfer and effectiveness through the proper evaluation of our current and future training programs. I am here to.
Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs ITEC 860 Fall 2003 Aniruddh Mukerji.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING Group 5. Effectiveness of Training  What is “effectiveness of training”? Effectiveness means producing an intended result.
PLAN AND ORGANISE ASSESSMENT. By the end of this session, you will have an understanding of what is assessment, competency based assessment, assessment.
Copyright © 2013 by The National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation. Published by Pearson. All rights reserved. HOSPITALITY HUMAN RESOURCES.
Performance Samples Patricia L. Sitlington, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation. Chapter 6 Training Evaluation Concepts Training Evaluation: The process of collecting data regarding outcomes needed to.
August 2007FFP Testing and Evaluation Techniques Chapter 7 Florida State Fire College Ocala, Florida.
Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation
TRAINING EVALUATION WHAT? WHAT? WHY? WHY? HOW? HOW? SO WHAT? SO WHAT?
Group HR Training & Development Welcome Good Evening 18 th September 2012 Sukanya Patwardhan.
Evaluation and Case Study Review Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
Jing Wan.  Introduction  Logic model  Evaluation methods(Design, data collection, analysis)  Communication & dissemination.
1 Producing Your Assessment Question Mark “Software for creating and delivering assessments with powerful reports”  Copyright 2000 QuestionMark. All.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
TRAINING FOR RESULTS EFFECTIVE TRAINING AS A PROFIT CENTER.
Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Training Evaluation.
Program Evaluation.
Chapter 6 Training Evaluation
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Interviewing PART THREE.
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
Evaluation: Methods & Concerns Otojit Kshetrimayum V.V. Giri National Labour Institute, Noida
SIUC Instructor Workshop Introduction to Assessment and Evaluation.
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Evaluation
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Strategy Tactics & Plans Job Roles Resources Tasks Knowledge, Skills, Attitude Tactics & Plans Job Roles Resources Tasks Knowledge, Skills, Attitude Job.
Training Evaluation Chapter 6
Training Evaluation Chapter 6 6 th Edition Raymond A. Noe Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
Improving Performance Through Feedback Anita R. Webb, PhD JPS Family Medicine Residency Fort Worth, Texas.
Copyright © 2015 by Microburst Learning, All Rights Reserved.
7 Training Employees What Do I Need to Know?
Training on Infection Prevention and Control
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Evaluation of Information Literacy Education
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
PART IV TRAINING THE SALES TEAM. PART IV TRAINING THE SALES TEAM.
Chapter Six Training Evaluation.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.
Evaluation of Training
Education Theory and Practice B ETP520S
Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model
Training Evaluation Chapter 6
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 1 Assessments and the Kirkpatrick Model Using Assessments to Evaluate Training

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 2 Donald Kirkpatrick  Kirkpatrick developed a model of training evaluation in 1959  Arguably the most widely used approach  Simple, Flexible and Complete  4-level model

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 3 The Four Levels  Level I: Evaluate Reaction  Level II: Evaluate Learning  Level III: Evaluate Behavior  Level IV: Evaluate Results  Fifth level was recently “added” for return on investment (“ROI”) but this was not in Kirkpatrick’s original model

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 4 Relationship Between Levels  Each subsequent level is predicated upon doing evaluation at lower level  A Level 3 will be of marginal use, if a Level 2 evaluation is not conducted Level 1 - Reaction Was the environment suitable for learning? Level 2 - Knowledge Did they learn anything Level 3 - Behavior KSA being used on the job? Level 4 - Results Was it worth it?

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 5 Improve Learning Environment Improve Knowledge/Skill transfer Check Performance Environment Check Requirements, Systems and Processes Only by assessing each level can we yield actionable results Level 1 - Reaction Was the environment suitable for learning? Level 2 - Knowledge Did they learn anything Level 3 - Behavior KSA being used on the job? Level 4 - Results Was it worth it?

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 6 Types of Assessments Used at Each Level Level 1 - Reaction Was the environment suitable for learning? Level 2 - Knowledge Did they learn anything Level 3 - Behavior KSA being used on the job? Level 4 - Results Was it worth it? TypeForm Summative Correlation of business results with other assessment results Summative Observation of Performance 360° Survey Diagnostic Summative Self-assessment Test Reaction Formative Survey Real-time Polling Quizzing

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 7 Reaction - What Is It?  How favorably participants react to the training (“Customer satisfaction”) Collects reactions to instructor, course, and learning environment Communicates to trainees that their feedback is valued Can provide quantitative information

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 8 Reaction - What It Looks Like  Questionnaire - Most common collection tool Content Methods Media Trainer style Facilities Course materials

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 9 Reaction - How to Perform  Determine what you want to find out  Design a form to collect/quantify reactions  Do Immediately  Develop acceptable scoring standards  Follow-up as appropriate

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 10 Learning - What Is It?  Knowledge  Skills  Attitudes

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 11 Learning - What It Looks Like  Media used to measure learning: Text Voice Demonstration  Methods used to measure learning: Interviews Surveys Tests (pre-/post-) Observations Combinations

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 12 Learning - How to Perform  Use a control group, if feasible  Evaluate knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes before and after  Get 100% participation or use statistical sample  Follow-up as appropriate

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 13 Behavior - What Is It?  Transfer of knowledge, skills, and/or attitude to the real world Measure achievement of performance objectives

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 14 Behavior - What It Looks Like  Observe performer, first- hand  Survey key people who observe performer  Use checklists, questionnaires, interviews, or combinations

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 15 Behavior - How to Perform  Evaluate before and after training  Allow ample time before observing  Survey key people  Consider cost vs. benefits 100% participation or a sampling Repeated evaluations at appropriate intervals Use of a control group

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 16 Results - What Is It?  Assesses “bottom line,” final results  Definition of “results” dependent upon the goal of the training program

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 17 Results - What It Looks Like  Depends upon objectives of training program Quantify  Proof vs. Evidence Proof is concrete Evidence is soft

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 18 Results - How to Perform  Use a control group  Allow time for results to be realized  Measure before and after the program  Consider cost versus benefits  Be satisfied with evidence when proof is not possible

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 19 Summary  Level I: Evaluate Reaction  Level II: Evaluate Learning  Level III: Evaluate Behavior  Level IV: Evaluate Results

Copyright © Questionmark Corporation and/or Questionmark Computing Limited, known collectively as Questionmark. All rights reserved. Questionmark is a registered trademark of Questionmark Computing Limited. All other trademarks are acknowledged. Slide 20 Readings to Consider  Kirkpatrick, Donald L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.  Worthen, Blaine R, James R. Sanders, Jody L. Fitzpatrick (1997). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (Second Edition).Addison, Wesley, Longman, Inc.  Kirkpatrick, Donald L. (1998). Another Look at Evaluating Training Programs. American Society for Training & Development.  Sieloff, Debra A. (1999). The Bridge Evaluation Model. International Society for Performance Improvement.