Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 14, 2013 KCTCS Board of Regents Efficiency, Effectiveness and Accountability Committee.
Advertisements

Improving Student Learning through Student Engagement January 18, 2006 Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Disaggregate to Appreciate Making SENSE of Texas’ Entering Community College Students 2012 TAIR Conference Corpus Christi, TX.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Data for FCDC Dec ACCJC New Standards Mission Fulfillment through institutionally defined standards Bakersfield College is committed to providing.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Committing to Student Engagement AVC 2008 Findings.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) Results June Scores range from one to four.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
STRATEGIC PLAN Kentucky Community and Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
STUDENT DIVERSITY AND HOW IT RELATES TO STUDENT SUCCESS Dr. Michael Conyette.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
Director, Institutional Research
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
North Seattle College All College Meeting
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings

CCSSE’s Growing Scope CCSSE 2004 Over 92,000 community college students 152 colleges 37 states CCSSE collegesin ‘05 Cumulative total approaching 400,000 students

Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice CCSSE reports survey results in two ways: national benchmarks — areas that educational research has shown to be important in quality educational practice — and students’ responses to individual survey items. The five benchmarks are: H Active and Collaborative Learning H Student Effort H Academic Challenge H Student-Faculty Interaction H Support for Learners CCSSEville Community College 2004 Benchmark Scores

Reaching for Excellence CCSSE encourages colleges continually to ask whether current performance is good enough and to reach for excellence in student engagement. Colleges can: 1. Compare themselves to the national average (the 50 mark). 2. Compare themselves to high-performing colleges. 3. Measure their overall performance against results for their least-engaged group, aspiring to make sure all subgroups engage in their education at similarly high levels. 4. Gauge their work in areas their college strongly values. 5. Contrast where they are now with where they want to be. CCSSEville Community College 2004 Benchmark Scores 50--

Developmental Education Students at CCSSE Colleges More likely to be a first-generation student Less likely to have a high school diploma Significantly less likely to identify English as first language Slightly more likely to be single and to have children at home.

Active and Collaborative Learning Key Findings: All CCSSE 2004 colleges Students Who Collaborated on Projects During Class Students Who Collaborated on Classwork Outside of Class

Student Effort Key Findings: All CCSSE 2004 colleges Students Who Come to Class Unprepared Hours Full-Time Students Spend Studying

Student Effort Students who often/very often prepared two or more drafts of an assignment: Developmental 56% Non-developmental 42% Students who often/very often worked harder than they thought they could to meet expectations: Developmental 52% Non-developmental 43%

Academic Challenge Key Findings: All CCSSE 2004 colleges Are Students Writing Enough? Are Students Reading Enough?

Academic Challenge Developmental Education Students Report Significantly Higher Levels of College Contributions to Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development Not so surprising: -Writing clearly and effectively -Speaking clearly and effectively -Solving numerical problems

Academic Challenge Developmental Education Students Report Significantly Higher Levels of College Contributions to Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development Also: -Understanding yourself -Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds -Developing a personal code of ethics -Gaining information about career opportunities

Student-Faculty Interaction Key Findings: All CCSSE 2004 colleges Students Who Discussed Ideas with Instructors Outside of Class Students Who Talked with Advisors or Instructors about Career Plans

Support for Learners Students’ Use of Academic Advising/Planning Services Students’ Use of Career Counseling Services

Support for Learners Developmental students report: -Significantly more frequent use of academic and student support services – except transfer assistance -Significantly greater importance placed on academic and support services – except transfer assistance -Greater satisfaction with academic and student support services across the board

Support for Learners Student Experiences Re: College Emphasis on… -Encouraging you to spend significant amounts of time studying -Encouraging contact among diverse students -Helping you cope with non-academic responsibilities -Providing the support you need to thrive socially All responses significantly higher for developmental students than for non-developmental students.

Summary: The Good News Developmental students… …have high aspirations – for associate degree and certificate attainment …appear to exert significant effort to succeed …take advantage of services offered by their colleges and are satisfied with those services

Why Focus on Developmental Education and the First Year? But… -Developmental students report lower grades – -And they are significantly more likely to indicate risk of dropping out of college due to academic under-preparation and lack of finances

Why Focus on Developmental Education and the First Year? CCSSE Respondents by Credit Hours Earned at the College

Engagement in Action Strategy #1: Engage early, engage often

Engagement in Action Strategy #1: Engage early, engage often Strategy #2: Stress academic advising

Engagement in Action Strategy #1: Engage early, engage often Strategy #2: Stress academic advising Strategy #3: Purposeful re-design