Alternative School Administration Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

The Fall Messier Marathon Guide
Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
EQUS Conference - Brussels, June 16, 2011 Ambros Uchtenhagen, Michael Schaub Minimum Quality Standards in the field of Drug Demand Reduction Parallel Session.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
A sample problem. The cash in bank account for J. B. Lindsay Co. at May 31 of the current year indicated a balance of $14, after both the cash receipts.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
2013 Fox Park Adopt-A-Hydrant Fund Raising & Beautification Campaign Now is your chance to take part in an effort to beautify our neighborhood by painting.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
WARNING This CD is protected by Copyright Laws. FOR HOME USE ONLY. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, lending, distribution, extraction, charging.
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAA Safety Team FAASafety.gov AMT Awards Program Sun ‘n Fun Bryan Neville, FAASTeam April 21, 2009.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Alternative School Administration Study Making Time

Wallace Foundation Identify and remedy conditions that interfere with school leaders in driving student achievement gains for all students. Improve initial leader preparation and ongoing professional development. Create collaborative relationships that will result in student achievement gains for all students.

Wallace Foundation 12 LEAD districts nationally 15 SAELP states 6 new LEAD/SAELP states/districts Is the principal’s job ‘doable’? Identify and correct conditions that interfere Establish a model “seamless” preparation and development continuum

LEAD: 10 Initiatives Aspiring Leaders: 5 Beginning Leaders: 3 Experienced Leaders: 1 Condition Change: 2

Condition: Time

Manager Instructional Leader Either/or…or both? Manager Instructional Leader

ASAS Questions Can management duties be separated from the principal’s job? Can a School Administration Manager (SAM) take on those duties successfully? Will the principal spend more time on instructional improvement? Will this focus on instruction improve relations with teachers? Will student achievement increase at a greater rate?

Progress SAM job description approved Job pool tested, SAMs hired Baseline time/task analysis established Baseline staff, parent and student perceptions established “One year later” data collected Professional development: change of practice

Time/Task analysis Teacher survey Parent survey Student survey Baseline Data 2004 Time/Task analysis Teacher survey Parent survey Student survey CATS Trend Data

Time November, 2004 21 randomly selected schools Retired principals trained as shadows to collect data Five days, Every Five Minutes

Activity Sub-categories 1. Management student discipline student supervision employee supervision employee discipline office work/prep building management parents/guardians SBDM, committees, groups, meetings district: meetings, supervisors, others external: officials, others celebration Activity Sub-categories telephone computer interaction, individual interaction, group read/write/think 2. Instruction student supervision work with student(s) employee supervision office work/prep. observation, walk through feedback parents/guardians SBDM, committees, groups, meetings district: meetings, supervisor, others external: officials, others teaching/modeling professional development planning, curriculum, assessment Celebration 3. Personal (lunch, breaks, restroom, errands, personal business)

Baseline Results Time Staff Parents Students

Principal Time at School 10 hours, daily 20 minutes, lunch and personal time 66.7% management 29.7% Instruction

Student/Principal Interaction What does your principal do? What is her/her main job? discipline 54% safety 19% manage school 13% help students learn 8% supervise staff 6%

Student/Principal Interaction 61% reported never having had a conversation with the principal. 39% reported having had a conversation — 65% discipline related.

Parent Perception 9% reported having had a discussion about instruction with the principal. 6% identified student achievement/instructional leadership as the primary role of the principal.

Teacher Perceptions Principal = Instructional Leader 57% say principal visited classroom in the last week 72% say they discussed a lesson with the principal in the last week 64% say principal assists with lesson planning, work analysis

Selection of Pilot Schools # Location Lunch MOBILE ECE 1 parent INDEX CTBS CATS present Trend Man. Inst. Pers.   fifteen East 23.7 10.2 7.4 37.4 25.0 62.5 86.8 95.6 0.7 57.9 32.7 9.4 twenty South 24.7 1.4 34.7 23.1 63.9 91.1 97.1 0.8 83.7 13.3 3 nineteen 31.4 4.4 4.5 42.4 29.3 58.2 83.0 96.0 1.9 64.7 34.3 1 eleven 34.8 9.3 7.7 48.4 33.7 56.1 68.5 94.7 87.5 11.9 0.6 eight 12.0 6.1 50.7 36.0 49.1 71.0 0.0 63.5 28.3 8.3 twenty-one 41.8 9.9 52.4 38.9 65.3 72.9 95.1 84.4 13.1 2.5 twelve West 46.5 8.5 53.8 40.7 53.5 71.2 96.3 59.6 38.7 1.7 Free and Reduced Lunch 23.7 24.7 31.4 34.8 37.4 41.8 46.5 66.7 29.7 3.6 53.3 61.2 65.0 69.3 69.5 72.9 74.4 80.8 83.7 84.2 87.1 87.6 97.1

Schools Selected nineteen 31.4 29.3 five 65.0 53.5 thirteen 84.2 64.2 Location Lunch MOBILE ECE 1 parent INDEX CTBS CATS present Trend Mang. Inst. Pers. nineteen East 31.4 4.4 4.5 42.4 29.3 58.2 83.0 96.0 1.9 64.7 34.3 1 five South 65.0 17.0 8.1 60.2 53.5 49.8 60.6 94.9 3.1 64.8 34.3 0.9 thirteen West 84.2 9.8 9.1 67.1 64.2 48.4 57.6 95.2 2.1 33.6 66.7 29.7 3.6

Changing the Role SAMs and Principals

SAM Job description Protect principal time Supervise and evaluate all classified staff Student behavior management Smooth operation of the school Budget, office management, schedules After hours use of school All things not instruction

March, 2004: Reality Check SAMs in place for two months Principals report change of practice SAMs report no change of practice What can we do?

Change of Practice

Change of Practice SAMs schedule principal time SAMs protect principal time Principals review student work with students, parents, staff Principals coach teachers Principals establish “hallway conference offices” SAMs track principal time

Time/Task Analysis Second Shadow Week, November, 2004

66.2 29.7 4.1 31.7 65.8 2.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% November 2003 November 2004 Weekly Average Personal Instruction Management

SAMs track principal time

SAMs track time monthly

Student/Principal Interaction What does your principal do? What is her/her main job? Principal’s Job (1/04) (2/05) Discipline 54% 22% Safety 19% 23% Manage school 13% 3% Supervise teachers 8% Supervise instruction 6% 49%

Student/Principal Interaction Have you ever had a conversation with your principal? Question (1/04) (2/05) Conversation with the principal? 39% Yes 61% No 67% Yes 33% No Discipline related? 65% 27% Instruction? 35% 73%

Teacher Perceptions January, 2004 57% say principal observed them in the last week 7% said they received feedback and direction 72% say they discussed a lesson with the principal in the last week 64% say principal assists with lesson planning, work analysis January, 2005 82% say principal visited classroom in the last week 22% said they received feedback and direction 95% say they discussed a lesson with the principal in the last week 91% say principal assists with lesson planning, work analysis 78% say principal is more engaged with instruction

Parent Perception Baseline 04 9% reported having had a discussion about instruction with the principal. 6% identified student achievement as the primary role of the principal. One Year Later 19% report having had a discussion about instruction with the principal. 45% identified student achievement as the primary role of the principal.

Culture Change “This is the best thing, and the hardest thing, I’ve ever done.” “I call him “grease.” “I’m sorry, the principal is in a classroom.”

CATS, 04 All three schools met or exceeded trend data Too early to draw conclusions using test scores

Lessons Learned Data, Data, Data Professional Development Time is a barrier Principals can change behavior Students, parents and teachers appreciate the difference Affordable, sustainable

Next Steps October 2005: CATS November 2005: Third Shadowing January 2006: Third surveys

Alternative School Administration Study Making Time

Contact and LEAD Kentucky mshell3@jefferson.k12.ky.us 502 485-3011