Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Use the date (six digit number – 00/00/00) for when services are to begin. This should be implemented as soon as possible following the meeting – but.
Special Education Continuum of Services Oswego City School District October 9, 2009.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 1 EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION.
C ontent of the IEP Produced by NICHCY, The IEP series… IEP Team Content of the IEP Meetings of IEP Team LRE Decision Making Children with Disabilities.
Connecticut State Department of Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
Supporting Students with Disabilities in the Classroom Standards Based IEPs LASPDG Presented by Kathy Kilgore January 22, 2015.
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
200.6(a)(1) Specially Designed Instruction 200.6(a)(1) Students with disabilities shall be provided special education in the least restrictive environment,
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2-1 Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services.
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Produced by NICHCY, 2007 Least Restrictive Environmen t D ecision M aking L R E Take me to my LRE. I’m ready to roll! Me, too. What about me? Yes. Count.
Produced by NICHCY, 2007 Least Restrictive Environme nt D ecision M aking L R E.
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE PLAAFP.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Developing Specially Designed Instruction
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 4, 5, and 6)
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
Section 7: Special Education Services and Programs Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS August 4,
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Essential Terms and Concepts  Special education has its own unique vocabulary and terms.  Being familiar with the concepts increases your understanding.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
COMPLIANT IEPs: Using Data and the IEP Process to make Appropriate Placement Decisions Cobb County School District DaVida Alston, Lisa Geiger, D’Nena Mock.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010.
Accessing Special Education Services for Your Child
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
The New IDEA in Special Education
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Laws and Regulations.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
American Institutes for Research
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
Quick Overview- Seven Step Process to Creating Standards Based IEPs
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
Content of the IEP Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Content of the IEP Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Content of the IEP Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Presentation transcript:

Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews

#10 The annual goals of the IEP did not address the child’s academic areas of need. (6)

#9 The IEP did not contain a statement of the services and supplementary aides and supports to be provided to enable the child to be involved and make progress in the general education curriculum. (7 & 11)

#8 The IEP did not indicate the location where specially designed instruction would be provided. (7)

#7 The IEP team and other qualified professionals did not review existing evaluation data on the child, including evaluations and information provided by the parents, if any, and identify what additional data were needed to complete the evaluation. (ETR)

#6 There was not sufficient evidence that the evaluation process addressed all areas related to the suspected disability. (ETR)

#5 The IEP’s did not state the amount and frequency information for specially designed instruction. (11)

#4 The IEP did not have a statement that addressed how the child’s disability effects their involvement and progress in the general education curriculum. (11)

#3 The IEP did not contain a statement of the extent to which the child will NOT participate with nondisabled children in the regular education classroom. (11)

#2 The IEP did not contain a statement of the specially designed instruction that addressed the needs of the child and support the annual goals. (7)

#1 The annual goals of the IEP are not stated in measurable terms. (6)

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE PLOP? Guiding Quantifiable Baseline

Directions for table group Choose a Reporter, Recorder, Timer and Task Master Answer your Question Be Prepared to Report to the Group

Measureable Annual Goals Does Your Goal Have The Following? Is the goal supported by information in the present level of performance which address the needs that result from the disability? Is who, the child’s name, present ? Is what he/she will be able to do present ? Is what level or degree of performance present ? Are the conditions under how the child will be expected to perform present? Is the length of time to master the goal present ? Is how progress will be measured present?

Content standard connection Are the goals connected to academic content standards?   (This is intended to focus on student specific skill deficits needed to master the academic content standards and should be supported with data in the present level of performance. It is not a restatement of the academic content standard.)

Now your task In your table groups, review John’s or Allison’s IEP. The PLOP is already completed, your task is to write a measureable annual goal based on the information provided. Each group should be prepared to present at least two goals for the student which they have chosen. Teams will complete Feedback Forms on each goal as they are presented.

Difference between benchmarks and objectives Mechanism used to reach the annual goal. Benchmark is a specific statement of what the child should know and be able to do in a specified segment of the year. How much and by when. Objective means a smaller, more manageable learning task that the child must master as a step toward achieving the annual goal. Objectives break the skills into discrete components that allow the child to successfully attain the goal. Same 6 elements must be applied

Section 7 Specially Designed Services Specially Designed Instruction Related Services Assistive Technology How do we determine what they need-what will their day look like-connecting to the goal

Specially Designed Instruction

Specially Designed Instruction Defined: “Adapting as appropriate to the needs of an eligible child, the content, methodology or delivery of instruction to address the unique needs of the child that result from the child’s disability and to ensure access of the child to the general education curriculum so the child can meet the educational standards that apply to all children within the jurisdiction of the school district.”

Specially Designed Instruction Instruction that supports the child to accomplish his/her IEP goals and NARROWS THE GAP between their present levels of performance and grade level benchmarks and indicators.

Completing Section 7 • Specially Designed Instruction describes the “content, methodology, delivery of instruction”.

– Are these elements present in the description? – Can anyone walk into the classroom and know what the student’s specially designed instruction is to entail? – Does the parent understand what the specially designed instruction is and how it is different from the instruction found in the typical general education classroom?

Specially Designed Instruction: Goals, Provider, Location of Services • Can all of the goals listed be attained through the description of the specially designed instruction?

– If “YES”, multiple goals can be listed. – If “NO”, the goals are separated and aligned with an appropriate description of the instruction to be provided the child.

Specially Designed instruction: Goals, Provider, Location of Services • Who will be providing this instruction? – Only the title of the person is needed • Where will this instruction be provided? – If it is provided in multiple locations, (ie: regular education classroom and resource room) it is considered multiple services and each listed separately.

Specially Designed Instruction: • Begin and End Date – Annotations state that this can be left blank if the beginning and end dates for the instruction is the same as the beginning and end dates of the IEP…. • Many districts do not allow this as it is confusing/unclear to parents.

Specially Designed Instruction: • Amount of Time – This refers to the amount of time instruction will be given toward the achievement of the goals listed, not amount of time in a class period or instructional period. – If multiple goals are listed in this instructional box it is the total amount of time that will be given to those goals as a group, not individually. Those goals must be related and receive the same specially designed instruction.

Specially Designed Instruction: • Frequency of Service –Aligned with the amount of time –Can be daily, weekly, monthly etc.

Does your district automatically place all students with disabilities in the regular education classroom?

Does your district offer all of the continuum placement options?

If your answer was “No,” what option(s) are not offered?

Why are these options not available to students with disabilities in your district?

Who makes your LRE decision in your district?

When is the least restrictive environment decision made in your IEP process?

Are the parents involved in the LRE decision process?

What justifications do you consider when you remove a student with disabilities from the regular education classroom setting?

The IEP must include a justification for why the child was removed from the regular education classroom, and - Is based on the needs of the child, not the child’s disability. - Reflects that the team has given adequate consideration to meeting the student’s needs in the regular education classroom with supplementary aids and services.

- Documentation that the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular education classes, even with supplementary aids and services, cannot be achieved satisfactorily. - Describes potential harmful effects to the child or others, if applicable.

Can a regular education teacher refuse to implement an IEP because he/she asserts they are not properly trained to educate students with disabilities?

To what extent could a school consider the impact of a SWD regular education class placement on non-disabled students?