146 th CFMC Meeting held June 24, 2013 SSC Meeting held June 19 – 20, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silk Snapper - Analysis of size-frequency Todd Gedamke (SEFSC) Photo from:
Advertisements

History, Problems and Recommended Solutions Fisheries Data Collection in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands Puerto Rico DNER USVI Department of Fish.
MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES 4.1 ACTION 1: Amend the Stock Complexes in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Units (FMU) Action 1(a) Grouper units Alternative.
 Background › The SSC recommended OFL = average or median catch for most species/species groups and ABC = OFL. › The CFMC asked the SSC to consider withdrawing.
Sheng-Ping Wang 1,2, Mark Maunder 2, and Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva 2 1.National Taiwan Ocean University 2.Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission.
SSC Report to the CFMC on its November 12,2014 meeting December 9, 2014 St. Thomas, USVI.
Population Size, Growth, Mortality and Movement Patterns of Yellowtail Snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus) in the U.S. Virgin Islands CRP Funded Project NMF
Determining relative selectivity of the gulf menhaden commercial fishery and fishery independent gill net data Southeast Fisheries Science Center Amy M.
FMSP stock assessment tools Training Workshop LFDA Theory.
The current status of fisheries stock assessment Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Center for the Advancement of Population.
458 Policies and Their Evaluation Fish 458, Lecture 22.
Generic Harvest Control Rules for European Fisheries Rainer Froese, Trevor A. Branch, Alexander Proelß, Martin Quaas, Keith Sainsbury & Christopher Zimmermann.
Hui-Hua Lee 1, Kevin R. Piner 1, Mark N. Maunder 2 Evaluation of traditional versus conditional fitting of von Bertalanffy growth functions 1 NOAA Fisheries,
ACL Scoping Document CFMC3/24/09-3/26/09. Action 1: Amending the Stock Complexes in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Unit.
The goal of the scoping meetings was to allow the public to comment on the options considered and to provide alternative options not yet considered by.
Allowable Catch Limits for Virgin Islands Fisheries Going Beyond Simple Landings Averages, Anecdotal Data On Species Groups and “One Size Fits All” Management.
SSC Report to CFMC 148 th CFMC Meeting held December 11-12, 2013 SSC Meeting held November 12-14, 2013.
Summary of Caribbean Data Evaluation SEDAR January, /24/09 Todd Gedamke (SEFSC)
Public Hearing Results Caribbean Fishery Management Council 150 th Meeting, August 11-12, 2014 Rio Grande, Puerto Rico Draft Amendment/Environmental Assessment.
SSC Meeting San Juan, PR August 31, Clarification regarding recommendations The Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) has previously stated.
STFA Yellowtail Snapper Tag-Recapture Project and Consequences of ACLs in St. Thomas/St. John.
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Population Dynamics Mortality, Growth, and More. Fish Growth Growth of fish is indeterminate Affected by: –Food abundance –Weather –Competition –Other.
Spatial and temporal variation in stock abundance of queen conch, Strombus gigas, in the US Virgin Islands Research conducted by Gordon & Tobias Department.
OPTIONS FOR AMENDMENT 2 TO THE FMP FOR THE QUEEN CONCH FISHERY OF PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS AND AMENDMENT 5 TO THE REEF FISH FMP OF PUERTO.
REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND STATISTICAL COMMITTEE Caribbean Fishery Management Council Scientific and Statistical Committee Oct 30 & 31 and Nov 1, 2012.
Final Annual Catch Limit Guidance Prepared by Andy Strelcheck (NMFS, SERO) Presented by Joe Kimmel.
Surplus-Production Models
STFA/SCCFA/CFMC Spiny Lobster Project David Olsen, STFA Josh Nowlis, Bridge Environment Daryl Bryan, STFA Funded by Caribbean Fishery Management Council.
SEDAR 42: US Gulf of Mexico Red grouper assessment Review Workshop Data inputs SEFSC July , 2015.
Revisiting the SSC Decision to Use all Available Data to Calculate Average Landings/OFLs/ABCs Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
Summer Flounder Review of 2015 Management Measures August 13, 2014.
Amendment 3 to the Fishery Management Plan for Queen Conch Resources of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
MARFIN & Saltonstall-Kennedy, and SEFSC Projects in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands SEFSC Bonnie J. Ponwith, Ph.D. CFMC August, 2015.
Summary of Atlantic Swordfish Species Working Group Discussion (see also SCI -021)
Caribbean Fishery Management Council 137 th Meeting March , St. Thomas, USVI.
Utilize commercial landings data by island (PR, STX, and STT) for (queen conch – STX and PR only) and (snapper unit 1, grouper unit.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
West Atlantic bluefin tuna Executive Summary. Biology Continued progress in knowledge of bluefin biology, but the complex behaviour of this species means.
Extending length-based models for data-limited fisheries into a state-space framework Merrill B. Rudd* and James T. Thorson *PhD Student, School of Aquatic.
SEDAR 42: US Gulf of Mexico Red grouper assessment Review Workshop Introduction SEFSC July , 2015.
SEDAR Caribbean Data Evaluation Workshop San Juan, Puerto Rico January 26-29, 2009 Data Evaluation And Advice Potential.
STFA Spiny Lobster Project Third Progress Report 8/12/2013.
SEDAR Update Policies and Procedures, Assessment Classifications, & SEDAR 26 Activities Prepared for the June 2011 Caribbean Council Meeting Julie A Neer.
Annual Catch Limits & NS1 Guidelines. 2 Requirements of the 2006 MSRA Annual catch limits and accountability measures must be implemented: in fishing.
Framework Action to Adjust the Buffer between the OFL and ACL for Snappers and Groupers In the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of Puerto.
Action 1 Alternative 1: Status quo MANAGEMENT REFERENCE POINT STATUS QUO DEFINITION Maximum Sustainable Yield Queen Conch, Spiny Lobster & Reef Fish MSY.
1 Climate Change and Implications for Management of North Sea Cod (Gadus morhua) L.T. Kell, G.M. Pilling and C.M. O’Brien CEFAS, Lowestoft.
Comprehensive Amendment to the U.S. Caribbean Fishery Management Plans Annual Catch Limit Control Rule 149 th Caribbean Fishery Management Council Meeting.
Application of Data-Limited Methods (SEDAR 46) and Potential Use for Management Shannon L. Cass-Calay, Nancie Cummings, Skyler Sagarese, Tom Carruthers.
Population Dynamics and Stock Assessment of Red King Crab in Bristol Bay, Alaska Jie Zheng Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska, USA.
USVI Commercial Catch Form Status. USVI Commercial Catch Form Developed as part of the Caribbean Commercial Data Improvement Project –USVI Department.
Delay-difference models. Readings Ecological Detective, p. 244–246 Hilborn and Walters Chapter 9.
ACL DETERMINATION STEPS TO FOLLOW ACTIONS 2 AND 3.
Goliath Grouper South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Scientific and Statistical Committee meeting April 6, 2011.
PRINCIPLES OF STOCK ASSESSMENT. Aims of stock assessment The overall aim of fisheries science is to provide information to managers on the state and life.
History of the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) U.S. Virgin Islands Marine Recreational.
Managing Stock Complexes Using Indicator Species: Pros and Cons
Development of Island-Based Fishery Management Plans
Caribbean Fishery Management Council
SEDAR 49 Assessment Review Workshop: Gulf of Mexico ABC Control Rule and DLM Theory in a Nutshell November 1, 2016 Jeff Isely, Skyler.
Report of the Scientific and Statistical Committee
Effects of Catch-at-Age Sample Size on Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish Spawning Stock Biomass Estimates Jeff Isely SEFSC Miami.
Recommendations from the ACLG
ACL Overages and AM-based Season Length Reductions
COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENT 2 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE QUEEN CONCH FISHERY OF PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN.
ACL Scoping Document CFMC 3/24/09-3/26/09.
Landings, ACLs, AMs, and OFLs for the Puerto Rico Commercial Sector
PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENT 2 TO THE FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE QUEEN CONCH FISHERY OF PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS AND AMENDMENT 5.
Landings, ACLs, AMs, and OFLs
Presentation transcript:

146 th CFMC Meeting held June 24, 2013 SSC Meeting held June 19 – 20, 2013

SEDAR 30: Assessed blue tang and queen triggerfish TIP data from Juvenile blue tang Acanthurus coeruleus Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula L. Johnson, Fishbase Barbara Kojis

School of primarily blue tang at Buck Island St. Croix, USVI

Goal of SEDAR 30 Determine stock status for blue tang and queen triggerfish Given data limitations abundance could not be determined Conducted mean length analyses to evaluate stock status in terms of mortality U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 4

Data sources reviewed during SEDAR 30 Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) Puerto Rico only Commercial landings By island platform and gear Trip Interview Program (TIP) Life history information Published literature U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 5

MRFSS in Puerto Rico Blue tang Five intercepted trips that retained or indicated discarding blue tang Two length measurements Queen triggerfish Less than 20 intercepted trips per year retained or discarded queen triggerfish Sixty length measurements Was not used for assessment U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 6

Commercial landings USVI catch reported as snapper/grouper or finfish 1997 – reported to species group Surgeonfishes Triggerifshes Puerto Rico Species specific Known problems with under-reporting Commercial landings were not used for assessment U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 7

Trip Interview Program – Blue tang U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 12 IslandGear type Number of Samples Number of years sampled Average number of samples per year -Pots & traps621- Puerto RicoHook & line111 Puerto RicoNets Puerto RicoPots & traps St. Thomas/ St JohnHook & line St. Thomas/ St JohnNets St. Thomas/ St JohnPots & traps St. CroixHook & line90330 St. CroixNets St. CroixPots & traps

Trip Interview Program – Queen triggerfish IslandGear type Number of Samples Number of years sampled Average # of samples per year -Pots & traps1222- Puerto Rico Dive/Spear/By Hand Puerto RicoHook & line Puerto RicoNets Puerto RicoPots & traps St. Thomas/St John Dive/Spear/By Hand616 St. Thomas/St JohnHook & line St. Thomas/St JohnNets221 St. Thomas/St JohnPots & traps St. Croix Dive/Spear/By Hand St. CroixHook & line St. CroixNets St. CroixPots & traps

Mean length analysis Length-frequency data were adequate for the pot and trap fisheries for both species Except in Puerto Rico for blue tang Used the Gedamke-Hoenig mean length estimator to obtain estimates of total mortality and evaluate how mortality has changed over time U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 14

Mean length analysis U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 15

Mean length analysis Beverton-Holt mean length mortality estimator U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 16 length at which all animals are fully vulnerable to gear mean lengthtotal mortality growth rate maximum length

TIP length-frequency data – blue tang U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 17 N = 860 N = 498 N =223 N = 66 N = 499 N = 840

TIP length-frequency data – blue tang U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 18 N = N = 3340 N =11771 N = 2104 N = 629 N = 1175

TIP length-frequency data – queen triggerfish U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 19 N = 2631 N = 323 N =1062 N = 536 N = 37 N =328

TIP length-frequency data – queen triggerfish U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 20 N = 2224 N = 876 N =495 N = 276 N = 3221 N =638

TIP length-frequency data – queen triggerfish U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21 N = 3919 N = 888 N = 2168 N = 757 N = 199 N =94

Blue tang life history information U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 22 Length -age L t = L ∞ (1-e K(t- to) ) Location t max (years)L max (mm)L∞L∞ Ktoto nSource San Blas SL Choat and Robertson (2002) Belize FL188 FL Mutz (2006) Los Roques FL199 FL Mutz (2006) Margarita FL---74Mutz (2006) San Blas FL231 FL0.490 ‐ Mutz (2006) Asencion FL Choat and Robertson (2002) Lee Stocking FL Choat and Robertson (2002) Asencion FL244 FL Mutz (2006) Bermuda FL203 FL Mutz (2006) Lee Stocking FL219 FL Mutz (2006)

Blue tang growth curves U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 23

Queen triggerfish life history information U.S. Departmen t of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administra tion | NOAA Fisheries | Page 24 Length -age L t = L ∞ (1-e K(t- to) ) Location t max (years) L max (mm)L∞L∞ Ktoto nSource Jamaica-447 FL Aiken (1975) PR-546 FL---- Bohnsack and Harper (1988) STT & STJ-465 FL---- Bohnsack and Harper (1988) PR & USVI7-415 FL Manooch and Drennon (1987) PR-760 FL----Pagán 2002 St. John-385 FL----Randall (1962) USVI-572 FL----Randall (1968) Brazil14460 FL441 FL de Albuquerque et al. (2011) south Florida-425 FL---- Bohnsack and Harper (1988) Brazil-450 FL----Menezes (1979)

Queen triggerfish growth curves U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 25

Mean length analysis Model is run first assuming no change in mortality and then with increased complexity Sensitivity analysis was conducted to characterize uncertainty in the mortality estimates U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 26

Blue tang, St. Thomas U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 27 L c = 19cm, L ∞ = 23.1cm, K = 0.49 Z 1983 = 0.09 Z = 0.4

Comparison of fishing mortality and natural mortality Blue tang, St. Thomas/St. John U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 28 Frequency Cumulative percent F/M

Comparison of fishing mortality and natural mortality Blue tang, St. Croix U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 29 Frequency Cumulative percent F/M

Queen triggerfish, Puerto Rico U.S. Departmen t of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administra tion | NOAA Fisheries | Page 30 L c = 29cm, L ∞ = 41.5cm, and K = 0.3y -1

Comparison of fishing mortality and natural mortality Queen triggerfish, Puerto Rico U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 31 Frequency Cumulative percent F/M

Queen triggerfish, St. Thomas/St. John U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 32 L c = 34cm, L ∞ = 41.5cm, and K = 0.3y -1

Comparison of fishing mortality and natural mortality Queen triggerfish, St. Thomas/St. John U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 33 Frequency Cumulative percent F/M

Queen triggerfish, St. Croix U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 34 L c = 28cm, L ∞ = 41.5cm, and K = 0.3y -1 Z = 0.7 Z = 1.07

Comparison of fishing mortality and natural mortality Queen triggerfish, St. Croix U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 35 Frequency Cumulative percent F/M

Main conclusions from AW report for blue tang: Puerto Rico The AW panel decided that data was insufficient to conduct length-based analysis. St. Thomas / St. John Results from length-based analysis suggests that total mortality increased, Year of change and magnitude of change was variable among the sensitivity runs. Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). Annual length-frequency data have been relatively stable over the time series. St. Croix Results from length-based analysis suggests that total mortality increased in 1983 (first year of available data), Magnitude of change was variable and dependent on parameter inputs. Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). Annual length-frequency data have been stable between Puerto Rico The AW panel decided that data was insufficient to conduct length-based analysis. St. Thomas / St. John Results from length-based analysis suggests that total mortality increased, Year of change and magnitude of change was variable among the sensitivity runs. Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). Annual length-frequency data have been relatively stable over the time series. St. Croix Results from length-based analysis suggests that total mortality increased in 1983 (first year of available data), Magnitude of change was variable and dependent on parameter inputs. Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). Annual length-frequency data have been stable between U.S. Departmen t of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administra tion | NOAA Fisheries | Page 36

Main conclusions from AW report for blue tang: General conclusions Available age-growth relationships suggest two possible explanations of growth (k = 0.4 or k = 0.8-1) adding to the uncertainty surrounding the mortality estimates Well-designed growth studies are needed for this species Age-growth relationship erodes at an early age relative to the blue tang life span Length analysis may be inappropriate for this species Collection of catch-at-age data may be more appropriate to adequately describe changes in blue tang population structure. General conclusions Available age-growth relationships suggest two possible explanations of growth (k = 0.4 or k = 0.8-1) adding to the uncertainty surrounding the mortality estimates Well-designed growth studies are needed for this species Age-growth relationship erodes at an early age relative to the blue tang life span Length analysis may be inappropriate for this species Collection of catch-at-age data may be more appropriate to adequately describe changes in blue tang population structure. U.S. Departmen t of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administra tion | NOAA Fisheries | Page 37

Main conclusions from AW report for queen triggerfish: Puerto Rico Results from length analysis suggest that total mortality declined in 1998 or 1999, An increase in mean length can be due to reduction in mortality or expansion to relatively unfished areas. Without detailed spatial catch data, it is difficult to separate these effects Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). USVI Results from length analysis suggest that mortality has remained unchanged in St. Thomas/ St. John over time and increased in St. Croix in 1985 or Industry representatives indicated that they release queen triggerfish >45cm. Violates model assumption of knife-edge selectivity Makes it difficult to interpret absolute mortality estimates General conclusions Available life history information suggested two different life strategies for queen triggerfish Age and growth studies are needed Puerto Rico Results from length analysis suggest that total mortality declined in 1998 or 1999, An increase in mean length can be due to reduction in mortality or expansion to relatively unfished areas. Without detailed spatial catch data, it is difficult to separate these effects Uncertainty about whether fishing mortality is higher than natural mortality (i.e., proxy for F MSY ). USVI Results from length analysis suggest that mortality has remained unchanged in St. Thomas/ St. John over time and increased in St. Croix in 1985 or Industry representatives indicated that they release queen triggerfish >45cm. Violates model assumption of knife-edge selectivity Makes it difficult to interpret absolute mortality estimates General conclusions Available life history information suggested two different life strategies for queen triggerfish Age and growth studies are needed U.S. Departmen t of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administra tion | NOAA Fisheries | Page 38

SSC’s Review of SEDAR 30 The SSC accepted the results for queen triggerfish and blue tang as the best available at this time recognizing the following limitations: Lack of life history information Low information content provided by the length frequency data for blue tang because of its determinant growth Potential violation of model assumptions because of dome shaped selectivity for queen triggerfish in STT/STJ due to discards of large fish Uncertainty in the data due to inconsistencies in annual sample size and non- randomness of samples Inability to address biomass benchmarks due to considerable uncertainty in landings data

Conclusions - Queen triggerfish The SSC concluded that the results of SEDAR 30 are consistent with the current status determination in PR and STT/STJ, which is that queen triggerfish is not undergoing overfishing. However, the result for STX indicates that overfishing might be occurring.

Conclusions - Blue Tang Results were too uncertain to be used for status determination Blue tang does not appear to be targeted in PR based on lack of reported landings Given the above, the SSC finds no basis for changing the ABCs for queen triggerfish and blue tang.

Recommendatons For blue tang length analysis is not appropriate and the SSC recommends collecting catch at age data to inform an age-structure model. For the queen triggerfish in St. Croix, the SSC recommends that approximately 500 length measurements be taken within the next year to inform further analysis. There is an urgent need for local age and life history parameters for the two species. Without the basic life history and age information, the assessments will continue not to be very informative for scientific advice and management. The SSC understands that a new collection of otoliths is under way and recommends that a carefully designed sampling protocol be implemented. Validation of catch data including expansion factors is also urgently needed.

Derivation of fishing mortality-based references points and the determination of overfishing status of queen snapper and silk snapper captured in the US Caribbean June 19, 2013 SEFSC Miami, Florida

Review of SEDAR 26 Assessed species Queen snapper, Etelis oculatus Silk snapper, Lutjanus vivanus Island platforms and gear types were assessed separately Queen snapper Puerto Rico, hook and line St. Croix, hook and line Silk snapper St. Croix, hook and line D. Bryan, FishBase.org T. Meyer, FishBase.org

Review of SEDAR 26 Data Trip Interview Program (TIP) Annual length data Most consistent species-specific data among the platforms

Review of SEDAR 26 Gedamke-Hoenig mean length estimator Computationally attractive for data limited situations – Minimal data inputs Length-frequency data – Mean length and length-at-full recruitment Life-history parameters – von Bertalanffy growth parameters Provides estimates of total mortality Fishing mortality can be derived from total mortality and estimates of natural mortality Does not assume population is at equilibrium Estimates temporal changes in total mortality

Review of SEDAR 26 Uncertainty in assessment Life history parameters were highly uncertain Sensitivity analysis was conducted Conducted assessment over a range of the input parameters

SEDAR 26 Assessment Conclusions Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix No evidence to suggest overfishing

SEDAR 26 Assessment conclusions Silk snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Temporal changes in total mortality were not statistically supported Low sample size in more recent years obscured the relationship between change in size and change in mortality

Silk Snapper St. Croix Hook and Line N=158 N=2985 N= 373 N=133 N=31 N=515 N=1775 Fork length (10mm bins) Frequency All years

SEDAR 26 Assessment Conclusions Queen snapper, hook and line fishery Puerto Rico No evidence to suggest overfishing Proportional change in total mortality was estimated to be less than 1 Fishing mortality less than Fmsy Required assumptions: First year of data collection represents the start (or close to the start) of the fishery and Initial estimate of total mortality is equal to natural mortality (Z~M) Fmsy ~ M

Per recruit analysis Goals of analysis: Derive fishing mortality reference points F max – maximum of the yield per recruit (YPR) curve F slope of YPR curve that is 10% of the slope at the origin F 30% - F that allows survival of 30% of spawning biomass per recruit Compare reference points to currents fishing mortality estimates Re-evaluate overfishing status Compare to estimates of current fishing mortality to reference points and determine probability of fishery experiencing overfishing Derived from estimates of current total mortality from the sensitivity analysis and estimates of natural mortality (F = Z - M)

Per recruit reference points F0.1 Fmax & F30% Spawning Biomass per Recruit Yield per Recruit Fishing mortality YPRSBPR

Per recruit analysis Goals of analysis: Derive fishing mortality reference points F max – maximum of the yield per recruit (YPR) curve F slope of YPR curve that is 10% of the slope at the origin F 30% - F that allows survival of 30% of spawning biomass per recruit Compare current fishing mortality estimates to reference points and determine the probability of fishery experiencing overfishing Derived from estimates of current total mortality from the sensitivity analysis and estimates of natural mortality (F = Z - M)

Age schedule and model assumptions

Probability of overfishing Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in Puerto Rico Cumulative percent Fcur/F Frequency 0

Probability of overfishing Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in Puerto Rico Cumulative percent Fcur/Fmax Frequency

Probability of overfishing Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in Puerto Rico Cumulative percent Fcur/F30% Frequency

Probability of overfishing Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Fcur/F Cumulative percent Frequency 35

Probability of overfishing Fcur/Fmax Cumulative percent Frequency Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix

Probability of overfishing Queen snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Cumulative percent Frequency Fcur/F30%

Probability of overfishing Silk snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Cumulative percent Frequency Fcur/F0.1

Probability of overfishing Silk snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Cumulative percent Fcur/Fmax Frequency

Probability of overfishing Silk snapper, hook and line fishery in St. Croix Cumulative percentFrequency Fcur/F30%

Conclusions Interpretation of overfishing status varied among the reference points Analysis highly dependent on the input value of the von Bertalanffy growth coefficient through the derivations Age-at-recruitment Natural mortality Used to derive fishing mortality from estimates of total mortality Used to derive survivorship-at-age

SSC Review of SEDAR 26 and New Approach Estimates of current F were derived from a specific time period that at least in the case of queen snapper is not consistent with the years used to calculate average catch. The available evidence indicates that overfishing probably has not occurred through 2008 and the queen snapper were probably not overfished. The current status of the stock is unknown since the most recent length frequency data included in the assessment was 2008 data. A true harvest control rule is not possible as no reliable estimates of biomass exist and the approach presented is approximately a constant F scenario. Adjusting the current ABC (Allowable Biological Catch) by any ratio assumes that existing average catch derived ABC is appropriate.

Discussion and Recommendations The SSC recognized the uncertainty in methodology due to uncertainty in life history parameters. The SSC RECOMMENDS that regional age-growth studies be conducted. For queen snapper, otoliths are already in storage and should be analyzed as soon as possible. The SSC RECOMMENDS that the most recent length based data be included in the mean length analysis aspect of the approach. Ideally, if ratios were to be used to modify OFL’s then the time period for average landings should correspond to the time period for the mean length analysis. However, this presumes the landings data are reliable. The SSC looked at years used to calculate average catch and found that slightly different time series had little effect on the value for average catch which corresponds to OFL.

The SSC spent most of first day discussing the expanded landings data for PR and the extremely high variability that has been observed in recent years. A number of members believed the high fluctuations are not a reflection of reality. The SSC strongly recommends that expansion factors be evaluated again and that reported landings alone be evaluated. Discussion and Recommendations continued

The SSC is concerned that reporting for Queen Snapper has changed and that reporting behavior is driving the recent overages. Implications: Fishers could have harvested more in the past so the current OFL is too low, or alternatively that current harvest rates are higher than expected and status is unknown. It was noted that, according to a Federal Register notice, the SEFSC needs to determine if overages result from a situation where “data collection and monitoring improved rather than because catches actually increased.” Apparently, the SEFSC concluded that data collection and monitoring had not improved and that catches actually increased, but the SSC understands that tracking the number of reporting fishers or individual/representative fishers over the recent time period hasn’t been presented. RECOMMENDATION: Reporting behavior and validation of landings needs to be studied and tracked over time to be able to adequately evaluate the difference between overages and changes in reporting.

Discussion and Recommendations continued The SSC recalls that the ACL was based on an average catch during a reference period and adjusted by a coefficient of 0.85 because the stock was considered to be undergoing overfishing. A coefficient of 0.9 was used for stocks for which overfishing was not occurring. In light of our current assessment, the later coefficient (0.9) might be more appropriate. SUMMARY statement: Both the SEDAR 26 results and the information presented from the new methodology suggests that overfishing is not occurring, although the assessment is too uncertain to be confident, and there isn’t much room for further development of the fishery. (It was pointed out that the analysis shows some probability that overfishing is occurring.) The SSC is concerned about the reliability of expanded catch data and uncertainty in life history estimates. The SSC concluded that at this time there was no scientific basis for modifying the ABC.