A Brief Guide to MDL's SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Version 1.0 January 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop
Advertisements

Weather Forecasting This chapter discusses: 1.Various weather forecasting methods, their tools, and forecasting accuracy and skill 2.Images for the forecasting.
Danish Meteorological Institute EPS Forecast of Weather Scenarios and Probability Presented at by Michael Steffensen Acknowledgments:
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
1 of Introduction to Forecasts and Verification.
Upcoming Changes in Winter Weather Operations at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Great Lakes Operational Meteorological Workshop Dan Petersen, Wallace.
WPC Winter Weather Desk Operations and Verification Dan Petersen Winter weather focal point Keith Brill, David Novak, Wallace Hogsett, and Mark.
“Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” NCEP CONDUIT UPDATE Brent A Gordon NCEP Central Operations January 31, 2006.
Details for Today: DATE:3 rd February 2005 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Assignment 2 briefing Evaluation of Model Performance 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models.
Part 5. Human Activities Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis.
Statistical correction and downscaling of daily precipitation in the UK via a probability mixture model A ‘Model Output Statistics’ (MOS) approach for.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
MDL Accomplishments and Plans: MOS, LAMP, EKDMOS, Storm Surge, AutoNowCaster, VLab NCEP Production Suite Review December 4, 2013.
Instituting Reforecasting at NCEP/EMC Tom Hamill (ESRL) Yuejian Zhu (EMC) Tom Workoff (WPC) Kathryn Gilbert (MDL) Mike Charles (CPC) Hank Herr (OHD) Trevor.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Hydrometeorlogical Prediction Center (HPC) Forecast Operations Branch Winter Weather Desk Dan Petersen.
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
The 10th annual Northeast Regional Operational Workshop, Albany, NY Verification of SREF Aviation Forecasts at Binghamton, NY Justin Arnott NOAA / NWS.
Juan Ruiz 1,2, Celeste Saulo 1,2, Soledad Cardazzo 1, Eugenia Kalnay 3 1 Departamento de Cs. de la Atmósfera y los Océanos (FCEyN-UBA), 2 Centro de Investigaciones.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
A Regression Model for Ensemble Forecasts David Unger Climate Prediction Center.
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
Using Short Range Ensemble Model Data in National Fire Weather Outlooks Sarah J. Taylor David Bright, Greg Carbin, Phillip Bothwell NWS/Storm Prediction.
“1995 Sunrise Fire – Long Island” Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter to Explore Model Performance on Northeast U.S. Fire Weather Days Michael Erickson and.
Slide Slide 1 Chapter 6 Normal Probability Distributions 6-1 Overview 6-2 The Standard Normal Distribution 6-3 Applications of Normal Distributions 6-4.
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
SNOPAC: Western Seasonal Outlook (8 December 2011) Portland, OR By Jan Curtis.
An Analysis of Eta Model Forecast Soundings in Radiation Fog Forecasting Steve Amburn National Weather Service, Tulsa, OK.
Verification of the Cooperative Institute for Precipitation Systems‘ Analog Guidance Probabilistic Products Chad M. Gravelle and Dr. Charles E. Graves.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
National Weather Service Application of CFS Forecasts in NWS Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction John Schaake Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA National.
Improving Ensemble QPF in NMC Dr. Dai Kan National Meteorological Center of China (NMC) International Training Course for Weather Forecasters 11/1, 2012,
Celeste Saulo and Juan Ruiz CIMA (CONICET/UBA) – DCAO (FCEN –UBA)
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
AMB Verification and Quality Control monitoring Efforts involving RAOB, Profiler, Mesonets, Aircraft Bill Moninger, Xue Wei, Susan Sahm, Brian Jamison.
1 An overview of the use of reforecasts for improving probabilistic weather forecasts Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Div.
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Experimental PQPF: Method, Products, and Preliminary Verification 1 David Novak HPC Science and Operations Officer.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Surface weather maps 500mb weather maps Satellite Images Radar Images.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
The Similar Soundings Technique For Incorporating Pattern Recognition Into The Forecast Process at WFO BGM Mike Evans Ron Murphy.
Recent Advancements from the Research-to-Operations (R2O) Process at HMT-WPC Thomas E. Workoff 1,2, Faye E. Barthold 1,3, Michael J. Bodner 1, David R.
2.There are two fundamentally different approaches to this problem. One can try to fit a theoretical distribution, such as a GEV or a GP distribution,
Insights from CMC BAMS, June Short Range The SPC Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) is constructed by post-processing all 21 members of the NCEP.
CBRFC Stakeholder Forum February 24, 2014 Ashley Nielson Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 CBRFC Forecast Verification.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
Forecasting Winter Precipitation
Ensembles and Probabilistic Prediction. Uncertainty in Forecasting All of the model forecasts I have talked about reflect a deterministic approach. This.
Nathalie Voisin 1, Florian Pappenberger 2, Dennis Lettenmaier 1, Roberto Buizza 2, and John Schaake 3 1 University of Washington 2 ECMWF 3 National Weather.
Judith Curry James Belanger Mark Jelinek Violeta Toma Peter Webster 1
Fly - Fight - Win 2 d Weather Group Mr. Evan Kuchera HQ AFWA 2 WXG/WEA Template: 28 Feb 06 Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited AFWA Ensemble.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
Probabilistic Forecasts Based on “Reforecasts” Tom Hamill and Jeff Whitaker and
The Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting Component of the 2011 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Experiment David Novak 1, Faye Barthold 1,2, Mike.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Salt Lake City, Utah 11 The Hydrologic.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
University of Washington Ensemble Systems for Probabilistic Analysis and Forecasting Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Ensembles and Probabilistic Prediction
Verifying and interpreting ensemble products
Tom Hopson, Jason Knievel, Yubao Liu, Gregory Roux, Wanli Wu
Dan Petersen Bruce Veenhuis Greg Carbin Mark Klein Mike Bodner
Question 1 Given that the globe is warming, why does the DJF outlook favor below-average temperatures in the southeastern U. S.? Climate variability on.
Model Post Processing.
Basic Forecasting Tips
Communicating Uncertainty via Probabilistic Forecasts for the January 2016 Blizzard in Southern New England Frank M Nocera, Stephanie L. Dunten & Kevin.
Post Processing.
Ensemble-4DWX update: focus on calibration and verification
Presentation transcript:

A Brief Guide to MDL's SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Version 1.0 January 2013

What's this all about? An innovative way to view and understand SREF output Calibrated probabilistic forecast guidance, based on NCEP's Short Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) system--SREF Winter Guidance (SWinG) Prototype includes weather elements that focus on rain/snow/freezing rain forecast decisions Available on the web for all SREF forecast cycles and time projections at a limited number of stations

Why use calibrated probabilities?  Ensembles are often overconfident (underdispersed).  Too frequently the verification falls outside the spread of the ensemble members.  SWinG forecasts are calibrated.  True measure of forecast confidence.  Statistically reliable spread.

How do I use it?  If precipitation type is a question, and  You expect SREF to be skillful  Assess the meteograms for your stations SREF/xml/meteoform_sref.php

SREF Winter Guidance--Full Page

SREF Winter Guidance—Top Half Higher confidence Lower confidence

SREF Winter Guidance—Bottom Half

How to Assess Meteograms  Time series forecasts of weather elements related to precipitation type  Black line is 50th percentile

How to Assess Meteograms  Grey areas show spread of the distribution (10th, 30th, 70th, and 90th percentiles) 10% 90% 70% 30%

How to Assess Meteograms  Red lines show the station specific climatological boundary for rain/snow, if available

How to Assess Meteograms  Tri-color lines show rule of thumb values for rain/freezing/frozen Rain/freezing frozen threshold Freezing/snow line All-snow threshold

Up Close  Close up of 850 mb Temperature

Up Close  Compare spread at 0300 and 1500 UTC. Forecast is more confident at 0300.

Up Close  At 0300, guidance indicates ~70% chance of 850 mb temperature below key value (-1.5° C)

Up Close  At 1500, SWinG indicates ~20% chance of 850 mb temperature below key value (-1.5° C)

Which weather elements? Current  2-m Temperature  850 mb Temperature  mb Thickness  mb Thickness  mb Thickness  mb Thickness Future  Dendritic Growth Zone Depth  Omega  Freezing Level  Positive/Negative Energy  Snow Liquid Equivalent Why these weather elements? There are better parameters for winter weather!

Why these weather elements?  We have a very short sample. SREF began running in this configuration 21 Aug  We are using a modified form of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). This technique can only forecast weather parameters that are observed daily.  Currently, SREF vertical velocities for NMM and NMMB have problems.  It's a new technique. We started with the easiest weather elements.

Which Stations?  On NCEP's Central Computing System, we generate SWinG for more than 3000 stations  Adapted from the BUFR station list used at NCEP  BUFR station list is source for BUFKIT application  On our web page, we generate images for ~400 stations  All upper air stations in CONUS and Alaska  Additional stations to support WFO LWX Winter Weather Pilot Project.  We can, and will, add stations to the web page  Contact us if you want us to add stations

How do we make SWinG? Using most recent verification...  Correct bias of each member  Weight the bias-corrected members (ARW, NMM, NMMB members)  Correct forecast spread  Compute probabilities We have named this technique Decaying Average Bayesian Model Averaging (DABMA).

Previous Forecasts Today's Observation Update Bias Corrections Bias correction for each model core... Latest SREF Forecast Correct Bias of Each Member We track and remove the bias of each member. We update this bias correction daily with the most recent verification. Previous Bias Corrections New Estimate = 0.95 x Previous Estimate x Today's Estimate Latest SREF Forecast Correct the Bias of Each Member i.e., 1 bias correction value each for ARW, NMM, NMMB, which is applied to each of their respective members more

Previous Bias- Corrected Forecasts Today's Observation Update Relative Weights Relative weights for each model core Using the most recent verification, we compute relative weights for bias-corrected ARW, NMM, NMMB members Previous Weights

Using most recent verification, correct forecast spread Previous Forecasts Today's Observation Compute optimal spread Optimal spread Raw Spread Corrected

We compute probabilities using a Normal Mixture Model to combine member forecasts.

Illustration: Three members (blue) contrib- ute to final probability distribution (black) For SREF, we use all 21 members.

We compute probabilities using a Normal Mixture Model to combine member forecasts. Relative model weights set height of each blue curve

We compute probabilities using a Normal Mixture Model to combine member forecasts. Bias-corrected SREF forecasts set position of each blue curve on X-axis

We compute probabilities using a Normal Mixture Model to combine member forecasts. The optimal spread deter- mines the spread of each blue curve.

Join the conversation! We are using the NWS Innovation Web Portal (IWP) to gather feedback from forecasters.  You will find  Additional documentation and case studies  Forum where you can submit questions and comments  For access  Follow the URL and login with NOAA credentials  Select “Available Communities” tab  Find “SREF Winter Guidance” and “Join”