1000 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA 94025 Phone 650.853.1660 Fax 650.324.9204 www.cornerstone.com An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR Michael C. Keeley,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips for the Instructor:
Advertisements

Utah Public Service Commission Technical Conference State of Utah’s Long-term Vision for Natural Gas Vehicles September 2, 2009 Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International.
TACKLING CLIMATE CHANGE A Presentation to the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment & Natural Resources ONE TONNE AT A TIME By Michael Gerbis,
ENERGY POLICY MAY 12, 2006 JOHN BUSH. CAN WE ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? What is an energy policy? Does the US have an energy policy? Does California have.
Applying Greenhouse Gas Emissions Lifecycle Assessment Jennifer L. Christensen WISE Intern 2009 August 5, 2009.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A BIOMASS-TO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA Pat Perez- Energy Commission May 8, rd Symposium on Biotechnology for.
Clean Cities / 1 COALITION NAME Electric Drive Vehicles Overview Presenter Title Date.
A THREAT TO RURAL AMERICA Overview of EPA Proposed Rule.
Setting a GHG Emission Reduction Target Asher Burns-Burg ICF International.
Rising Food and Energy Prices October 2 nd, 2008 Corvallis, Oregon A. Michael Schaal Director, Oil and Gas Division Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting.
Page 1 3/13 – Lynchburg 4/23 – Fredericksburg 3/28 – Charlottesville 4/12 – Danville.
Energy Situation, Security and Policy of China Dr. FENG Fei Development Research Center State Council, PR China.
RISING OIL AND GAS PRICES IS GOOD FOR US AND WORLD ECONOMY IN THE LONG RUN By: Harpreet Singh.
Financial Executives Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Canadian Environmental Policy This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual.
California’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Law and Nuclear Power California State Assemblyman Chuck DeVore January 26, 2009 Presented in the California.
Peak Oil Opportunities and Challenge at the end of Cheap Petroleum Richard Heinberg Scripps College September 18, 2006 The Challenge of Peak Oil Richard.
The Science and Economics of Energy: Learning about Solar Energy.
The President’s “Twenty In Ten” Energy Security Plan Allan B. Hubbard Assistant to the President for Economic Policy & Director, National Economic Council.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
Energy Group Khoa Nguyen Brian Masters Elena Jaimes Zach Walker Charise Frias.
Ensuring the Energy, Environmental, and Economic needs of North America Canadian Energy Perspectives.
The Value Proposition for Cellulosic and Advanced Biofuels Under the Federal Renewable Fuel Standard Sarah Thornton, Esq. Director, Biofuels and Biomass.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Demand Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015.
Energy security Professor Jim Watson Director, Sussex Energy Group University of Sussex Research Fellow, The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES OF THE 21st CENTURY by Robert Q. Riley Ford hybrid-electric concept car.
1. 2 Objectives  Describe how hydrogen may help improve public health  Describe the benefits to the environment  Explain how hydrogen may help stimulate.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis How much will low prices stimulate oil demand? For Oil and Money October.
Ventura County Civic Alliance Fossil Free By ‘33 A New Energy Direction Community Environmental Council.
European Commission DG TREN / C: Conventional Energy Greenhouse gas mitigation and energy policy, a European perspective Presentation by Cristóbal.
The Status and Future of Transportation Fuel Technologies for Wisconsin Maria Redmond Wisconsin State Energy Office 2013 Sustainability Summit and Exposition.
California Energy Commission Overview of Revised Vehicle Attributes and Scenarios Energy Demand Cases and Forecast of Vehicle Attributes for 2015 Transportation.
Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the Green Economy American Bar Association Renewable Energy: Legal Challenges and Solutions for the.
2  World oil reserves  U.S. owns 2-3%  U.S. uses 25% The Importance of Energy Independence.
State and Business Action on Climate Change Judi Greenwald Director of Innovative Solutions Pew Center on Global Climate.
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Providing Fuels of the Future Catherine Reheis-Boyd President October 24, 2011 WESTERN STATES PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION.
09/30/03Presentation by Pat Perez, Manager, Transportation Fuels Office 1 The Causes for Gasoline Price Changes in California During 2003 Presentation.
Affordable, Clean, Local Plug-in Partners Campaign Plug-in, Flexible Fuel, Hybrid Electric Vehicle.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California Bioenergy Action Plan Southern California Emerging Waste Technologies Forum Los Angeles, California July 27, 2006.
1 Is there LNG in California’s Future? “LNG: When East Meets West” Zeus Development Conference Long Beach, CA by David Maul Manager, Natural Gas Office.
1. 2 Objectives  Discuss how propane may help improve public health  Describe the benefits of propane to the environment  Explain how propane may help.
The Environment Ms. Dennis & Mr. Patten Participation in Government.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy Prepared for: CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting American Public Power Association Washington, D.C. December.
By: Christina Nahar Conservation Transport.  An effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must include: -Improved fuel economy -Reduce carbon.
Demand Management
California Energy Commission The California Energy Commission (CEC) Presented to the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce March 5, 2007.
Energy Information Administration 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo Energy Trends Since the First Major.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
Assessment of the Economic Impact of Greening Vehicular Transport in Barbados Winston Moore (PhD) and Stacia Howard Antilles Economics November 2015.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
Mickey Oros Altergy Systems Sr. Vice President – Business Development Chairman, Industry Advisory Panel National Hydrogen Association Keynote Session 2:
1 Some Modeling Results for the Low Carbon Fuel Standard International Energy Workshop Venice, June 19, 2009 Carmen Difiglio, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Secretary.
LEVERAGING US EXPERIENCE: INDIA’s ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY ROAD MAP
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
CONSERVATION OPTIONS Global energy intensity — the amount of energy needed to generate each unit of GDP—has fallen steadily over the last several decades.
FOSSIL FUELS AND PROSPERITY
Biofuel Demand Projections In the Annual Energy Outlook
Robert Fabek Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, Zagreb
The California Energy Commission (CEC)
The Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Trends in the Taxation of Canadian Motor Fuels By Robert Lyman © 2018
Environment Committee November 29, 2016
Presentation transcript:

1000 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA Phone Fax An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR Michael C. Keeley, Ph.D. June 29, 2006

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 2 Michael C. Keeley, Ph.D. My name is Michael Keeley. I’m a Senior Vice President of Cornerstone Research, a consulting firm specializing in the application of economics and finance to issues arising in business and complex commercial litigation. I have particular expertise in the oil and gas industries, and have provided economic expertise to the banking, electric utility, automotive, software, health care, semiconductor, chemical, pharmaceutical, and telecom industries among others. Prior to joining Cornerstone Research, I served as an officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and was an economist at Stanford Research Institute (SRI).

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 3 An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR The California Chamber of Commerce asked me to evaluate the California Energy Commission (CEC) 2005 Integrated Economic Policy Report (IEPR) against Governor Schwarzenegger’s goals for California energy policy as stated in an August 23, 2005 letter to the state legislature: –“Adequate and reliable energy supplies… affordable energy… and advanced energy technologies that protect and improve economic and environmental conditions.” My study finds that the CEC’s recommendations are inconsistent with the governor’s goals and will hurt consumers in California. I recommend an alternative blueprint for California energy policy, based on market principles, that would better achieve the governor’s goals.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 4 The IEPR Recommendations The CEC supports an arbitrary, mandated reduction in petroleum fuel (gas and diesel) use to 35% below forecasted business-as-usual levels by 2025 (15% below the 2003 level). The CEC recommends these reductions be made by a mandated doubling of vehicle fuel economy (to 40 mpg) and mandating increased alternative fuel use.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 5 The IEPR Policies Are Flawed The CEC recommendations for petroleum fuel use reductions are unrealistic and unattainable. The CEC recommendations will not result in adequate, reliable and affordable transportation fuel supplies. The mandates would impose substantial costs on consumers and businesses in California while providing few benefits.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 6 The IEPR Policies Would Hurt California’s Consumers The mandates will have an impact on consumers’ driving equivalent to increasing gasoline prices to $5.14 per gallon. The mandates would cost consumers at least $8 billion and 90,000 jobs in the year Mandates for alternative fuels, which are more expensive than petroleum fuels, would increase fuel prices substantially. None of the IEPR’s transportation fuel policy options would contribute to increased fuel supplies, but instead would limit the quantity of fuel consumed.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 7 The IEPR Policies Offer Few Benefits The mandated reductions in petroleum fuel use could increase, not decrease, dependence on foreign crude oil. The policies would have no measurable effect on U.S. energy security. California already has the cleanest burning gasoline in the world. The IEPR policies would have a very small (almost negligible) effect on pollution. California’s citizens would be tackling global greenhouse gas emissions and would receive only a small fraction of any benefits. The policies could be self-defeating since they provide incentives for economic activity to move out of the state.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 8 Petroleum-Based Fuels Will Continue To Be Important The CEC agrees that petroleum–based fuels will be the primary transportation fuels for the foreseeable future.  Demand for transportation fuels will increase by at least 32% by  Recent growth in gasoline use in California (despite rising gasoline prices) implies that California would have to reduce its current level of consumption by almost 25% to meet the CEC target. Even larger reductions than forecast by the CEC will likely be required by Adequate, reliable and affordable supplies in California will require increased production and/or imports of transportation fuels.

An Alternative Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy June 2006 Page 9 A Blueprint for California Transportation Fuel Policy Market forces tempered by environmental concerns will provide the right incentives for fuel efficiency improvements and the addition of alternative fuels to transportation fuel supplies. Regulatory roadblocks to conventional and alternative fuel infrastructure and use, such as a cumbersome permitting process, should be removed. The state should fund university research as a foundation for innovations in fuel efficiency and alternative fuel technologies. The state should educate consumers about fuel efficiency and alternative fuel options. The state should purchase fuel-efficient, alternative fuel, or flexible fuel vehicles for its fleets to the extent it is economic.