ESA ALIVE Initiative A Satellite-Based Communication Channel for the Reliable Distribution of Early Warning Messages The Alert Interface via EGNOS (ALIVE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOA for EGovernment 1 Emergency Services Enterprise Framework: A Service-Oriented Approach Sukumar Dwarkanath COMCARE Michael Daconta Oberon Associates.
Advertisements

Page 1 EGNOS added value in the regulated Tracking and Tracing Services for Livestock Transport EGNOS/Galileo services benefiting to regulated applications,
Edgar Thielmann Applications of the European GNSS INFO DAY GALILEO FP7 Bruxelles 27 January 2009 EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
International Civil Aviation Organization
Introduction to GNSS opportunities in different Market Segments
Vehicle-infrastructure integration: creating co-operative mobility systems and services Hearing EU Parliament, 22 January 2009 Hermann Meyer, CEO.
ATN/GNSS Seminar Varadero, Cuba 6 to 9 May 2002 GNSS spectrum and signal vulnerability issues Presentation 5.2 by V. Iatsouk, GNSS Panel Secretary ANB/ICAO.
Satellite Digital Multimedia Broadcast system : a new tool for Public Protection Disaster Recovery B. MARTIN Workshop.
1© Nokia Siemens Networks 2011 To change the document information in the footer, press [Alt + F8] and use the „Nokia_Siemens_Networks_–_Change_Document_Information“
Galileo Europe’s Satellite Navigation System Professor Terry Moore.
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on "GNSS Applications for Human Benefit and Development“ Prague, Czech Republic September 2010 Jeffrey.
GALILEO OVERVIEW AND STATUS Alexandre Steciw Cracow-23 September 2004
© 2005 Oak Ridge Technology Connection, LLC 1 Global Emergency Communications: The Near-Term Challenge Dr. Eric J. Novotny Senior vice President Oak Ridge.
Satellite Communications Systems and Emergency Communications Dr. Joseph S. Bravman Omnisat, LLC December 12, 2005.
Absolute Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM)
Basic Principles of GPS Mathias Lemmens EU GIS/Mapping Advisor Abuja 4 th August 2005.
Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance
Aviation Considerations for Multi-Constellation GNSS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS): – Augmentation of navigation satellite systems (GNSS). Operational SBAS or Systems being built (beyond study):
New Satellite-based Solutions for Train Control Systems
Aviation Benefits of GNSS Augmentation Workshop on the Applications of GNSS Chisinau, Moldova May 2010 Jeffrey Auerbach Advisor on GNSS Affairs Office.
Refinement of maritime users needs, Brussels December 18, 2002 The Galileo support to the Search and Rescue Programme (SAR/Galileo)
State Services Commission Crown Copyright 2006 RADIO COMMUNICATIONS – APCO P 25 TECHNICAL STANDARD SUITE It is recommended that the e-GIF committee Approve.
SAT expo - Rome 04/02/2010 The SafeTRIP project Guy Frémont - Sanef.
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
GLONASS Government Policy, Status and Modernization
User Requirements for GNSS Interoperability at Global, Regional, National and Local Scales Matt Higgins Co-Chair of Working Group D of the International.
1 Javier Pérez Bartolomé Service Provision and Performance European Commission TREN-G3.
Navigation solutions powered by Europe 1 WORKSHOP: European GNSS Applications in H2020 Introduction Christoph Kautz Prague, 4 February 2014 Navigation.
Galileo: programme status and research activities
GNSS Receiver - Software Radio Concept František Vejražka Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
11 Satellite-based solutions for Train Control Systems European Parliament, Brussels Tuesday, 11 February 2014 Francesco Rispoli, Manager Satellite Technology.
UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Wireless Telecommunications Laboratory M. Tsagkaropoulos “Securing.
© GMV, 2010 Propiedad de GMV Todos los derechos reservados EUROPEAN GNSS EGNOS AND GALILEO. CHARACTERISTICS AND ADVANTAGES OF BRUSSELS. OCTOBER 1 st, 2010.
GALILEO OPPORTUNITIES Viktoras Mongirdas Mokslo, inovacijų ir technologijų agentūra ESNC Lithuania kick-off Vilnius,
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
IGS Workshop 2008 The Galileo Ground Mission Segment Performances Francisco Amarillo-Fernandez, Massimo Crisci, Alexandre Ballereau John Dow, Martin Hollreiser,
European GNSS for ITS: EGNOS contribution ITS WORLD CONGRESS 2011 Orlando– 18 October 2011.
GALILEO The European Programme for Global Satellite Navigation Services GALILEO 03/2004 EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Spazio ZeroUno Cell Broadcast Forum Plenary, Milan, May 28-29th 2002 Andrea Ghirardini Business Development Spazio ZeroUno An efficient and effective method.
Common Questions - Global Positioning System Devices
GSC /10/2015GSC-8, OTTAWA Randolph Wohlert T1A1 Chairman Wayne Zeuch T1 Vice Chairman ETS – Public Safety and Disaster Relief.
Present and Future of China Satellite-Based Augmentation System China Satellite Navigation Office February 2014.
June 2013 Global SBAS Status Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) Interoperability Working Group (IWG) June 2013.
1 WP2: Communications Links and Networking – update on progress Mihael Mohorčič Jozef Stefan Institute.
Automatic Person Location Technologies and Solutions for Public Safety Users Kenneth Hubner International Business Development Manager Sepura Limited.
Timothy Putprush Baltimore, MD September 30, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Presentation to.
SERIT – SG8 Contributo per la preparazione di HORIZON 2020.
Considerations for a European Global System Enrico Saggese Senior Vice-President for Space Activities Coordination.
U.S. International Activities Supporting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Compatibility and Interoperability October 16, 2008 David A. Turner.
INTUG ITU - The Future of Voice Geneva, January THE FUTURE OF VOICE Session 6: Shaping an Enabling Regulatory Paradigm Sergio.
Interoperability, Interworking, Sharing Risto Toikkanen Beijing November
Munich SATNAV, Munich Satellite Navigation Summit February 21-23, 2006 Michael E. Shaw Director, U.S. National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
CGSIC International Subcommittee Prague, Czech Republic March 14, 2005 Michael E. Shaw Director, Navigation and Spectrum Policy U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 EU funding for sustainable energy. 2 Standardisation Ivan Konaktchiev Certification Engineer.
Proprietary and Confidential – Use or distribution subject to restrictions on first page TerreStar Global Connectivity no matter where you are driving.
EasyWay - conclusion.
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System
A New Era in Critical Communications
CONNECTING CARS EVERYWHERE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) Combined Performance International Committee on GNSS (ICG-4) Working Group A Saint Petersburg,
Galileo & EGNOS for regulated markets from a Service Provider perspective “Galileo & EGNOS for public interest services” MENTORE event, Brussels.
GNSS opportunities: EGNOS for Mapping & Galileo for Surveying
Introduction to GNSS opportunities in different Market Segments
Satellite Emergency Communications in ETSI (TC SES)
GRALLE Galileo-based Reliable Automatic and Low Latent EWS
Experiments and Potential Applications
Overview of ETS in Committee T1
Mark Epstein Senior Vice President Qualcomm
Augmentation Service from the Zenith
Presentation transcript:

ESA ALIVE Initiative A Satellite-Based Communication Channel for the Reliable Distribution of Early Warning Messages The Alert Interface via EGNOS (ALIVE) for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation

The requirements for an alert system Overview of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) How SBAS meets the alert requirements The ALIVE concept Possible implementation strategy Presentation Topics

The Need for an Alert System Disasters are as devastating to advanced nations as they are to third world~ Arguably, we are more reliant on technology ‘000’s of lives can be saved by early warning and mitigation Disasters do not respect national boundaries But one type of communications channel cannot meet the needs of all citizens at all times

High Level Requirements Resilient from terrestrial infrastructure damage High level of integrity Institutionally owned End user device must be ubiquitous Global standard, integrated into disaster management centres Cope with several contemporaneous events

The requirements for an alert system Overview of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) How SBAS meets the alert requirements The ALIVE concept Possible implementation strategy Presentation Topics

SBAS – an augmentation to GPS

EGNOS – where we are today EGNOS is due to become operational in Mar 08 Technical performance already stable Differential corrections for GPS Upgradeable to other GNSS including Galileo 1-2m accuracy from wide area corrections Equivalent to commercial DGPS services Integrity alert within 6 seconds if position information is deemed unreliable Free to air at point of end use Signals received via geostationary satellite in same frequency band as GPS

Satellite-based Augmentation Systems Three SBAS Systems: USA: Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) JAPAN: Multifunction Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS) EUROPE: European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System (EGNOS) Global service interoperability

Institutionally controlled, secure, operated for safety of life applications Designed to: guarantee adequate message broadcast provide integrity of messages provide confirmation of transmission Receivers are: based on GPS receivers share same globally accepted standards are the most abundant “satellite communication receivers” in the world Receivers combine capability of receiving messages with the ability to: determine the location of the receiver the three existing SBAS together provide a global coverage SBAS Characteristics

The requirements for an alert system Overview of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) How SBAS meets the alert requirements The ALIVE concept Possible implementation strategy Presentation Topics

The disaster alert proposal… Communication capacity larger than required for system operation - sufficient margin to send additional ALIVE messages Inherent characteristics appropriate for alert messages Ground-based infrastructure is very unlikely to be affected by a disaster/crisis SBAS communication channel cannot be disrupted in a crisis situation (ARNS protected bands) Unique opportunity for broadcasting of alert messages

How SBAS Meets Alert requirements SBAS receivers get alert messages and also have their position simultaneously - only users in target areas need to act Unique worldwide standard - all SBAS receivers are identical SBAS operated with all guarantees - Safety of Life, Institutional control, 24 hours non stop; confirmation message is broadcast in time Can be implemented in very short time Works in places with no operational infrastructure Potential global coverage together with all other SBAS

EGNOS Capability EGNOS has to respect minimum update rate to comply with safety of life requirements – primary mission. Possibly 35% of bandwidth is available A 250-bit message every 3-4 seconds (75 bps) Without SA this increases to 140 bps Compares favourably to SAR preliminary mission analysis requirement of 7 bps.

The requirements for an alert system Overview of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) How SBAS meets the alert requirements The ALIVE concept Possible Implementation Strategy Presentation Topics

The architecture of ALIVE implementation…. The Alert Interface Via EGNOS (ALIVE)

The requirements for an alert system Overview of SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) How SBAS meets the alert requirements The ALIVE concept Possible Implementation Strategy Presentation Topics

Key implementation issues Need for global coverage and international co-operation Technical feasibility and potential affects on core EGNOS mission Receiver compatibility and functionality and implications for device manufacturers System architecture definition and requirements for on-board database – thin or thick client? Institutional convergence amongst interested governments and agencies Development of revised SBAS international standards The need for a flexible data interchange format for collecting and distributing early warnings over information networks and the potential adoption of the OASIS CAP standard

Possible Implementation Strategy Step 1: Presentation of the ALIVE concept to relevant Disaster Management authorities (in progress) Ste p 2: Feas ibility asse ssment of SBA S funct ionality, Step 3: Cons olidation of ALIVE Mission Requirements with expert groups Step 4: Propose the SBAS communication functionality (incl. ALIVE) in the context of the GNSS Accompanying Program for ESA delegations consideration Step 5: Detailed specifications; message standardization; detailed definition study; test services through EGNOS test Bed ; SBAS ALIVE enabled receiver detailed design. Step 6: SBAS communication function (incl ALIVE mission) Implementation Phase and development of SBAS ALIVE enabled receivers Step 7: Opera tional integr ation of the SBAS comm. functi onality (inc ALIVE missio n) in EGN OS Ste p 8: Disa ster prev entio n/mit igati on quali ficati on and start of oper ation s (coul d start in 2008 )

Conclusions SBAS cannot be regarded as ‘one stop shop’ for disaster alert broadcast channel Must be seen in context of suite of channels designed to meet specific needs of citizens Commercial satellite communications Public mobile networks Public fixed networks Private mobile data Terrestrial broadcast (TV, Radio) Internet/ Public address

SBAS – an effective, complementary and inexpensive disaster alert broadcast channel The three existing SBAS together provide global coverage and share the same worldwide accepted standards SBAS GPS combine the possibility of warning with the ability to determine the location of the receiver in the same equipment The SBAS systems, having been conceived as safety critical systems with the necessary built-in features to guarantee timeliness of delivery, confirmation of transmission and service availability SBAS are institutionally controlled and may readily support the necessary regulated structures to control service access SBAS offers a very low operational cost suitable for a public service when compared to most other solutions SBAS (like other space systems) offers survivability in the event of many (terrestrial) disasters as well as speedy restoration after the event

Thank you for your attention