July 2009 1 Coastal Water Project Capital and O&M Cost Description Moss Landing Power Plant - Desalination Plant Site.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

The three most important considerations for development of wind farms are: LAND with good to excellent wind resource CONTRACT to sell electricity produced.
DESIGN LAYOUT OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan NOVEMBER 9, 2011.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Validation of W4e Hydropower Turbine Generator PI Henry W Russell Walker Wellington,
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project - Presentation to Monterey Co. Water Resources Agency June 25, 2012.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Regulatory Refresher The Municipal Regional Permit Kristin Kerr, P.E., QSD EOA, Inc. Municipal Maintenance Training Workshop May 23, 2013.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Cornerstone Engineering Group The Foundation for Your Civil Engineering Needs Camanche Reservoir Water Treatment Plant Project Cecilia Zamora Evangelina.
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Cost Estimate for Different Wind Turbine Technologies Bin Cai Wind.
July Coastal Water Project Capital and O&M Cost Description North Marina Alternative - Desalination Plant Site.
EM15 – Contractors COST MANAGEMENT
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES INSTALLED EQUIPMENT COSTS.
Economics – Why Today? Collecting data Additional information for request –Single vs multiple units –Quantity –Quality Future decisions Economic analysis.
United Water & Sanitation District Stonegate Village Metro District Water Supply Opportunities 1.
 Groundwater Supply ◦ Quantity ◦ Quality  Infrastructure ◦ Treatment ◦ Transmission ◦ Distribution  Response Plans ◦ Long-term ◦ Short-term ◦ Emergencies.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
1 CTC 450 Review Water Quality Water Quality. 2 CTC 450 Water Distribution Systems Water Distribution Systems.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
Water System Planning Study
Special Order by Consent Wastewater Collection Improvement Projects Mark Fisher and Dennis Asbury Final Report to City of Eden October 20, 2009.
Construction Cost Estimating Class #2: Concept Estimating Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
Technical Manager; Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals.
Sectoral Coverage – Construction and related services Workshop on Scheduling Specific Commitments for Construction and related engineering services and.
Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project April 23, 2012.
ELK MEADOWS HOA Water Master Plan (Supply, Treatment, Distribution, and Storage) May 2005.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
LCWDBoardMtg_ pptx/1 LCWD Board Meeting January 14, Carneros Avenue, Napa Los Carneros Water District.
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
TOWN OF NORTH EAST NEW TOWN HALL AND HIGHWAY FACILITY September 2015.
Technical Workshops on Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A July 26 & 27, 2012.
Network Appurtenances Major operations within a water transport and distribution systems are: 1. Transmission. 2. Storage. 3. Pumping.
Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002.
Chapter 37 Pipeline Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the.
FOOD ENGINEERING DESIGN AND ECONOMICS
About Us  We are a group of Mechanical Engineers specialized in Construction & Engineering Services.  Our mission is to provide highest quality of construction.
Utility Engineers, PC.  Generation  Transmission  Distribution.
NC AWWA-WEA 95th Annual Conference
Generation Costs. Fuel InputProcess (Generating station) Electrical Energy output Cost of Electrical energy = Cost of fuel + processing cost.
Variable Load on Power Stations
GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO Water and Sewerage Company (WASCO) Greater Maseru Water Supply Feasibility Study & Preliminary Design Results of Financial.
Components of Water Networks Eng. Mona Al-Gharbawi Eng. Ayman Al-Afifi
California Water Plan April 14, 2005 Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Technical Analysis.
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
Desalination for Drinking Water Purposes TCEQ Trade Fair David A. Williams, P.E Robert W. Sims, P.E. Austin, Texas May, 2016.
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department |  1   Reuse, Every Drop Has Value Seminar FPL JPA.
Overview of Desalination Trends and Jaffna Project
Big Cypress Basin Capital Project Update Jeffrey Kivett, P.E., Director Operations, Engineering and Construction Division Jeffrey Kivett, P.E., Director.
City of Farmersville Wastewater Project January 26, 2016 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Water Filtration Plant Improvements Project Summary
Recycled Water Project Basis of Design Report
2016 Alaska Western Workshop Cost Estimating 101
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Process Economics Factors that affect profitability
Costing and Project Evaluation
Estimating Capital Costs
Opportunities for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage for Electric Utilities
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
Nadine ALLEMAND Objectives of the presentation
FEE INCREASES Public Work Shop June 2, 2018.
Southwest Section AWWA 2018 – Baton Rouge, LA
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
PROJECT.
PROJECT.
Presentation transcript:

July Coastal Water Project Capital and O&M Cost Description Moss Landing Power Plant - Desalination Plant Site

2 Introduction  Present updated cost estimates for Proposed Project at Moss Landing including key assumptions and approach  Workshop Presenters: Mark Schubert, PE, CAW Paul Findley, PE, RBF Consulting Dave Stephenson, CAW  Data and assumptions derived from cost estimates contained in Attachments K and L of the Schubert Testimony, dated May 22, 2009

Moss Landing Project  First Proposed in Plan B Report, 2002  Proposed Project in PEA, 2005  Basic Components, Per DEIR:  10 mgd Desalination Plant near Moss Landing  Sourced from MLPP Cooling Water System  Brine Disposal to MLPP Outfall  Pipelines to CAW Service Area  Terminal Reservoir  Pump Station and Pipeline to ASR Wells  2 New ASR Wells + 2 Existing ASR Wells

Moss Landing Project (cont’d) Cost Estimate History Capital Costs Annual O&M Costs  Plan B $176M$6.4M (2001 $) (for 10,730 afy)  PEA/CDR: $ M$ M (gross) (2005 $) $6.4M (net) (for 11,730 afy)  Current: $270M$ M (gross) (2009 $) $7.4M-8.3M (net) (for 9,300-10,100 afy)

Updating the Moss Landing Cost Estimates  Changes, Compared to PEA/CDR Estimate:  Updated to 2009 dollars (from 2005 dollars), checked previous estimates, and added more detail  Changed implementation and contingency factors  Pressure membrane filters instead of submerged  Added 20% RO standby capacity  36-inch diameter product water pipeline

Updating the Moss Landing Cost Estimates (Cont’d)  Changes, Compared to PEA/CDR Estimate:  Monterey Pipeline with Valley Greens PS  2 new ASR wells (instead of 3), shorter ASR Pipelines  Assumed 700 afy of desal water delivered via ASR  Increased ASR PS capacity, buried Terminal Reservoir  O&M costs estimated at 15,200 afy total system demand  Changed energy unit costs

7 Capital Cost Estimate Capital Cost Description Pipeline Pump StationWell Process Equipment Building/ Structure Civil WorksTank Elec. I&CPropertyAllowance Construction Costs Off-Site Feedwater & Brine FacilitiesXXNMML NM X Desalination Plant X XXXXX X Desalinated Water ConveyanceXX XX X X Terminal Reservoir & ASR PSXX XXX X X ASR SystemX X XX X X Implementation Costs X ROW Easement & Land Acquisition X Contingency Allowance X ML = Moss Landing NM = North Marina X = Both Sites

8 Pipelines  Cost Components:  Material Adjusted Vendor Quotes for Pipes Type II Asphalt Concrete Erosion Control (BMP)  Labor & Equipment ROW Preparation, Pipeline Installation, Erosion Control, Surface Restoration, & Bore Pit Construction Prevailing Wages per Department of Labor Variable Production Rates for Standard Crews Off-site Transport and Storage of Excavated Material Required Equipment per Construction Expert

9 Pipelines (cont’d)  Special Construction $1,500/ LF for Jack and Bore Dewatering Wells = $32,000 per Jack and Bore Crossing Bridge Crossings: Tembladero Slough ($670/LF) and Salinas River ($1,890/ LF)  Cathodic Protection $5/ LF for metallic pipelines  Contractor Overhead & Profit (OH&P) 18.5% of all above costs Average Total Cost: $400/ LF

10 Pump Stations  Desalinated Water PS & ASR PS:  Quantity estimates and unit prices per recent similar project estimate  All Other Pump Stations:  Equipment estimated on $/ Installed HP, plus 25% for taxes, installation, & material, plus 18.5% for contractor OH&P  Building based on $110/ SF, includes contractor OH&P  Wet wells based on $700/ CY of concrete

11 ASR Wells  Monitoring Well, Core, & Test well at ASR Well 3  Test Well at ASR Well 4  Stainless Steel Material for Test Wells  Wellhead facilities at ASR Wells 3 & 4  Conversion of Test Wells to Production wells  Well Pumps  Electrical & Pump Building  Well Field Piping & Civil Work  Electrical, I&C  Back flush Water Reclamation Facility  Estimates from ASR Systems  Contractor OH&P included in above

12 Process Equipment  Cost Components:  Vendor Supplied Equipment RO System, UF System, Pumps, Screens, & Chemical Systems Includes Delivery, Taxes, Manuals, Testing, & Training  Installation Includes Labor, Equipment, & Contractor Supplied Appurtenances Estimate based on expert consultation and experience  Building, Electrical, I&C, and Site Work Estimated Separately  Contractor OH&P 10% for RO Equipment 18.5% for other installed equipment

13 Buildings & Structures  Floor Slabs, Foundations, and Hydraulic Structures were estimated at $1100/ CY  Superstructures were estimated at:  $120/ SF for large process buildings  $110/ SF for pump stations  $350/ SF (first floor area) for two story admin building  Detailed estimates for buildings were estimated using commercially available cost estimating software

14 Civil Works  Line Items in the Estimate:  Desalination Plant Equalization Basin  Desalination Plant Earthwork, Sitework, & Piping  Terminal Reservoir Earthwork, Sitework, & Piping  ASR Backflush Reclamation Basin  Dried Solids Storage  RO Clean in Place (CIP) Waste Storage

15 Civil Works (cont’d)  Unit Costs:  General Site work $5/ SF Site Preparation Rough Grading Fine Grading Paving Landscape & Irrigation Site Lighting & Security Fencing  Excavation / Backfill $7/ CY  Yard Piping $400/ LF  Equalization Basin Liner$7/ SF  Above Costs Include 18.5% Contractor OH&P

16 Tanks (Reservoirs)  Circumferentially Pre-stressed, Post-Tensioned Concrete Tanks w/ Concrete Covers  Buried Terminal Reservoir: $1.75/ gallon  Above Ground Clearwell: $1.50/ gallon  Costs Include 18.5% Contractor OH&P  Earthwork, Site work, and Piping estimated separately  Based on analysis of two similar recently constructed projects

17 Electrical, Instrumentation & Controls  Desalination Plant Electrical /I&C  Power intensive facility  Allowance of 25% of other plant non-electrical costs, based on recommendation from electrical engineering expert Includes plant control systems, and SCADA system for remote communications and control  Additional $1M for substation to step down from 230 KV to 12 KV, per recent estimate on similar project  Other Facilities Electrical /I&C  Allowance of 5 to 15% of facility non-electrical costs, depending on power intensity of facility Includes connection to SCADA system

18 Property  Site Acquisition  Based on 2009 communication with licensed real estate appraiser: Residential:$400,000-$1,000,000/Acre Light Industrial:$600,000-$800,000/Acre Agricultural:$3,000-40,000/Acre  ROW Acquisition for Pipelines (Present Worth)  Transportation Agency of Monterey County and private agricultural lands evaluated by licensed real estate appraiser

19 Allowances  Electrical/ I&C  Contractor OH&P  Used 18.5%, except for RO Equipment at 10%  Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization  Typically included in OH&P. Added 1% for Desalination Plant only

20 Allowances (cont’d)  Implementation  Project Administration and Management, Engineering, Legal  Used 30% of base construction costs, based on experience, excluding costs through December 31,  Approximately half (15% of base construction costs) included with construction for design-build facilities  Contingency  Covers unanticipated changes in project scope or schedule due to unforeseen changed site conditions; regulatory or institutional requirements, including mitigation implementation and permit compliance; and acts of nature.  20%, based on AACEI, for “conceptual design” stage of project development.

21 Moss Landing Capital Cost Estimate Summary ( 2009 $) Off-site Feedwater/Brine$ 3M Desalination Plant$ 96M Desalinated Water Conveyance$ 54M Terminal Reservoir/ ASRPS$ 15M ASR System$ 10M Subtotal for Construction$ 178M Implementation Costs$ 39M Present Worth of Land/ROW Costs $ 7M Contingency Allowance$ 45M Total- Capital Costs$ 270M

22 Accuracy  Cost estimating accuracy is typically keyed to project development stage  Proposed Project between Class 3 and Class 4  AACEI Class 3-Budget, 10-40%: -10/20% to +10/30%  AACEI Class 4-Study, 1-15%: -15/30% to +20/50%  Used -15%/+25 %  So final Moss Landing Project capital costs could be in range of $230M to $340M in 2009 Dollars

23 Operation & Maintenance Costs O&M Cost Description EnergyChemicalsLabor Membrane Replacement General R&R O&M Costs Avoided Facilities Off-Site Feedwater & Brine FacilitiesX NM Desalination PlantXXXXX Desalinated Water PumpingX X Terminal Reservoir & ASR PSX X ASR WellsXXX X Valley Greens PSX X Begonia Iron Removal PlantXXX X Segunda PSX X X Seaside Wells X General System X ML = Moss Landing NM = North Marina X = Both Sites O&M Costs Avoided Include: Energy, Chemicals, & Labor

24 Energy  Energy Rate Schedules were selected considering:  Based on PG&E Tariffs  Load E-19 (< 1000 kw) E-20 (> 1000 kw)  Grid Voltage Transmission Voltage Primary Voltage Secondary Voltage

25 Energy (cont’d)  Unit Costs for Energy for each facility were developed considering:  Time of day (Peak, Partial Peak, Off-Peak)  Season (Summer / Winter)  Service Voltage  Maximum Demand per Month  Average Use per month  Diurnal Load Profiles  Energy Unit Costs: $ $0.142 /kWh  Desalination Plant at Moss Landing Winter $0.079/ kwh Summer $0.0112/ kwh  Highest Unit Cost is at remote pump stations

26 Chemicals  Variable according to annual production  Chemicals and dosages per DEIR Project Description  Chemical costs obtained by 2009 quotation from national vendor  Bulk delivery and storage

27 Labor  Fixed, does not vary with annual production  Operations labor categories and rates from CAW- Monterey  Desalination plant staffing levels estimated on the basis of two other desalination plants and consultation with industry experts

28 Repair and Replacement  Assumed replacement of 20 % of membranes every year starting in 2021 for Moss Landing Project  Assumed R&R for structures, buildings, and civil works at 1% of original cost, per year.  Assumed R&R for mechanical systems at 3% of original cost, per year.

29 O&M Costs Avoided  Project will reduce production and operations costs at:  Begonia WTP (BIRP) by 6900 afy, $1.36M annual reduction  Segunda PS, by 6900 afy, $0.37M annual reduction  Seaside Wells, by 2200 afy, $0.28M annual reduction  Datum used is current conditions:  Begonia WTP (BIRP) at 11,500 afy  Seaside Wells at 3,700 afy  Avoided costs were developed on basis of existing operational data, calculation of avoided power, and consistent (calculated) energy unit cost

30 ML Project O&M Cost Estimate  For 2021, in 2009 Dollars, at 10,100 AFY: Desalination Plant:$ 9.3M Desalinated Water Conveyance:$ 0.5M ASR System:$ 0.5M Total (gross) $10.3M Costs avoided: ($ 2.0M) Total (net)$ 8.3M

31 End of Formal Presentation