The Forest for the Trees Visualizing Adverse Events Andreas Brueckner Bayer Healthcare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patients’ Perspective on HTA and Off-label use David Head MBA Chief Executive RP Fighting Blindness 25th Annual EuroMeeting 4-6 March 2013 RAI, Amsterdam.
Advertisements

Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
Industry/FDA/Academia Safety Graphics Working Group Introduction and Overview FDA/QSPI Biostatistics, Statistical Programming, and Data Management Summit.
Qi Jiang and Liping Huang on Behalf of the Adverse Event Sub Team
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
ABCWINRisk and Statistics1 Risk and Statistics Risk Assessment in Clinical Decision Making Ulrich Mansmann Medical Statistics Branch University of Heidelberg.
JumpStart the Regulatory Review: Applying the Right Tools at the Right Time to the Right Audience Lilliam Rosario, Ph.D. Director Office of Computational.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
 Pharmacovigilance – Patient’s standpoint Steve Arlington May 2007.
PSYCHOLOGY 820 Chapters Introduction Variables, Measurement, Scales Frequency Distributions and Visual Displays of Data.
Barry Cherney, Ph.D., Deputy Director DTP/OBP/CDER/ FDA Perspectives on Comparability of Biotechnology Derived Protein Products.
FDA Public Hearing: Reporting of Adverse Events to Institutional Review Boards March 21, 2005 CIOMS VI Working Group Proposals Wendy P. Stephenson, MD,
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
Applied Epidemiology Sharla Smith. Discussion Assignments How to complete a discussion assignment –Read the chapters –Evaluate the question –Be very specific.
1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs.
Writing the “Results” & “Discussion” sections Awatif Alam Professor Community Medicine Medical College/ KSU.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
Introduction to Drug Rediscovery John Lisman Attorney-at-law Lisman Legal Life sciences Insert your logo in this area then delete this text box.
Impact of E9 Addendum to Industry
How to audit the role of the vendor in the conduct of outsourced studies Kristel Van de Voorde Director Global Quality Regulatory Compliance Bristol-Myers.
Presenter Name Title Organization Twitter Handle Insert your logo here, then delete text.
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April Quantitative risk analysis using exposure-response.
Robert Gordon Biostatistics and Medical Safety Johnson & Johnson
Graphical Approaches for Safety Signal Detection Efforts of the FDA-Industry-Academia Working Group Mat Soukup, Ph.D. Acting Team Lead Biometrics 7, CDER.
Click to add Presentation Title Arial 32, 5 line max title space line 3, title space line 4, title space line 5 Presenter Title Organization Insert your.
1 Optimal Strategies for Preparing Integrated and Clinical Summaries for a New Drug Application: Making it Work Under Any Circumstance Lisa A. Pierchala,
White Papers to Fill the Gaps of Standardization of Tables, Figures, and Listings (Creating Standard Targets) Analyses and Displays for Vital Signs, ECG,
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
 An exposure-response (E-R) analysis in oncology aims at describing the relationship between drug exposure and survival and in addition aims at comparing.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Bayesian approach to equivalence study of medical device 1 1.
Robert Gordon FDA/QSPI Biostatistics, Statistical Programming and Data Management Summit Washington D.C. March 2012.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in the US Virginia (Ginny) Beakes-Read Executive Director, Global Regulatory Policy and.
Strategic Analyses and Interpretation: Regulatory Intelligence for Decision Making Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy & Science ViroPharma Incorporated.
Good Laboratory Practices and Inspection Readiness Paul Swidersky President/Sr. Consultant Quality Associates, Inc.
Meredith Brown-Tuttle, RAC Director APT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Process-based Metadata From a DIA Presentation: eTMF – Migrating from Paper Trial Master Files to Electronic Eldin Rammell, Managing Director, Rammell.
Experiences from building a lessons- learned database for regulatory interactions Åsa Rembratt Sr Reg Intelligence Manager Novo Nordisk A/S 26th Annual.
Group Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Bath Lisa Hampson Department of Mathematics.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in Canada, EU, Japan, and US Chairperson: Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy &
Some epidemiological principles and methods
- A “Portable” Implementation
Visualizations of Safety Data
Mutagenic Impurities: Guidances Update w/ CMC Perspectives
Presenter Title Organization
Track 11 Symposium 27 June :30 – 3:00 PM
Perspective on GCP Warning Letters
DIA Virtual Journal Club Statistical Considerations on the Evaluation of Imbalances of Adverse Events in Randomized Clinical Trials Discussant Susan.
Molly Butler Auditor II Quality Associates, Inc.
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
8. Causality assessment:
Improving Adverse Drug Reaction Information in Product Labels
Community-Based and Cluster-Randomized Studies –‘Pragmatic’ Approaches for Life Cycle Evidence? Florian Eichmann, PhD Principal Scientific Affairs and.
FirstPoint and FirstDoc Application of the DIA EDM Reference Model
Presenter Name Title Organization.
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
Data Mining AERS FDA’s (Spontaneous) Adverse Event Reporting System Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety Carolyn McCloskey, M.D., M.P.H.
Presenter Name Title Organization.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
William W. Gregory for the CIOMS MLG Exploratory Team Pfizer Inc
Gregory Levin, FDA/CDER/OTS/OB/DBIII
Presentation transcript:

The Forest for the Trees Visualizing Adverse Events Andreas Brueckner Bayer Healthcare

Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. (“DIA”), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association, Drug Information Association Inc., DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2

Statistical Disclaimer 3

Motivation Guidance from Above Developing Standard Views of Safety Data Concluding Remarks References Outline 4

Motivating Graphic 5

Motivation - Safety Safety assessment and risk management is crucial in drug development. Recent trends highlight the need for prospectively planned analysis strategies to assess safety. Develop standardized tools to summarize and analyze safety data for typical safety issues. 6

More Motivation – Safety Graphics Ability to highlight key safety signals and depict key characteristics from both small and large databases. The choice of graph and its detailed design should allow a quick decode of the information. Improves retention of information displayed. 7

Motivating Example – Table Results 8

Motivating Example – Results Graph 9

Guidance from Above 10

ICH E9 11

3.3.3 Trials to Show Dose-response Relationship For this purpose the application of procedures to estimate the relationship between dose and response, including the construction of confidence intervals and the use of graphical methods, is as important as the use of statistical tests. 6.4 Statistical Evaluation In most trials the safety and tolerability implications are best addressed by applying descriptive statistical methods to the data, supplemented by calculation of confidence intervals wherever this aids interpretation. It is also valuable to make use of graphical presentations in which patterns of adverse events are displayed both within treatment groups and within subjects. ICH E9 – Statistical Principles 12

CIOMS VI 13

From the perspective of illustrating the course of an adverse event, it is very much preferred to present the cumulative hazard. CIOMS VI – Management of Safety Information from Clinical Trials 14

FDA Reviewer Guidance 15

Explorations of Time-Dependency for Adverse Findings The reviewer should explore time dependency of adverse reactions: For important adverse reactions that occur later in treatment, there should be explorations of the time dependency of the reaction. Possible methods include: A life table (Kaplan-Meier graph) describing risk as a function of duration of exposure (i.e., cumulative incidence) Plotting risk for discrete time intervals over the observation period (i.e., a hazard rate curve) reveals how risk changes over time. FDA Reviewer Guidance – Adverse Findings 16

FDA Labeling Guidance 17

FDA Labeling Guidance 18

FDA Labeling Guidance - Effectiveness Graphs 19

FDA Labeling Guidance - Graphical Principles 20

Motivation Guidance from Above Developing Standard Views of Safety Data Concluding Remarks References 21

FDA/Industry/Academia Working Group 22

(a) Identify areas particularly applicable or useful to regulatory review in which graphics can enhance understanding of safety information. –List major safety questions. –What is the critical information needed to answer these questions ? (b) Develop a palette of statistical graphics for specialized reporting of clinical trials data. –Develop an inventory –Recommend graphics for clinical data based on good graphical principles Draw up what would be effective to address (a). (c) Create a publicly-available repository of sample graphics including data sets and sample code. Project Objectives 23

Clinical Questions 24

CTSPEDIA - Clinical Questions 25

CTSPEDIA - Graphics 26

Example 1 - Incidence of AE Which AEs1 are elevated in treatment vs. control?

Example 2 - Incidence of AE Which AEs1 are elevated in treatment vs. control?

Example 3 – What is the safety profile of the drug? Which AEs1 are elevated in treatment vs. control? *It shows the relative risk or ratio of the adverse event rates on the x-axis and the p-value comparing treatment and control on the y-axis. The additional information on the p-value of the treatment effect is important since it incorporates the number of observed events and confidence in the treatment effect.

Source: Xia A, 2011 Example 4 - AE Occurrence over time Is there a difference in the time to event? 30

Example 6 - AE Occurrence over time Event History Plot

Source: Qi Jiang, Amgen Example 5 - AE Occurrence over time Incidence Prevalence Plot

Motivation Guidance from Above Developing Standard Views of Safety Data Concluding Remarks References 33

Complex statistical concepts and data structures can be conveyed at a level which is within reach to those with little statistical training. Ability to highlight key safety signals and describe efficacy characteristics from large databases. Paradigm is to actively assess the data in a manner that is visual, intuitive, and geometric. Reasons to Include Graphic Summaries 34

Clinical trial results are more transparent (hard to hide the data if it is all shown). Increases the likelihood of detecting safety signals and understanding patients characteristics. Improves the ability to make clinical decisions Improves communication to the public. Potential Results Using Effective Graphics 35

Special thanks to the Members of the FDA/Industry/Academia Safety Graphics Working Group Regulatory: Mat Soukup, George Rochester, Antonio Paredes, Chuck Cooper, Eric Frimpong, Hao Zhu, Janelle Charles, Jeff Summers, Joyce Korvick, Leslie Kenna, Mark Walderhaug, Pravin Jadjav, Richard Forshee, Robert Fiorentino, Suzanne Demko, Ted Guo, Yaning Wang, Industry: Ken Koury, Brenda Crowe, Andreas Brueckner, Stephine Keeton, Andreas Krause, Fabrice Bancken, Larry Gould, Liping Huang, Mac Gordon, Matthew Gribbin, Navdeep Boparai, Qi Jiang, Rich Anziano, Susan Duke, Sylvia Engelen, Academia: Frank Harrell, Mary Banach 36

Thank You for Your Attention 37

References and Useful Links Amit O, Heiberger R and Lane P (2007). Graphical approaches to the analysis of safety data in clinical trials. Pharmaceut. Stat. 7(1): Cooper AJP, Lettis S, Chapman CL, Evans SJW, Waller PC, Shakir S, Payvandi N and Murray AB (2008), Developing tools for the safety specification in risk management plans: lessons learned from a pilot project. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 17: 445–454. Lewis S, Clarke M (2001): Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ, 322, Dubin JA, Mueller HG and Wang JL (2001), Event history graphs for censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine, 20: 2951–2964. Xia HA, Crowe BJ, Schriver RC, Oster M, Hall DB. Planning and core analyses for periodic aggregate safety data reviews. Clin Trials April 2011 vol. 8 no Heiberger R and Holland B, Statistical Analysis and Data Display. Springer, New York, NY, Cleveland WS. Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, Summit, NJ, Cleveland WS. Elements of Graphing Data. Hobart Press, Summit, NJ, Robbins NB, Creating More Effective Graphs. Wiley-Interscience, Tufte ER, The Visual Display of Qualitative Information. Graphics Press, Chesire, CT, Tufte EB, Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Chesire, CT, Tufte ER, Visual Explanations. Graphics Press, Chesire, CT, Michael Friendly's Gallery of Data Visualization - The Best and Worst of Statistical Graphics Robert Allison's SAS/Graph Examples - Frank Harell's Tutorial: Statistical Presentation Graphics JSM 2010 Session, "Use of Graphics in Clinical Trials“ 38