Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (ABL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Advertisements

Fultz Landfill Site Remediation Ohio by Simon Taylor.
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
1 BoRit Asbestos & The Superfund Process Stacie Peterson, Remedial Project Manager (RPM)
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
1 Fort Monroe: An Update on the Environmental Cleanup VDEQ Presentation to the Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority March 19, 2009.
Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
PROPOSED REGIONAL GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ACTION ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT June 11, 2010.
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Federal Mogul Department for Environmental Protection Kentucky Division of Waste Management February 10, 2015 Presented by Chris Jung To Protect and Enhance.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Investigating Ground Water Contamination at Ohio’s C&DD Landfills Aaron Shear Ohio’s Solid Waste and C&DD Program Annual Meeting May 9, 2013.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
CEMEPE Skiathos island, June 2007 Business activities in the environmental sector in Greece: Current status and prospects E. Kondili 1 *, J. K. Kaldellis.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Opportunities with Union Carbide RCRA National Meeting May, 2005 Bob Greaves EPA Region 3.
Enviromental aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Marcela Maturová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Fort Ord, Monterey County, California History and Closure of a Landfill on a former Military Installation and Current Superfund Site Derek S. Lieberman,
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Typical Design of a Production or Monitoring Well.
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
Former Point Cook Fire Training Area Contamination Remediation Works Project Community Information Session 26 September 2013.
Aerojet Environmental Update Carmichael Town Hall Meeting March 12, 2008 Michael Girard Aerojet Environmental Site Remediation (916)
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
Team Successes at the Former Memphis Depot, Memphis, Tennessee Presented by: David D. Nelson, P.G.Thomas C. Holmes Project Manager, CH2M HillProject Manager,
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
The Dalles, Industrial Certification Northwest Aluminum Company The Dalles, Oregon Douglas C. MacCourt Ater Wynne LLP US German Bilateral Working.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
The Woodlawn Landfill Site A Case Study in the Values and Methods of Ecological Revitalization.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
BROWNFIELDS 2005 Dealing with Unexpected Contamination Lowry Air Force Base Redevelopment Denver, CO Tom Markham, Executive Director, Lowry Redevelopment.
Fort Detrick Installation Restoration Program Area B Groundwater November 1, 2010 Fort Detrick, Maryland A Sustainable Community of Excellence.
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Stony Hill Road Contamination Wake County.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Redevelopment Authority of the County of Washington O
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Attendance, Introductions & Correspondence Old Business
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
UNC Superfund Research Program
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Introduction EPA is overseeing the RI/FS for the Rolling Knolls Landfill being conducted by several companies under a 2005 administrative order on consent.
Presentation transcript:

Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (ABL) Environmental Cleanup

Cumberland, Md. Maryland West Virginia ABL Area Map

Allegany Ballistics Laboratory A government-owned, contractor-operated plant (Plant 1) of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Operated by ATK Tactical Systems Company, LLC Installation Restoration Program (IRP) managed by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division (LANTDIV) Environmental studies/engineering - CH2M Hill

Allegany Ballistics Laboratory Conducts research, development, testing and production of solid rocket propulsion, laser initiation systems, composite and metal structures for military tactical missiles and gun launched systems. These include air-to-air, air-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles and gun launched systems for the U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force.

ABL Economic Impact 850 full time employees (Oct 2003) $38 million annual payroll (2002) $73 million goods & services purchased locally in FY2003 $260 million facility improvements & maintenance since 1984. $28 million/year projected thru 2005.

ABL Environmental Issues 1983 study identified 9 sites, 7 were recommended for further evaluation: - Northern Riverside Waste Disposal Area (1) - Previous Burning Grounds (2 & 3) - X-ray developing solution disposal site (4) - Inert landfill (5) - Sensitivity test area water impoundment (6) - Beryllium landfill (7) Production Well ‘A’ identified in 1983, became Site 10 Production Well ‘F’ identified in 1995, became Site 11 Various Building 167 areas identified in 1983, became Site 12

Environmental Concerns Soil and ground water contamination Solvents Production materials and by-products No immediate threat to human health or the environment Concerns are for potential future residential land and water uses

Environmental Cleanup A multi-step process 1. Preliminary Assessment / Site Inspection (PA/SI) - Specific sites identified - Sampling is conducted to confirm or deny the presence of contamination 2. Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (RI/FS) - Determines the nature and extent of contamination. - Risk Assessment for human health and the environment - Evaluates numerous options 3. Record of Decision (ROD) - All parties involved agree on proposed cleanup 4. Remedial Design / Remedial Action (RD/RA) - Determines and emplaces selected technology

Installation Restoration Program January 1983 - Initial Assessment Study February 1989 - Technical Review Committee (TRC) formed May 1994 - Plant 1 listed on National Priorities List December 8, 1994 - TRC changed to Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) January 1998 - Federal Facility Agreement

National Priorities List (NPL) National list of environmental sites based on calculation of risk to human health and the environment “Worst-First” clean up Listing on NPL brings funding priority “Superfund” for civilian sites DoD funding for military sites Federal Facilities Agreement establishes working arrangement between Navy, EPA, and W.Va.

Site 1 - Riverside Disposal Area Approx. 11 acres Used as waste burning, storage and disposal area Volatile organic compounds (primarily solvents) and metals detected in soil, ground water, and sediment. Air stripping of ground water began in 1998 Soil investigation completed in 2002, ecological and human health risk assessments for soil are in progress

Site 1 Groundwater Time Line

Site 1 Treatment Plant Construction 53% of the project budget of approximately $5 million was allocated to local vendors or businesses 1 % OHM Equipment 1% Local Equipment Rental 4% OHM 7% Direct Costs (local) 8% Direct Costs (others) 18% Major Equipment 20% Labor and Fees 41% Subcontractors (local)

Site 2 Previous Burning Ground (1942-1949) Burning ground area utilized from 1942-1949 located southwest of Building 361 A few solvents, hydrocarbons, and metals detected in soil and groundwater Additional groundwater sampling is proposed for this site

Site 3 Previous Burning Ground (1950-1958) Burning ground area utilized from 1950-1958 Two areas of disturbed soil and four linear features identified in aerial photographs A few solvents and metals were detected in soil and groundwater Ecological and human health risk assessments are in progress

Site 4B Spent Photographic Developing Solution Site Area adjacent to Building 181 were spent photographic solutions (containing silver, cyanide and phenols) were discharged Metals contamination found in soil A Pilot Study is planned to assist with clean up of soil

Site 5 Inert (non ordnance) Landfill Soil and ground water contamination from disposal of drums which had contained solvents, laboratory and photographic chemicals, and construction debris. Landfill cap completed in September 1998 Approximately 4 acres Groundwater studies completed in 2002 Ecological and human health risk assessments are in progress

Site 6 - Sensitivity Test Area Surface Water Impoundment Approximately 2.5-acre man-made surface water impoundment located 500 feet down-slope from sensitivity test area Part of Area of Concern I Sediment samples collected in September 2001 indicate no explosive constituents were detected. Therefore, a no further action closeout document was prepared for the site in February 2002

Site 7- Beryllium Landfill 6 x 6 x 10-foot pit for disposal of laboratory materials Contents excavated in 1995, segregated in 1996, and disposed of in 1997 No further action decision document was signed for the site in 2001

Site 10 - Production Well ‘A’ Identified in 1983 and recommended for continued monitoring Interim Remedial Action to treat water at Site 1 treatment plant proposed in March 1998. Decision document signed in June 1998 Shallow groundwater treatment began in February 1999 Final decision document for Site 10 groundwater (not yet issued) stipulates that the system be expanded to include bedrock groundwater extraction and treatment. Expanded system began operation in February 2002

Site 11 - Production Well ‘F’ Well installed in 1961 but never put into operation because sand in borehole prevented pumping. Free product (solvents) found in well in 1995. Investigation of soil and groundwater, sampling and re-boring of the well during Sept.-Oct. 1999 removed source of contamination. Performed 4 rounds of quarterly groundwater sampling following source removal Draft Remedial Investigation Report, including a risk assessment, submitted November 2002.

Site 12 - Former Area of Concern N, Building 167 Solid Waste Management Units Nine units in the vicinity of Building 167 where wastes historically handled Investigated Units 37N and 52 during Phase I Phase II and Phase III (as Area of Concern N) Solid Waste Management Unit/ Area of Concern Investigations Discovered two solvent plumes One centered around Building 167 (primarily TCE) One centered around former wastewater sump (Unit 37N) Area of Concern N was designated IR Site 12 RI currently underway to determine vertical extent of groundwater contamination and the extent of subsurface soil contamination

Site Status 1 2 3 4B 5 Site Study Invest. Decision Cleanup Groundwater Soil All media All media Soil Soil Groundwater, Surface Water and Sediment

Site Status Cont’d... 6 7 10 11 12 Site Study Invest. Decision Cleanup NFA decision document prepared in February 2002 NFA decision document signed September 2001 Interim decision document for groundwater signed June 1998; final remedy implemented February 2002 Soil All media All media

Public Participation Two-way, interactive communication that involves the community in the clean up process.

The Players RAB West Navy ATK Virginia EPA Maryland Decision Document Communities

What is a RAB? Restoration Advisory Board Made up of representatives from the community and government agencies Members provide advice to decision makers All members are equal

ABL RAB Mission Statement Serve as a forum for discussion and exchange of information between federal/state agencies and the community regarding the cleanup program at ABL Provide an opportunity for stakeholders to review Installation Restoration Program cleanup progress, provide input and participate in dialogue with decision makers Complement other public participation initiatives

ABL RAB Mission Statement continued The purpose of this mission of private-public dialogue is to provide a trust-building process among the various stakeholders and government agencies, to protect human health and the environment, to restore the identified National Priorities List sites and to prevent or minimize future pollution from these sites. Accomplishing this mission is expected to enhance the viability of ABL to provide employment and valuable public services for years to come.

RAB Responsibilities Provide advice to regulatory agencies Consider important clean up issues Review and evaluate technical documents Recommend priorities Conduct regular meetings, which are open to the public

Benefits of Public Participation Understanding cleanup issues and progress Opportunity to participate in the process and influence decisions Clean up that is responsive to community desires

RAB Members Stakeholders Interested individuals Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) State regulatory agencies (Md. & W.Va.) Local city and county governments U.S. Navy and ATK Tactical Systems Company, LLC.

Stakeholders Any person, group, or organization affected by, or having a vested interest in, the environmental issues or the process used for their resolution.

RAB Activities Publicize RAB meetings & activities Update Community Relations Plan Increase community awareness Increase understanding of environmental issues, process, and accomplishments

RAB Members The number of RAB members should be large enough to reflect community diversity, yet small enough to be workable The ABL RAB meets quarterly New community members are welcome

Community Member Expectations Serve at least a two-year term Attend all RAB meetings Review and comment on technical documents Communicate with the community and interested groups

RAB Co-chairs Dr. Betsey T. Kagey, Ph.D. (301) 722-0029 E-mail: Bkagey@mail.frostburg.edu Mr. Lou Williams, NAVSEA, (909) 920-9737 ABL contact: Les Mull (304) 726-5425

Information Repositories LaVale Public Library 815 National Highway LaVale, Md Fort Ashby Public Library Lincoln Street Fort Ashby, W. Va.