Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Advertisements

Selecting Supernovae for Cosmology
UCL’s interests: photo-z, mass-obs calibration, systematics Granada, Sep 2010 Ofer Lahav, University College London Ofer Lahav, Stephanie Jouvel, Ole Host.
The Physics of Large Scale Structure and New Results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Beth Reid ICC Barcelona arXiv: arXiv: * Colloborators:
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
SDSS-II SN survey: Constraining Dark Energy with intermediate- redshift probes Hubert Lampeitl University Portsmouth, ICG In collaboration with: H.J. Seo,
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Upper limits on neutrino masses from cosmology: new results Øystein Elgarøy (Institute of theoretical astrophysics, University of Oslo) Collaborator: Ofer.
Christian Wagner - September Potsdam Nonlinear Power Spectrum Emulator Christian Wagner in collaboration with Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib,
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Å rhus, 4 September 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy, France)
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Neutrinos in Cosmology Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” INFN, Roma-1 NOW-2004, 16th September, 2004.
NEUTRINO PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY STEEN HANNESTAD, Aarhus University BLOIS, 31 MAY 2012 e    
Signe Riemer-Sørensen, University of Queensland In collaboration with C. Blake (Swinburne), D. Parkinson (UQ), T. Davis (UQ) and the WiggleZ collaboration.
NEUTRINO MASS FROM LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 8 December 2008 e    
Inflationary Freedom and Cosmological Neutrino Constraints Roland de Putter JPL/Caltech CosKASI 4/16/2014.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Studying Cosmic acceleration and neutrino masses with DES. Studying Cosmic acceleration and neutrino masses with DES.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
Cosmic Structures: Challenges for Astro-Statistics Ofer Lahav Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London * Data compression – e.g. P(k)
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Yun Wang, 3/2011 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and DE Figure of Merit Yun Wang Yun Wang WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 BAO as a robust.
Cosmological Particle Physics Tamara Davis University of Queensland With Signe Riemer-Sørensen, David Parkinson, Chris Blake, and the WiggleZ team.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
Anadian ydrogen ntensity apping xperiment CHIMECHIME CHIMECHIME WiggleZ Dark Ages Stars 13.7Gy CMB Big Bang Reionization 1100 z∞ SDSS 7Gy CHIME.
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
Weighing neutrinos with Cosmology Fogli, Lisi, Marrone, Melchiorri, Palazzo, Serra, Silk hep-ph , PRD 71, , (2005) Paolo Serra Physics Department.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, D. Fouchez, F. Henry-Couannier, S. Kermiche, C. Tao, A. Tilquin September 2012.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
BBN: Constraints from CMB experiments Joanna Dunkley University of Oxford IAUS Geneva, Nov
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Cosmological aspects of neutrinos (III) Sergio Pastor (IFIC Valencia) JIGSAW 2007 TIFR Mumbai, February 2007 ν.
THE CONNECTION OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS WITH COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 1 OCTOBER 2009 e    
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Luminous Red Galaxies in the SDSS Daniel Eisenstein ( University of Arizona) with Blanton, Hogg, Nichol, Tegmark, Wake, Zehavi, Zheng, and the rest of.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
NEUTRINOS IN THE INTERGALACTIC MEDIUM Matteo Viel, Martin Haehnelt. Volker Springel: arXiv today Rencontres de Moriond – La Thuile 15/03/2010.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
WG1 NuFact04, Osaka, July Neutrino mass and Cosmology: current bounds and future sensitivities Sergio Pastor (IFIC) ν.
DESY, 30 September 2008 Julien Lesgourgues (CERN & EPFL)
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Cosmological aspects of neutrinos (II) Sergio Pastor (IFIC Valencia) JIGSAW 2007 TIFR Mumbai, February 2007 ν.
Cosmological constraints on neutrino mass Francesco De Bernardis University of Rome “Sapienza” Incontro Nazionale Iniziative di Fisica Astroparticellare.
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey : cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample arXiv:
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
ν Are we close to measuring the neutrino hierarchy? Filipe B. Abdalla
Presentation transcript:

Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:

Outline: 1.Neutrinos have mass! 2.Neutrino signatures in cosmology 3.Probes of the Model Cosmic Microwave Background Galaxy Surveys Supernovae and Baryon Oscillations 4.Work: Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav (2009): arXiv: (+ In prep. 2010) 5.For the Future…? Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL

Neutrino oscillations indicate they have mass! But not on the absolute scale of mass… Beta-decay kinematics Neutrinoless double beta-decay Cosmology! KATRIN nemo Thomas, Abdalla, Lahav (2009) For example… Not just interesting physics but, an integral part of the cosmological model… Age of precision Cosmology Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL

Signatures in the Model Act as radiation or matter and affect the Universe’s expansion history Suppress the growth of matter structure and cosmological perturbations Neutrinos have large thermal velocities and Free-stream out of over-densities/inhomogeneities thus suppressing the clustering of matter and galaxies Which we might see in a power spectrum… Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL Neutrino fraction is directly related to sum of masses (RHS)

Probes of Cosmology Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) WMAP 5 year (CMB) : < 1.3 eV (95% CL) Komatsu et al. [arXiv: ] Thomas et al. [arXiv: ] ModelDataConstraint With the CMB the effect depends on whether neutrinos are relativistic or not: Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL Suppress potentials - change heights of peaks OR Affect matter-radiation balance Suggestive of a CMB limit ~ 1.5 eV (E.g. Ichikawa 05)

Probes of Cosmology Supernovae (SN) E.g. Supernova Legacy Survey CMB + SN + BAO : < 0.69 eV (95% CL) Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) Standard candle allows one to measure the expansion history Tighter matter/hubble constraint aids neutrino determination Standard ruler allows one to measure the expansion history Tighter matter/hubble constraint aids neutrino determination Primordial CMB photon-baryon oscillations are imprinted onto late-time matter power spectrum: BAO Thomas et al. [arXiv: ] Komatsu et al. [arXiv: ] Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL E.g. Percival et al

Probes of Cosmology + Galaxy Clustering! Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Suppress the growth of matter structure and cosmological perturbations Smaller Scales Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL

Probes of Cosmology + Galaxy Clustering! Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav - in prep Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) Photometric Redshift Largest galaxy survey 723,556 LRGs 7,746 square degrees Volume: 3.3 (Gpc /h)^ < z < 0.65 ANNz - Collister and Lahav 2004 Padmanabhan et al Four redshift bins Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL 2SLAQ - 13’000 spectroscopic training/evaluation set

Probes of Cosmology + Galaxy Clustering! Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Including the production of a new SDSS galaxy clustering angular power spectra Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav - in prep We can use this with the BAO(!) - Improves combined neutrino constraint further! One of the largest galaxy surveys to date Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL MegaZ DR7

Probes of Cosmology + Galaxy Clustering! Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGS) 4 bins: 0.45 < z < 0.65 CMB + SN + BAO + SDSS LRGs + HST: < 0.28 eV (95% CL) Thomas et al. [arXiv: ] MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL 12 Parameters: Max multipole l=300

Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav [ ] Cosmology and Neutrinos Komatsu et al. [arXiv: ] < 1.3 eV (CMB) < 0.67 eV (CMB+SN+BAO) Tereno et al. [arXiv: ] < 0.54 eV (CMB+SN+BAO+WL) Ichiki, Takada & Takahashi [arXiv: ] < 0.54 eV (CMB+SN+BAO+WL) Seljak et al. [arXiv: ] < 0.17 eV (+ Lyman Alpha…) Systematics - e.g. winds? Using all the aforementioned probes for complementary data constraint Recent BAO data and production of newest galaxy clustering angular power spectrum CMB+SDSS+SN+BAO+HST CMB + SN + BAO + SDSS LRGs +HST With luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) sampling a large cosmic volume Cosmology is starting to predict that experiments such as KATRIN (mentioned earlier) will not detect anything Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL 0.28 eV

WOOHOO! Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL

‘Systematics and Limitations’ Cosmology = Good  However Parameter DegeneraciesGalaxy BiasNon-linearities Most quoted results assume cosmological constant cosmology Degeneracy with w increases error bar Model underlying matter power spectrum but measure the galaxy power spectrum Scale dependence…mimic…? Bias result or lose data Perturbation theory/ N-body simulations Although we want tighter neutrino constraints We also want trustworthy neutrino constraints. Work In Progress… Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL Work for the Future… E.g. Saito et al 09 Brandbyge & Hannestad 09 E.g. Hannestad L_max = 300 => 0.28 eV L_max = 200 => 0.34 eV

Summary Cosmology is a sensitive neutrino experiment! (Funded billions of years ago!) Massive neutrinos suppress the growth of structure Probes such as galaxy clustering or weak lensing are sensitive to growth Integral part of cosmological model and parameter space Have a complete complementary constraint on neutrinos (sub eV region) Systematics and limitations still exist though… The Future is promising but with work to be done… Tighter neutrino constraint. Trustworthy neutrino constraint. Having produced data for a tighter constraint Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL

Related and Further Reading Cosmology and Neutrinos Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav [arXiv: ] Komatsu et al. [arXiv: ] Tereno et al. [arXiv: ] Elgaroy and Lahav [arXiv: ] Seljak et al. [arXiv: ] Brandbyge & Hannestad [arxiv: ] Saito et al [arxiv: ] Galaxy Clustering Thomas, Abdalla & Lahav (In Prep. (v. soon)) Neutrino Experiments NEMO [arXiv: ] KATRIN Contact: Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL Thank You for Listening! :)

Shaun Thomas: UCL Simulation - testing the code by reconstructing input cosmology Evaluated the previous DR4 release which was consistent with Blake et al. (MegaZ DR4)

1,2 1,3 1,4 2,3 Shaun Thomas: UCL

2,4 3,4 Shaun Thomas: UCL

Mixing matrix profile Little correlation between multipole bands introduced by partial sky after binning

Shaun Thomas: UCL Excess Power

Shaun Thomas: UCL