Curs 7: Teorii ale discursului Centering Dan Cristea Selecţie de slide-uri prezentate în tutoriale (RANLP-03, Borovits, Sept. 2003; ICON-04, Hyderabad,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUBJECT–VERB AGREEMENT
Advertisements

Referring Expressions: Definition Referring expressions are words or phrases, the semantic interpretation of which is a discourse entity (also called referent)
REPORTED SPEECH.
If clause.
Albert Gatt LIN3022 Natural Language Processing Lecture 11.
VERB TENSE: PRESENT PERFECT SIMPLE
Curs 11: Aşteptări şi satisfacerea lor în parsarea discursului Dan Cristea Selecţie de sliduri.
Automatic Essay Scoring Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems (E. Miltsakaki and K. Kukich, 2004) Universität des Saarlandes.
2. would rather...than Direct Speech & Indirect Speech.
1 Discourse, coherence and anaphora resolution Lecture 16.
Pronouns In this lesson we will learn about: Personal pronouns
Anaphora Resolution Spring 2010, UCSC – Adrian Brasoveanu [Slides based on various sources, collected over a couple of years and repeatedly modified –
Chapter 18: Discourse Tianjun Fu Ling538 Presentation Nov 30th, 2006.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING NLP-AI IIIT-Hyderabad CIIL, Mysore ICON DECEMBER, 2003.
Pronoun - Antecedent Agreement A pronoun must agree in number (either singular or plural) with its antecedent (what it refers to in the text). Indefinite.
CS 4705 Algorithms for Reference Resolution. Anaphora resolution Finding in a text all the referring expressions that have one and the same denotation.
CS 4705 Lecture 21 Algorithms for Reference Resolution.
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 4.
Centering theory and its direct applications
July 2003LSA1 Computational Approaches to Reference Massimo Poesio (University of Essex) Lecture 4: Centering Theory.
1 Pragmatics: Discourse Analysis J&M’s Chapter 21.
Pragmatics I: Reference resolution Ling 571 Fei Xia Week 7: 11/8/05.
Pronouns in Compound Subjects and Objects *Sometimes you use a pronoun as part of a compound subject.
Present Perfect Tense Present Perfect Tense is one of the most often use in all English Grammar Tenses and yet one of the tense that most difficult to.
Lessons Present Perfect Tense  Formation Present of to have (have, has) + past participle I have seen (I’ve seen) that film. Past participle:
Curs 10: Veins Theory Discourse structure and coherence Dan Cristea Selecţie de sliduri.
Borovets, sept Discourse theories and technologies Dan Cristea “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iasi, Faculty of Computer Science and Romanian Academy,
REPORTED SPEECH Unit 11 – English 12 Instructor: Nguyễn Ngọc Vũ
1.The speaker raised his voice but still couldn’t make himself____. A. hear B. to hear C. hearing D. heard 2. On afternoon, Mrs Green went to the market,
Pronouns.
Verb Forms and Related Matters
Pragmatics Language in Context
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 3.
Literary Elements What are they? All of the “parts” of a story are called the elements. Each element plays a pivotal part in creating the final piece.
Present perfect or present perfect continuous
Word Roots: Classics 30 Thursday, August 12, 2010: Unit 4.
Reported Speech in English He said that… If / Whether “Will she read…?” TO + Infinitive Verbs to the nearest PAST “I” changes to “he”
Practice Examples 1-4. Def: Semantics is the study of Meaning in Language  Definite conclusions Can be arrived at concerning meaning.  Careful thinking.
A system for generating teaching initiatives in a computer-aided language learning dialogue Nanda Slabbers University of Twente Netherlands June 9, 2005.
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 2.
EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF ANAPHORA Massimo Poesio Università di Trento and University of Essex Vilem Mathesius Lectures Praha, 2007.
PERSONAL PRONOUNS, POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS AND POSSESSIVE ADJECTIVES.
Theories of first language acquisition.  We are not born speaking!  Language must be acquired. ◦ Learning vs. acquisition  If we think of all that.
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 7.
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 1.
Past Perfect Grammar Guide mgr Anna Waligórska – Kotfas PWSZ Konin.
Relative clauses When there are two sentences where there is some information repeated, they tend to become one by means of a relative pronoun.
Hullo Folks! How are you going? Let’s continue our adventure to the World of Language in Use With the Pragmatics Ranger E. Aminudin Aziz.
Why is he happy? PPT Why is Susan happy? Susan is happy because she is receiving her certificate. receive / certificate.
Sequence of Tenses.
A TEACHER NEW AT MAPPING ASKS STUDENTS TO MAP HERE IS THE ASSIGNMENT AND SOME MAPS.
1 Special Electives of Comp.Linguistics: Processing Anaphoric Expressions Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 5.
1 Deixis and Anaphora. 2 Remembering It is necessary to take into considerations the conditions of production of enunciates, to the study of signification.
CONDITIONALS.
PASSIVE VOICE. The position of the elements of clause structure in a statement usually follows this sequence: Subject + verb+ object+ complements (circumstances):
PRAGMATICS. SCHEDULE May 14: Yule ch. 1, 2 and 3 May 16: Yule ch. 4, 5 and 6 May 21: Yule ch. 7, 8 and 9 May 22: Seminar EXAM Thursday; May 31,
Adjective Phrases  Who  Whom  Which  That  Whose  Where.
Objectives: To determine how an author uses the meaning of words or phrases, including figurative language and connotative meanings, in a text; analyze.
John greeted Moira and asked how she was. She told him she was fine. He said it was great to see her. He added that they hadn’t seen each other since.
Present Perfect Tense © 2015 albert-learning.com.
Alive-0 6 Term 3: Lesson 1 (part 2)
COMPARISON-CONTRAST STRUCTURE WORDS
To help you on the osslt and in life
HAVE + STH + DONE Causative have.
Referring Expressions: Definition
Anaphora Resolution Spring 2010, UCSC – Adrian Brasoveanu
Algorithms for Reference Resolution
Alive-0 6 Term 3: Lesson 1 (part 2)
Comparative Constructions II
Livelylock.
Presentation transcript:

Curs 7: Teorii ale discursului Centering Dan Cristea Selecţie de slide-uri prezentate în tutoriale (RANLP-03, Borovits, Sept. 2003; ICON-04, Hyderabad, Dec. 2004) şi conferinţe

Centering - a theory of local discourse coherence Joshi,A.K. and Weinstein,S., 1981: “Control of Inference: Role of Some Aspects of Discourse-Structure Centering“ Grosz,B.; Joshi,A.K. and Weinstein,S., 1986: “Towards a computational theory of discourse interpretation” Brennan,S.E.; Friedman,M.W. and Pollard,C.J., 1987: “A Centering approach to pronouns“ Grosz,B.; Joshi,A.K. and Weinstein,S, 1995: “Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse” Strube,M. and Hahn,U., 1996: “Functional Centering“ Walker,M.A.; Joshi,A.K. and Prince,E.F. (eds.), 1997: “Centering in Discourse“ Kameyama,M., 1997: “Intrasentential Centering: A Case Study“ Poesio, M., Stevenson, R., Di Eugenio, B. and Hitzeman, J. 2004: “Centering: A Parametric Theory and Its Instantiations”

CT: goals of the theory explains why certain texts are more difficult to process than others explains why we use the pronouns the way we use them anchors a practical approach for anaphora resolution

A smooth discourse from (Walker, Joshi and Prince, 1997) a. Jeff 1 helped Dick 2 wash the car. b. He 1 washed the windows as Dick 2 waxed the car. c. He 1 soaped a pane. He in c. is Jeff because soaping can only be related to the washing event

A... smooth discourse a. Jeff 1 helped Dick 2 wash the car. b. He 1 washed the windows as Dick 2 waxed the car. c. He 2 buffed the hood. He in c. is Dick, because buffing can only be related to the waxing event. less

CT: focus helps to disambiguate pronominal anaphora 1. Susan 1 is a fine friend. 2. She 1 gives people the most wonderful presents. 3. She 1 just gave Betsy 2 a wonderful bottle of wine. 4. She 1 told her 2 it was quite rare. 5. She 1 knows a lot about wine. from (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein, 1995)

CT explains the normality or oddness of some utterances a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. from (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein, 1995)

This text has a defect… a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. He was sick and furious at being woken up so early.

This text has a defect… a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. He was sick and furious at being woken up so early.

This text repairs the proceeding a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early.

... And we can go on like this: a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. f. He told Terry to get lost and hung up.

But here we have again a problem... a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. f. He told Terry to get lost and hung up. g. Of, course he hadn’t intended to upset Tony.

But here we have again a problem... a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. f. He told Terry to get lost and hung up. g. Of, course he hadn’t intended to upset Tony.

Finally, we are done! a. Terry really goofs sometimes. b. Yesterday was a beautiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. d. He called him at 6 A.M. e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. f. He told Terry to get lost and hung up. g. Of, course Terry hadn’t intended to upset Tony.

CT: the main lines Applies to just one segment of discourse –refers to Grosz&Sidner´s Attentional State Theory Sees the segment drawn up of adjacent utterances (sentences) Discourse entities are called centers

Centers John gave Mary a flower. person1 type = person name = John gender = masc person2 type = person name = Mary gender = fem flower1 type = flower number = sg the realisation relation

What is a center? John went to Mary ‘ s house He met her down the street. He found it down the street. person1 type = person name = Mary gender = fem the realisation relation house1 type = house number = sg the realisation relation

For each utterance, compute: - a list of forward-looking centers C f (u i ) = ranking: subject > direct-object > indirect-object > others -a backward-looking center C b (u i ) = highest-ranked element of C f (u i-1 ) that is realised in u i -a prefered center C p (u i ) = e 1

Rule 1: pronoun realisation If some element of C f (u i-1 ) is realised as a pronoun in u i, than so is C b (u i ) –it captures the intuition that pronominalisation is one way to indicate discourse salience –if there are multiple pronouns in a sentence, realising discourse entities from the previous utterance, than C b must be one of them –if there is just one pronoun, then the pronoun must be the C b

Rule 1 observed a. Terry really goofs sometimes. C f = ([Terry]) b. Yesterday was a beatiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. C f = (he=his=[Terry], [the sailboat]) C b = [Terry] c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony], [the expedition]) C b = [Terry] d. He called him at 6 A.M. C f = (he=[Terry], him=[Tony]) C b = [Terry]

Rule 1 still observed a. Terry really goofs sometimes. C f = ([Terry]) b. Yesterday was a beatiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. C f = (he=his=[Terry], [the sailboat]) C b = [Terry] c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony], [the expedition]) C b = [Terry] d. He called Tony at 6 A.M. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony]) C b = [Terry]

Rule 1 disobserved a. Terry really goofs sometimes. C f = ([Terry]) b. Yesterday was a beatiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. C f = (he=his=[Terry], [the sailboat]) C b = [Terry] c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony], [the expedition]) C b = [Terry] d. Terry called him at 6 A.M. C f = ([Terry], him=[Tony]) C b = [Terry]

Rule 2: transitions C b (u) = C b (u-1) C b (u)  C b (u-1) C b (u) = C p (u) C b (u)  C p (u) CONTINUINGSMOOTH SHIFT RETAININGABRUPT SHIFT CON > RET > SSH > ASH Following (Grosz, Joshi and Weinstein, 1995) and (Brennan, Friedman and Pollard, 1987)

Rule 2: a point of discontinuity a. Terry really goofs sometimes. C f = ([Terry]) b. Yesterday was a beatiful day and he was excited about trying out his new sailboat. C f = (he=his=[Terry], [the sailboat]) C b = [Terry] c. He wanted Tony to join on a sailing expedition. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony], [the expedition]) C b = [Terry] d. He called Tony at 6 A.M. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony]) C b = [Terry] e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. C f = ([Tony]) C b = [Tony] CONTINUING SMOOTH SHIFT

Rule 2: further analysis... d. He called Tony at 6 A.M. C f = (he=[Terry], [Tony]) C b = [Terry] e. Tony was sick and furious at being woken up so early. C f = ([Tony]) C b = [Tony] f. He told Terry to get lost and hung up. C f = (he=[Tony], [Terry]) C b = [Tony] g. Of, course Terry hadn ’ t intended to upset Tony. C f = ([Terry], [Tony]) C b = [Tony] CONTINUINGSMOOTH SHIFTCONTINUINGRETAINING

Centering hints on pronominal anaphora a. I haven ’ t seen Jeff for several days. b. Carl thinks he ’ s studying for his exams. c. I think he ? went to the Cape with Linda. from (Grosz, Joshi & Weinstein, 1983) C f = (I=[I], [Jeff]) C b = [I] C f = ([Carl], he=[Jeff], [Jeff´s exams]) C b = [Jeff]

Centering explains why we understand he in unit c as Jeff b. Carl thinks he’s studying for his exams. c. I think he ? went to the Cape with Linda. C f = ([Carl], he=[Jeff], [Jeff´s exams]) C b = [Jeff] RETAINING ABRUPT SHIFT C f = (I=[I], he=[Jeff], [the Cape], [Linda]) C b = [Jeff] C f = (I=[I], he=[Carl], [the Cape], [Linda]) C b = [Carl] Jeff

Centering: any problems? still a local theory (applies inside a segment) BUT what is a segment? ranking of C f ellements –on what criteria (surface-order, syntactic role, functional (Strube&Hahn, 1996) )  language dependant null pronouns –Italian, Japanese, Romanian intrasentensial centering (Kameyama, 1997) Centering - a parametric theory (Poesio et al, 2004)