ThinLAY Asphalt for Pavement Preservation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Advertisements

Sub-Grade Preparation-Equipment Caterpillar Paving Products
USE OF POLYURETHANE GROUT FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT SLAB STABILIZATION Indiana County District 10-0 Lessons Learned 1.
CUPGA 2008 Western Canada Perspective on State – of - the Canadian Technology Challenges and Solutions John Berti, P. Eng.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
22 nd Conference Roads and Works Asphalt Trial – Outcomes so far Rod Ellis Board Member IPWEA SA.
The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners City of North Bend Pavement Management Plan & Street Utility Fee Analysis February 11, 2014.
Michigan Department of Transportation Perpetual Pavement Rep. Rick Olson’s 2012 Best Practices Conference on Road and Bridge Maintenance Curtis Bleech.
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Pavement Preservation and Maintenance Private Roads Maintenance Workshop August 18, 2012.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
S HANE B UCHANAN K ANSAS DOT AND K ANSAS A SPHALT P AVEMENT A SSOCIATION F ALL F ORUM N OVEMBER 5, 2014 T OPEKA, K ANSAS 4.75 mm (Thinlay) Mixes With High.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Tranlation: EASL’s Average Daily Traffic Time or Traffic Pavement Condition Index Pavement Performance Pavement Condition High Performance Intersections.
Your Roads The Future, Some History, and Alternatives For Wasco County April 23, 2013.
Why Pavement Maintenance and Preservation? Sponsored by: Minnesota T 2 Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
City of Somersworth Presentation to City Council on Pavement Management Presented by: Joe Ducharme, Jr., P.E. Contract City Engineer & Britt E. Audett,
Concrete Paving: Opportunities for Virginia Robert R. Long, Jr. Executive Director American Concrete Pavement Association Mid-Atlantic Chapter October.
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director.  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Pavement Preservation and the Role of Bituminous Surface Treatments—A Washington State View Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 20,
Pavement Maintenance II Part 1a: SurfaceTreatments Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
Preventive Maintenance
Session 3-6 HMA Overlays.
Pavement Maintenance II
Saving Your Asphalt! 36 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference & Equipment Show February 18-20, 2009.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
Performance & Distress of Flexible Pavement Serviceability/Performance Concept.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
Perpetual Pavement Design John D’Angelo Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC Canadian User Producer Group for Asphalt Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Session 4 Preventive Maintenance Treatments. Learning Objectives 1.Identify typical preventive maintenance techniques used on HMA and PCC pavements 2.Identify.
Ultra Thin Bonded Wearing Coarse Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman, P.E. SemMaterials.
National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures. 2 Outline Trends in RAP and RAS usage and practices Motivations for higher recycled contents Barriers.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
Multi-Layer Systems By Vadim Kravtsov Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc 1.
Chip Seal Design Chapter 2. North America (ranked by prevalence) Empirical / Past Experience No Design Method Own Method McLeod (1960’s) - Asphalt Institute.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Deschutes county road department otta seal gravel road conversion pilot project December 7, 2016 oaces chip seal workshop.
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
Thin Lift Asphalt Overlays
Pavement Preservation Techniques Used in Virginia
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Pierce County Pavement Preservation Program
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Barriers to Implementation of In-Place Recycling
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Introduction to Pavement Design
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

ThinLAY Asphalt for Pavement Preservation Tone Garrett Executive Director Mississippi Asphalt Pavement Association Alabama Quality Asphalt Conference

Too Much Month At The End Of The Money Now more than ever we are expected to do more with less. We don’t have the funding to maintain roads we have, much less build new ones. Traffic is still increasing No Quick Fix on the Horizon

Objective What is ThinLay Asphalt? Why ThinLay Asphalt? Where ThinLay Asphalt?

Lawyers behind every tree Why ThinLay Asphalt? Funding Crisis Escalating Construction Costs Declining Revenues Increasing Regulations More Miles To Maintain Lawyers behind every tree Construction Cost Fewer Road Miles Less New Construction Funding Crisis – As construction and material cost continue to rise, revenue from fuel taxes remains flat. This fact creates a situation in which fewer miles of road can be paved per year and less new construction can be expected. Both areas are important. New construction is needed to alleviate congestion and provide opportunity for economic development. Maintenance of our existing roads is important to keep a good level of service and avoid major reconstruction efforts. Dollars Revenue Time

Current Overlay Practice = Never Catch UP Example - Lane miles in MDOT Dist. 1= 5,399 26.2 % of these or 1,405 lane miles are shown in Poor or Very Poor Condition. It would cost over $141 million to do a typical overlay on this 26.2 % Current Funding Level is about $18 million per year. So it will take 8 years to overlay the pavements currently in poor condition.

The Opportunity Focus nationwide has shifted from construction to preservation Lane miles increased only 8% 1980-2009 The value of our National highway and road system estimated at $1.75 trillion Preservation of the system will dominate future expenditures

The Opportunity Map 21 moves the nation to performance management Agencies will be required to track and report pavement condition Smoothness will be an important element in the condition rating

Opportunity/Threat Agencies are looking at new ways to extend their preservation $$ Have developed a 1R (pave mainly) program In Mississippi for the first time the DOT is increasing chip seals in their Preservation program at the expense of asphalt overlays

What about thinlay asphalt? We have promoted thin lifts for many years Have had our successes Many states have made inroads with thin lifts Ohio’s Smoothseal for example In Mississippi with the help of MDOT we have had a good experience

We have a great message We do everything the seal treatments do + We improve smoothness We last longer We add structure We’re faster We’re quieter The public prefers asphalt to chip and slurry seals

So why aren’t we dominating the market? First cost often dominates the decision process Pavement managers have to cover specific numbers of miles annually with available $

So why aren’t we dominating the market? Common Condition rating systems do not recognize the added benefits provided by smoother treatments or treatments that add structure We have not done a good job of quantifying the cost and structural benefits

3 Key Messages Performance benefits Structural benefits Cost benefits

Preventive Maintenance Pavement Condition The difference between the effect of preventive and reactive maintenance is significant. Not only is the timing of application different, but the effect (represented by the slopes of the after-treatment performance curves) is also different. Time or Traffic

Condition Rating Systems Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a measure of visual surface distress “only” Most thin treatments therefore only address surface distress Most thin treatments do not improve ride and some actually reduce ride quality

Present Serviceability Index (PSI) Treatments that both repair pavement distresses and improve pavement profile can restore serviceability to new pavement levels. (Very Good) 5.0 Accumulated Traffic Over Life of Pavement Present Serviceability Index (PSI) Lowest acceptable level of serviceability (Terminal Serviceability) (Very Poor) Preventive maintenance treatments differ widely in their ability to improve serviceability.

Present Serviceability Index (PSI) (Very Good) 5.0 Treatments that primarily repair pavement distresses without improvement to pavement profile have minimal effect on serviceability. Accumulated Traffic Over Life of Pavement Present Serviceability Index (PSI) Lowest acceptable level of serviceability (Terminal Serviceability) (Very Poor) Preventive maintenance treatments differ widely in their ability to improve serviceability.

Present Serviceability Index (PSI) (Very Good) 5.0 Performance more typical of ThinLay asphalt applications. Accumulated Traffic Over Life of Pavement Present Serviceability Index (PSI) Lowest acceptable level of serviceability (Terminal Serviceability) (Very Poor) Preventive maintenance treatments differ widely in their ability to improve serviceability.

Structural Benefits Preventive Maintenance treatments are supposed to be non-structural Slurry seals, Chips Seals, micro sufacing add no structure A 1/2 to 1 inch asphalt overlay does and should be recognized and credited

Structural Benefits Most pavements designed for 20 years with AASHTO design They have finite bottom up fatigue life TENSILE STRAIN

Structural Benefits A seal type treatment applied on those pavements will have no impact on the tensile strain TENSILE STRAIN

Structural Benefits Preventive seals on pavements will only mask the impending structural distresses and eventually lead to full depth failures

Change

Timely thin overlays “Thinlays” can save your structure

Asphalt Thickness VS. Fatigue Life What’s in an inch? Asphalt Thickness VS. Fatigue Life Thickness Micro strain Reps to failure 2” -652 30,234 3” -495 71,537 4” -383 160,693 5” -302 340,507 6” -242 682,133

Structural contribution of 1” A 1 inch overlay of an existing 4 inch pavement will double the fatigue life Once you achieve a perpetual design thickness you can focus on managing at the surface for functional attributes as your structural worries are over

Perpetual 1” at a time Thin overlays add up and can get you there Here is a simple example You have an existing pavement 4 inches thick designed for 20 years so at year 10 you have consumed 50% of its fatigue life

Perpetual 1” at a time If you apply a chip seal at year 10 the strain at the bottom is unchanged and fatigue consumption will continue at the same rate The pavement will develop full depth cracking over the next 10 years, roughness will increase and full depth repairs will be required

Perpetual 1” at a time Alternatively if you apply a 1 inch overlay at year 10 you reduce the strain and extend the fatigue life to near 40 years (5 inch pavement has double the fatigue life of a 4 inch pavement) You now have only used up 25% of the life instead of 50% A second 1 inch overlay at year 20-25 would further extend the fatigue life to beyond 50 years

Initial Costs

Economics of Preventive Maintenance Treatments

Cost Comparison. Thin Lift Overlay = $2.53 per square yard Micro-Surfacing = $1.92 per square yard 32% cost increase

Life Cycle Costs 20 Years, I=4%, assume thinlay =10 year life Average micro surfacing life = 5 years Thinlay = $5.82 Micro Surface = $8.20 Thinlay Saves $2.38/yd2 in 20 Years, adds structure, and provides high serviceability

Life 5 4 9 13

Structure?

Look Familiar?

Pavement Preservation?

WE CAN’T GO BACK EVEN IF WE WANTED TO!

The Idea Whose Time Has Come

Jones County ¾”

Mix Design Requirements Sieve Size Percent Passing 1/2 inch 100 3/8 inch 95-100 No. 4 75 min No. 8 22-70 No.16 -- No. 200 4-12 Gradation ASTM C1252 Fine aggregate angularity of 40 or greater. Up to 30% rap may be used which must be separated on a ½ inch screen.

What Is ThinLay Asphalt?

General Mixture Specifications Mixture Gradation between 9.5 mm and 4.75 mm Allows Producer to adjust Nominal Maximum Size to allow use of available/economical materials Air Voids – Between 4% and 6% Allows Designer to adjust/lower asphalt content while maintaining a “tight” impermeable mixture RAP – Allowed up to 25% Allows Designer to reduce the virgin binder added to the mixture Sand – Allowed up to 30% Allows additional sand – most economical aggregate General Mixture Specifications were developed with help from industry to allow for flexibility in design to optimize the cost.

General Construction Specifications Lift Thickness – Specified between ½” to 1” Allows for economy – Less Mixture Tons per Mile Single Lift Overlay Used as a Preventative Maintenance Technique – Spot Pre-Leveling and Repair of Structurally Deficient Areas Required Density Requirement – Monitored Roll to Refusal Rolling Pattern Established by Nuclear Gauge Smoothness – Slight Improvement Expected As good or better than previous pavement surface Construction Specifications were developed to maximize the Tons per Mile. Depending on the road condition, Thin Lift Mixtures can be designed to be placed as thin as ½”. In reality, ¾” is likely a good thickness for most candidate roadways. If there are deficient areas along the roadway, spot leveling, bump grinding, or structural pavement repair may be necessary prior to the placement of Thin Lift Asphalt. Density – Because of the thin nature of this mixture, density determination by core or nuclear gauge is very difficult. DENSITY IS STILL IMPORTANT. Density is the most important indicator of a long lasting pavement. The specification allows for a monitored roll to refusal. Smoothness – It is expected that even with a ¾” lift there will be some improvement to the smoothness/ride.

Square Yards of Pavement Placed MDOT Test Locations Route/ County Approx. Length AADT Design Thickness Theo. Tons HMA Actual Tons HMA Square Yards of Pavement Placed SR 370 Lee/Prentiss 1.5 Miles 1200 ¾ inch 938 1144 22745 SR 370 / Itawamba 2.9 Miles 1000 ½ inch 1128 1718 40624 SR 371 / Prentiss 1.1 Miles 1500 1 inch 997 930 17449

SR 370 Lee/Prentiss ¾ Inch Before 36 Months

SR 370 Lee/Prentiss ¾ Inch Before 36 Months

SR 370 Lee/Prentiss ¾ Inch Before 6 Months 36 Months

SR 371 Prentiss 1 Inch Before 6 Month 24 Month

SR 371 Prentiss 1 Inch Before 6 Month 36 Months

SR 371 Prentiss 1 Inch Before After 36 Months

SR 370 Itawamba 1/2 Inch Before 6 Month 36 Months

SR 370 Itawamba 1/2 Inch Before 6 Months 36 Months

SR 370 Itawamba 1/2 Inch Before 6 Month 36 Months

SR 370 Itawamba 1/2 Inch Before 6 Months 36 Months

SR 370 Itawamba 1/2 Inch Before 6 Month 36 Months

Preservation Comparisons ThinLay Microsurface Slurry Seal Chip Seal Corrects Surface Distress √ Increase Skid Resistance Minimizes Curb Loss Can Be Applied In One Pass Eliminates Loose Aggregate Corrects Minor Rutting Minimizes Delamination Improves Ride Quality Increases Structural Strength Improves Pavement Drainage

Why ThinLay Asphalt? Cost Comparison – Typical Overlay to ThinLay Overlay Assume $70 / mixture Ton Assume 110 lbs./yd2/in. Cost Per yd2 Per Year Assuming 10 Life 9.5 mm @ 1.5” ThinLay @ 1” ThinLay @ ¾” ThinLay @ ½” $40,656 $27,104 $20,328 $13,552 Lane Mile $0.64 $0.42 $0.32 $0.21 Square Yard 0% 33% 50% 67% Savings Cost Comparison – Illustration suggests/demonstrates how Thin Lift Asphalt can be used to save the cost per lane mile in MDOT’s resurfacing program. Main point – The idea that Cost/square yard/year Life Cycle Cost analysis is important when considering types of resurfacing treatments

Why ThinLay Asphalt? Life Cycle Cost of ThinLay Maintenance Treatments Higher Initial Cost?? – Can be offset by Thinner Lifts Cost/Square Yard/Year Asphalt Mixture with 10 year Design Life Life Cycle Cost of Thin Lift Maintenance Treatments Higher Initial Cost – Later when discussing the mixture specifications, point out the cost saving measures that have been included in the specification. Thinner Lifts helps optimize the cost per mile of resurfacing. Cost/Square Foot/Year – On pavement structures that are structurally sound and have low traffic volumes, a new asphalt overlay CAN realistically last 10 years or more. If a 10 year design is assumed, the Cost/Square Foot/Year goes down dramatically.

Benefits to the Traveling Public Why ThinLay Asphalt? Benefits to the Traveling Public Improved Ride Improved Smoothness Less Road Noise Public Perception Freshly Paved Road – New Road No Broken Windshields Benefits to the Traveling Public Improved Ride – Even at ¾” good paving practices indicate that there WILL be an improvement in the ride. We have excellent producers and lay down crews in Mississippi that will maximize the ride. Public Perception – The public expects and wants fresh, newly paved asphalt pavements. The public perception of a single lift overlay is that it is a NEW ROAD.

Why ThinLay Asphalt? Concept of Pavement Preservation Pavement Preservation Concept – Describe Level of Service Curve vs. Time Motto of Pavement Preservation – “The right treatment at the right time” This mindset AVOIDS/Postpones major reconstruction cost.

Where ThinLay Asphalt?

NCAT Mississippi Test Sections

Where ThinLay Asphalt? Low Volume ST Routes (3 Digit Roads) - City Streets – County Roads Low Volume Roads – The Thin Lift Maintenance Mix is intended for ST type routes with low traffic volumes and low truck traffic. A High Performance 4.75 mm Mixture can be used for MT or HT routes. The 4.75 mm mixture is not covered by this presentation.

Special Thanks I could not have made this presentation without help from: James Williams – Deputy Chief Engineer, MDOT Mark Holly – 1st District Engineer, MDOT

Safe, Smooth, Sustainable Thinlay Asphalt Safe, Smooth, Sustainable Longest Life of all treatments Lowest life cycle cost Superior Smoothness Preferred by road users Maintains Structural integrity Thank You!!

Questions Remember that the only stupid question is the one that goes unasked.