Www.DirectTrust.org 1101 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036 Understanding Patient Engagement in Stage 2 MU: Direct, HIPAA, VDT, and Patient Engagement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996– charged the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) with creating health information.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Direct Exchange from Provider to Patient/Consumer ….and Back! David C. Kibbe, MD MBA.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Supporting Meaningful Use Stage 2 Transition of Care Requirements
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Temporary Certification Program: Overview Educational Session August 18, 2010 Carol Bean, PhD Director, Certification Division Office of the National Coordinator.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
1101 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC :00 pm EDT, May 2, (773)
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Direct Exchange An Introduction for Providers Engaged in Stage 2 Meaningful Use David.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
HIT Standards Committee Hearing on Trusted Identity of Patients in Cyberspace November 29, 2012 Jointly sponsored by HITPC Privacy and Security Tiger Team.
Security & Privacy Strategies for Expanded Communities Deven McGraw Partner Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP 1.
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families June 17, 2013 Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair 1.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Recommendations Adopted by The Health IT Policy Committee Relevant to Consumer Empowerment May 24, 2013.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Dealing with Business Associates Business Associates Business Associates are persons or organizations that on behalf of a covered entity: –Perform any.
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup NwHIN Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) May 15,
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC David C. Kibbe, MD MBA President and CEO, DirectTrust Senior Advisor, AAFP AMDIS, Boston,
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
HIPAA THE PRIVACY RULE. 2 HISTORY In 2000, many patients that were newly diagnosed with depression received free samples of anti- depressant medications.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
The Culture of Healthcare Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security Lecture d This material (Comp2_Unit9d) was developed by Oregon Health and Science University,
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
1101 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC :00 pm ET, June 15, (626)
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Your Guide. Table of Contents Welcome to MyChart…………………………….…..3 How to Sign Up………………………………… MyChart Homepage (navigating through MyChart)……...
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Privacy and Security Tiger Team Potential Questions for Request for Comment Meaningful Use Stage 3 October 3, 2012.
HIPAA Access Guidance Marissa Gordon-Nguyen Office for Civil Rights January 20, 2016.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
HIPAA Training. What information is considered PHI (Protected Health Information)  Dates- Birthdays, Dates of Admission and Discharge, Date of Death.
Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC DirectTrust Collaborating to Build the Security and Trust Framework for Direct Exchange.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Getting Started: BCeID Sign Up
EHR Incentive Program 2018 Program Requirements
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Understanding Patient Engagement in Stage 2 MU: Direct, HIPAA, VDT, and Patient Engagement Deven McGraw Partner Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP with David C. Kibbe President and CEO DirectTrust Slides and transcript to be published at DirectTrust.org

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Note to Slides This presentation was provided by Deven McGraw during an interview by David C. Kibbe. The transcript of the interview provides the questions and longer text answers. Both the slide deck and the transcript are available from DirectTrust on the website

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC HIPAA & HITECH Patients have the right to access their health information in the form or format they request, as long as the info is reproducible in that form/format (HIPAA). Patients can get this information electronically if information is stored electronically (HITECH). Patients can have information directly sent to a third party if the choice is “clear, conspicuous and specific.” (HITECH)

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC What is acceptable digital format? Must have capability to provide some human readable digital copy (for ex., PDF). Not required to adopt every format requested by patients – negotiate re: mutually acceptable format.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Sending to Third Parties “Clear, Conspicuous & Specific” means: – In writing (can be electronic) – Signed by the patient (can be electronic) – Clearly identifies designated person/entity and where to send the information.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Responsibilities of Sender Covered entities may rely on the information provided in writing by the patient and need only have reasonable procedures in place to assure that the address provided by the patient is correctly entered. – “For example, reasonable safeguards [to be followed by the covered entity] would not require the covered entity to confirm that the individual provided the correct address of the third party, but would require reasonable procedures to ensure that the covered entity correctly enters the address into its system.” (page 5635)

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Must be Sent Securely? HIPAA Security Rule requires secure transmission of PHI – but: If patient requests in unsecure format, provider must sent “in the form or format requested by the patient.” Yes, in this case, the patient’s wishes can trump Security Rule obligations.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Really? Yes – but you are expected to provide a “lite” warning about security risks to make sure patient is aware of choice he/she is making. – “We do not expect covered entities to educate individuals about encryption technology and the information security. Rather, we merely expect the covered entity to notify the individual that there may be some level of risk that the information in the e- mail could be read by a third party. If the individuals are notified of the risks and still prefer unencrypted , the individual has the right to receive [PHI] in that way, and covered entities are not responsible for unauthorized access of [PHI] while in transmission to the individual based on the individual’s request. Further, covered entities are not responsible for safeguarding information once delivered to the individual.” (p.5634)

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC HIPAA & VDT: Compatible? Two separate legal regimes – Meaningful Use (VDT) enforced by CMS, HIPAA by the HHS Office for Civil Rights (CMS). They convey separate rights – but it is possible to leverage one (VDT) to help you comply with the other (HIPAA).

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC VDT - Professionals Under Stage 2 of Meaningful Use, eligible professionals are required to provide more than 50% of their unique patients with timely access to their health information. In addition, more than 5% of unique patients need to either view, download or transmit this information to a third party. Timely access means within 4 business days of the information being available to the professional.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC VDT- Hospitals Eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals must provide more than 50% of their inpatient or ER discharges with access to information about their hospital stay within 36 hours of discharge. They also must get more than 5% of their patients to use this functionality.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC What info must be provided? For professionals, information includes: – current and past problem list, procedures, lab test results, current medication list and med history, current medication allergy list and history, vital signs, smoking status, demographic information, and care plan fields (care team members, goals and instructions).

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC What info must be provided? For hospitals, information includes: – admit and discharge date and location, reason for hospitalization, care team, procedures performed, current and past problem list, medications & allergies (current list and history), vital signs at discharge, lab test results available at discharge, summary of care record, and discharge instructions.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC How is HIPAA different? More information – patients entitled to all information in a “designated record set.” Longer lead time – up to 30 days, plus another 30 if information is stored off-site. Can charge for labor costs.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Bottom Line Meaningful use may help you meet HIPAA obligations. Affirmatively provides relevant information for patients in a more timely (and possibly cheaper [for them]) way. VDT may be a “form or format” acceptable to both patient and provider. The “T” in VDT may help satisfy patients’ needs to get information to a third party.

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Certification Criteria The 2014 criteria require certification only to the ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport specification (not XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging) for the “transmit to third party at the request of a patient” functionality (e.g., the “T” in VDT). Final Stage 2 Rule: MU objectives must be met using certified technology (pages and 54037).

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Secure Messaging (Stage 2 MU) Relevant only to eligible professionals. More than 5% of an EP’s unique patients must send a secure message using the electronic messaging function of certified EHR technology (inflow not outflow). No particular technical standard required for certification; CEHRT must demonstrate the capability to “enable a user to send messages to, and receive messages from, a patient in a manner that ensures: both the patient (or authorized representative) and EHR technology user are authenticated; and the message content is encrypted and integrity-protected in accordance with the standard for encryption and hashing algorithms specified at [Section] (f).”

Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC Thank you! Deven McGraw Partner Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP David C. Kibbe, MD MBA President and CEO DirectTrust