Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Regional Work & The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Sharing with ESC Providers September 22 nd, 2008.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
1 9/14/12. Core Principles of OIP (SPDG)  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership Team (district & building)
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Session Materials  Wiki
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Building a Unified and Coherent Statewide System of Support
TRUMBULL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time

2 General Outcomes for Today  Discuss the Development of the OIP  Understand the four stages of the Ohio Improvement Process  Understand the Roles and Responsibilities of the District Leadership Team (DLT)  Set the ground rules for work on the DLT  Create a schedule to complete the OIP  Discuss Next Steps: OLAC Survey

3 Shift Happens Video

4 OIP Overview and Development Recent Developments 1.Advancements in technology have allowed ODE to identify and gather data tools to support districts in decision making and planning. 2.Research has provided concrete knowledge about what works and how leadership in districts should be distributed to improve instructional practice and student performance.

5 Recent Developments (Cont.) 3.Many federal and state initiatives attempting to design improvement processes have fallen short of the mark. 4.The 126th General Assembly created a coordinated, efficient regional service delivery system to support state and regional improvement initiatives. Substitute HB 115 clarified roles and responsibilities of regional service providers with an emphasis on districts improving student performance. OIP Overview and Development

6 Ohio Leadership Advisory Council (OLAC) – District Expectations Common Characteristics in Districts that Plan Successfully  Collaborative structures and community engagement  Culture and expectation for the use of data in decision making  One plan with focused goals for achievement  Board alignment and support of district and building goals  Monitoring goals for achievement and instruction  Use of resources to support achievement and instruction that are intentionally allocated

7 Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership Team (district & building) structures and practices  Produce one focused plan that aligns all improvement efforts  Rely on quality data and data interpretation and use data effectively at each level  Expect substantive changes in student performance and instructional practice

8

9 Being on OIP Pioneer

10 Preparing for the OIP Define Leadership in Terms of Practice  Superintendents  DLTs  BLTs

11 Why Leadership Team Structures?  Shift focus from a single individual to a team that can function as purposeful communities  Distribute key leadership functions  Align and focus work across the system using few district goals  Ensure effective leadership is exercised at all levels of the system  Engage in all four stages of the OIP for the long-term

12 District Leadership Teams Primary Functions  Setting performance targets aligned with district goals;  Monitoring performance against the targets;  Building a foundation for data-driven decision making on a system-wide basis;  Designing system planning and focused improvement strategies; structures, and processes;

13  Facilitating the development and use of collaborative structures;  Brokering or facilitating high quality PD consistent with district goals; and  Allocating system resources toward instructional improvement. District Leadership Teams Primary Functions

14 Building Leadership Teams Primary Functions  Foster shared efficacy;  Build a school culture that supports effective data-driven decision making;  Establish priorities for instruction and achievement aligned with district goals;  Provide opportunities for teachers to learn from each other and greater opportunity for teacher leadership;

15  Monitor and provide effective feedback on student progress;  Support the development, implementation, and monitoring of focused building improvement plans;  Make recommendations for the management of resources, including time, and personnel to meet district goals. Building Leadership Teams Primary Functions

16 Data Wranglers

17 Stage 1: Identify Critical Needs DATA ask essential and probing questions

18 Ohio’s Decision Framework  Sorts and organizes district and building data into specific data sets  Data helps identify major problems and causes  Leadership teams answer questions about selected data and make data-related decisions - Decisions displayed in series of scorecards - Scorecards provide profiles of defined district or building needs  Organized decision-making process produces clear Needs Assessment

19 Decision Framework Focus  Achievement  Expectations & Conditions  Resource Management

20 Achievement  Student data by content area (i.e. Math) - 3-year trends - Aggregated/disaggregated  Curriculum, assessment, instructional practices  Teacher/administrator quality and stability  PD quality and alignment

21 Expectations & Conditions  Leadership practices  Discipline, attendance, expulsions, graduation, dropout - 3-year trend - Aggregated/disaggregated  Parent/community engagement and practices

22 Resource Management  Time  Personnel  Money  Intentional decision-making

23 District Profile

24 Stage 2: Develop Focused Plan SYSTEM all parts must be integrated and connected

25 Decision Framework Automatically Transfers to CCIP  Needs Assessment transfers automatically to Ohio’s Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan (CCIP) system  Becomes basis for focused goals, strategies and actions to improve educational outcomes for all students

26 Stage 3: Implement Focused Plan Full Implementation – require actions aligned with district goals to occur in every classroom across the district

27 Stage 4: Monitor Improvement Process CONTINUOUS – system of ongoing feedback and monitoring at the district, school, classroom, and student level

28 OIP Benefits  Reduces duplication of effort  Focuses on student success not programs  Streamlines process  Promotes coordination and cooperation  Builds personnel capacity - Redirects staff time – admin/improvement - Everyone trains on and supports the same process and tools (the agency and the field) - Builds statewide and regional data capacity that supports and informs everyone

29 Contact Information State Support Team Region 5 -Single Point of Contact (SPOC) – Richard Kajuth Phone: 1(800) Consultants Lead: Support: Tel: Your County Educational Service Center -Your Contacts Here

30 Next Steps for ???? DLT  OLAC District Leadership Survey  Data Wrangling  Next Meeting: )