1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Oregon Reading First Lesson Pacing (C) 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Introduction to Lesson Progress Reports (LPRs)
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting December 10, 2009.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Regional Coaches’ Meeting October, 2005
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Adopted July 2012 Effective School Year.  1. Comprehensive Reading Plan  2. Developmental Screening and Kindergarten Entry Assessment ( )
SOUTHEAST READING IMPROVEMENT Jessica Morgan Intervention Specialist.
Pennsylvania Reading First Leadership Meeting A Pathway For Success Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida Center for Reading.
School Improvement Specialist Meeting
Advanced Progress Monitoring – individuals and groups Presentation by, Ben Ditkowsky, Ph.D. and Stacey Weber, Ed. S.
DATA BASED DECISION MAKING IN THE RTI PROCESS: WEBINAR #2 SETTING GOALS & INSTRUCTION FOR THE GRADE Edward S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director, Center for Promoting.
California Mini-CorpsOctober 10, Writing SMART Goals In order to become a team – a group of people working interdependently to achieve a common.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
ELP Smart Goal Intervention Instruction ELP Inservice Feb 25/26 09.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
Setting ambitious, yet realistic goals is the first step toward ensuring that all our students are successful throughout school and become proficient adult.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Data Day 2016 Tier 2/3: Reviewing your System of Interventions.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Plan for Response to Intervention (RTI). What is Response to Intervention? Response to Intervention (RTI) is a practice of providing high-quality instruction.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Group Intervention Review (20% Meetings)
Data-Based Leadership
Tier 1 Building a Strong Core.
Elizabeth Levene, The HELPS Program can Provide YOU with the Tools to Help Struggling Readers Welcome Elizabeth Levene,
Systems Problem Solving
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Assessment: Progress Monitoring Part 1
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency

2 Keys to Success ©Sense of Urgency ©Identify Specific Goal and Timeline ©Research-Based Interventions (with tenacity) ©Progress Monitor to Inform Instruction (avoid insanity) ©Focus on Alterable Components ©“Whatever it takes!” Attitude

3 Definition of Insanity Einstein: “Engaging in the same behavior, expecting different results” Reading First: Progress monitoring without using the data to inform instruction!

4 Prediction Approximately 75% of students identified with reading problems in the third grade are still struggling readers in the 9th grade ( Shaywitz et al., 1993; Francis et al., 1996). Given a child who was a poor reader at the end of first grade, the probability of remaining a poor reader at the end of fourth grade was.88 (Juel, 1988).

5 Ruining the Prediction ©DIBELS can be used to predict the future of young readers…. ©Our job: Ensure that prediction (in the case of poor readers) does not become reality. ©Our goal: Identify students who are heading towards failure and put them on the track to success by intervening. Progress monitoring allows us to evaluate whether what we are doing is working.

6 DIBELSPurposeWhoWhen Benchmark Assessment Progress Monitoring Screening/ Outcome Formative/ Inform Instruction All Students Students Below Benchmark Fall, Winter, Spring On-going: Strategic = monthly, Intensive = bi- weekly Using DIBELS to evaluate whether our instruction is effective for each student…

7 The Urgency of Intervention ©Third Grade (Intensive Level - Fall) Student Name: ORF ScorePts. from BenchmarkWkly growth (30 wks) Growth (21 wks) Austin Aaron David Leslye Shyanne Daesia Mathew

8 Set goals (expect growth) that put the odds in the students’ favor ©Odds of “meets expectation” on OSAT given 3rd grade ORF of 110 : 90 of 91 or 99%. ©Odds of “meets expectation” on OSAT given 3rd grade ORF below 70: 4 of 23 or 17%. r =.73 53% of Variance Meets Does not meet Expectations Exceeds R.H. Good III, 2003

9 Identify Goal and Timeline ©What is the outcome goal?  What is the next DIBELS benchmark for the student’s grade level? ©What is the present level of performance?  What is the student’s current DIBELS benchmark scores? ©How much growth is needed? ©How much growth does this require per week?

10 Goal Setting Example: Bunky Bunky: 1st grade (January) What is the outcome goal? –The spring benchmark for 1st grade ORF is a minimum of 40 correct words per minute What is the present level of performance? –10 wpm, 1st Grade DIBELS ORF How much growth is needed? –30 wpm by the Spring Benchmark! How much growth does this require per week? –30 divided by 16 weeks = 2 words per week

DMG (c) Aimline: Ensure Bunky is on Track to Reach the Goal! The aimline connects where you are to where you want to get to, and shows the course to follow to get there. Aimline

12 Example:Nick Nick: Second Grade (January) What is the outcome goal? The spring benchmark for 2nd grade ORF is a minimum of 90 correct words per minute What is the present level of performance? 43 wpm, 2nd Grade DIBELS ORF How much growth is needed? 47 wpm by the Spring Benchmark! How much growth does this require per week? 47 divided by 17 weeks = 2.8 words per week

13 Weekly Growth

14

15 Are Your Intensive Students Closing the Gap? Effectiveness of Grade 2 Intensive Support Programs Students Intensive at Beginning of Year Beginning ORF Score Middle ORF Score Is the Gap Closing? total growth (average gain per week) Marcus Timmy Maria Stacey Louis Ethan Regina Dana (.4) 2 (.1) 16 (1.1) 4 (.2) 12 (.8) 33 (2.2) 17 (1.1) Reality: 73% of this school’s intensive 2nd graders are losing ground. 18% are making only parallel growth.

16 What About Students Severely Behind? Example:Sue Sue: Third grade (January) What is the outcome goal? The spring benchmark for 3rd grade ORF is a minimum of 110 correct words per minute What is the present level of performance? 15 wpm, 3rd Grade DIBELS ORF How much growth is needed? 95 wpm by the Spring Benchmark! How much growth does this require per week? 95 divided by 17 weeks = 5.6 words per week

17

18 What to do with Sue? 4Intervene ASAP. 4 Select the most intensive intervention program. 4 Consider use of skip schedules to accelerate student performance. 4 Double or triple dose reading instruction. 4 Set goals for lesson progress and track carefully. It’s going to require sustained, significant effort to move Sue to the grade level benchmark.

20

21 Monitoring Sue’s Progress: 4 Monitor regularly with third grade DIBELS ORF passages. 4 A grade level team may decide to collect more information using measures that will be sensitive to the instruction provided: 1. In-program assessments 2. Out-of-grade DIBELS ORF passages

Guidelines: Caution: If a student is being progress monitored using ORF passages below grade level, it is critical to plan ahead to provide a schedule that will allow the student to close the gap as quickly as possible.

23 Let’s look at your student data…. 1.Pair up with a teacher at your grade level. Specialists and administrators, please join a group! 2.Identify a student in the intensive range at your grade level. 3.Answer the following questions: What is the outcome goal? What is the present level of performance? How much growth is needed? How much growth is required per week? 4. Repeat with a student in the strategic range.

24 Monitoring Progress: Use Decision Rules to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Instructional Program

25 Why Decision Rules? ©How do you know when to continue or modify an intervention? ©Do you have unlimited time to continue with interventions that are not working? ©We have to know: Is the student improving and at the rate expected?

26 1.If three (3) consecutive data points are above the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal. Data Decision Rules

27 Stay the Course! Data Decision Rules 2. If the date points align with the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal.

28 Decisions Rules- Basics “Don’t Wait!” 3. If three (3) consecutive data points are below the aimline, change the intervention. Data Decision Rules

DMG (c) Evaluate Support: Modify Instruction for Nick? Words Correct Aimline Dec. Scores Feb. Scores Jan. Scores March Scores April Scores May Scores June Scores

DMG (c) Evaluate Support: Modify Instruction for Bunky? Whoops! Time to make a change! Words Correct Aimline

31 Things to Consider Regarding Decision-Making: ©Focus on the question: “Will the individual reach his/her goal by the end of the goal period?” ©Decide to change the intervention whenever the rate of progress falls below the expectation. ©Think of changes to the intervention as fine tuning (alterable variables) rather than major reconstruction of interventions.

32 Evaluate Progress and Adjust Instruction: What To Do When Students Aren’t Learning Enough

33 Alterable Variables Chart

34 Adjusting the Intervention Example: Bunky Intervention Prior to Decision Rule: Core HM (45 min.) Reading Mastery (45 min. in medium level group – 12 students) Additional 30 minutes of RM firm-up Adjustments: - Improve fidelity and delivery of RM instruction (perky pace, opportunities to respond, etc.) - Reduce group size to 6 or fewer students

DMG (c) Evaluating Support Modify Instruction for Bunky Now? Words Correct Aimline

36 Adjusting the Intervention Example: Sue ©Intervention Prior to Decision Rule:  Core HM (60 min.)  Reading Mastery Fast Cycle (30 min.)  Title I (double dose of RM) ©Adjustments:  Replace core with additional intervention time; add Read Naturally to build fluency  Triple dose depending on progress

DMG (c) Evaluating Support Modify Instruction for Sue Now? Words per Minute Aimline Dec. Scores Feb. Scores Jan. Scores March Scores April Scores May Scores June Scores 120

38 Let’s look at your student data…. 1.Please go back to the student in the intensive range that you identified in the previous activity. 2.Use their progress monitoring booklet to answer the question: Is this student making adequate progress? 3.If not, using the alterable variables chart and your current CSI map, discuss possible changes that could be made to the student’s program. 4.Repeat with additional students…

39 Setting up your school’s progress monitoring system: ©All teachers and specialists should be trained on DIBELS administration by January of ©Work in your Early Reading Team to develop the plan for progress monitoring this spring. ©At minimum, each classroom teacher should be progress monitoring at least 2-3 of the students in their reading group(s) to gain experience with the measures.

40 Remember...Keys to Success ©Sense of urgency ©Identify Specific Goal and Timeline ©Research-Based Interventions (with tenacity) ©Progress Monitor to Inform Instruction (avoid insanity) ©Focus on Alterable Components ©“Whatever it takes!” Attitude