An Overview of Mandatory COOL (Country of Origin Labeling) Derrell S. Peel Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Country-of-Origin Labeling Overview of the Interim Final Rule Updated Oct. 10, 2008 Overview of the Interim Final Rule Updated Oct. 10, 2008.
Advertisements

Selling Eggs, Poultry and Organic Products at Farmers Markets Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance.
Selling Agricultural Products at Farmer’s Markets Deanna Baldwin, Program Manager Food Quality Assurance.
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
2012 Beef University Direct Marketing Beef Jason Fischbach, Agriculture Agent Ashland and Bayfield County March 5, 2012.
Definition  Commodity – Undifferentiated – Perfectly competitive markets  Products – Differentiated – Monopoly - Workable competition – Niche Market,
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Cattle Industry Derrell S. Peel Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State University.
Country of Origin Labeling Agricultural Marketing Service.
Who Will Regulate my Food Business? John E. Rushing, Ph.D. Department of Food Science NCSU.
Country of Origin Labeling, Final Rule 2013: Labeling Provisions for Muscle Cut Covered Commodities National Chicken Council Webinar Wednesday, June 12,
Purchasing and Receiving
Age Verification for Japan: What is involved and is it right for me? Prepared by: John D. Lawrence Iowa State University Western Center for Risk Management.
YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES YOUTH & FAMILIES AGRICULTUREHEALTHECONOMYENVIRONMENTENERGY COMMUNITIES Youth Livestock.
Regulatory | education | partnership Overcoming North American Trade Hurdles Barry Carpenter.
Poultry Bill & Processing in Oregon Will Fargo Food Safety Specialist Food Safety Division Oregon Department of Agriculture (503)
Protecting Food Safety From naturally occurring sources –Cholesterol From intentional contamination –Food terrorism 25 Chapters 10 and 11 Knutson, Penn.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs Country of Origin Labeling Finfish & Shellfish.
Traceability The ability to trace and follow a food, feed, or food producing animal or substance intended to be or expected to be incorporated into a food.
Overview of Title XI: Livestock Four C’s for Livestock Bradley D. Lubben Extension Public Policy Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
What’s C.O.O.L.? Implications for U.S. Producers and Consumers Wendy Umberger Asst. Professor and Extension Agribusiness Economist Department of Agricultural.
Update on NAIS and the Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) What is COOL? – Food Labeling Program/Law – Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling – Introduced.
Matthew Loke Hawaii Department of Agriculture Agricultural Development Division February 24, 2009 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING (COOL) CTAHR Agricultural.
Comparative Advantage and Labor Issues in the Livestock and Meat Industry in Mexico and the U.S. Derrell S. Peel Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma.
Food Safety Outlook…. FOOD SAFETY & PROTECTION THE CURRENT FRAMEWORK OF THE U.S. FOOD SAFETY & PROTECTION SYSTEM OTHER GROUPS & ORGANIZATIONS WITH INTEREST.
2008 Farm Bill: Livestock and M-COOL Geoff Benson Dept. of Agricultural & Resource Economics NC State University.
Nancy S. Bryson, The Bryson Group PLLC GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD ANIMALS: USDA Legal Authorities Backgrounder Nancy B. Bryson The Bryson Group PLLC.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Food Laws and the Market and Distribution Systems Chapter 2.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Kenneth C. Clayton Associate Administrator Agricultural Marketing Service U.S. Department of Agriculture OPPORTUNITIES FOR ECONOMISTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL.
Animal ID: Opportunities for Value-Added Marketing and Production Efficiencies Prepared by: Kynda R. Curtis Assistant Professor and State Specialist Department.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs Country of Origin Labeling Barry L. Carpenter Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program Barry L. Carpenter Deputy.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Farmer’s Markets: Approved Foods and Health Licensing
Regulation and Labeling Food Technology Ch 26. Regulation and Labeling The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the United States Dept of Agriculture.
Amendment to the Lacey Act November 13, Like Minds Think A Like!  Will my overseas partners understand the importance of providing the required.
‘Impacts of Country of Origin Labeling on North American Beef Trade’ Prepared for the Organized Symposium: ‘Impacts of Country-of-Origin Labeling on North.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
What Testing Is Required As a Basis for Certification?  Certification must be based on “a test of each product or upon a reasonable testing program” 
Some Special Markets for Meats John E. Rushing, Ph. D. Department of Food Science NCSU.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Key National and Trade Marketing Organizations AEC 317 December 3, 2014.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and the Beef Industry March 13, 2003.
1 1 Poultry Slaughter Exemptions Under the Federal Poultry Products Inspection Act and the SC Poultry Products Inspection Law SC Poultry Products Inspection.
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
System of Reinspection NACMPI August 27, 2008 Mary Stanley Office of International Affairs Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
SH, Feb Emerging Roles for Food Labels Dr. Shida Henneberry Professor of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University Nanjing.
Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.
Country of Origin Labeling
Country of Origin Labeling National Fisheries Institute September 29, 2015.
1 Why National Organic Standards? Consumers wanted a more transparent and responsive supply chain.  Concerns about the environment  Certain food attributes.
By: Shelby Stauffer. The Labeling law that requires all retailers, supermarkets and grocery stores to notify customers on the origin of certain foods.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Elizabeth McNulty Head of Incidents Branch Food Standards Agency.
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Billy Moss Area Livestock Teacher North Region Agricultural Education February 2004.
What can I sell at a farmers market
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Act on the Traceability of Cattle and Beef (KOREA)
Country of Origin Labelling
Agricultural Marketing
Who Will Regulate my Food Business?
2019 Cattle Market Update Derrell S. Peel
Agricultural Marketing
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of Mandatory COOL (Country of Origin Labeling) Derrell S. Peel Livestock Marketing Specialist Oklahoma State University

Brief History of COOL Became law in the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act (2002 Farm Bill) (PL ) – Amended Ag Marketing Act of 1946 FY 2004 Consolidated Appropriations Act (PL ) delayed implementation of COOL until September 2006 for all covered commodities except fish and seafood. Mandatory COOL for fish and seafood implemented April, The Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2006 (PL ) further delayed implementation of mandatory COOL for covered commodities except fish and seafood until September 30, The Food, Conservation and Energy Act (2008 Farm Bill) modified COOL law. August 1, 2008: USDA published Interim Final Rule for implementation on September 30, 2008

Consumer Notification Required at Retail Country or countries of origin Label or notice must: – Be in English and legible – Not obscure other required information Administered by USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Must be consistent with other applicable federal rules – Food and Drug Administration (FDA): food labeling – Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS): meat labeling – U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): labeling imported products

Commodities Subject to COOL Muscle cuts of beef, lamb, chicken, goat and pork Ground beef, lamb, chicken, goat and pork Wild & farm-raised fish & shellfish Fresh & frozen fruits & vegetables Raw peanuts, pecans & macadamia nuts Ginseng

Businesses Subject to COOL Retailers of covered commodities as defined by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) of – Excludes small retailers (<$230,000/year invoice cost of perishable agricultural commodities) Suppliers of covered commodities must provide origin information to buyers

Exemptions to COOL Food Service Establishments – Restaurants, food stands, taverns, etc. – Delicatessens, salad bars, lunchrooms etc. inside retail establishments Processed foods – Products changed in character by cooking, drying, curing, smoking, etc. – Products combined with another covered commodity or substantive food item.

Implementation Timeline Mandatory final rules by September 30, month grace period for full compliance Retailers urged to begin phasing in the program immediately – Product produced before September 30, 2008 exempted

COOL Meat Origin Categories for Muscle Cuts AU.S. Origin “Product of U.S.” - Must be born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. BMultiple Countries of Origin “Product of U.S., Country X (and Country Y)” - Meat from animals born, raised and/or slaughtered in the U.S. and not imported for immediate slaughter CImported for Immediate Slaughter “Product of Country X and U.S.” DImported Meat “Product of Country X” - Labeled per CBP designation of origin

Retailer and Supplier Use of Meat Origin Categories Retailers, packers and intermediary suppliers may include Category A product in a Category B label which includes all countries as applicable Retailers, packers and intermediary suppliers may commingle Category B and Category C product in a single label as “Product of Country X and U.S.”, with other countries as applicable

Ground Meat Labeling Label must include all actual or reasonably possible countries of origin, in any order Sources of raw material not in the processor’s inventory for more than 60 days is not “reasonably possible” and must be deleted from the label.

Recordkeeping: Retailers and Suppliers Must be legible May be hard copy or electronic Various forms of documentation acceptable – Records used in the normal course of business May be maintained in any location Must be made available to USDA representatives within 5 days if requested

Recordkeeping: Retailers Records of origin, supplier and identify of covered commodity must be maintained for one year with appropriate combinations of package labels, shipping container labels and supporting documentation.

Record-Keeping: Suppliers Suppliers includes growers, distributors, handlers, packers and processors Suppliers must make available information to the subsequent purchaser about the country(ies) of origin of the covered commodity. Suppliers must maintain records to establish and identify the immediate previous source (if applicable) and immediate subsequent recipient of a covered commodity for a period of one year from the date of the transaction.

Recordkeeping: Packers In the case of meat, packers are considered the supplier responsible for originating the origin declaration for meat. Packers must possess or have legal access to records that are necessary to substantiate the claim. A producer affidavit is acceptable as evidence of origin provided it is made by someone having first- hand knowledge of the origin of the animals and identifies the animals unique to the transaction.

Affidavit Statements Developed by industry; examples available from organizations 1.Continuous affidavit/declaration. – Allows producers to make a continuous origin affidavit, that would be kept on file by the market, stocker, feeder or slaughter plant, until revoked by the affidavit’s signer. 2.Supporting declaration for specific transactions – For use with a continuous affidavit on file, or as a “stand alone” affidavit/declaration related to a specific transaction. This language could be used on check-in sheets, invoices and/or other sales documents. 3.For sales to packers – Statement says the livestock supplier will maintain those records for one year from date of delivery of the livestock, and will make them available, as required by the COOL law.

Recordkeeping: Producers Congress limited record-keeping requirements to documents used “in the normal conduct of business” Animals born or imported before July 15, 2008 are considered in as U.S. origin Animals identified under NAIS or official animal identification program need no additional verification of origin

Cow-Calf Implications Be prepared to supply affidavits for animals sold – Record of buyer and/or sale date and location Need records to document normal course of business – Herd and calving records – Vaccinations and vaccine purchases – Feed purchases Important to document herd size and composition as of July 15, 2008 – Producers may be selling, for several years, brood animals that were grandfathered in on this date Maintain records on raised cows and bulls Request affidavits on purchased cows and bulls

Stocker/Feeder Implications Request affidavits for purchased animals – Record of seller and/or sale date and location Provide affidavits for sales groups – Record of buyer and/or sale date and location Commingled and resorted animals (with same origin) may be sold under a “consolidated” affidavit Animals need not be individually tracked as long as records document a balance between total purchases and sales Imported and domestic animals best segregated, with supporting records unless individual animal ID is used

Enforcement Legislative authority for enforcement given to the USDA Secretary; encouraged to partner with states with enforcement infrastructure 30 day period for retailers and suppliers to take necessary corrective action Civil penalty up to $1000 if no good-faith effort to comply, but only after notice and opportunity for hearing

U.S. Beef Industry Summary 2007 All Cattle and Calves, Jan 1, Million Head Calf Crop37.36 Million Head Steer and Heifer Slaughter (FI)27.49 Million Head Cow and Bull Slaughter (FI)6.23 Million Head Cattle Imports, Total Canada Mexico 2.49 Million Head 1.40 Million Head 1.09 Million Head Beef Production (FI)26.07 Billion Pounds Beef Imports3.05 Billion Pounds Beef Exports1.82 Billion Pounds