Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2010 survey Review/discuss proposed Spring 2011 Survey Any other.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSLI Fall 2013 Survey Almost 7:30 Democratic Club Nov. 1, 2013 Presentation by Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues www2.aacc.edu/csli.
Advertisements

The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview Review CSLI History/Mission Opportunities for Student Learning and Civic Awareness Your Help Dan Nataf,
2014 Elections in Maryland Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues, Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli Nov. 13/20, 2014.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County and 2010 Elections By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel.
Being an MSUSA Officer What Does it Take? WHAT YOUR YEAR WILL LOOK LIKE IF YOU ARE ELECTED STATE CHAIR, VICE CHAIR OR TREASURER OF MSUSA. STUDENTS BRING.
1 Public Perceptions of Terrorism and Government Preparedness National and Local Trends and Findings November 16, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director,
1 Public ne Arundel County: Greater Severna Park Council – Presentation of CSLI Survey Findings for Spring 2009 April 14, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director,
CSLI Advisory Board Meeting September 18, Agenda I.Welcome II.Chairman’s report – Hal Counihan (away for family reasons) III. Director’s report.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 20, 2011 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation November 15, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
Overview of Recent Elections, 2010 By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College November 18, 2010.
Your Vote, Your Voice, Your Choice!
2012 Elections and Public Opinion Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
The Public’s Perceptions and Experiences with the Economy in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 7, 2010 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
Based on Recent Surveys of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
GREATER SEVERNA PARK COUNCIL PRESENTATION Results of Oct , 2012 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132 Anne Arundel Community.
Presentation of CSLI Fall 2009 Survey Findings + Annapolis Election Musings Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: CSLI Campus Presentation November 7, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings February 21, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues: Introductory Meeting Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept. 11, 2014 Agenda Call to order Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Spring 2014 survey Review/discuss proposed Fall 2014.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Initial Hearing on Separation of Powers and Legislative Oversight— House Policy Staff Briefings Gary Ciminero, Michael Civittolo and Sandra Whitehouse.
Service Learning at the Center for the Study of Local Issues Review CSLI History/Mission The Semi-Annual Survey: An Opportunity for Student Learning and.
Getting Involved In The S. G. A. Tyrone M. Smiley December 3, 2007 Intro to Public Relations.
CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 11, 2010 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2009 survey Review/discuss proposed.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept. 16, 2010 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Spring 2010 survey Review/discuss.
2006 Elections, Recent Public Opinion Findings By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Spring 2009 survey Review/discuss.
Elections in Oregon Produced by the League of Women Voters® of Oregon Education Fund.
1 CSLI Advisory Board – Fall 2006 Presentation Review of Spring 2006 Survey Findings September 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for.
1 Overview of the Center for the Study of Local Issues March 30, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept 13, 2012 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2012 survey Review/discuss proposed.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Coordinators of Volunteers of Anne Arundel County– Reflections about Trends affecting Nonprofits in AA County June 5, 2009.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 29, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
VOTING TATIANA CARDOSO NICOLE CABRERA STEPHANIE ESPINOSA ADRIANA GUTIERREZ ROBERT PRIETO JONATHON WARRING P.3.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues: Instructional Meeting Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132 Anne Arundel Community.
Civics Review. The Supreme Court decision referred to by the phrase “one person, one vote” made our state governments fairer by…
Results of March 4-7, 2013 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
CSLI Wrap-Up Meeting, Fall 2014 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 13, 2014 Agenda Call to order Survey Committee report Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2013 survey Review/discuss.
Recap of Recent CSLI Survey Findings from Fall 2008 Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Part of the Sarbanes Center for Public.
2014 Elections in Maryland Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues, Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli Nov. 13/20, 2014.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings June 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
CSLI Semi-annual Survey Fall CSLI Semi-Annual Survey – Fall 2007 Main issues to be covered: CSLI Benchmark Questions – Most important issues, right/wrong.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings December 13, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
CSLI Semi-annual Survey for Fall 2007 The Center for the Study of Local Issues is part of the Paul S. Sarbanes Center for Community and Public Service.
By Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College August 4, 2010.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation May 12, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study.
CSLI Fall 2007 Survey Review the process Review the findings.
Greater Severna Park Council Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
District 32 Republican Club Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Elephants Club Presentation By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli March.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Understanding and Participating in The Utah Republican Party Caucuses & Conventions The Basics All state recognized political parties hold caucus meetings.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings November 2, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
POLITICAL PARTY ORGANIZATION
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2010 survey Review/discuss proposed Spring 2011 Survey Any other new/old business Adjournment Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD

1. Housing Commission of Anne Arundel County –  Client: Provides housing for low income families and seniors in eight communities ◦ Type of survey: Resident satisfaction and facility condition – used for planning, oversight and HUD accreditation purposes ◦ Methodology: Self-administered at each community. Residents fill them out at the time of contract renewal, producing a quarterly stream of completed surveys for CSLI to use for data entry and report generation. ◦ N=Varies by community ◦ Current status: Waiting for next quarter’s questionnaires. ◦ Income generated: Overall $5100, retained for CSLI operations: $5100. ◦ Students employed: 0-1

2. Fire Department – Strategic Planning Survey  Client: Provides fire and EMT services for county residents ◦ Type of survey: Measures citizen awareness, operational trade/off preferences, satisfaction. ◦ Methodology: Telephone (landline only). ◦ N=311 ◦ Current status: Completed ◦ Income generated: Overall $5000, retained for CSLI operations: $558 ◦ Students employed: 10-15

3. Police Department – Accreditation Survey  Client: Provides public safety for county residents ◦ Type of survey: Identical to previous surveys – citizens’ perceptions of police professionalism and effectiveness, seriousness of crimes.. ◦ Methodology: Telephone (landline only). ◦ N=Around ◦ Current status: Starts Feb. 14. ◦ Income generated: Overall $5000, retained for CSLI operations: $600 (estimated) ◦ Students employed: 10-15

4. Radcliff Scholarship Survey of recipients  Client: AACC Foundation/Entrepreneurial Studies ◦ Type of survey: Asks about impact of scholarship, recipients’ current circumstances. ◦ Methodology: Multi-modal – mail, , Facebook, telephone ◦ N=49 of 86 (57% response rate) ◦ Current status: Completed ◦ Income generated: Overall $1600, retained for CSLI operations: $900 ◦ Students employed: 1-2

5. Coordinating Center  Client: Provides medical coordinating services for severely ill patients ◦ Type of survey: Customer satisfaction ◦ Methodology: Mailed with telephone follow-up and second mailing if needed. ◦ N= 690 ◦ Current status: Completed ◦ Income generated: Overall $2860, retained for CSLI operations: $1330 ◦ Students employed: 4-5

1. CSLI student interns ◦ Spring 2011: 2 ◦ Hours: vary depending on projects and needs of the moment but goal is to average five hours per week per intern ◦ Duties: range from data entry, survey design, student supervision, and telephone interviewing. 2. Legislative Interns – Maryland General Assembly ◦ Spring 2011: 10 ◦ Hours: hours a week ◦ Duties: Work with members of the General Assembly in various capacities ◦ Other internships – does your area of work have any need for student interns?

3. CSLI student club ◦ Inception: 2006 – designated an official student club. ◦ Organizational structure: Officers include president, vice president, secretary and treasurer, elected at beginning of fall semester. CSLI interns usually chosen as club president/vice president ◦ Budget: Varies yearly– : $1115 from student association. ◦ Activities: Anticipate visits to Baltimore Council of Foreign Affairs; Annapolis

 Radio: WNAV – director was interviewed about CSLI fall research findings. Also on radio Nov. 2 for election analysis.  Presentations: Director made presentations to Elephants Club, 33 rd Democratic Club, Almost 7:30 Democratic Club, Leadership Anne Arundel, and Maryland Government Financial Officers Association. Panel discussion about surveys and local issues moderated by Paul Foer in Annapolis.  Newspaper: Various articles in Capital, Baltimore Sun and Washington Post.  CSLI Web site: Posted all new presentations and updates to searchable database (see

Semi-annual Survey and Web Panel Web panel: We have accumulated a total of around 715 possibly valid addresses. ◦ About 1/3 of respondents accept request to give addresses. ◦ Used to do pre-election polling in September. ◦ Will be conducting a spring online survey composed with student input. ◦ Response rate typically around 25%.

Semi-annual Survey – Overview of Spring 2011 Results

Remarkable stability in right/wrong direction…

Percentage saying “excellent” or “good” also stable since March 2009

Some costs have gone down

Minor improvement in readiness to spend

State Issues: O’Malley vs. Ehrlich for Governor in November County Results in 2006: Ehrlich 56.9 vs. O’Malley 42.0 percent GAP = 14.9 O’Malley won by 6.5 percent statewide in 2006 County Results in 2010: Ehrlich 54.2 vs. O’Malley 43.4 percent GAP =10.8 O’Malley won by 14.5 percent statewide in 2006 Spring 2010Fall 2010 All categs. Some categs All categs. Some categs Some w/o undecid ed Average GAP O’Malley Ehrlich Other Undecided Neither Unsure/NA Total

Gubernatorial Races – Anne Arundel County O’Malley on low end of typical Dem vote deficit

Including Shay GAP Only a few thousand votes separate Dem/Rep candidates

Nov June 2010 Online Poll Sept Online Poll October 11-14, 2010 Nov. 2 Candidate Actual Vote All Categories All categories Exclude some Exclude all except voters Actual Vote Gap 222/ Johnson/ Conti (Owens) 23 (Conti) Leopold 5152/ Other --15/ Undecided Neither --4/792-- Unsure Total101/ Unlike Governor’s race, CE race much harder to predict –much tightening at the end…

How informed County Executive Governor Very1535 Somewhat3648 Not very Total100

On this issue are you more favorable to Conti, Leopold or Shay? Issue ContiLeopold L-C Shay UndecidedDon’t know enough Undec.+ don’t know enough Allowing slots at Arundel Mills mall Improving transportation Protecting the needs of vulnerable populations in the county budget Maintaining high ethical standards Improving public schools Keeping neighborhoods safe Making County government more efficient Preserving the environment Managing growth Having the right experience for the job Keeping taxes low Encouraging economic development

ContiLeopoldL-CShayUndecided Don’t know enough U Undecided/Don ’tknow enough Having the right experience for the job Encouraging economic development Making County government more efficient Managing growth Keeping taxes low Improving public schools Keeping neighborhoods safe Allowing slots at Arundel Mills mall Improving transportation Preserving the environment Protecting the needs of vulnerable populations in the county budget Maintaining high ethical standards

Opponents to the introduction of slot machines at Arundel Mills Mall are circulating a petition to put the county council’s decision to grant zoning needed for slots to referendum in November, potentially reversing the decision. Do you support or oppose this petition effort? PositionSpring ‘10 Fall ‘10 Actual GAP0 011 Support Oppose Unsure No answer2 -- Total99100 Will you be voting for or against Question A on the November ballot? A "for" vote would approve the County Council's zoning decision permitting slots in the county, including at Arundel Mills and Laurel. An 'against' vote would leave the county without slots zoning at any location.

: National Issues: % approving of president’s job by party Bush Obama

: National Issues: Presidential job approval

 Go to Questionnaire in MS Word Go to Questionnaire in MS Word