Probation Supervision Rule NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
DEMISTIFYING INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE TRANSFERS POA August 10, :00am OPCA INTERSTATE COMPACT UNIT MATT CHARTON-DCA NICOLE ALDI–SUPERVISOR KELLY.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Applying EBP In The Field Midge Christianson, Director 6W Community Corrections Montevideo, Minnesota , extension 212
COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,
Juvenile Justice system
Fundamentals of Community Corrections (FCC) Training - Supporting Evidence-Based Practices in all ATI Programs NYAPSA Conference October 21, 2013 Yvonne.
Chapter 5 Probation Officer Issues. Introduction The tasks most prescribed to probation officers in all 50 states are: Supervision -46 Investigate cases.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Community Corrections
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
Probation Modification and Termination
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
NYS Probation Officers Association Conference 2012 Gary Govel and Patti Donohue Community Corrections Representatives NYS Division of Criminal Justice.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
TBI SOR Training August JUVENILES  Tennessee Adjudications  14 years of age or more  Occurred on or after  Offenses: Aggravated.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Chapter 7 Probation Modification and Termination.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Department of Correctional POSITION PAPER ON SOCIAL REINTEGRATION DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Services.
Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
The Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ~SPEP~
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions Alternatives to incarceration Operated by probation/parole agencies No need to create new bureaucracies More punitive.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
PROBATION TERMS AND OFFENDER BEHAVIOR Purpose: To align the terms of probation with a behavioral change model of probation and evidence-based practices.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
Replicating the Concepts Behind Project HOPE Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
1 Welfare Transition Monitoring A Detailed Look at the WT Quality Assurance Tool 2009.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Created by Jonathan Lee and Allen Lim
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
Supervision Responsibilities
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Presentation transcript:

Probation Supervision Rule NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services DCJS Office of Probation and Correctional Alternatives Part 351 of Title 9 NYCRR Probation Supervision Rule 2012 Training for Probation Directors, Supervisors, Staff Development Officers, and FPP Certified Instructors NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Probation and Correctional Alternatives OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES

The Importance of Probation Supervision Nearly 120,000 adults and 17,000 juveniles are under probation supervision on any given day-a larger number than those incarcerated in prison or under parole supervision combined. It is the mechanism by which officers enforce the orders of the court and change offender behavior in order to reduce recidivism and enhance public safety. It is the most visible aspect of probation that the public utilizes to measure the effectiveness of probation.

Why a new Supervision Rule? Current rule: not updated in nearly 30 years outdated practices and language not based in evidence risk levels more offense focused than offender focused focused on beginning and end stages of supervision rather than entire process

Why a new Supervision Rule? Opportunities for Improvement Enhance public safety and provide some mandate relief for counties Incorporate evidence-based practices developed over the last two decades Re-engineer assessment, case planning, and reassessment to support best practices throughout the entire supervision period Re-focus ISP and PED efforts to improve supervision of high risk cases Provide for well defined approach to administrative cases

Why a new Supervision Rule?. Opportunities for Improvement Emphasize quality not just quantity in probation contacts Incorporate technology in probation work Incorporate more structured graduated sanctions and rewards into probation supervision Incorporate quality assurance/supervisory oversight

Rule Revision—the Process Workgroup started meeting monthly in January 2010, included COPA, NYSPOA, NYSAC, DCJS Legal and Research staff, DOB, Executive Chamber, and OPCA staff. Monthly meetings for almost 2 years were held. Process was data-driven with data presented by Northpointe, Orbis Partners, and DCJS Literature reviews were conducted via Council of State Governments and APPA documents Other states and jurisdictions were consulted-NYS Parole, NYS OCFS, Federal Probation, Texas, Colorado, Arizona In all, 18 draft versions were developed and reviewed

Probation Supervision is based in… Responsivity Principle Program Integrity Principle Risk Principle Need Principle

Definitions Section 351.1 Active vs. Administrative case Actuarial risk case plan Contacts (collateral; contact substitution; home contact; in-person contact; positive home contact; probationer contact) Criminogenic need Educational achievement Employment retention Evidence-based practice Graduated sanctions Incentive Interim Probation Supervision Merit credit and merit credit activities Program completion Pro-social community activities Protective factor Risk and need assessment Risk management Risk reduction Specialized assessment Stabilization period Sustained program participation Technology Victim restoration

Objective and Applicability Sections 351.2 and 351.3 What is the point of the rule? Provide procedures Interim Probation Supervision cases now included Promotes evidence-based practices in probation supervision Holds offenders accountable, improves offender competencies, restores victims Reduces recidivism The rule is applicable to all probation departments in NYS For family and criminal court supervision cases For interim supervision cases

Case Assignment Section 351.4 No change—still three (3) business days from probation department’s official notification of disposition Requires Probation Director or designee to: Review case for legality of sentence and inclusion of all statutorily required conditions; and Verify the dates of disposition or interim probation supervision Assign to specialized caseloads, if available

Assessment and Case Planning Section 351.5 Assessment and Case Plan process must be completed within thirty (30) business days Assessment needs to be completed if not already completed during PSI What is 30 business days?

The Assessment Section 351.5 (a) Initial Interview: within eight (8) business days from the date of case assignment (previously was 5 days from sentence for ISP and 7 days from sentence for others) Still allows for auxiliary personnel to conduct limited Initial Interviews Allows for documented exceptions for cases where probationer is unavailable for Initial Interview within eight days

Supervision Level Assignment Section 351.5(b) Risk assessment instrument shall assist with supervision level Levels now based on Greatest Risk; High Risk; Medium Risk; and Low Risk Case status now includes Active Cases or Administrative Cases Over-rides must follow policy, be approved and documented Supervision requirement while pending assessment is in-person contact every week

Supervision Level Assignment Section 351.5(c) All applicable legal case requirements must be met at this time: DNA sample SORA status compliance Fingerprints Restitution

Case Planning Section 351.5(d) Case plan shall be based primarily on information from assessment/s Case plan must include efforts to engage probationer and/or family Case plan must be focused on remediation of behavior giving rise to complaint (charge) Case plan must address identified risk and needs, and include protective factors and strengths Case plan is the road map for probation supervision—outlines how conditions of probation will be achieved

Case Planning Section 351.5(d) cont. Case planning should include: Feedback to probationer of assessment results Use of Motivational Interviewing styles and skills Analysis of probationer level of motivation Matching motivation level to case plan goals/strategies Long term goals (achievable by end of probation); short term goals (achievable by next reassessment); and action steps (achievable by next appointment with Probation Officer) Identified roles and responsibilities of those involved in case plan

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 Balance between risk management and risk reduction What is risk management? What is risk reduction? Active or Administrative case status?

New Risk Levels Greatest Risk High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk

Required Contacts In Person Contact requires the physical presence of the probationer Probationer Contact requires a visual contact with the probationer (allows for real-time technology) Collateral Contact requires a third party verification of probationer information Positive Home Contact requires the physical presence of the probationer during the home contact Home Contact is a contact at the probationer’s home without the physical presence of the probationer

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (a) (1-4) Contacts for Greatest Risk 6 probationer contacts per month, with a minimum of 1 in-person contact per week and 2 probationer contacts per month 6 collateral contacts per month-related to criminogenic needs 1 positive home contact each month from case assignment—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact Contacts for High Risk 1 in-person contact per week 6 collateral contacts per quarter—related to criminogenic needs 1 positive home contact during the 1st month from case assignment-thereafter, 3 home contacts per quarter, 2 of which must be positive home contacts—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (a) (1-4) Contacts for Medium Risk 2 probationer contacts per month, with a minimum of 1 in-person contact per month 2 collateral contacts per quarter—related to criminogenic needs 1 positive home contact during 1st 45 days from case assignment—a positive home contact counts as an in-person contact Contacts for Low Risk 1 contact per month Collateral contacts as needed Home contacts as needed

Stabilization Period Stabilization period means the first three (3) months of juvenile probation supervision and three-six (3-6) months of adult probation supervision as a Greatest Risk or High Risk probationer during which the probationer is assessed for compliance with the conditions of probation and the case plan. Stabilization periods are not necessary for Medium and Low Risk cases, as by definition, they are relatively stable. Stabilization period is the minimum amount of time during which the probation officer is able to assess the probationer for compliance before Merit Credit may be considered

Merit Credit Eligibility Merit credit means a protocol by which Greatest Risk, High Risk or Medium Risk probationers, who are in compliance with their conditions of probation and achieving their case plan goals, may be considered for a reduction in contacts by their probation officer, or eligible for other forms of incentives as determined by local probation departments. Merit credits reflect sustained and measurable achievement and must be documented in the case file. Merit credit activities are defined as victim restoration measures, employment retention, educational achievement, sustained program participation, program completion, or pro-social community activities. Merit credit activities are directly related to the probationer’s identified criminogenic needs, conditions of probation and case plan.

Merit Credit Activities Educational Achievement is measurable and documented educational or vocational achievement Employment Retention is sustaining documented employment Program Completion is documentation of completing all program requirements Pro-Social Community Activities must be extended, consistent participation that can be measured and documented Sustained Program Participation must have consistent attendance and meaningful participation that can be documented Victim Restoration Measures can include restitution, community service, apology letters, other restorative practices and must also be documented

Stabilization Period and Merit Credit Eligibility-how it works For Greatest Risk: Following the stabilization period (3 months for juveniles and 3-6 months for adults), and if the probationer is compliant with the conditions of probation and case plan, and there is documentation of merit credit activities, the probationer may be credited with up to a maximum of 1 probationer contact per month on an on-going basis unless rescinded. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion; or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities. For High Risk: Following the stabilization period (3 months for juveniles and 3-6 months for adults), and if the probationer is compliant with the conditions of probation and case plan, and there is documentation of merit credit activities, the probationer may be credited with up to a maximum of 1 in-person contact per month on an on-going basis unless rescinded. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion; or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities.

Stabilization Period and Merit Credit Eligibility-how it works For Medium Risk: Documentation of the following may be credited toward up to 1 probationer contact per month. Merit credit activities are defined as the following: (1) Victim Restoration Measures; (2) Employment Retention; (3) Educational Achievement; (4) Sustained Program Participation; (5) Program Completion or (6) Pro-Social Community Activities. For Low Risk: No merit credit may be applied to the one contact per month that is statutorily required.

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (b) Juvenile Contact Substitution The intent is not to reduce quantity of contacts but to restructure contacts to support the juvenile and his/her family while engaged in short-term community based evidence based treatment programs

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (b) Juvenile Contact Substitution Available at the discretion of the department Applies only to JD and PINS cases under age 18 at time of disposition Lasts no longer than 6 months Requires participation in a community-based program which is evidence-based (program must be known and approved by the department and effective in addressing criminogenic needs) Allows for substitution of up to 50% of required contacts with probation officer by community-based program One of the required collateral contacts by probation officer must be with the community-based program that is making the substitute contact

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (c) Administrative Cases Can include cases with any assigned supervision level who are unavailable for Active Supervision Contacts for Administrative Cases 1 Contact per month (specific contacts allowed for absconder cases) Types of Administrative Cases include: Absconders Hospitalization Interstate cases Incarcerated Residential program ICE cases

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (d) Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews Purpose is redefined to ‘reassess probationer progress (or lack of) in achieving the goals identified in the case plan and his/her compliance with conditions of probation’ Allows for objective, quantitative input into case planning decisions For Active juvenile Family Court cases-every three (3) months For Active Criminal Court cases and adult Family Court cases-every six (6) months For Administrative Cases-every twelve (12) months

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (d) cont. Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews Step One: Reassess using reassessment/case review instrument—the initial provides a baseline point to measure against Review compliance with contact requirements Review Merit Credit activities, if applicable Review compliance with conditions of probation and case plan achievement

Probation Supervision Section 351.6 (d) cont. Periodic Reassessment/Case Reviews Step Two: Consider the case for the following possible options: Case Plan modification? Reclassification to another supervision level? Conditions of Probation modification? Merit Credit eligibility, where applicable?

Probation Supervision Practices Section 351.7 (a-f) Specific probation supervision practices include: (a) Victims Services (restitution, notification, information, referrals for assistance) (b) Probationer Referrals (probation officer role in addressing resistance; matching probationer to program; higher risk probationers referred to higher intensity programs; providing assessment information to program) (c) Risk Management (monitoring probationer activities; reviewing conditions of probation; documentation)

Probation Supervision Section 351.7 (d) cont. Specific probation supervision practices include: (d) Risk Reduction (use of assessment information; monitoring achievements and challenges in case plan; using incentives; using Merit Credits; using graduated sanctions; swift and certain graduated responses; modifying Conditions of Probation) (e) Technology (Ignition Interlock, GPS, computers, video-conference, electronic monitoring) should be used to enhance supervision, not replace (f) Supervisory Directives (use of written departmental policies giving specific instructions for probationers to follow)

Inter- and Intra- State transfers Section 351.8 State Laws OPCA Rule 349 Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (ICAOS) Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Review of compliance with conditions of probation and case plan goals Waiver of extradition signed

Termination of Sentence Section 351.9 Early Termination/Early Discharge When ‘probationer is no longer in need of such guidance, training or other assistance which would otherwise be administered through probation services’ and When ‘probationer has diligently complied with the terms and conditions of sentence of probation’ and ‘the termination of the sentence of probation is not adverse to the protection of the public or the victim/s’

Case Closing Section 351.10 Case Closing options include: Termination of Sentence (ET/ED) Maximum Expiration (ME) Revocation Complete intrastate transfer Death Other (DOCCS; federal custody)

Reporting Requirements Section 351.11 Probation departments must report any and all information requested to the Commissioner of DCJS

Patricia.Donohue@DCJS.ny.gov 518-485-5168