2 Steel Manufacturers Association Environment & Energy -- Climate Change Update: US Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) May 19, 2009 Tom Dower, Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005.
Advertisements

Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
1 ACT AND ADAPT: CLIMATE CHANGE IN SCOTLAND Climate Change Division.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
Session 3: The Federal Question: Setting a Good Precedent & Positioning California for Competitive Advantage California Public Utilities Commission Greenhouse.
Federal Initiatives Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008 vs. Bingaman-Specter Low Carbon Economy Act Presented By: Jennifer Knorr April 8, 2008.
1. 2 The Problem 75% of our energy expenditures leave the state, versus growing jobs, incomes and revenues here at home. Indiana already imports essentially.
Regional Emission-free Technology Implementation (RETI): Diversifying the U.S. Electricity Portfolio Marc Santos 2008 ASME WISE Intern University of Massachusetts.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
PRME Seminar “Responsible Management of GHG Emissions” Fri 14 October 2011 Gujji Muthuswamy Department of Management Faculty of Business and Economics.
An Introduction to the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage in Ukraine Keith Whiriskey.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Policy Matters Ohio To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition.
The Business Council for Sustainable Energy Business Council for Sustainable Energy Integrating Energy Efficiency into New Jersey’s Air Quality Programs.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
Financial Executives Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Canadian Environmental Policy This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
Regulatory Approaches to Address U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rebecca Stanfield Shriver Center Climate Change Symposium September 30, 2009.
Point of Regulation, Permit Allocation, Uses of Revenue, and Offsets in S (Lieberman-Warner) Presentation to the Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
Cap and Trade and the Western Climate Initiative December 10,
Climate Change Gets Specific – Evolution of Legislation and ACES Victor B. Flatt, Tom and Elizabeth Taft Distinguished Professor of Environmental Law,
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
National Petroleum Council Study Balancing Natural Gas Policy: Fueling the Demands of a Growing Economy September 2003.
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
A Year’s Progress and Promise for the Future. State Leadership Center for Climate Strategies.
Climate Change Mitigation The Global Environment Facility and the Conventions: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.
January ‘06Advice to Minister1. January ‘06Advice to Minister2 Understanding Climate Change Climate Change Action Plan Elements Climate Change Action.
Action Plan « Towards a sustainable industrial policy » An industrial policy for a competitive low carbon economy High Level Group on the competitiveness.
Federal Climate Change Legislation Update on Senate and House Legislation Discussion of Strategy Next Steps… COG Climate Change Steering Committee November.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Carbon pricing: a key mechanism to drive down urban GHG emissions.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Cathy S. Woollums Sr. V.P. Environmental MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company NARUC Annual Convention November 12, 2007 U.S. Climate Policy: It Takes a.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY United The United States of America Schwartz, Swallow, and Wu Global Energy Consulting, Inc.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the Green Economy American Bar Association Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the.
1 The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change Science Program Office Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change.
EEI Energy Efficiency Initiative Eric Ackerman ( Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy April 23, 2007.
Sustainable Energy Solutions © 2006 Pembina Institute Comments on “Carbon Pricing and Environmental Federalism” Matthew Bramley Director,
Climate and Energy Package Open Days 2008 Workshop “ Climate change and the role of regions“ 7 October 2008 Martin Weiss European Commission DG ENV, unit.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Stanley J. Kabala, Ph.D. Center for Environmental Research & Education Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pa. U.S.A.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
CEMENT SECTOR PRESENTATION TO WCI CANADIAN PARTNERS OCTOBER, 2008 QUEBEC CITY, QUEBEC.
The international community’s response to climate change Halldor Thorgeirsson Deputy Executive Secretary UNFCCC.
Warwick Business School The drivers of low carbon business strategies Andrew Sentance, Warwick Business School Warwick University Climate Policy Workshop.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
Legislation to Reconcile Energy Policy with Action on Global Warming: Need and Prospects Robert M. Simon Democratic Staff Director Senate Committee on.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Ontario Industrial EPS Proposal IETA Insights for Ontario Stakeholders Clean Economy Alliance Webinar 15 March 2019 Toronto, Canada.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
Industrial Value Chain: A Bridge Towards a Carbon Neutral Europe
Presentation transcript:

2 Steel Manufacturers Association Environment & Energy -- Climate Change Update: US Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) May 19, 2009 Tom Dower, Vice President Lighthouse Consulting Group USCAP Political Outreach Coordinators

3 Diverse Voices Represented Member Organizations:

4 About our Coalition Launched in January 2007 with the Call for Action Consensus-based, with 25 corporations and five environmental groups Created to articulate the need for prompt enactment of strong federal climate legislation A more detailed Blueprint for Legislative Action released in January 2009 Advocating enactment of legislation consistent with Blueprint and Call for Action

5 The Scientific Case for Action Science is sufficiently clear to justify prompt enactment of legislation Each year we delay action increases the risk of unavoidable and potentially costlier consequences “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report

6 The Economic Case for Action Unchecked GHG emissions will limit economic growth, strain public budgets Legislation to harness market forces to reduce GHG emissions can reduce the economic cost of achieving desired reductions and spur investment in 21 st century technologies which in turn can generate jobs, economic growth U.S. needs to be positioned to succeed in the new low-carbon, global economy

7 Why Do We Need Legislation? Well-crafted federal legislation can:  Create an enforceable mechanism to slow, stop and reverse greenhouse gas emissions  Enable the marketplace to identify opportunities for increased investment and provide the foundation for a low-carbon economy  Reduce the economic cost of uncertainty  Avoid/minimize use of command and control approach  Spur innovations in new technologies  Enhance energy security

8 A BLUEPRINT FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

9 What is the Blueprint? Detailed framework for a possible path forward on climate legislation An approach to achieve aggressive environmental goals in a responsible and economically sustainable manner A consensus of diverse organizations

10 USCAP’s Climate Approach Economy-wide cap-and-trade program Clear linkages with emissions offsets, cost containment measures Allocation of allowance value to transform economy, modernize energy infrastructure, smooth transition for consumers and adapt to the impacts of global warming Complementary measures to spur transformation to low-carbon economy U.S. leadership on international stage

11 Core Blueprint Components Climate Protection 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 Cap & Trade Targets & Timetables Scope of Coverage

12 Core Blueprint Components Economic Protection Allocation of Allowance Value Offsets Cost Containment Climate Protection 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 Cap & Trade Targets & Timetables Scope of Coverage

13 Core Blueprint Components International Principles Technology Transformation Coal Technology Credit for Early Action Buildings/ Energy Efficiency Climate Protection 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 Cap & Trade Allocation of Allowance Value Offsets Cost Containment Targets & Timetables Scope of Coverage Economic Protection Transportation

14 Cap-and-Trade Program Federal cap-and-trade program coupled with cost containment measures and complementary policies ensures environmental integrity, economic stability Declining, economy-wide emission reduction targets Provides incentives to transition to new technologies while ensuring GHG emissions reductions

15 Targets and Timetable Aggressive emission reduction targets for capped sectors as well as total U.S. emissions:  97% - 102% of 2005 levels by 2012  80% - 86% of 2005 levels by 2020  58% of 2005 levels by 2030  20% of 2005 levels by 2050 USCAP recommends program to provide credit for early action

16 Scope of Coverage Goal to cover as much of economy as politically and administratively possible within a cap-and-trade program Point of regulation:  Large stationary sources regulated at point of emission  Transportation fuels regulated at refinery gate or point of importation  Natural gas use could be covered by regulation of local distribution companies (LDCs)

17 OFFSETS AND COST CONTAINMENT MEASURES

18 Adequate Offsets Critical Offsets reduce greenhouse gas emissions not otherwise included in cap Offsets must be:  Environmentally additional  Verifiable  Permanent  Measureable  Enforceable

19 Offset Administration Congress to establish Carbon Market Board that sets overall annual upper limit for offsets within a range  Upper limit starts at 2 billion metric tons  Authority to increase to 3 billion metric tons  Domestic and international offsets each limited to no more than 1.5 billion metric tons in given year Additional offsets contained in strategic offset and allowance reserve pool No “firm-level borrowing”

20 Strategic Offset and Allowance Reserve Pool Mechanism to limit extreme volatility and spike in allowance prices, especially in the early years of program Includes program-based and other governmentally certified offsets and, as a last resort, allowances borrowed from future compliance period at system level Carbon Market Board charged with releasing offsets and/or allowances from the Strategic Reserve Pool at a CMB-specified threshold price

21 DISTRIBUTION OF ALLOWANCE VALUE

22 Our Approach to Distribution “Allowance value” is either the value of a freely- distributed allowance or revenue generated by a government auction of allowances Distribution of allowance value should facilitate transition to low-carbon economy A significant portion should be initially distributed free to capped sectors, including economic sectors particularly disadvantaged by secondary price effects of a cap, to help protect consumers Free distribution of allowances to be phased out over time

23 Allowance Value Over Time

24 Fair and Equitable Distribution Blueprint identifies principles to guide fair and equitable allocation of allowance value to:  End-use consumers of electricity, natural gas, transportation fuels  Energy intensive industries facing international competition  Trade-exposed commodity products  Competitive power generators and other non-utility large stationary sources  Low-income consumers and workers in transition  Programs to achieve technology transformation  Adaptation needs of vulnerable people and ecosystems at home and abroad

25 COMPLEMENTARY MEASURES

26 Complementary Measures and Policies Intended to spur rapid technology transformation and to support the transition to a market based approach to reducing GHG emissions May be mandatory or incentive-based When applied to sectors under the cap, intended to overcome market barriers imperfections that may prevent price signal from achieving actual reductions in emissions in those sectors

27 Technology Transformation Robust program to produce substantial investment in new technologies Federal support for pre-commercial and higher-risk phases of technology research, as well as early demonstration and deployment of new technologies Funding should be transparent, predictable, and accountable; not subject to annual appropriations; and leverage private investment

28 Coal Technology Incentives to facilitate and accelerate early deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology Address financial and regulatory barriers Coupled with these provisions, USCAP recommends new standards:  CO 2 emissions standards for coal plants initially permitted after January 1, 2015  Retrofit requirements for coal plants permitted after January 1, 2009, and prior to January 1, 2015

29 Transportation Economy-wide emission reduction targets require systematic approach involving:  Fuel providers  Vehicle and equipment manufacturers  Consumers and other end users  Public transportation, infrastructure and land use officials Recommendations include improving vehicle efficiency, reducing fuel carbon content and increasing the efficiency of transportation system

30 Buildings/Energy Efficiency Policies and measures that improve energy efficiency are an immediate step Congress can take Emissions reduction programs include:  State- or utility-sponsored conservation programs  Tightened building codes and standards  Appliance efficiency standards

31 The Need for Action “The scale of the undertaking to address climate change is enormous, and should not be underestimated. For this issue to be successfully addressed – and failure is not an option – the way we produce and use energy must fundamentally change, both nationally and globally.” – USCAP Call for Action, January 2007

32 LIGHTHOUSE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC 1150 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 717 Washington, DC Phone: Fax: