Text Complexity Quantitative Qualitative Reader and Task.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reading Complex Text and Exemplary Text Common Core State Standards Carrie Wozniak.
Advertisements

Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 3.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: K – 5 Teachers.
►Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy. ►Compare the CCSS grade level expectations for text complexity. ►Identify the three.
Amy Painter 3 rd Grade Teacher Chesnee Elementary School.
Text Complexity AND THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Adapted from Kansas State Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Series English.
Lexile and Text Complexity Training Indian Knoll Elementary July 2012.
English Language Arts Six Instructional Shifts Focus on Shift 3 Staircase of text complexity - Qualitative Measures.
Close Reading Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
{ Helping English Learners Access Complex Text in the Common Core CATE-FACET: Yosemite Conference Alesha M. Ramirez, Tulare County Office of Education.
Text Complexi ty in the Common Core Classroo m Patricia Coldren Lee County Schools k 12. nc. us.
Defining Rigor through Research and the Common Core Standards
CCGPS English Language Arts The CCGPS in English Language Arts consist of three sections: Anchor StandardsGrade Level Standards Literacy Standards for.
Text Complexity and The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects Carole Mullins Eng/LA Regional.
Text Complexity Common Core State Standards English Language Arts
The Common Core State Standards: The Common Core State Standards: Supporting Districts and Teachers with Text Complexity Susan Pimentel, Co-Lead Author.
UNLOCKING THE TOOLS TO TEXT COMPLEXITY. Agreements We will… – A – Assume Responsibility – S – Seek information – P – Participate actively – I – Integrate.
ELA Coordinators Meeting: Close Reading and Text Complexity Tamra Gacek October, 2012 Literacy and Early Learning Unit Office of Teacher Effectiveness.
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 18, 2014.
1. 2 August 15, 2012 (Part 1)  Provide ADMINISTRATORS with EXPERIENCE & MATERIALS to “turnkey” workshops and informations in your buildings.  Understand.
Text Complexity the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts, Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects 3-5 Learning Community.
WORLD LANGUAGES : A Year of Transition. Today’s Outcomes  Celebrate the start of the school year  Greet new teachers  Explore areas of focus.
Simplifying Text Complexity Module 4. The Dilemma The difficulty in transitioning from high school to college and careers may be caused, in part, by a.
Transition to PA Common Core Teaching Content Copyright ©2011 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 2.
November 18 th, 2014 ELA Review and Adoption Committee.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards. Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction (text complexity) Reading, writing, and speaking grounded.
ATP Science Teachers ELA Science Literacy Standards April 6, 2011 Becky W. Smith, Facilitator P12 Math Science Outreach of PIMSER.
Text Complexity & The KY Core Academic Standards for ELA and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects.
Elementary Principal’s Meeting January Reading Key Requirement of CCSS All students must be able to comprehend texts of steadily increasing complexity.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 3: Text Complexity Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching and Learning.
Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 Content Area Teachers.
Shifts in the Common Core. What the shift are you talking about? Card Sort Activity (10 minutes) Handout: Reflecting on the Common Core Shifts Handout:
College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Montana K-12 Content Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Text Complexity.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS MODULE 4 FEBRUARY 2013 Reading Common Core Focus: Text Complexity.
Overview of Text Complexity Text complexity is defined by: Qualitative 2.Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality.
CCR Anchor Standard 10 – Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently 10/18/2015MSDE2.
Text Complexity and the Common Core Standards for Middle School ELA Waiver Day ~ November 8, 2011 Sherry Birchem.
Text Complexity This portion of the module will explore quantitative and qualitative dimensions of texts as well as reader and task considerations.
We’re not through with you yet!. Educator Enhancement Academy ELA, Grades 2 Day 2 Ashley Gunnoe – Title 1, Wirt County Carrie Cronin – 2 nd Grade Teacher,
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Focus: Text Complexity 3/28/
Science & Literacy - Text Complexity “Beyond the Land of Oz” Sid Larson, Literacy Consultant CESA2 Dr. Kevin Anderson.
Session 6 Text Complexity ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy, Summer 2011 © Maryland State Department of Education.
Understanding Rigor in Reading: Text Complexity and Supported Struggle.
From To Text Complexity. Readability morphs to text complexity ACT (2006) reported on the testing of American high school students for their readiness.
Text Complexity for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Close Reading. AGENDA Demands of complex text on the reader Close reading tools for comprehending complex text Question and answer opportunities with.
Close Reading.  Discuss Model for Text Complexity  Discuss Reader and Task  Define Close Reading  Model a Close Reading Lesson  Create a Close Reading.
Session 3: Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers.
READING STRATEGY: Question-Answer Relationship Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
1 The Role of the Text in Comprehension Reader Activity Sociocultural Context Text RAND READING REPORT.
The What, the Why, and the How California Reading Association October 23, 2015 This presentation can be found on SlideShare at
Text Complexity Accessible and Rigorous
Understanding the Lexile Stretch and Its Rationale Text Complexity.
Introduction to the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET): ELA
Presented by the Iowa Area Education Agencies September 16, 2014.
Participants will:  Become more familiar with Disciplinary Literacy  Identify the importance of text complexity in disciplinary literacy.  Identify.
Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 Content Area Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert.
GREENSBURG SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PA Common Core Standards: A Year of Collaborative Inquiry Professional Development.
Text Complexity Audience: 6-12 ELA Teachers Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy Area V Regional Superintendents of Schools Robert Daiber.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Meeting comprehension demands for Complex text
Three Instructional Shifts
Tackling Text Complexity
CCGPS English Language Arts
Presentation transcript:

Text Complexity Quantitative Qualitative Reader and Task

ACT Report and Text Complexity In 2006, ACT released a report called Reading Between the Lines. The report showed which skills differentiated those students who equaled or exceeded the benchmark score in reading from those who did not. It was not the ability to make inferences, determine main ideas, or to understand words and phrases in context that set the benchmark students apart from the other students.

ACT Report and Text Complexity The clearest differentiator was students’ ability to answer questions associated with complex texts. The most important implication of this study was that about half of our students did not have the higher-order or critical thinking skills needed to be successful in college or in a career.

The idea of Text Complexity is not new: Our renewed attention to text complexity is due to the language used in the State Core Standards. Each time a topic is revisited, we have more research to consider resulting in deeper knowledge. For about a century, we used readability formulas to determine levels of text yet the level of text that is appropriate for a specific grade level remained a mystery.

Revisiting Text Complexity As we currently revisit this topic, we need to go deeper and look at text complexity not only quantitatively but also qualitatively as well as the match between readers, texts, and tasks. Turn to page 5 in Appendix A of your Utah Core Standards to look at a three-part model for determining how easy or difficult a particular text is to read.

Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity Best measured by a human reader Text aspects to be measured qualitatively are: ▫Purpose (informational text) ▫Levels of meaning (literary text) ▫Conventionality and clarity of language ▫Structure ▫Knowledge demands

Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity Turn to page 6 in Appendix A of the Utah Core Standards Annotate: ▫Important information ▫Questions you have about any of the information ▫Important vocabulary

Qualitative Measurement My sketch of Qualitative Measurement.

Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity Turn to a partner and share your annotations. Discuss what you found to be important. Provide clarification for any questions your partner has about the information.

Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity “Stand up, hand up, pair up!” Stay standing and explain Qualitative Measurement using your own words. Throw in a surprise element that will help your partner stay focused as you speak.

Qualitative Measures of Text Complexity Now that we understand qualitative measures, let’s take a look at our texts: ▫Using the Text Complexity Rubric and page 7 in Appendix A, qualitatively measure one of the texts we have been using in class. ▫Complete the Purpose and Meaning, Structure, and Language sections of the metric. ▫Share your thoughts.

Quantitative Measures of Text Complexity Best measured by computer software. Text aspects to be measured quantitatively are: ▫Word length ▫Word frequency ▫Sentence length ▫Text cohesion

Quantitative Measures of Text Complexity Using your trump card sheet as a reminder, complete principles 2 and 3 with quantitative information in Appendix A, page 8. Locate a partner and complete principles 4-6 with the same information on page 8. ▫Annotation ▫Sticky note sketch ▫Discuss and clarify ▫Stand and summarize with surprise element

Quantitative Measures of Text Complexity Now that we understand quantitative measures, let’s take a look at our texts: ▫Locate the Target Grade Level and Lexile Score sections on the Text Complexity Rubric. Using and the grade level band chart on page 9 in Appendix A, fill in the quantitative measure for one of the texts we have been using in class. ▫Share your thoughts.

Reader and Task Considerations While the prior two elements of the model focus on the inherent complexity of text, variables specific to the reader and the particular task must also be considered when determining whether a text is appropriate for a given student.

Reader Considerations Text complexity is based, in part, on the skills of the reader. When students have the literacy skills necessary to read a text, they are likely to understand what they are reading. It is not hard for students who can decode the words to understand the following passage: Annemarie eased the bedroom door open quietly, only a crack, and peeked out. Behind her, Ellen was sitting up, her eyes wide. (Lowry, 1989, p. 43)

Reader Considerations However, when looking at the reader element, more than an analysis of the current reading skills should be considered. The definition of readability should also include: An analysis of the style of writing because some styles are harder to understand than others. Attention to audience and whether the writing was intended for them.

Reader Considerations Other reader variables that should be considered are: Thinking Skills- attention, memory, critical analytic ability, inferencing, visualization, relationships Motivation- purpose for reading, interest Background- vocabulary, topic, linguistic and discourse, knowledge of how to use comprehension strategies, and prior knowledge Content- maturity level, potentially concerning elements

Reader Considerations What aspects of this text would need to be considered for readability in order to read and comprehend this text? Anyway, the fascinating thing was that I read in National Geographic that there are more people alive now than have died in all of human history. In other words, if everyone wanted to play Hamlet at once, they couldn’t, because there aren’t enough skulls! (Foer, 2005, p. 3)

Task Considerations Task variables are: Purpose- Can shift during reading Complexity of the task assigned- skimming to get the gist, studying with the intent of retaining the information Intended Outcome- an increase in knowledge, a solution to a real-world problem

Reader and Task Considerations Reader and task assessments are best made by teachers employing: ▫Professional judgment ▫Experience ▫Knowledge of the students ▫Knowledge of the subject

Text Complexity and the Core As teachers we know that: Students struggle when they are asked to read complex texts by themselves. They do not succeed because they do not have the appropriate related language, knowledge, or skills to be able to comprehend the information.

Text Complexity and the Core Teachers also realize that: When they provide the needed supports, students have greater success reading material that could be initially identified as frustration level. Text difficulty is not the real issue. Instruction is.

Scaffolding Instruction The State Core Standards challenge teachers to provide scaffolded instructional supports for every learner and to do so with complex and difficult texts. As Tim Shanahan (2011) noted, If the teacher is doing little to support the students’ transactions with text then I suspect more learning will accrue with somewhat easier texts. However, if reasonable levels of instructional support are available then students are likely to thrive when working with harder texts. (para. 11)

Anchor Standard #10 Anchor standard 10 in the College and Career Readiness Anchor Standard for Reading covers text complexity. This standard’s wording is deceptively simple: Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently (NGA & CCSSO, 2010a, p. 10).

Reader and Task Considerations Look at the Text Complexity Rubric, think about the students (readers) in your class, and consider the reason (task) for reading the book you chose to analyze. Would this be a complex text that you would use in your classroom? Share your thoughts.

Information taken from: Text Complexity: Raising Rigor in Reading by Douglas Fisher, Nancy Frey, and Diane Lapp International Reading Association. 7 Actions that Teachers Can Take Right Now: Text Complexity by Elfrieda H. Hiebert TextProject & the University of California, Santa Cruz. Utah Core Standards for English Language Arts

Strong Content Knowledge Read “They build strong content knowledge.” (second paragraph, page 7) Underline the key phrases that describe what students will be doing. What is most important? Share with your neighbor How does this relate to our last discussion on Text Complexity?

Integrating Art

The Elements and Principles of Art Through Photography Prezi Finding the elements of art in primary source photographs Finding the elements of art in the world around us Connection activities