Reading, Language, Brain: The role of computational models Mark S. Seidenberg University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Children Acquire Language
Advertisements

Visual Word Recognition II Language Use and Understanding Class 4.
Human Communication.
Language Comprehension Speech Perception Semantic Processing & Naming Deficits.
Cognitive Neuroscience of Language 1. Premise 1: Constituent Cognitive Processes Phonological analysis Syntactic analysis Semantic analysis Premise 2:
The Neuroscience of Language. What is language? What is it for? Rapid efficient communication – (as such, other kinds of communication might be called.
Aimee L. Arnoldussen; Julia L. Evans; Mark S. Seidenberg Performance Matching: Comparing Children with Specific Language Impairment to Younger Children.
Learning linguistic structure with simple recurrent networks February 20, 2013.
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Modeling Reading Development From First Grade Text Michael W. Harm, CMU Mark S. Seidenberg, Wisconsin/Madison.
Language Comprehension Speech Perception Naming Deficits.
Modeling Language Acquisition with Neural Networks A preliminary research plan Steve R. Howell.
11/2008AAAI Circuit sharing and the implementation of intelligent systems Michael L. Anderson Institute for Advanced Computer Studies Program in.
Jelena Mirković and Maryellen C. MacDonald Language and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison Introduction How to Study Subject-Verb.
Recent Findings in the Neurobiology & Neuropsychology of Reading Processes A. Maerlender, Ph.D. Clinical School Services & Learning Disorders.
Representation, Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology.
Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Language. Language Communication – transmitting information Many animals communicate Call systems – system of communication limited to a set number of.
Reading. How do you think we read? -memorizing words on the page -extracting just the meanings of the words -playing a mental movie in our heads of what.
Copyright © 2010 Allyn & Bacon This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public.
EE141 1 Language Janusz A. Starzyk
2 2  Background  Vision in Human Brain  Efficient Coding Theory  Motivation  Natural Pictures  Methodology  Statistical Characteristics  Models.
The pyramids of EgyptThe Great Wall They are ________ of the world.wonders The Great Barrier ReefThe Grand Canyon.
Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci.. Phonology in IFG Gelfand and Bookheimer, Neuron 2002.
Background The physiology of the cerebral cortex is organized in hierarchical manner. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) constitutes the highest level of the.
Age of acquisition and frequency of occurrence: Implications for experience based models of word processing and sentence parsing Marc Brysbaert.
Computational Cognitive Neuroscience PSYC 4175/5175 Randall O’Reilly.
Failed, because: Discriminability alone is not enough; code on speech needs to be compatible with speech. Minimally, must have the speed of speech. Lessons:
Emergence of Semantic Knowledge from Experience Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Methodology of Simulations n CS/PY 399 Lecture Presentation # 19 n February 21, 2001 n Mount Union College.
What is modularity good for? Michael S. C. Thomas, Neil A. Forrester, Fiona M. Richardson
The Influence of Feature Type, Feature Structure and Psycholinguistic Parameters on the Naming Performance of Semantic Dementia and Alzheimer’s Patients.
Modelling Language Acquisition with Neural Networks Steve R. Howell A preliminary research plan.
ADULT LANGUAGE DISORDERS Week 1 Jan 13, Text Book LaPointe, L. L. (2005). Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Language Disorders. 3rd edition, Thieme,
Semantic Processing and Irregularly Inflected Forms Michele Miozzo & Peter Gordon Columbia University Introduction Recent models of lexical representation.
Rapid integration of new schema- consistent information in the Complementary Learning Systems Theory Jay McClelland, Stanford University.
丹东市 “ 十二五 ” 德育专项小课题 凤城市 东方红小学 鄂秀春. 提出的背景 家长教师之间亟待相互了解。 传统方式不能满足家校沟通的需求。 拥有良好的网络环境和教师资源。
What to do to practise writing? 石嘴山市师资培训中心 周淑英. Learn and Write.

The PDP Approach to Understanding the Mind and Brain Jay McClelland Stanford University January 21, 2014.
The Cross-Script Length Effect: Evidence for Serial Processing in Reading Aloud Kathleen Rastle (Royal Holloway University of London), Linda Bayliss (Royal.
COGNITIVE MORPHOLOGY Laura Westmaas November 24, 2009.
认真学习 胡锦涛七一讲话精神 主讲 张作臣 年 7 月 1 日,在北京人民 大会堂隆重举行的庆祝中国共 产党成立九十周年大会上,胡 锦涛总书记发表了重要讲话。
省锡中实验学校首批班主任工作室核心成员会议 德育需要制度的约束 德育也需要文化的浸润 我校德育建设的文化追求 ●垂握百年文化根基.
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
Aimee L. Arnoldussen 1 ; Julia L. Evans 2 ; Mark S. Seidenberg 1,3 Neuroscience Training Program 1 ; Department of Communicative Disorders 2 ; Department.
The Emergent Structure of Semantic Knowledge
Articulatory Net I.2 Oct 14, 2015 – DAY 21
曹辉 2013 年 9 月 北京市商业学校 数字化资源中心介绍. 一、信息化发展史 通信领域信息化发展史.
初中基础 (2272 期 ) 45 版 Stars with famous parents.
Pattern Associators, Generalization, Processing Psych /719 Feb 6, 2001.
Biological and cognitive plausibility in connectionist networks for language modelling Maja Anđel Department for German Studies University of Zagreb.
Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center.
一、中国梦与中国特色社会主义道路创新 中国梦即实现中华民族的伟大复兴 中国梦的实现路径是中国道路 中国特色社会主义道路的科学表述 中国特色社会主义道路的形成 是对新中国成 立 60 年成功经 验的总结 是对中国近代 170 年以来历 史经验的总结 是对五千年中 华优秀文化文 化的总结.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
Welcome to All S. Course Code: EL 120 Course Name English Phonetics and Linguistics Lecture 1 Introducing the Course (p.2-8) Unit 1: Introducing Phonetics.
扬州大学数学科学学院欢迎你! 人才培养工作 扬州大学数学学学院始终以 “ 全面发展、健康成才 ” 为学 生培养的最终目标,培养的学生基础扎实,学风纯正, 每年均有数十人被保送或考取国内外著名大学深造,在 “ 全国大学生数学建模竞赛 ” 和美国大学生数学建模竞赛.
VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION. What is Word Recognition? Features, letters & word interactions Interactive Activation Model Lexical and Sublexical Approach.
Fun with English 5B Changsong Primary School My English name is Apple. I’m from Nanjing. I speak English and Chinese. I like traveling around the world.
Neurobiology of Dyslexia Elizabeth S. Norton, Sara D. Beach and John DE Gabrieli Presented by Michaela Cronin April 16, 2015.
Perception & Imagination:
Learning linguistic structure with simple and more complex recurrent neural networks Psychology February 2, 2017.
WELCOME to Tongji University
James L. McClelland SS 100, May 31, 2011
The what, where, when, and how of visual word recognition
Saidna Zulfiqar bin Tahir STATE UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR
FMRI Setup. fMRI Setup slice orientations sagittal coronal axial.
Levels of Linguistic Analysis
Toward a Great Class Project: Discussion of Stoianov & Zorzi’s Numerosity Model Psych 209 – 2019 Feb 14, 2019.
Conserved Sequence Processing in Primate Frontal Cortex
Presentation transcript:

Reading, Language, Brain: The role of computational models Mark S. Seidenberg University of Wisconsin-Madison

I am very happy to be here. And to visit the National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning The modern study of reading in Chinese began with the pioneering work of Shu Hua. In the West, this is the most famous laboratory for scientific studies of reading and language in China. And China is a very big country.

My Own Work Children, adults Normal, dyslexic English, Serbian, Chinese, others Brain circuits Behavior Computational models Connectionist models that simulate detailed aspects of acquisition, skilled performance. Dyslexia = anomalies in how system develops Mainly at Medical College of Wisconsin. Jeff Binder, Lab director.

Computational models Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989 (about the time neuroimaging came into psychology)

Computational models Harm and Seidenberg, 1999: phonology, dyslexia Zevin and Seidenberg, 2006: consistency effects, nonwords, individual differences

Computational models Joanisse & Seidenberg, 2000: verb morphology. The “past tense debate”

Computational Models Harm & Seidenberg, 2004: computing MEANING

Many other models Many people, labs

Inferior frontal/insular cortex Inferior SMG buffer Supramarginal gyrus Primary auditory area/ and surroundings (Input) Inferolateral anterior temporal region (Semantics) Temporal lobe Insular-Opercularis (Output) Opercularis-Triangularis Anterior STG/STS Middle STG/STS Sound + auditory word input Activation of meaning (from other modalities) and input to spontaneous speech production 9 Articulatory speech

Hidden layer Elman Input Sound Semantics (Input & Output) Output sound Hidden layer 10 Ueno, Lambon Ralph, Rogers, 2012

The reading models instantiated several theoretical principles. General, not linked to details of any single model Are they correct? Are they still relevant? Needed? What good are these models???

But, how are these components, processes realized? What is in the ovals? What does an arrow represent? How is the system learned? How is it represented in the brain? Every theory/model must have these basic elements: What reading IS. What is different about “dual-route” models (e.g., DRC, CDP+) meaning spellingsound context 1. only about pronunciation aloud: no semantics 2. a second mechanism for pronouncing some words: adds word frequency 3. “functional architecture”: independent of brain 4. no learning

Let’s look at some of the basic principles. And what has happened to them.

1. Distributed representations Current status: fMRI evidence for word-specific representations univariate methods biased against finding highly distributed representations? Much research using other methods (MVPA and related tools) Chris Cox (Wisconsin grad student), Tim Rogers, M. Seidenberg How are categories represented? Artifacts, animals, etc.

2. Variable mappings between codes Arbitrary, correlated, to what degree? Quasiregularity Depends on writing system More about this later! Current status: many investigations across different writing systems Dual-route models: DRC: GPC rules. Very different. CDP+: rules are gone. Replaced by connectionist network.

3. Statistical learning Learning based on frequencies, distributions of events gradual, structures emerge over time Current status: 1. Using models to look at reading development under atypical conditions perceptual, learning, experiential deficits dialect differences in US teaching methods

3. Statistical learning Learning based on frequencies, distributions of events gradual, structures emerge over time Current status: 1. Using models to look at reading development under atypical conditions perceptual, learning, experiential deficits dialect differences in US teaching methods 2. Statistical learning in language acquisition

Related mechanisms in reading Chinese? 刘川生书记在致辞中代表学校向莅临大会的领导和专家表示热烈的欢迎,对 北京市委、市政府长期以来关心和支持北师大建设表示衷心的感谢。刘川生 书记指出,文化是民族的精神家园,推进文化创新发展是时代赋予我们的神 圣使命。大学是文化传承创新的重要阵地,在中华文化创新和传播的伟 Where are the words?

4. Processing by satisfying multiple constraints. A general way of solving complex problems. Part of what makes humans intelligent! Key idea: nonlinear combination of clues in isolation, not very informative together, very informative What is it? A living thing

4. Processing by satisfying multiple constraints. A general way of solving complex problems. Part of what makes humans intelligent! Key idea: nonlinear combination of clues in isolation, not very informative together, very informative What is it? A living thinguniversity professor

4. Processing by satisfying multiple constraints. A general way of solving complex problems. Part of what makes humans intelligent! Key idea: nonlinear combination of clues in isolation, not very informative together, very informative What is it? A living thinguniversity professorVisiting NKLCNL

4. Processing by satisfying multiple constraints. A general way of solving complex problems. Part of what makes humans intelligent! Key idea: nonlinear combination of clues in isolation, not very informative together, very informative What is it? A living thinguniversity professorVisiting NKLCNL American ME!

In reading aloud orthographyphonologysemantics Activation from both parts

Recent research: is semantics used in reading words aloud (in English)? Dual-route models: No Some studies show such effects (Strain, Patterson, Seidenberg, 1996) but not all.

Will Graves, Medical College of Wisconsin  Rutgers University Imageability effects on reading words aloud Skilled adult readers Highly educated Individual differences among readers?

DTI volume of sem-phon pathways AG – pSTG ITG – pMTG Correlate with imageability effect For skilled readers of English

So: skilled readers (in English) differ. Related to anatomical differences in relevant parts of reading circuit. Need to look at other individual differences.

Combining constraints in reading for meaning: orthographyphonologysemantics

Reading Chinese “ radical ”

But contributions vary with type of character Transparency of radical? Consistency of phonetic? Characters with other structures N-N compounds like TELEVISION 电视 more semantics, less phonology?

“Division of labor” depends on writing system, word, task, reader

About morphology Much debate about what is “morphological” in Chinese. Much debate about what is “morphological” in English. Simple view: minimal units of meaning. Discrete. Combined like beads on a string BOAT HOUSEHOUSE BOAT

But, many partial regularities BAKER:person who bakesBAKE + ER TALKER:person who talksTALK + ER GROCER:person who sells food*GROCE CORNERa vegetablenot CORN + ER DISLIKEDIS + LIKEnot LIKE DISAGREEDIS + AGREEnot AGREE with DISCOVERDIS + COVER*not COVER SWEETBREADSnot sweet, not bread BOOTLEGmake illegal alcohol SLAPSTICKa kind of humor

Similarity ratings: TEACHERTEACH BACKERBACK CORNERCORN

Seidenberg and Gonnerman, TICS, 2000 Morphemes are graded, not discrete Reflect correlations between form and meaning Which vary in degree Many similarities to Chinese

5. Interconnectivity Representations determined by functions in circuits

6. Models perform TASKS Activation is task dependent. Circuits both represent and process information Many studies showing task-dependence of activation in areas like pOTS Yang et al. Mano et al. (in press): in naming vs. visual discrimination tasks others

Conclusions The models are a useful tool. They are not literally correct. The principles that govern them are relevant to understanding brain, behavior. More so than the specific architectures that were proposed; too simple! 1. distributed representations 2. variable mappings 3. statistical learning 4. constraint satisfaction 5. Interactivity, feedback 6. task orientation (others)

Thank you! Thanks to collaborators Modeling Tim Rogers (Wisconsin) Chris Cox (Wisconsin) Jason Zevin (Weill Cornell Sackler) Michael Harm (Google) Marc Joanisse (Western Ontario) David Plaut (CMU) Jay McClelland (Stanford) Imaging (Medical College of Wisconsin Jeff Binder, lab director Will Graves Rutvik Desai Quintino Mano Chinese language Tianlin Wang (University of Wisconsin)

Binder, Graves, Desai, Seidenberg articles