Fig. 1-1: Agriculture-related vegetation types (irrigated crops, dryland crops, and grasslands) cover most of the Great Plains region. There are also many.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
States and Regions Chapter 1, Lesson 1.
Advertisements

2013 N EBRASKA A GLAND M ARKET H IGHLIGHTS by Bruce Johnson UNL Department of Agricultural Economics
Zhengxi Tan *,1,2, Shuguang Liu 2, Carol A. Johnston 1, Thomas R. Loveland 3 Jinxun Liu 4, Rachel Kurtz 3, and Larry Tieszen 3 1 South Dakota State University,
The Midwest Included States: Michigan (MI), Ohio (OH), Indiana (IN), Illinois (IL), Iowa (IA), Wisconsin (WS), Minnesota (MN), and Missouri (MO). Regions.
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Potential for soil carbon sink enhancement in 3 northern Great Plains states.
1 Opening List the major Southern cities and one fact about each one, even if it is just the state it is in.
United States. The West: Pacific States Most of the population in the West live in the Pacific states, with 34 million in Cali. Before WWII, economy was.
US Carbon Trends March 17, USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium1 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Contemporary Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Ridge.
Dave Sauchyn, Ph.D., P.Geo. C-CIARN Prairies Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry Ottawa, December, 2002.
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
Soil C Residence Times Calculate residence times of C pools in previous figure. Measure of response time to perturbations. Table below shows approximate.
The Latest Numbers on Alabama Agriculture November 8, rd Butler/Cunningham Conference.
INTRODUCTION Weather and climate remain among the most important variables involved in crop production in the U.S. Great Lakes region states of Michigan,
Soil Carbon in Global Perspective Two main anthropogenic C inputs are form fossil fuel and soil/plants Main C sinks are atmosphere, oceans and (???) ecosystems.
Agriculture, Water and the California Economy Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference San Diego Friday August 24, 2012 Daniel A. Sumner, University.
Impacts of Climate Change on Corn and Soybean Yields in China Jintao Xu With Xiaoguang Chen and Shuai Chen June 2014.
Texas History The Geography of Texas Physical Geography b 2nd largest state in the nation b b Area is 267,277 sq mi b b 1,240 km (770 mi) from east to.
Regions of the United States The Mountain West Colorado (CO), Wyoming (WY), Montana (MT), Idaho (ID), Utah (UT), Nevada (NV),
Early People of North America LESSON 2: THE SOUTHWESTERN PEOPLE.
Subregions of the United States and Canada
Global Emissions from the Agriculture and Forest Sectors: Status and Trends Indu K Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
Effects of Land Cover Change on local and regional climate Ann Thijs Physical Climatology December 1, 2005 Tropical deforestation, Borneo.
Regions of the United States
Climate Change Impacts in the United States Third National Climate Assessment [Name] [Date] Great Plains.
Climate change and the future of world agriculture MARTHA ANNE DEBERRY SYDNEY FOGLE RACHEL HIMMELSTEIN LEIGH SNELGROVE None Like it Hot.
Lesson X: We will look at the causes & effects of the Dust Bowl Blue text book pages Look at the map & charts and answer the questions below.
FATAL OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES IN SELECTED AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES 2005 – 2012 (Midwest Region) January 2015.
Page 1 Met Office contribution to RL5 Task ‘Large-scale interactions between atmospheric moisture and water availability - coupling of atmospheric.
APCA Importance of Tennessee Agriculture Daryll E. Ray University of Tennessee Agricultural Policy Analysis Center 2010 Tennessee Farmland Legacy Conference.
A Primer on Drought History in Georgia David Emory Stooksbury, Ph.D. State Climatologist – Associate Professor Engineering and Atmospheric Sciences The.
The “Dust Bowl” aka the Dirty Thirties
Drought and Heat Wave of 2012 Midwest and Great Plains Worst drought since 1956 with ~60% of contiguous U.S. under drought, worst agricultural drought.
WATER RESOURCES. What do we use water for? AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY DOMESTIC 25 bathtubs full 37 gallons 2,400 bathtubs full 40 gallons per person per day.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Restoration Monitoring Bruce K. Wylie 1, Steve Boyte.
Oklahoma Agricultural Land Value Update Roger Sahs, Extension Specialist OSU Department of Agricultural Economics.
Oklahoma Agricultural Land Value Update Roger Sahs, Extension Specialist OSU Department of Agricultural Economics.
The “Dust Bowl” "Dust Bowl" was a term born in the hard times from the people who lived in the drought- stricken region during the great depression.
Oklahoma Land Value Update Roger Sahs, Extension Specialist, Ag Econ.
REGIONS OF TEXAS In which region do you live?. REGION A geographical area identified by common features Human Geographical Features Characteristics created.
THE GREAT PLAINS. Historical Perspectives of the Region –Spanish explorer Coronado explained, "this region is the best I've seen for producing the crops.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
©CSCOPE 2007 Economic Regions of the United States Economic Regions of the United States.
The Real “Old West” The Caprock Escarpment divides the Great Plains This region was once home to immense herds of Buffalo Droughts here are frequent,
Sample Slide with Image
Regions of the United States The Midwest
Responses of ecosystem carbon stocks to changes in land use, management, and climate in Ghana Climate Scenarios for the 21st Century 1.No Climate Change.
The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI) An Update on Progress and Future Activities Brian Wardlow 1, Jesslyn Brown 2, Tsegaye Tadesse 1, and Yingxin.
CLIMATE CHANGE CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITY David Skole Professor of Global Change Science Michigan State University.
Do Now-Answer the Following By Yourself!!!! Without Notes 1. Name this State 2. Name the Capital of the State 3. Name this State 4. Name the Capital of.
REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
United States.
Case Study: Food Security
2015 RPA Update: Forest Carbon Projections for the United States
Texas Geography Chapters 1, 2, and 3.
Regions of Texas.
The Midwest.
VegDRI Products Additional VegDRI products for rangeland decision makers and other users will be available at the VegDRI page within the Monitoring section.
Bell Work Figure it out with a partner.
Life on the Great Plains
Climate change of Tunisia
Sample Slide with Image
Weston Mickelsen & Nathanael Baker
Sample Slide with Image
Sample Slide with Image
Rural Geography.
Rangeland Soil Carbon: State of Knowledge
Sample Slide with Image
Roger Sahs, Extension Specialist
Roger Sahs, Extension Specialist
Linda Joyce Rocky Mountain Research Station USDA Forest Service R&D
Presentation transcript:

Fig. 1-1: Agriculture-related vegetation types (irrigated crops, dryland crops, and grasslands) cover most of the Great Plains region. There are also many federal lands located throughout the Great Plains region. (Modified from Kittel and Ojima landcover maps derived from the Loveland (1991) AVHRR analysis.)

Fig. 1-2: The number of farms (left axis) in the Great Plains has been decreasing over the last 70 years, however, the area in farms (right axis) has remained relatively steady during the same period. (Source: University of Texas Population Research Center 1998)

Fig. 1-3: Average historical ( ) precipitation and temperature in the Great Plains region.

Fig. 1-4: In the last 70 years, the rural population in the Great Plains has declined, while the urban population in the region has climbed steadily.

Fig. 1-5: The population in the Great Plains is aging. The number of people who are living in the region who are 65 years old or older has steadily increased over the last 70 years. Likewise, the total population of the region has been increasing, although this growth is most often felt in urban areas, with other areas of the region often losing population. There was a decline between 1980 and 1990 of the number of residents aged

Fig. 1-6: The services industry made up the largest piece of the Great Plains Gross Regional Product in Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries contribute the smallest piece, only about 2%. (Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis 1998)

Fig. 1-7: Although agriculture controls about 70% of the land area in all three sub-regions of the Great Plains (Northern Great Plains = Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota; Central Great Plains = Wyoming, Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas; Southern Great Plains = Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas), the contribution of agriculture to the Gross Regional Product in very small. Agriculture is very important in the region for many reasons, but it is not a major player in the regional economy compared to other industries. (Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis 1998, USDA 1997 Census of Agriculture)

Fig. 1-8: Rangelands and pastures cover over 50% of the land area in the Great Plains, and croplands (both dryland and irrigated) cover another 25% of the land area. (Source: Loveland 1991)

Fig. 1-9: Historical population trends and projections of population to 2050 in the Great Plains. All three scenarios project a population increase in the region in the future.

Fig. 1-10: Minimum (panels a-h) and maximum temperatures (panels i-p) over the Great Plains as projected by both model experiments at 2030 (average of ) and 2090 (average of ). Both the actual values (panels a-b, e-f, i-j, and m-n) and the deviations from the historical period ( ) (panels c-d, g-h, k- l, and o-p) are shown. The projected increases in minimum temperatures are greater than the increases in maximum temperatures. The CCC model produces hotter results in both time periods

Fig. 1-11: Precipitation over the Great Plains as projected by both model experiments at 2030 (average of ) and 2090 (average of ). Both the actual values (panels a-b and e-f) and the deviations from the historical period ( ) (panels c-d and g-h) are shown. The CCC model shows decreases in precipitation over parts of Oklahoma and Texas in both time periods, whereas, the Hadley model shows mainly slight to moderate increases in precipitation over the region.

Fig. 2-1: Atmospheric CO 2 levels have varied with the temperature over the last 150 thousand years. The rate of CO 2 increase in the last 200 years is unprecedented in the paleo-record.

Fig. 2-2: Two hundred years of Great Plains maximum temperatures are shown here. The first 100 years represent historical data, and the last 100 years shows results from the two climate model experiments. There is a trend towards increasing maximum temperatures into the future. (Source: Kittel et al. 1997, Kittel et al. 2000)

Fig. 2-3: Two hundred years of Great Plains minimum temperatures are shown here. The first 100 years represent historical data, and the last 100 years shows results from the two climate model experiments. There is a trend towards increasing minimum temperatures into the future. (Source: Kittel et al. 1997, Kittel et al. 2000)

Fig. 3-1: The CCC model experiment projects the possibility of severe droughts in the Great Plains at the end of this century. The Hadley model projects much less severe drought potentials.

Fig. 3-2: Historical trends ( ) and projections of trends into the future ( ) in actual evapotranspiration (AET), net primary productivity (NPP), minimum temperatures, maximum temperatures, and precipitation in cool-season (C 3 ) grassland regions of the Great Plains. (Source: Kittel et al. 1997, Kittel et al. 2000)

Fig. 3-3: Historical trends ( ) and projections of trends into the future ( ) in actual evapotranspiration (AET), net primary productivity (NPP), minimum temperatures, maximum temperatures, and precipitation in warm-season (C 4 ) grassland regions of the Great Plains. (Source: Kittel et al. 1997, Kittel et al. 2000)

Fig. 3-4: Historical trends ( ) and projections of trends into the future ( ) in actual evapotranspiration (AET), net primary productivity (NPP), minimum temperatures, maximum temperatures, and precipitation in wheat regions of the Great Plains. (Source: Kittel et al. 1997, Kittel et al. 2000)

Fig. 3-5: Average historical net primary productivity ( ) and model projections of average changes in NPP in the future ( and ). At 2030, the CCC model shows the largest decreases in NPP over parts of Oklahoma and northern Texas (panel b). This corresponds to the increase in temperature and the decrease in precipitation projected in this region. At 2090, besides a slight decrease in NPP over the panhandles of Texas and Oklahoma, both models project moderate increases in NPP over the region (panels e and f).

Fig. 3-6: Average historical soil carbon ( ) and model projections of average changes in soil carbon in the future ( and ). Over most of the region, in both time periods and for both model experiments, the soil carbon remains relatively stable into the future (panels b-c and e-f).