The trigger1 The Trigger YETI 7th January 2008 Emily Nurse Outline: Why do we need a Trigger? The trigger system at CDF Rate control at CDF Triggering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leptoquark Searches at the Tevatron April 16th, 2004 XII th Deep Inelastic Scattering Workshop Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia For the CDF and DØ Collaborations.
Advertisements

 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 4. 2 Physics Menu for Today Top quark and W boson properties at the Tevatron.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
CDF Trigger System Veronica Sorin Michigan State University Silicon Workshop UCSB May 11,2006.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
EPS 2003, July 19, 2003David Buchholz, Northwestern University Performance of the D0 Experiment in Run II Detector Commissioning and Performance Accelerator,
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Charged Higgs Results from Tevatron Sudeshna Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India For CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab, Chicago.
27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated.
Tampa - April 19, 2005APS April Meeting – M.Rossi1 DILEPTON TRIGGER for SUSY CDF Melisa Rossi - Udine University APS April Meeting Tampa, Florida.
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
FNAL Users’ Meeting, 06/02/03, p. 1 Top and Electroweak Results from CDF Igor Volobouev LBNL for the CDF Collaboration.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 Search for new physics in dilepton and diphoton final states with CDF Xin Wu (University of Geneva, Switzerland) On behalf of the CDF collaboration.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Single Top Quark Production Mark Palenik Physics 564, Fall 2007.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool For the CDF collaboration EPS 2003, Aachen, Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Photonic Final.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
More technical description:
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Deep Inelastic Scattering 2006
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Top Quark a particle odyssey Todd Huffman University of Oxford
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

The trigger1 The Trigger YETI 7th January 2008 Emily Nurse Outline: Why do we need a Trigger? The trigger system at CDF Rate control at CDF Triggering on rare events Backup Triggers The LHC

The trigger2 Triggers The trigger is a vital part of collider experiments - if you screw up the trigger the data is lost forever! Particularly challenging at hadron colliders: –I will use CDF as an example to discuss some of these challenges.  Silicon tracking detector  Central drift chambers (COT)  Solenoid Coil  EM calorimeter  Hadronic calorimeter  Muon drift chambers chambers  Muon scintillator counters  Steel shielding

The trigger3 Why do we need a trigger at CDF? The Tevatron ring contains 36 bunches of protons and 36 bunches of antiprotons with 396 ns between bunch collisions. There is no way we can store the information from the detector for each collision - and nor do we want to: –  (ppbar) ~60 mb –  (ppbar  W  ) ~25 nb (1 in 2,400,000) –  (ppbar  ttbar ) ~7 pb (1 in 8,600,000,000) –  (ppbar  W ,H )  0.2 pb (1 in 300,000,000,000) The trigger decides in real-time whether a particular event is interesting enough to store for data analysis. Cross section (  ) = measure of likelihood of a particular type of event occuring when particles collide (measured in barns = cm 2 ) pp

The trigger4 CDF’s 3 level trigger Level-1: –Hardware triggers. –Processing in a parallel pipelined operation. –L1 decision always occurs 5.5  s after the collision (i.e. every 14 collisions). –The 14 events are stored in a pipelined buffer whilst the L1 decisions are made. –Rate reduction: 1.7 MHz  25 kHz (1 : 70) Level-2: –Hardware and software triggers. –Decision takes ~30  s per event. –4 L2 buffers can store 4 events whilst trigger decision is made. –Rate reduction: 25 kHz  600 Hz (1 : 40) Level-3: –PC farm running offline-type code. –Rate reduction: 600 Hz  100 Hz (1 : 6) Total data rejection factor is 1: 17000

The trigger5 CDF’s 3 level trigger Level-1: –Calorimeter objects: Jet object EM object E T miss,  E T –COT tracks (p T > 1.5 GeV) –Muon tracks Level-2: –All L1 information with better granuality –Calorimeter clustering for jets, taus, electrons and photons. –ShowerMax measures EM cluster position –Silicon tracks with displaced vertex information for B decays. Level-3: –Fully reconstructed events using full granuality of detector (electrons, taus, muons, photons, E T miss, jets, B decays etc)

The trigger6 Trigger Table (a.k.a. Menu) The CDF physics program is rich and divergent Many different triggers are required to select events with different signatures: –Higgs searches e, , , E T miss, jets –BSM searches e, , , E T miss, jets,  –EWK measurements e, , , E T miss –Top physics e, , , E T miss, jets –B physics e, , low p T tracks with displaced vertex –QCD jets –etc… High p T single e,  Low p T e, ,  pairs Photons E T miss Jets Di-tracks (with displaced vertex)

The trigger7 Luminosity Luminosity: measure of the probability of a proton-antiproton collision (the more particles per unit volume the higher the luminosity.) –Instantaneous luminosity: L [cm -2 s -1 ] –Integrated luminosity: L int [cm -2 ] A Tevatron store (period of continuous collisions) runs for ~24 hours - L starts high and decreases with time. L = 220  cm -2 s -1 L = 40  cm -2 s -1

The trigger8 Trigger rates For a given process (e.g. ppbar  W  ) the rate[Hz] = .L –Which can mean a factor ~5 variation in rate throughout a store! The  of some triggers also depends on L : –Some increase with L as there are more ppbar collisions per bunch crossing:  More random hits in tracker  more fake tracks.  More energy in calorimeter  more fake jets. –Some decrease (triggers with isolation cuts become less efficient). –Some are ~ constant.  of a certain process is independent of L but  of some triggers can depend on L

The trigger9 Prescales The rates of some triggers are too high to sustain at high L. Options: 1)Prescale the trigger by a constant factor (wasteful at low L where we can handle the rate!) 2)Apply a L dependent prescale. When a trigger is prescaled a fraction of the events satisfying the trigger criteria are randomly rejected. A prescale of 10 means only 1 in 10 events will be accepted! Types of L dependent prescale: 1)Multiple tables: Make a low- L and a high- L table with different prescales (change in the middle of a store). 2)Luminosity enable: Some triggers are initially switched off then automatically switched on once a certain (low) luminosity is reached. 3)Dynamic prescale: Feedback system that adjusts the prescale of triggers throughout a store according to the total trigger rate.

The trigger10 Dynamic Prescale Beginning of store: –High luminosity  high rate. –High rate triggers prescaled by their MAXIMUM value. As the store progresses feedback system adjusts prescales: Luminosity decreases  rate decreases Prescales decrease  rate increases End of Store: –Low luminosity  low rate. –High rate triggers prescaled by their MINIMUM value (preferably =1!). Many triggers have dynamic prescales, algorithm decides which prescale to change first: –Order by MAXIMUM prescale then un-prescaled rate. Time Rate

The trigger11 Trigger rate control at CDF Fixed Prescale (P): Accept 1/P of all events. Luminosity Enable: Switch on a trigger at a certain inst. lumi.; Takes no data at high lumi. where the rate is too high. Dynamic Prescale [DPS]: Prescale decreases through-out the run, depending on the total trigger rate. Instantaneous luminosity rate

The trigger12 Limited by L2 rate Trigger rates versus luminosity

The trigger13 Triggering on rare events : Higgs searches at CDF CDF and D0 are in with a fighting chance of discovering the SM Higgs. As well as more luminosity we need more improvements to existing analyses. The trigger plays a vital role in the acceptance of Higgs events - there has been a recent surge in effort to improve Higgs triggers at CDF M H = 115 GeVM H = 160 GeV

The trigger14 Triggering on rare events: an example analysis Higgs production in association with a W: H  bb, W  Events can be selected by a number of different triggers:  = 0.6 tight central muon: 29%

The trigger15 Triggering on rare events: an example analysis Higgs production in association with a W: H  bb, W  Events can be selected by a number of different triggers:  = 0.6 tight central muon: 29% central muon extension: + 9%  = 1.0

The trigger16 Triggering on rare events: an example analysis Higgs production in association with a W: H  bb, W  Events can be selected by a number of different triggers:  = 0.6 tight central muon: 29% central muon extension: + 9%  E T miss : +28%  E T miss + jet: +14%  loose central muon: + 4% TOTAL = 84%  = 1.0 Already used in analysis  Trigger already running  New trigger, recently added

The trigger17 The history of the CMX trigger Level 1: –8 GeV central track

The trigger18 The history of the CMX trigger Level 1: –8 GeV central track –Matched in  to muon drift chamber and scintillator hits.

The trigger19 The history of the CMX trigger Level 1: –8 GeV central track –Matched in  to muon drift chamber and scintillator hits. Level 2: –Increase track p T threshold to 15 GeV. –Tighter matching cuts. Level 3: –Increase track p T threshold to 18 GeV. –Tighter 3D matching cuts.

The trigger20 The history of the CMX trigger Level 1: –8 GeV central track –Matched in  to muon drift chamber and scintillator hits. Level 2: –Increase track p T threshold to 15 GeV. –Tighter matching cuts. Level 3: –Increase track p T threshold to 18 GeV. –Tighter 3D matching cuts.

The trigger21 The history of the CMX trigger A rate of 400Hz at L2 for one trigger is too much! (total available ~650Hz). Emergency solution was to prescale this trigger at high luminosity Cross section increases due to fakes!

The trigger22 CMX trigger: saved by a track trigger upgrade? Upgrade adds stereo layers angle giving Old trigger used 4 axial layers only The Central Outer Tracker consists of 8 layers of cells: 1,3,5 and 7 are axial (giving r-  information only). 2,4,6 and 8 are at a small stereo angle giving z information. Upgrade adds stereo layers Axial layers only Add stereo confirmation 3D track-muon matching We should start running the 3D trigger this week with no prescale! (The axial only trigger will also run on Dynamic Prescale).

The trigger23 L2 calorimeter trigger The L2 calorimeter trigger was also recently upgraded to cope with high luminosities. Smarter jet algorithm uses “cone” instead of “continuous” clustering, reducing luminosity growth terms. Better calorimeter granuality used for E T miss trigger. Sharper turn on curves  better efficiencies

The trigger24 “Backup” Triggers Most analyses require “backup” triggers in addition to “signal” triggers: Measurement of trigger efficiencies : – W_NOTRACK trigger selects W  e events based on E T miss and tight EM cuts but no track  track trigger efficiency for high p T electrons. Background studies : –~low E T jet triggers to measure probability of a jet faking a lepton (fake rate). –A non-isolated version of  triggers (with a prescale) can be used to estimate backgrounds. Detector calibration : –Low E T electron trigger used to study time dependence of calorimeter gain. Trigger studies : –Trigger that passes any L2 accept through L3 (prescaled!) - allows unbiased trigger studies.

The trigger25 LHC triggers Even more challenging than the Tevatron!: –40 MHz crossing rate with ~10 9 events per second at design luminosity. Level-1 : –Hardware trigger –CAL and MUON only (no track) –40 MHz  kHz High Level Triggers : –Software using full detector resolution. –Start with “Region Of Interest” (only reconstruct regions of the detector triggered at Level-1). –Eventually reconstruct entire event – kHz  100 Hz

The trigger26 Summary : points to remember 1)Rate control : try to utilise available bandwidth at all luminosities (non-trivial!) 2)Beware of luminosity growth terms in trigger cross-sections! 3)Remember to “or” your triggers Can lead to considerable increases in acceptance, maximise the significance of your result! 4)Design your trigger table carefully: Remember to include backup triggers to measure efficiencies and backgrounds! But don’t sacrifice golden search channels with backups gone wild!

The trigger27 Back-up slides

The trigger28 High p T lepton SUSY di-lepton TAU + lepton RunIIb Physics Priority & Triggers Committee’s Straw 3E32 (CDF 8055, Ristori et al.) = prescaled at high lumi (1)Are our highest priority triggers running un-prescaled at all luminosities? Note: colour code indicates what is needed to conform to Straw Table projections. many other triggers will be helped by the upgrades.

The trigger29 XFT hits are mapped to muon stubs at L2 based on a 3 sigma multiple scattering term a misalignment parameter (dominates at high PT ). The default value of the misalignment parameter was 1.5 degrees (CMX and CMU). On April 5th (runs after ) tighter matching was added to the muon triggers: CMX: misAlign=0.6 CMUP: misAlign=0.8

The trigger30 L2 stereo reconstruction  (p T )/ p T 2 ~ 2%,  (  ) ~ 6 mR