CEQA and Fuels Treatments California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Allen S. Robertson Environmental Protection - Sacramento.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Planning & Community Development Department Municipal Code Amendments: Adoption/Certification Authority of California Environmental Quality Act Reviews,
SB4 Implementation & Kern County Oil and Gas EIR Update Air and Waste Management Association – Golden Empire Chapter Western States Petroleum Association.
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
Site development issues, focusing on site acquisition Douglas Bock See also: Stephen’s “Visual Tour of the OVRO site” FASR Planning Meeting, AUI, August.
PLANNING FOR SUPPRESSION REPAIR How to estimate the amount of Suppression Repair work and design your strategy to complete it.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Role in Timber Harvest Review.
Report On The Status Of The Remediation Of The Sonoma County Waste Tire Sites Board Meeting Agenda Item 4 February 18, 2004.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
White Hill Middle School Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Ross Valley School District Community Meeting November 1, 2011.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
CEQA 101 CEQA City of Sacramento Community Development Dept. March 2016.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Introduction to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
CILA 16th Annual Conference Viejas Resort & Casino October 14, 2016
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
Construction Management & Inspection
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
CAL FIRE permitting and legal considerations related to burning
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Off Site Mitigation Measures under CEQA
Presentation transcript:

CEQA and Fuels Treatments California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Allen S. Robertson Environmental Protection - Sacramento

Objectives: ► When does CEQA apply? ► Who is the “lead agency? ► What CEQA documents are required? ► What analysis is necessary? ► What is the process/timeline? ► How does CEQA relate to NEPA? ► What about other environmental laws? CEQA and Fuels Treatments

CEQA Authority California Environmental Quality Act Public Resources Code Division 13. Environmental Quality §§ – CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 §§

CEQA Applies to: “Projects” According to CEQA a Project is: ► a discretionary action by a public agency which has the potential to result in a physical change in the environment, either directly, or indirectly.

CEQA Applies to: Public Agencies Yes ► State Agencies ► Counties/Cities ► CA Universities ► Special Districts  RCD  Cemetery  Irrigation  LAFCO No ► Federal Agencies ► Other States ► Corporations ► Non-profit groups ► Pvt. Organizations ► Pvt. Land Owners ► Fire Safe Councils Fire Safe Councils are not Public Agencies and have no CEQA responsibilities

CEQA Applies to “Discretionary Actions” Discretionary Action - requires the exercise of judgment or deliberation in approving the project. Includes Public Agencies: ► Carrying out a project themselves ► Funding a project carried out by others ► Issuing a permit to others for a project ► Facilitating or assisting in a project FSC projects are subject to CEQA where state or local governments are funding, permitting or assisting

Permit ► THPs ► DFG 1600 Fund ► Grants ► VMP/CFIP Carry out ► Construction ► Forest Research Facilitate ► Hand Crews ► Equipment Discretionary Action Examples

CEQA Applies to: Physical Changes in the Environment Physical Changes in the Environment include: ► Cutting trees, brush, limbs ► Using heavy equipment off-road ► Creating dust, smoke or noise ► Exposing mineral soil ► Disturbing species or reducing habitat ► Changing aesthetics There may be direct or indirect changes. State grants to FSCs that do not result in physical changes are not projects subject to CEQA.

In Summary If the activity : ► Involves a discretionary action, ► By a public agency, ► And may lead to physical changes in the environment, ► Either directly or indirectly… Then it is a “project” subject to CEQA. Generally, a public agency will recognize its lead agency role and make these determinations; however, on occasion an agency may not be aware that no other agency has filled the role.

Lead Agency The Public Agency making the first, or primary, discretionary decision on a project is Lead Agency In the case of a FSC project, generally: ► The grantor in approving grant funds ► The permitter in issuing a permit, or ► The facilitator in rendering assistance in some way. A Responsible Agency makes secondary project approvals or permits and relies upon environmental analysis of the lead agency. A Trustee Agency is an agency with jurisdiction over natural resources held in trust.

Lead Agency The lead agency is responsible for: Determining appropriate CEQA document and level of analysis ► Consulting with other agencies and public ► Ensuring that all project impacts are identified and mitigated ► Completing CEQA process and filing documents The lead agency may require grant recipient assistance in completing these tasks.

CEQA Documents The lead agency will determine what CEQA document is necessary, depending on: ► Results of surveys/studies ► Project magnitude/timing/location ► Unique or unusual circumstances ► Input from other agencies/professionals ► Applicable exemption classes ► Type and ability to mitigate impacts

CEQA Documents Categorical Exemption ► Hand treatments, pile burning, Negative Declaration (Mitigated) ► Mechanical treatments, broadcast burning Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ► No EIRs for fuels projects to-date Programmatic EIR ► Rely on existing program documents (VMP/CFIP)

Categorical Exemptions ► Used where the project generally “fits” the exemption description ► Requires “limited analysis and restrictions” to ensure that impacts don’t occur ► Various “exceptions” to the use of an exemption may apply The exemptions don’t need to be applied literally, nor are they to be applied too liberally; the lead agency must be reasonable in their application.

“Limited Analysis and Restrictions” “Restrictions” on operations to support an Exemption include: ► No broadcast burning - piles O.K. ► No heavy equipment off road - except existing fire breaks ► Avoidance of wetlands, watercourses, vernal pools ► No “commercial” tree removals – no THP/THP Exemption ► Minimize noise, dust, aesthetic effects to neighbors through restricted days/hours of operation and buffers “Limited analysis” to support an Exemption includes: ► Archaeological Records Check and survey and/or sign-off by CAL FIRE archaeologist, Section 106 if Federal funds ► CNDDB check with survey of, or avoidance of, identified sensitive habitats ► Informal consultation with agencies were necessary

Categorical Exemptions Exemption examples include: Class 1 – Existing Facilities ► Maintenance/grading of existing fuel breaks Class 4 - Minor Alterations to Land or Vegetation ► Fuel management within 100 feet of structures ► Chipper programs ► Fire Safe Demonstrations ► Community Shaded Fuel Breaks Class 7 and 8 – Actions to Protect Resources or Environment ► Extensive shaded fuel breaks along roads/ridges ► Piling and burning Per CAL FIRE policy, work may not proceed until the Exemption is filed at the State Clearinghouse

Negative Declaration Completion of Initial Study/CEQA Checklist ► Archaeological Records Check and survey and/or sign-off by CAL FIRE archaeologist, Section 106 if Federal funds ► CNDDB check with survey of, or avoidance of, identified sensitive habitats ► Informal consultation with agencies were necessary ► Consideration of impacts to: aesthetics, air quality, noise, soils, water quality, etc. All impacts must be less than significant (after mitigation) to qualify for a negative declaration

Negative Declaration Additional Steps: ► Approval of draft Neg Dec by CAL FIRE ► Filing of draft document at State Clearinghouse ► Formal consultation with public agencies ► 30 day public/agency comment period ► Public noticing ► Consideration of all comments received ► Adoption of final Neg Dec by CAL FIRE ► File a Notice of Determination (NOD) Work may not proceed until the NOD is filed at the State Clearinghouse

Programmatic EIR Some FSC projects may “fit” one of more of CAL FIRE’s programs where much of the environmental analysis is already completed: ► Vegetation Management Program (VMP) ► California Forest Improvement Program (CFIP) Eligible projects may only need completion of a Program Checklist, limited site specific analysis and informal consultation with responsible and trustee agencies.

Budgeting Grant Recipients may be called upon to: ► Prepare CEQA Checklists ► Provide NDDB/Information Center searches ► Conduct surveys ► Assemble draft documents, etc. So, be sure to budget for hiring RPFs or other consultants and pay for studies.

CEQA v. NEPA ► NEPA is the federal “equivalent” to CEQA ► NEPA is triggered by federal “actions” ► No NEPA where grants are passed through California FSC, however there may still be a need to consult with other federal agencies ► Joint CEQA/NEPA documents may be prepared ► Or, separate documents relying on same supporting analysis

Other Environmental Laws In the preparation of CEQA documents for FSC projects, CAL FIRE will ensure that all other environmental laws are considered: ► State/Federal Endangered Species Acts ► Migratory Bird Treaty Act ► Air District Burn Permits ► USACOE (Corps) 404 permits ► Stream Bed Alteration Agreements 1600 ► Section 106 NHPA Where neither CEQA nor NEPA apply the grantee is still responsible for compliance with all state and federal laws.

Questions?