Formula Grants F ormula grants are Federally appropriated dollars which are allocated annually to the 50 States and Insular Areas for the purpose of continuing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Advertisements

Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
Allowable and Unallowable Costs
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
Matching Requirements for Formula Grants 2010 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference (NERAOC) Hosted by the University of.
Agricultural Research, Extension and Education Reform Act (AREERA) Program and Administrative Update May 25, 2011.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
AREERA - Section 105 & 204 Compliance Session 38 - Tuesday, May 18, 2010 Brenda Barnett Budget & Fiscal Specialist.
CDBG Financial Management Requirements For Grant Administrators.
Matching for Formula Grants Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Session 66 Presenter: Brenda Barnett Branch Chief, Formula Grants.
Property and Equipment Disposition Larry Jenkins, BTOP Grants Officer Marianne Eggers, NOAA Grants Management Specialist.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
OMB Circular A-21 Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
If the funder provides specific guidelines related to format or contents of your budget… FOLLOW THEM! Otherwise, your proposal may not make it out of.
Closeouts and Equipment Disposition Marianne Eggers, NOAA GMD.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
YouthBuild Financial Management. DOL Requirements DOL adapted OMB Circular A -102 under 29 CFR Part 97 –States follow their own policies and procedures.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Cohort 8 Grant Closeout Procedures HEIDI SCHULTZ DEBRA APPLETON.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Western Region CSREES Administrative Officer’s Meeting Monterey, California October 4 – 6, 2005 Janet Downey, Staff Accountant OEP, POFMB, Oversight Section.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Audit-Readiness Riverside Community College District Grants Office.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Head Start Fiscal Training April 2009 Trainer: PhuongY Nguyen.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Quality Research Administration Meeting Record Retention Policies for Contracts and Grants Tam Tran Assistant Director, Sponsored Projects September 12,
CSREES Administrative Officers Conference Session #62, May 7, 2008, 1:00 pm – 2:15 pm Savannah, Georgia 1994 Tribal College Endowment Interest.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
1 SPS Primer SPS Primer Workshop Cost Accounting Considerations When Preparing Budgets for Sponsored Proposals Division of Financial Affairs.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
1890 Section 1444 (Extension) Formula Program P. S. Benepal NIFA/USDA 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers Conference Morgantown,
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Leveraged Resources, Match & Intellectual Property June 2009.
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.
Financial and Administrative Management
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT -
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Record Retention Daniel Adams Office of Audit Services May 12, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Formula Grants F ormula grants are Federally appropriated dollars which are allocated annually to the 50 States and Insular Areas for the purpose of continuing agricultural research and extension activities.

Formula Fund Programs  Research (1862 and 1890 LGIs)  Hatch Act of 1887  McIntire-Stennis Act of 1962  Evans-Allen (Section 1445 of the National Agriculture Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of NARETPA)  Animal Health & Disease Research  (Section 1433 – NARETPA,1977)

Formula Fund Programs  Extension (1862 and 1890 LGIs)  Smith-Lever Act of 1914  Section 1444 of NARETPA, 1977  Renewable Resource Extension Act of 1978 (RREA)  Education (1994 LGIs)  Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 Program

Hatch Act Funds  Recipients: State Agricultural Experiment Stations in 50 States, DC, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Micronesia, American Samoa, and Northern Marianas Islands

Hatch Act Funds  Matching:  100% for 1862 LGIs on Hatch Regular and Multi-state Research funds  Insular 1862s must match 50% of their FY 2002 allocation, and thereafter. Matching waivers may be requested.

Hatch Act Funds  Carryover:  100% may be carried over for one full year.  Funds must be expended by the end of the second year.

FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION

ALLOWABLE COSTS  Factors Considered: Reasonable Allocable Applied Consistently Limited by regulations-OMB Circular A-21 (Cost Principles for Educational Institutions) and Administrative Manual for the Hatch (Experiment Station) Act as amended.

REASONABLE:  Recognized as necessary  Meets the terms and conditions of the Federal statute and Plan of Work/agreement  Market prices for comparable goods/services  Acted with due prudence in responsibility  Consistent with the institution’s policy

ALLOCABLE:  It was purchased solely to benefit the project or program If it benefits more than one project, costs must be allocated on any reasonable basis (adopted by the institution) which is applied consistently  Costs may not be shifted from one project to another to cover budget shortfalls or overruns  Costs allocable to industry or foreign governments may not be shifted to Federal awards  Internal Controls-no “one” person has control over all aspects of a transaction

APPLIED CONSISTENTLY  Reasonable method adopted by institution  Documented

LIMITED BY:  Applicable Federal Statute  Agency Administrative Guidance  Cost principles in OMB Circular A-21, A-87, A-110  Code of Federal Regulations (Title VII)

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING OPERATIONS  Accountability shall be based on the total annual Hatch program conducted by each station, rather than on individual projects.  Examinations in the form of audits or internal audits are required to occur not less than every two years. Generally, examinations conducted on a university wide basis to test the fiscal integrity of financial transactions, as well as compliance with the terms and conditions of Federal grants and other agreements will meet the requirements of the Act.

UNALLOWABLE COSTS:  Entertainment costs  Fines or penalties  Goods and services for personal use  Housing and personal living expenses  Indirect costs/overhead  Insurance against defects  Legal expenses  Lobbying

UNALLOWABLE COSTS  Advertising and public relations costs Except: hiring staff, procurement, disposal; etc.  Airfare costs (excessive amounts)  Alcoholic beverages  Alumni activities  Bad debts  Commencement costs  Contingency provisions  Donations and contributions

UNALLOWABLE COSTS  Memberships in civic, social, or community organizations  Recruitment costs (excessive)  Salaries related to classroom instruction  Selling and marketing expenses  Student activity costs  Tuition  Volunteer services  Any other costs deemed unallowable by statute, regulation, or policy

DOCUMENTATION STANDARDS  Costs must be reasonable, allocable, and allowable  Internal controls (no “one” person has control over all financial aspects of a transaction)  Reasonable method of allocation  Must meet the requirements of A-110, Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-profit Organizations

RECORD RETENTION  All records pertinent to an award must be retained for 3 years from the date of submission of the Final SF-269, Financial Status Report Financial records Supporting documents Statistical records All other pertinent records

EXCEPTIONS  Unless litigation, an audit, or other claim is initiated prior to the termination of the 3 year period. (Keep until resolved.)  Records for real property & equipment must be retained for 3 years after final disposition

MATCHING FUNDS  Contributions may be included when the following are met: Verifiable in the records Not included as contributions for other Federal awards Necessary and reasonable for the project Allowable under the Cost Principles Non-Federal funds (donations) Are in the approved budget Conform to other provisions of OMB Circulars

Matching requirements The Hatch program is exempt from the indirect cost provision of OMB Circular A-21. Accordingly, indirect costs are not allowable as contributions in satisfying the matching requirements.

TRAVEL  Research Formula funds: Approval delegated to Research Director/A-TR for both domestic and foreign travel.

JOINT/SPLIT APPOINTMENTS  Costs included Activities directly related to the project Writing reports or articles Participating in seminars and meetings Consultations  Costs for salaries and fringe benefits are determined by time and effort reporting.

FRINGE BENEFITS  Contributions to LGI retirement systems is limited to 5% of the salaries paid from formula funds  Health Insurance program  Unemployment Compensation  Workman’s Compensation

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:  Equipment purchases of $5,000 or over, should be capitalized for all formula funds.  New construction or renovations – not allowed with extension funding  Use the depreciation method normally used by UC for the asset type

PROPERTY DISPOSAL  When replacing a vehicle, one vehicle may be used as a trade-in to offset the cost of a new vehicle purchased with formula funds  When vehicles or equipment ($5,000 value and more) are no longer needed for the project, LGI may retain provided Federal awarding agency or it’s successor is compensated (7CFR )  Equipment with a unit acquisition cost of less than $1,000, may be sold or retained with no further obligation to the Federal government (7 CFR )  Otherwise, contact CSREES for disposition instructions

Program Income  Royalties from copyrights or patents resulting from research conducted with Federal formula funds are not considered program income and represent no obligation to the Federal government  Proceeds from the sale of real or personal property purchased in whole or part with Federal funds (7 CFR )  All other program income shall be retained by the LGIs and used to further program objectives  Program income is not acceptable as matching funds

There are three types of reporting requirements for these funds: Plan of work CRIS Financial Reporting

Plan-of-Work Reporting  1) Considers the entire portfolio of agricultural research and extension formula funds awarded to each 1862 and 1890 land-grant institution.  Each 1862 and 1890 land-grant institution is required to submit every five years a plan of work for their agricultural research and extension formula funds authorized under the Hatch Act, Smith-Lever Act, and sections 1444 and 1445 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act.  Every year LGI’s are required to submit an Annual Report of Accomplishments and Expenditures.

Current Research Information System (CRIS) Reporting is done on a project basis. Hatch research projects are submitted for approval to CSREES by the state agricultural experiment stations (SAES). Each year SAESs submit to the CRIS office a progress report and an expenditure report for all the Hatch projects they supported in the previous year.

Financial Reports  Certification of Offset (Form CSREES-2103) which is completed by the SAES's to certify that matching funds have been made available;Form CSREES-2103  b) SF-272, Federal Cash Transaction Report, which is submitted on a quarterly basis through the U.S. Department Health and Human Services' Payment Management System (DHHS-PMS); andSF-272, Federal Cash Transaction Report  c) SF-269, Financial Status Report, which is submitted on an annual basis to the Funds Management Branch by December 31st, for the reporting period of October 1st through September 30th. SF-269, Financial Status Report

AREERA Requirements  The Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (AREERA) amended the Smith-Lever Act, the Hatch Act, and the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (the funding authorities for Extension and Research activities) to require approved Plans of Work from Extension and Research in order to receive federal funding.  The AREERA Plans of Work pertain only to the Smith-Lever 3(b)&(c), Hatch, Evans-Allen, and 1890 Extension funds. Other funding authorities such as the Smith-Lever 3(d), NRI, and other grants and project funds will continue to require plans or proposals for their continued distribution of funds.

Hatch Act Funds  Use must meet AREERA requirements: Section 204 of AREERA added Section I to the Hatch Act, which states that states must expend for integrated research and extension activities in FY 2000 and thereafter a percentage that is equal to the lesser of 25 percent or twice the percentage of funds expended by the institution for integrated research and extension activities in FY (This section also require that the institutions include in the plan of work a description of the manner in which they will meet these multi-state and integrated requirements.)

UC Next Steps ….  To meet the increased accountability requirements on the use of Hatch Funds, new accounts and funds will be used to record Hatch expenditures.  Beginning October 1, 2006 expenditures will be charged directly to the new accounts and funds.

UC Next Steps …. Separate OP fund numbers have been set-up to track expenditures for:  Regular Hatch  Multi-state Hatch  Integrated Hatch  Multi-state / Integrated Hatch

Contact Information: Jo Ann Javier Director, Financial Services UCOP – ANR Tel: