Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASME Certified Yankee Dryer King Hardware May 3rd, 2010.
Advertisements

Codes & Standards.
ASME Liaison Report to CRE May 18, 2011 Urey R. Miller, P.E.
INSTITUTE FOR PRESSURE VESSEL & PLANT TECHNOLOGY VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L. Zeman Vienna University of Technology.
CE Regulation Service PROLAB Tech Rev 1 Machinery Directive Flow Chart A brief guide.
ASME Nuclear Conformity Assessment
Gas Transmission Pipelines
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus March American Welding Society Stainless Steel Edition.
Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting
1 EN Core Standards for Pressure Equipment Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive Warsaw, June 2004 Dr. Reinhard Preiss TÜV Austria Krugerstrasse.
Pressure Vessels.
13.4. GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: PRESSURE VESSELS
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
Materials Bratislava 11/12/13 April 2005 Presented by Peter Hanmore For the benefit of business and people TAIEX Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Comparative Study: EN – ASME VIII
GRPE GRPE CGH 2 Experts (A sub-group of the GRPE Informal Group “Hydrogen/Fuel Cell”) JASIC Presentation At The GRPE CGH 2 Experts Meeting.
Proposal to the MDM.032 Working Group Y Morier Meeting
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement. Intentions Free movement  CE marking for vessels, accessories and assemblies Well-defined responsibilities  Manufacturer,
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
1 Comparative Study: EN – ASME VIII Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive Warsaw, June, 2004 Dr. Reinhard Preiss TÜV Austria Krugerstrasse.
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Chapter 2– Guide to ASME Code VIII, Division 1, Pressure Vessels Engineering Technology Division.
Welding Inspection and Metallurgy
The Pressure Equipment Directive and Innovation Guy BAYLAC Technical Advisor of EPERC TP European Commission/TAIEX PED Worshop in.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Metal Fabrication Quality and conformity of our products 2015.
National Legislation on in- service inspections and the PED.
Fernando Lidonnici Convenor of WG’C’/CEN TC54 Sant’Ambrogio Servizi Industriali SRL - Milano The advantages of the new calculation methods provided in.
PED and Swedish regulations
PED Workshop, Bratislava April 2005 PED and Presumption of Conformity Product Standards for pressure vessels, boilers and piping, and “Horizontal” standards.
Pressure Systems: Users Guide Introduction This guidance note summarises the key features of the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations (PSSR). Theses Regulations.
DESIGN AND IN-SERVICE INSPECTIONS Guy BAYLAC Technical Advisor to EPERC TAIEX Workshop, Working Group 4 Bratislava – 12 April 2005.
TAIEX Poland, June 2004 Comparison and Presumption of Conformity of some standardisation systems Ed Haynes CEN Consultant Pressure Equipment.
SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEL-2 INSTALLATION IN THE LAB Paolo Magagnin (BE-BI-ML) 24 – April
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
Notified Body Problem Solving Warsaw, Poland 24/26 June 2004 Presented by Peter Hanmore For the benefit of business and people TAIEX Workshop on the Pressure.
API Spec 6A: ASME Section V And Section IX Reference Editions Tim Haeberle API SC Summer Meeting.
Core Standards in the Pressure Equipment Area
C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Technical.
CODES FOR VESSELS/HEAT EXCHANGERS Avinash Nayak. (46) Shrikantkumar Padhy (47) Jitendra Patil (48) Manoj Patil (49) Ganeshprasad Pavaskar (51)
- Generals for PED matters - Definition of pressure vessel and classes - Who is who according to PED - Definition of pressure vessel + codes for XFEL -
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Technical Basis of Material Toughness Requirements in the ASME Boiler and Pressure.
Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
The application of the PED on the design codes for cryogenic equipment and future developments foreseen in this field Paris, 06/09/2016 l Hervé BARTHELEMY.
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
PED Conformity assessment of materials Poul Holmegaard
Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement
For the benefit of business and people
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
BS EN 10204:2004 Metallic Products – Types of inspection documents
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Riga,
Pressure Equipment (PED):
Rules for Mechanical Design and Pressure Testing for Detector vessel
Pressure Equipment (PED) --- Baltic Pressure Equipment Workshop
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Presentation transcript:

Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules Fernando Lidonnici Convenor of WG’C’/CEN TC54 Sant’Ambrogio Servizi Industriali SRL - Milano

LEGAL AND NORMATIVE ASPECTS USA: the ASME Code (Section VIII for Pressure Vessels) is the safety standard generally accepted, but there are differences in the different States (in some of them it is imposed by law, in other it is required for insurance purposes only). Europe: the PED (Process Equipment Directive) is a law and therefore it is compulsory in all the European countries. It requires compliance with the Essential Safety Requirements (ESRs) only, not with a detailed set of rules. The use of a “Harmonized Standard” (EN 13445 for Pressure Vessels) assures “Presumption of Conformity” with the PED, but other standards are also acceptable, provided they take into account the ESRs.

REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASME: requires strict compliance with the section of the ASME code concerning a given pressure component (there is a specific section for each type of component). The ASME stamp (different for each section) assures full compliance with every detail contained in that section. The Manufacturer is responsible to take into account the requirements and loading conditions specified by the Purchaser.. PED: the Manufacturer (not the Purchaser) is fully responsible for the safety of the equipment in all the possible conditions: normal operating, exceptional, testing, transport, erection, maintenance, etc. The CE mark means that only the ESRs have been complied with, not a specific code or standard. Design and fabrication must be made on the basis of a specific Risk Analysis, different for each component, under the responsibility of the Manufacturer.

DESIGN ACCORDING TO ASME SECTION VIII div.1 Nominal design stresses for Steels in Section VIII division 1 are limited by a very high safety coefficient on tensile strength (3,5). In the creep range the characteristics of the welding material are supposed to be the same as the base metal. DBA (=Design by Analysis) and Fatigue Analysis only possible with Section VIII division 2 (special vessels). DBE (Design by Experiment) only possible where calculation formulae are not provided in the Code. Section VIII division 1 covers all materials (Steels, Cast Iron, Al alloys, Cu alloys, Ni alloys, Titanium, etc.)

DESIGN TO PED + EN13445.3 Safety coefficients are only recommended, however deviations from recommended values must be supported by additional prescriptions giving the same level of safety. The harmonized Pressure Vessel Standard considers the recommended value of 2,4 on tensile strength; this value may be lowered to 1,875 (amendment already approved) if additional prescriptions are taken. The actual characteristics of weld metal must be taken into account, particularly in the creep range. DBA is always possible, fatigue analysis is mandatory for all vessels subject to cyclic loadings. DBE possible only for small components (in EN 13445.3 it will be covered in an amendment already approved). EN 13445 is limited to steels, Spheroidal Cast Iron and Aluminium alloys only (amendment already approved for Aluminium and design of Steels in the Creep Range)

MATERIALS ACCORDING TO ASME Only SA (or ASTM) materials may be used (plus a few EN materials considered in the Code). Allowable design stresses based on hot tensile / creep properties are directly provided in the Code. The material Manufacturer is not required to give a guarantee on such characteristics. Only a few SA / ASTM material specifications give impact properties at room or low temperatures.

MATERIALS ACCORDING TO PED + EN 13445.2 There are three possibilities: Use of EN harmonized material standards. These standards usually contain hot tensile characteristics and impact test values which are therefore automatically guaranteed by the material Fabricator. Use of materials for which an EAM procedure has been carried out (only possible for a few materials not yet contained in EN standards). Use a PMA (Particular Material Appraisal) = original specification plus supplementary requirements to be guaranteed by the material Fabricator.

JOINT EFFICIENCIES (of main welded joints) ASME: from 0,7 (no NDT) to 1 (full NDT). Joint efficiency 1 required for Lethal Service, large thicknesses, materials with particular welding difficulties. It is possible to use 0,7 also for large vessels. PED + EN 13445: also from 0,7 (no NDT) to 1 (full NDT). EN 13445 limits the use of testing group 4 (joint efficiency 0,7) to carbon steels (temperatures +10 / +200 °C) and austenitic stainless steels (temperatures -50 / +300°C) only, with pressure smaller than 20 bar and pressure x volume smaller than 20000 (above 100°C) or 50000 bar x litre, provided the content is not dangerous (Group 2 Fluids only).

HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURE ASME VIII division 1: the lower of (formula to be applied to all pressure parts of a specific vessel) PED (Recommended): the higher of (formula to be applied to all the pressure parts of a specific vessel), however not less than . Use of lower hydrostatic test pressures is permitted if alternative measures assuring the same safety level are taken. EN 13445.5: the hydrostatic test pressure may be limited to the maximum value compatible with the actual thicknesses of the main pressure parts determined by design conditions. For Vessels of Testing Group 4 a higher test pressure is provided. Note: PS = Design Pressure, = ratio between nominal design stress at 20°C and nominal design stress at design temperature.

CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES ASME: Authorization given to the Manufacturer to affix an ASME Stamp (specific for the particular kind of pressure component concerned) after a survey carried out by ASME and the National Board of Pressure Vessel Inspectors. Design, fabrication and inspection activities carried out under the surveillance of an Authorized Inspection Agency. Particular precautions are to be taken for vessels in “Lethal Service”. PED: Specific certification procedures (modules) have been provided in order to cover 4 different hazard categories of vessels. Some modules are based on QC (Quality Control) procedures, other on QA (Quality Assurance) procedures (lower degree: self certification, higher degree: either full QC (step by step checking), or full QA (Qualification of the Manufacturer). For Vessels the hazard category depends on the content (dangerous / / non dangerous) and on its physical state (liquid or gas / vapour). Each module provides a different involvement of a Notified Body, specifically authorized by one of the European countries. Note: also assemblies made of several pressure component are subject to a certification procedure.

PED: Conformity assessment table for dangerous gases

PED: Conformity assessment table for non dangerous gases

PED: Conformity assessment table for dangerous liquids

PED: Conformity assessment table for non dangerous liquids

PED: Conformity assessment modules for the various hazard categories