Unit 4 Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS building a critical foundation of knowledge needed for comprehending complex texts.
SUMMER ACADEMY KINDERGARTEN – GRADE 2 DAY 1. OUTCOMES: As a result of the summer teaching academy, the K-2 participants will... Gain an understanding.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh 1.Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language. 2.Evidence:
The Instructional Advances in ELA/Literacy CCR Standards for Adult Education Unit 1 Connecting the College and Career Readiness Standards to the Key Advances.
Close Reading in the 7-12 Classroom. What is close reading? Engaging with a text of sufficient complexity directly Examining meaning thoroughly and.
Unit 3 Identifying Questions Worth Answering Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Literacy Meredith Liben of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
Preparing for the National Boards. What Do You Need to Do for Entry 2? 1. Instructional Context 3. Analysis of the Video Recording 2. Planning & Instruction.
Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Supplemental Instructional Materials Aligned to the Common Core State Standards It will take a number of years to develop new curriculum frameworks and.
Activity 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Instructional Shifts.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Huron CCSS Literacy Workshop November Where Are We Headed Today? Transition to Common Core Curriculum Alignments Webb Levels revisited Text-Based.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Unit 2 Selecting Texts Worth Reading Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Welcome to Unit 6 Seminar: Learning The Language Learning and Assessment Strategies 1.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
Welcome! U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education StandardsWork, Inc. New Orleans April 1—2, 2014.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Language Arts and Social Studies A cross-curricular approach to instruction Session 1.
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments
Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
EQuIP Student Work Protocol — ELA/Literacy. Session Goals Develop reviewers’ ability to:  Use the EQuIP Student Work Protocol to examine student work.
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 3.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Got Citizenship? September 12, 2013 Common Core: Close Reading.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh The CCSS & Close Reading 1.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
MATH/ELA ROLLOUT: INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS AND SCOPE AND SEQUENCE.
Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational text. Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary.
Transition to PA Common Core. Common Core Introduction Essential Questions What are the Common Core Standards? What are the instructional implications.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Translating English Language Arts/Literacy Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Instruction November 2015 CCRS Teacher-Leadership Institute.
Reading like a Detective Deeper Reading with Text- Based Questions.
Putting the Pieces Together
Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015.
The College and Career Readiness Standards: An Brief Overview Troy Goracke, Program Administrator;
Aligning Instruction: Key Considerations for Quality ELA Lessons and Units North Carolina Department of Public Instruction English Language Arts Department.
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
ELA/ELD CCSS Content and Pedagogy Grades 7-12: ELD CCSS Shifts and Expectations for EL Programs Taken from the California Department of Education Draft.
Introduction to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET): ELA
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Winn Parish August 2013.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Key Advances and Translating English Language Arts/Literacy Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
6 + 1 Writing Traits Selma City Schools Summer Conference
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Presentation transcript:

Unit 4 Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor, Reingold, Inc. December 2014 The Instructional Advances in ELA/Literacy CCR Standards for Adult Education

Three Key Advances Prompted by the CCR Standards 1.Text Complexity: Regular Practice With Complex Text (and Its Academic Language) 2.Evidence: Reading and Writing Grounded in Evidence From Text 3.Building Knowledge: Building Knowledge Through Content-Rich Nonfiction 2

Key Advances Build Toward CCR for All Students 3

Unit 4 Objectives Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts  Show how valuable a well-crafted writing prompt can be as a summative learning activity—not just for learning to write but also for reading comprehension and building knowledge.  Learn how to identify and create strong writing prompts. 4

Rationale for Building Knowledge From Texts Relevance and Importance Based on the Research  Prior knowledge is a strong predictor of students’ ability to comprehend complex texts. To cultivate their knowledge, students must read and write regularly about content-rich, complex texts. (Hampton and Kintsch)  Writing about what they read improves students’ comprehension of the text (and their writing skills). (Graham and Hebert)  The reading deficit is integrally bound to a knowledge deficit. (Hirsch) 5

Implications of Building Knowledge on Instruction  Provide coherent selections of content-rich, strategically sequenced texts so students can build knowledge about a topic.  Always demand evidence in student writing.  Provide well-crafted writing prompts as a summative learning activity, not only to improve writing, but also to strengthen reading comprehension.  Ask students to regularly conduct short, focused research projects and defend their point of view to create a useful and lasting knowledge base. 6

7 Now let’s do some hands-on work identifying high-quality writing prompts...

Materials (Part One)  Directions for Participants  Worksheet: Writing Prompts for The Words We Live By: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution  Resource: CCR Anchor Standards  Resource: Excerpt from The Words We Live By: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution 8

Directions (Part One) 1.Get out your copies of The Words We Live By, CCR Anchor Standards, CCR Anchor Standards, and the worksheet containing two writing prompts for The Words We Live By. 2.Work with a partner to determine which prompt is aligned to the CCR Standards and which prompt is not. For each of the two prompts you are examining, ask the questions on the following slide to determine which prompt is stronger. 9

Guiding Questions  Is the question worth asking?  Does it provide students with an opportunity to explore what they have learned from the text?  Does it ask students to include evidence from the text in their response?  Does the prompt use the language of the CCR Standards where appropriate?  Is the prompt reasonable for the time and energy allotted? 10

Directions (Continued) 3.After you have decided which prompt is the best, use the CCR Anchor Standards to determine which reading, writing, and language standards are embodied in the aligned writing prompt. 4.Share your results with the group at your table. 11

Discussion Questions  What is the value of the text-dependent prompt compared with the other prompt?  What CCR reading, writing, and language standards do you think students would address when working on responses to this prompt?  What changes in current practice might this type of writing require? 12

13 Now let’s do some hands-on work generating a high-quality writing prompt...

Materials (Part Two)  Directions for Participants  Resource: CCR Anchor Standards  Resource: Eleanor Roosevelt’s Speech to the Members of the American Civil Liberties Union  Resource: Identifying Questions Worth Answering Answer Key for Eleanor Roosevelt’s Speech to the Members of the American Civil Liberties Union 14

Directions (Part Two) 1.Read the Roosevelt text and the high-quality, text- dependent questions written for it. 2.Use the essential understanding or central idea identified to begin framing the prompt. A great prompt should get students to their own grasp of that essential understanding. 3.Discuss possible prompts with your partner(s). 4.Examine the CCR Anchor Standards for reading and writing to determine which standards you want to have students focus on in fulfilling this prompt. 15

Directions (Continued) 5.Agree on and write a prompt. Discuss whether it will produce writing for building an argument (CCR Writing Standard 1) or explanatory or informative writing (CCR Writing Standard 2) and label it. 6.Discuss the prompts you and your colleagues developed, and determine which of them best meets the criteria on the following slide. 16

Criteria for High-Quality Writing Prompts  Require students to gather, organize, and present evidence from what they read.  Expect students to return to the text.  Use the language of the CCR Standards where appropriate.  Give writers an opportunity to explore what they learned from the text.  Require an exploration of the most essential ideas from the text.  Are reasonable in terms of the time and energy allotted to students to complete the task. 17

Reflections  Are any volunteers willing to share their writing prompt?  What makes a good prompt?  What changes in current practice might this type of writing require? 18 18

Next Steps  How has participating in this activity changed your thinking about the CCR Standards?  How will you use the information and understanding you have acquired to improve your teaching practice and student learning?  What additional training and tools would strengthen your ability to do so? 19