Kirsty McCormack.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNITED NATIONS’ RESPONSE TO THE
Advertisements

Magnet Recognition Program®
Seminar "Open Government in the Making" Brussels, 4 October 2012 Andrea Halmos European Commission, DG CONNECT Unit H3 Public Services.
Presentation by Pippa Lord, Senior Research Officer National Foundation for Educational Research Listening to Learners Conference University of East London.
An initiative of the Think Local Act Personal Partnership
EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
Intervention Research and Strategy Options
The Business Support Professional Career Pathway Leonardo Partnership Management Meeting CECA´s headquarter Seville, Spain March 2010.
February Dakar, Senegal
Making Progress - Planning the next steps Gary Leeming, Associate Director for Informatics.
Promoting patient-centred healthcare around the world Patient-Centred Healthcare: From Policy to Practice Jeremiah Mwangi, Senior Policy Officer 26 May.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting
Secondary Data Analysis: Systematic Reviews & Associated Databases
Meaningful Patient Involvement In FP7 Research Nicola Bedlington Meaningful Patient Involvement In FP7 Research Nicola Bedlington Open Information Day.
1-1 PRESENTER The Role of the Framework 7 Advisor Your Name Your Websites Websites
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
HSRU is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. The author accepts full responsibility for.
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY DESIGNS IN EVALUATING MEDICINES USE INTERVENTIONS 1 Lloyd Matowe 2 Craig Ramsay 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University 2 HSRU,
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination An overview of development and progress May 2013 PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Website: open.umich.edu/education/ | Copyright 2009 The University of Michigan. This work is licensed under the Creative.
Research and Museums Galleries Scotland KT Scotland: Policy and Practice Conference 23 April 2010 Alison Turnbull Head of Research & Standards.
Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Criteria for Centres of Expertise for Rare Diseases in the EU following EUCERD Recommendations RARECARENet Project: Consensus meeting on.
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews.
Evidence based implementation for quality and health promotion in hospitals Professor Jos Kleijnen Director Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University.
Health Promoting Health Service: Development day.
18 th to 21 st June 2013 Primary Care Sciences Keele University RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS For further enquiries contact Debbie Cooke Tel: +44(0)1782.
Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre 5 July 2013 NIHR Programmes and topic identification Alison Ford, Senior Programme Manager.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Steph Garfield-Birkbeck Assistant Director NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton.
HSRU is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates. The author accepts full responsibility for this talk. Health.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
XXX_DECRIPT_MON00/1 Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive.
Janine Margarita R. Dizon, PhD Research Supervisor Center for Health Research and Movement.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
A translational routemap for public health research Peter Craig Programme Manager, MRC PHSRN Knowledge Transfer Scotland, Heriot Watt University, 23 April.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Who, What and Why are We? Global Health Research at the Norwegian Health Services Research Centre Atle Fretheim Researcher, Coordinator International Health.
Decent Work country policy analysis. 30 th August 2011 Three interrelated assignments to improve services to Constituents, achieve operational synergies:
Supporting Development of Organisational Knowledge Management Strategy NHS Librarians Meeting 3 rd June 2010.
The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.
Mapping Research on the Social Value of Architecture Martin Edge, Tony Craig and Anna Conniff The Robert Gordon University Aberdeen Scotland A report on.
The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
Multi-disciplinary University Traditional Health Initiative (MUTHI): Building Sustainable Research Capacity on Plants for Better Public Health in Africa.
EUNetPaS is a project supported by a grant from the EAHC. The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the author(s). The EAHC.
R&D Report to SL&M Board 17 September 2002 Graham Thornicroft Director of Research & Development Gill Dale Research & Development Manager.
Sources of systematic reviews Arash Etemadi, MD PhD Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
Methods: The project used a mixed methods approach including qualitative focus groups, a questionnaire study and systematic searches of the research literature.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
From current process to future best practice how the government’s SEN&D reforms will transform services and support in Norfolk for children, young people.
OUR FOCUS FOR 2011 TO 2012 The CfWI produces quality intelligence to inform better workforce planning, that improves people’s lives.
Evidence-based Insurance Medicine What is Cochrane and Cochrane Insurance Medicine? Rebecca Weida, MSc University of Basel.
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
RUNNING RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS
The Trial Protocol Tool: the PRACTIHC software tool that supported the writing of protocols for pragmatic randomized controlled trials  Shaun Treweek,
This is a presentation template which can be used and adapted to communicate key introductory messages and stimulate discussion about the personalisation.
Writing research and grant applications – from idea to submission
Civil Protection Financial Instrument – Prevention Projects
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
An Introduction to the NIHR programmes
Simon Large – Chief Executive
Presentation transcript:

Kirsty McCormack

Other unit staff Marion Campbell Craig Ramsay Adrian Grant And all of you!

What is Practihc? Pragmatic Randomised Trials in Health Care Systems Funded by the European Commission's 5th Framework Programme for international collaboration with Developing Countries An international research and technology development (RTD) network to facilitate information for action on priority health problems

What is the purpose of the project? (1) To improve partner countries health systems by increasing their capacity to evaluate health care delivery systems, specific health policy, public health and clinical choices and identify those options which are effective

What is the purpose of the project? (2) To develop the global science of pragmatic RCTs and promote inclusion of their findings as an element in health care decision making

What is the purpose of the project? (3) To promote RTD co-operation internationally by consolidating a network of established centres with expertise in RCTs, and to extend this network to support the achievement of scientific excellence and real world health system decision making relevance in neighbouring countries.

Partner institutions

Specific scientific and technological objectives (1) To locate or develop tools and resources to support development and use of pragmatic RCTs To study up to 100 partner experiences in pragmatic RCTs To systematically review the published literature on conduct of RCTs in developing countries

Specific scientific and technological objectives (2) To develop and pilot a programme of workshops on the design and conduct of trials To promote the science of pragmatic randomised trials To reinforce scientific and technological co-operation between researchers in developing countries and in the European Community

HSRUs contribution To locate or develop research tools and resources to aid the design of pragmatic trials e.g. Trial protocol template Guidelines Checklists Software Information resources Examples

Search strategy WWW search Ask known trialists and trial co-ordinators Practihc partners NOTE: Not a comprehensive search

Evaluation criteria Relevant to pragmatic trials Relevant to developing countries Guidelines and checklists should be evidence based and not superceded Software should be free, user friendly, can be downloaded, can be packaged, and works.

Trial protocol template A trial protocol template has been developed using a variety of resources including: A web search for existing protocol templates Review of existing trial protocols Consultation with trial-co-ordinators

Guidelines Declaration of Helsinki ICH GCP EU Data Protection Act Consort Statement Guidelines for clinical trials in South Africa Developing Written Information for Patients Good Practice Guidelines

Checklists Initial search concludes that many checklists located are too specific and not relevant Will need to develop checklists for the purposes of practihc Checklists for each section of the protocol template have been developed within the context of ‘things to consider when writing a protocol’

Software Software located: Randomisation programs Sample size calculator (HSRU) Data management and analysis tool (EpiInfo) Software to be commissioned: Budgeting tool Project management tools e.g. Gantt chart and monitoring tool

Information resources Resource Centre for Randomised Trials (RCRT) TrialsCentral MRC Trials Managers’ Network The Cochrane library Directory of randomisation software and services UK Clearing House on Health Outcomes

Examples Participants information leaflets Informed consent forms Recruitment strategies Participant retention strategies Dummy tables Sample size justifications Progress and final reports

PRACTiHC website www.practihc.org The collaboration will make all tools and resources accessible to people planning evaluations of health care interventions via the PRACTiHC website www.practihc.org

Web page

Next PRACTiHC Workshop Havana, Cuba 9th-12th February 2003