(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE 2013-201.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Template 10 IV.Identifying Key Points for School.
Advertisements

Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO)
Teacher Effectiveness and the Student Learning Objectives Process
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Hazleton Area High School
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
This Presentation: 1.Brief background on teacher evaluation 2.Look at the SLO Process Template 3.Critique Goal Statements and aligned Performance Measures.
1 Pennsylvania’s Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Process.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
This morning’s presentation: 1.Brief background on teacher evaluation 2.Look at a 3 rd grade SLO model 3.Awareness of available training and development.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Essential Questions: 1. How does an SLO factor into teacher evaluation? 2. How will the SLO process be organized at Lower.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
Overview for Teachers. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Templates -Assessment Literacy-
Central Columbia School District. Multiple Measures of Student Achievement Multiple Measures of Student Achievement 1.Building Level Data (School Performance.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
This Presentation: 1.Brief background on teacher evaluation 2.Look at the SLO Process Template 3.Critique Goal Statements and aligned Performance Measures.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Overview for School Leaders. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Template 10 IV.Identifying.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Assessment Literacy Series
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) Orientation Module © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) 1 Michele Westphal.
(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
PDE’s Student Achievement Challenge. We don’t want you to feel like this….
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview for School Leaders
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Overview for School Leaders
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR, THE EVALUATIO N OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES SERVING AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SHALL GIVE DUE CONSIDERATION TO THE FOLLOWING: (I) CLASSROOM OBSERVATION AND PRACTICE MODELS THAT ARE RELATED TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (A) PLANNING AND PREPARATION. (B) CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT. (C) INSTRUCTION. (D) PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES. (II) STUDENT PERFORMANCE, WHICH SHALL COMPRISE FIFTY PER CENTUM (50%) OF THE OVERALL RATING OF THE PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYE OR TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYE SERVING AS A CLASSROOM TEACHER AND SHALL BE BASED UPON MULTIPLE MEASURES OF House Bill 1901 Race to the Top Teacher Effectiveness

Observation/Evidence (50%) Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching 4 Domains, 22 Components Principal/Evaluator Observes

6 Domain Focus— Adapted from Danielson’s Framework for Teaching 6 Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities What a teacher knows and does in preparation for teaching. All aspects of teaching that lead to a culture for learning in the classroom. Professional responsibilities and behavior in and out of the classroom. What a teacher does to engage students in learning.

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation (offstage) 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction 1f Designing Student Assessments

Domain 2: Classroom Environment (onstage) 2a Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c Managing Classroom Procedures 2d Managing Student Behavior 2e Organizing Physical Space

Domain 3: Instruction (onstage) 3a Communicating With Students 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c Engaging Students in Learning 3d Using Assessment in Instruction 3e Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities (offstage) 4a Reflecting on Teaching 4b Maintaining Accurate Records 4c Communicating with Families 4d Participating in a Professional Community 4e Growing and Developing Professionally 4f Showing Professionalism

Danielson Framework, Domain 3: Instruction 11

1.Building Level Data (School Performance Profile) Academic Achievement, Graduation/Promotion Rate, Attendance, AP-IB Courses offered, PSAT, Building Level PSSA and Keystone Assessment Data 2.Correlation Data Based on Teacher Level Measures PSSA, Keystone Data 3. Elective Data (SLOs)

A (5)process to (4) document a (3) measure of educator effectiveness based on (2)student achievement of (1)content standards. 13

SLO Concepts Student achievement can be measured in ways that reflect authentic learning of content standards. Educator effectiveness can be measured through use of student achievement measures.

District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements SLO Big Idea We can use student achievement on the assessments listed below to measure teacher effectiveness. How do we do this?

Page 1: Classroom Context, SLO Goal, Student Performance Indicator Page 2: Student Performance Measure, Teacher Expectations Refer to the SLO Template handout.

1a-1c: Teacher Information  Teacher Name  School Name  District Name 1d. Course Title/Targeted Content Area  General Statements: Grade General Music, Elementary Band  Emphasis Statements: A specific concept, unit, PSSA reported category 1e: Grade Level 5th Grade; 9,10,11,12 1f: Students for whom the SLO is written (and why) Statements: 60 students (3 Sections 3rd th General Music, as opposed to all 6 sections—collecting data for a sample of students as opposed to using all students)

2a. The SLO Goal Statement: What is the Important Learning (Content)? HS Choral Ensemble Students will demonstrate independent performance skills appropriate to positive musical contribution in a choral performing ensemble. Kindergarten Classroom Music Students will create, recreate, and express music through the use of their voice, instruments, and movement 8 th Grade General Music Students will demonstrate independent production and creation of music and apply concepts as informed consumers of music. HS Music Technology Level 1 Students will demonstrate proficiency in musical arranging/composing through the use of a Digital Audio Workstation (DAW).

2b. Standards selection Targeted content standards used in developing the SLO. 2c. Rationale statement Explains why the SLO is important and how students will demonstrate learning of the standards through this objective.

1.Know and understand the Standards PA Standards National Common Core Arts Standards (new 2013) 2. Assessment Tasks Authentic to the grade or course Aligned to Standards 3. Assessment Scoring Can describe levels of student achievement toward standards based learning

3: Performance Indicator Describes individual student performance expectation a.What performance measure(s) –tests, assessments– will be used to measure student achievement of the standards, and what’s the expected student achievement level based on the scoring system for those measures? b.What’s the expected achievement level for unique populations? (IEP, students who did not do well on a pre-test, etc.)

Performance Indicator Statement HS Choral Individual Vocal Assessment Task Students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 6 out of 8 criteria of the second scoring rubric. Individual Sight Singing Task Students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 2 out of 3 criteria indicated on the second scoring rubric. Music Technology Students are expected to achieve a proficient level on all performance measures in both Music Based and Technology Based Rubrics.

3: Performance Indicator Describes individual student performance expectation c.Are the performance measures linked? (Must an individual student demonstrate proficiency on all measures to be described as proficient?) b.Should some performances measures count more because they address standards that are addressed more in this course of study?

What’s the Test? 4a: What are the names of the performance measures? 4.b: Who created them? 4c: How do they relate to the learning objective? Are they appropriately rigorous? (Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) 4d. Will the performance measure show growth over time or achievement of the learning standards, or both?? 4e: How often is the test given? 4f: Will certain populations need any accommodations to complete the performance measures? 4g. Are any unique resources (or purchased materials) needed to implement the performance measures? 4h: What are the scoring tools? (test keys, rubrics, checklists, etc.) 4i. What background do personnel need to administer and score the performance measures? 4j. How will student achievement be reported to verify (5a) Teacher Expectations?

5a: Teacher Effectiveness Measure Describes the number of students expected to meet the performance indicator criteria. 5a: Proficient 85% to 94% of students meet the performance indicator.

Proficient!

How is PA planning to implement the SLO component?

1. Provide Models

2. Provide Assessment Literacy Dr. J.P Beaudoin Research In Action Student Achievement Measures Development Design and Purpose, Item Specification, Test Blueprint, Scoring Keys, Operational Forms & Administrative Guidelines, Form Review SLO Template Development Design and Development Calibration and Quality Review

Developing Assessment Literacy Current Training Modules in Process for PA Use Template The SLO Process Training Orientation Module Vetting and Review Training Module SLO Quality Assurance Review Checklist Refinement Control Checklist-PDE Version SLO Rubric Page 1, Section 2 The Student Learning Objective Training Module 1: Design and Purpose Statement Handout 1: Purpose Statement Handout 2: Targeted Standards Template 1: Purpose Statement Template 2: Targeted Standards Vetting and Review Worksheet 1: SLO Rationale Worksheet 2: Standards Selection Worksheet 3: SLO Blueprint Final Page1, Section 3 Achievement Expectations Training Module 4: Scoring Keys and Rubrics Page 2, Sections 4 Performance Measure Training Module 2: Test Specification and Blueprint Handout 3: Test Specification and Blueprint Designs Handout 4: DoK Cheat Sheet Template 3: Test specifications and Blueprint Module 3: Item Specifications5: Item Examples & Item Tag Coding Handout 4: DoK Cheat Sheet Handout 5: Item Examples & Item Tag Coding Module 4: Scoring Keys and Rubrics Handout 6: Scoring Key Example Handout 7: Rubric Examples Template 5: Scoring Key Rubric Module 5: Operational Forms and Administrative Guidance Handout 8: Operational Form Demo Handout 9: Administrative Guidelines Demo Template 4: Operational Form Example (Algebra 1 Post-test) Template 6: Administrative Guidelines Module 6: Form Reviews Handout 10: Quality Assurance Checklist (Final) Vetting and Review SAM-L Rubric

Implementation Process to Date 1.Research from other states and educational resources (RSN, REL, CTAC, Center For Assessment, CTCURRICULUM.ORG, etc.) 2. Develop the SLO process 3. Create models through practitioner development groups

 Develop online resources to create SLOs  Train IU and District level leaders  Take a year to let everyone practice the process 

Questions? (Relax! The process materials will be online!)

Educator Effectiveness: SLO SLO Resources Objectives%20Handbook%201%200%20FINAL.pdf Effectiveness/Documents/SLO%20Manual.pdf Assessment Development Resource: beta.ctcurriculum.org

O David Deitz Consultant, PDE