Background—MOOS-IvP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning with Purpose Control Design and Implementation of a Small-Scale Autonomous Hovercraft Ryan Mackay Joshua Bevan Nicholas Lutz Mario Stamatiou University.
Advertisements

Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Working for the future - today
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
Autonomous Mapping Robot Jason Ogasian Jonathan Hayden Hiroshi Mita Worcester Polytechnic Institute Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisor:
MCECS Guide Robot Project Project Update 5/23/2012.
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV)
A.G.I.L.E Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Managers: Dr. Joel Schipper Dr. James Irwin Autonomously Guided Intelligent.
Wireless Ethernet AT-Rover Group 1 Beau Cook, Barry Greenwood, Danny Martin, Matt Patella, Ian Petrie.
GPSBot 08- “Rikki” An Introduction. Agenda The Team Motivation Objectives Enabling Processes Sub-Systems Time-Line Budget Obstacles Continuation Applications.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
FOLLOWER SENSORS AND ACTUATORS EE 552 INTSTRUCTOR :Dr MOHAN KRISNAN BY MOHAMMED KASHIF IQBAL ANESH BODDAPATTI UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
GPS Robot Navigation Critical Design Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Autonomous Dual Navigation System Vehicle Dmitriy Bekker Sergei Kunsevich Computer Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology December 1, 2005 Advisor:
Simultaneous Localization and Map Building System for Prototype Mars Rover CECS 398 Capstone Design I October 24, 2001.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
Deon Blaauw Modular Robot Design University of Stellenbosch Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering.
Introduction to Robotics Electronics and Robotics Club.
1 ECE Department Thermal Mapping Drone Team 17 Jamyang Tenzin Stefan Totino Dylan Fallon Jason Fellow Advisor: Joseph Bardin.
Amsterdam October 2003 M. Sedita VLVnT Installation and Maintenance of the submarine network The Maintenance aspect present some difficult as their.
June 12, 2001 Jeong-Su Han An Autonomous Vehicle for People with Motor Disabilities by G. Bourhis, O.Horn, O.Habert and A. Pruski Paper Review.
Automatic Directional Antenna Azimuth Controller Cezanne Camacho, Andrew Curtis, and Tyler Bowen Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington,
PropaGator Oral Report 2 Andrew Wegener IMDL 2012.
Modularly Adaptable Rover and Integrated Control System Mars Society International Conference 2003 – Eugene, Oregon.
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Development of Control for Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASV) Co-Leaders: Forrest Walen, Justyn Sterritt Team Members: Andrea Dargie, Paul Willis,
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS Department of Engineering Design AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER ROBOTIC LABORATORY Researchers : Dr. Asokan Thondiyath, Mr.
Mobile controlling robot. What is a Robot ? “A re-programmable, multifunctional manipulator designed to move material, parts, tools, or specialized devices.
MAE 435 Project Design and Management II 19 October,
Final Presentation.  Software / hardware combination  Implement Microsoft Robotics Studio  Lego NXT Platform  Flexible Platform.
Background—MOOS-IVP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic.
Team: Justin Audley, Blake Brown, Christopher Dean, Andrew Russell, Andrew Saunders Advisor: Dr. Richard A. Messner Sponsors: Dr. Richard A. Messner, UNH.
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI CI Kick-Off Meeting Devils Thumb Ranch, Colorado September 9-11, 2009 Autonomous Marine Sensing and Control Arjuna Balasuriya,
Swarm Robotics Indresh Yadav.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
Hardware Sponsors National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Phong Le (EE) Josh Haley (CPE) Brandon Reeves (EE) Jerard Jose (EE)
Autonomous Metal Detector Vehicle (AMDV) Jared Speer Lamar Williams Jr. Nathan Stephan University of Central Oklahoma Department of Engineering and Physics.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Remote Controlled Submarine Students Osama Naji Abu-Omar Hakam Marwan Risheh Supervisor Dr. Luai Malhis An-Najah National University Computer Engineering.
1 Structure of Aalborg University Welcome to Aalborg University.
PropaGator Oral Report 3 Andrew Wegener IMDL 2012.
Joshua Petrohilos Supervisor: Nasser Asgari.  Bachelor of Engineering (Robotics)/Master of Engineering (Electronics)  My role: Electrical Design.
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
Software Narrative Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
Heterogeneous Teams of Modular Robots for Mapping and Exploration by Grabowski et. al.
BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display. Introduction BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display  The main objective of this.
UNH FIREFIGHTING ROBOT Ryan Morin, Craig Shurtleff, Andrew Levenbaum, Stephen Tobin, and Liam O’Connor University of New Hampshire: College of Engineering.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Miniature.
Autonomous Wheelchair Tyler Morton & Ben Hoerst Senior Design Advisor: Dr. Stanislaw Legowski Project Advisor: Dr. Steven Barrett ECE Senior Design.
1 Cartel: Cartography (mapmaking) + Intel (intelligence) Preliminary Design Review ECE4007 L01 – Senior Design – Fall 2007 School of Electrical and Computer.
Wireless Bluetooth Controller For DC Motor. Introduction Wireless becoming more and more available and widely used Bluetooth is one of the major players.
INSTRUMENT CONTROLLED MICROSCOPY Mason Jellings, Justin Gearing, Sarah Reichert, John Byce Client: Dr. Joshua Medow Advisor: Professor Thomas Yen Introduction.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
Simulations of Curve Tracking using Curvature Based Control Laws Graduate Student: Robert Sizemore Undergraduate Students: Marquet Barnes,Trevor Gilmore,
Components of Mechatronic Systems AUE 425 Week 2 Kerem ALTUN October 3, 2016.
Autonomous Surface Vehicle
Data Processing & Controls
‘SONAR’ using Arduino & ultrasonic distance sensor
Balanduino Supervisor: Dr. Raed Al-Qadi Prepared by: Nadeen Kalboneh Nardeen Mabrouk.
Rudra Timsina Micah Lucas Marc Salas Advisor: Richard Messner
TMR4225 Marine Operations, ROV systems:
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)
Presentation transcript:

Background—MOOS-IvP Objective The purpose of the project is to obtain proof of concept of autonomy. Our group has been tasked with developing the logic necessary that is flexible enough to be installed on a range of surface vehicles. The logic must be implemented such that it is able to perform three main tasks: Obstacle Avoidance Track & Trail Travel from a waypoint to a specified end point The prototype will have the ability to know where it is at all times and arrive at its specified destination while avoiding obstacles. Autonomous surface vehicles (ASV) are extremely useful for both military and civilian purposes. ASVs can be used for a wide variety of tasks in which human operation is either inefficient and/or too dangerous, including: Ocean Mapping Surveillance Search and Rescue Background—ASV Figure 1: Example of an ASV ocean floor mapping. This same method can also be used for search and rescue. Figure 2: Example of an ASV completing track and trail with an underwater ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle) that is mapping the ocean floor. MOOS-IvP is equipped with tools to aid in development as well as mission deployment. One is the pMarineViewer, which gives a graphical representation of the current state of a particular mission, displays a variety data that is being used within MOOS-IvP, and allows control over the mission through programmable buttons. Figure 3 shows this in motion. Arduino Serial Ultrasonic Sensors Ultrasonic Sensors IMU Figure 3: The built-in MOOS-IvP graphical mission viewer (pMarineViewer) running a simulation of a track and trail mission. MOOS-IvP Communication The payload autonomy interface is a MOOSApp which subscribes to MOOSDB variables that are published by the IvP Helm. It then forwards this data to the Arduino over the USB serial connection, with its schematic shown in Figure 4. At the same time, the interface reads in sensor data sent from the Arduino and forwards this data to the MOOSDB to be read by the IvP Helm. Data that is sent to the Arduino, includes desired heading and speed. Data can then be sent back from the Arduino in the form of position, actual heading and speed, and detected obstacle data. Figure 4: Diagram displaying the map of the communication between the onboard computer and the feedback system of sensors. Autonomous Surface Vehicle Andrew D’Amore, Kristin Therrien, Tom Conway, Billy Lerner—Mechanical Engineering Mike Bogochow, Jeffery Masucci, Cody Noel—Computer Science Graduate Advisors: Damian Manda, Firat Eren Advisor: Professor May-Win Thein NAVSEA POC: Dr. Martin Renken, Keyport NAVSEA Hull Construction The ASV was chosen to be built instead of purchased due to specific size requirements and the need for accessibility. The hull of the ASV has been crafted from fiberglass for durability and strength. This provides a light-weight body to allow easy maneuverability. The dual-motor, dual rudder assembly was chosen to provide sufficient power and precise control for the ASV. A latch was constructed for the top of the hull out of plexiglass and clamps. To prevent the possibility of water leaking into the boat, a foam sealant was used to seal the latch top. This assembly can easily be removed to access and update the interior electronics. Figure 5: (Left) Three-step process of modeling and construction of the hull for the prototype. (Middle) Two DC Brushless motor setup with corresponding Encoder. (Right) Two 120A ESC (Electronic Speed Controller) with their corresponding 22.2V Hyperion Batteries. Feedback System By its nature, autonomy requires a precise feedback system to function efficiently. The feedback system constantly relays environmental and internal information back to the onboard computer (with autonomy installed) such that the autonomy can make accurate decisions. Visual Feedback System—Playstation®Eye Used to detect object of known diameter to determine distance and orientation from said object Essential for Track & Trail capability Sonic Feedback System—Ultrasonic Proximity Sensor 3m range pinging capabilities Used to detect obstacles in 30° field of view Heading Feedback System—9 Degrees of Freedom Razor IMU Triple-axis digital-output gyroscope 13-bit resolution, ±16g, triple-axis accelerometer Triple-axis, digital magnetometer RPM Feedback System—PT series ServoTek Hollow Encoder Used to control the speed of the ASV 30 Pulse, 15V Special Thanks The group would like to acknowledge Sheldon Parent, Paul Lavoie, Scott Cambell, Mike Conway, and James Abare for allowing us to use their facilities and helping us with various construction tasks. Additional thanks to the UNH NASA MMS QuadSatC team for developing the visual recognition program. We’d also like to thank Tracey Harvey and Jenn Bedsole for their valuable input on our project. This research focuses on development of a modular autonomy platform and application to hydrographic surveying. The basic behaviors and controlling electronics developed by the undergraduate ASV team will be applied to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) autonomous platform known as EMILY and all necessary functionality replicated. Additional behaviors will then be developed relating to seafloor mapping, including avoidance of newly detected shoals and automatic development of survey lines to achieve full coverage. A sonar system will be mounted to EMILY for testing these behaviors. Collaboration with NOAA Figure 6: Emily, Courtesy of NOAA