Each AASHTO fiscal year, the Trnsport Task Force (TTF) reviews and makes decisions related to enhancements and new development requests for Trnsport. 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Web Trnsport Implementation TEA/TUG October 1-9, 2008 Saratoga Springs, NY.
Advertisements

Page 1 of 11 Lessees can submit individual Unit Values for their Production Entities if they do not want to utilize the default unit value. If no Unit.
Web Trnsport Agency Feedback. Agencies Visited: Florida DOT Indiana DOT North Carolina DOT Ohio DOT Oklahoma DOT Vermont DOT.
New Jersey Trnsport Cost Estimation System (CES) Implementation TUG 2006 John Lombardi Info Tech, Inc.
Primer Class Jim Ferguson (TUG Vice Chair, Nebraska Dept of Roads) October 12, 2004.
Beta Testing: The Contractor’s Perspective Trns·port User Group Meeting October 2005.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
2006 Ballot Process David Castleberg TUG Chair, Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation October 22, 2006.
Training for OCAN Users Day 2
Supply Chain Management System (SCMS) ICT4D Conference: Accra, Ghana, March 2013 SCMS Overview 1.
AASHTO Trnsport ® Contractor’s Report Thomas P. Rothrock, Ph.D. Senior Vice President November 6, 2005.
Insert software product logo (or name) on slide master AASHTO Civil Rights and Labor Management System Executive Summary.
2006 Trnsport Task Force Report Trnsport Users Group Conference October 22, 2006 Portland, Maine Jim Johnson, Florida DOT Chair, Trnsport Task Force.
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager October 22, 2006 A Primer for Trnsport Users.
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager October 6, 2007 A Primer for Trnsport Users.
TRACER and NGT Estimation Kyle Knudson, TRACER Product Manager Teresa Franklin, Trnsport Product Manager October 25, 2006 Earth Tech & Info Tech Collaboration.
Insert software product logo (or name) on slide master 2005 Trnsport User Group Meeting November 6, 2005 Roger Bierbaum CRLMS Civil Rights and Labor Management.
Track, View, Manage and Report on all aspects of the Recruitment Process… with ease!
TUG Overview David Castleberg (TUG Vice Chair, Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation) November 6, 2005.
The PestLens web system:
Next Generation Trnsport Presented by Paul Neumann, TTF Chair, Colorado DOT Ian Baldwin, Info Tech, Inc. November 2005.
Trns*port Data Model Unification Joe Pugh Virginia Department of Transportation Peggy Leight Info Tech Inc 11/06/05.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) October 6, 2007.
TUG, AASHTO, TTF Primer Class Tim Lindberg (TTF Member from South Carolina) November 6, 2005.
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager November 6, 2005 A Primer for Trnsport Users.
INDOT’s Scheduling / Project Management System (SPMS) Vision & Objectives for Next Generation SPMS Mike Jenkins, Indiana DOT Teresa Franklin, Info Tech,
Next Generation Trnsport Trnsport Users Group Conference Field Management TAG November 7, 2005.
MEGS+ Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus Office of Special Education May 2012.
2009 Key Note Participating with AASHTO Trns∙port ® Sheri Meyerhoff Indiana Department of Transportation September 27, 2009.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Web Trnsport – Beta Testing and Implementation TUG Roundtable Discussion Elizabeth Rodgers Info Tech, Inc. October 9, 2007.
Next Generation Trnsport Presented to the AASHTOWare Trnsport User Group October 14, 2004.
Cloverleaf and TeamTrack Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager October 26, 2006.
Trns port Modification Reports Process Presented at the Trnsport User Group Conference Burlington VT by Shirley Daugherty NE DOR Chair, Trnsport Task Force.
Jim Ferguson, Nebraska DOR Trnsport User Group Chair It’s a TUG Chair’s Life A 2005 Review Welcome to 2005 TUG Conference Daytona Beach, Florida.
Course # PEMS Version 2.0 Upgrades. Unit 8 PEMS Version 2.0 Upgrades Several improvements to PEMS application  Improvements based on: - Change.
TUG Chair Report Report for the Fiscal Year of 1999.
Facility Reporting v. 1.0 Managing Clinical Staffing Reports on the Illinois Outcomes Website May 20, 2009.
TUG Overview Brian Parnell (TUG Chair, South Carolina Department of Transportation) October 6th, 2007.
TransXML Survey and Scoping Study NCHRP Project Task 295 (2011) Frances Harrison Spy Pond Partners, LLC.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Cost Estimation System CES Implementation at NDOR TUG 2006.
Using the Right Method to Collect Information IW233 Amanda Murphy.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
System for Administration, Training, and Educational Resources for NASA External Training Requests for Users and Supervisors November 2009.
Unit Visit Tracking is available through MyScouting for commissioners to electronically submit unit visit reports.
Welcome to State of Michigan Central FinanceExpense Approval and Modification Tutorial Brought to you by the Office of Financial Management.
Cloverleaf and TeamTrack Teresa Franklin Trnsport Product Manager October 9, 2007.
Next Generation Trnsport Current Development Update Presented by Ian Baldwin, Info Tech, Inc. October 2006.
Validate Scope What we have: Requirement Traceability Matrix Verified Deliverables What we do: Inspection What we get: Accepted Deliverables.
Working with Info Tech, Inc. Teresa Franklin Director, Trnsport Development 2008 TUG Warm Up Saratoga Springs, NY.
2005 Trnsport Task Force Report Trnsport Users Group Conference November 6, 2005 Daytona Beach, Florida Paul Neumann, Colorado DOT Chair, Trnsport Task.
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix Add Project Name.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
0 eCPIC User Training: A-11 Funding Information These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or modified only by FESCOM.
People First System Enhancements Release 1 B Manager and Employee Workshop February 2006.
Next Generation Trnsport Impact Assessment Sub-project Jim Johnson, Florida DOT and Pamela Barry, Info Tech, Inc.
IProcurement What’s New in E-Business Suite Release 12 Naveen Mauwala.
ODOT Culvert Inventory & Inspection Program. Ohio defines a bridge as any structure with span or diameter equal to or greater than 10 feet as measured.
President/Vice President Training: Leading your PTA
Quick Info Tables: Unsubmitted Transactions Transactions with Alerts
Software Project Configuration Management
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix
Lesson Nine: Epic Appointment Scheduling Referrals Reports
Introduce myself & around table
Fiscal policy program Presented by Cindy Draper, Fiscal Policy Officer – Training Days 2018 Introduce myself This session is to provide an overview of.
Introduction to Fiscal Policy Program
Presentation transcript:

Each AASHTO fiscal year, the Trnsport Task Force (TTF) reviews and makes decisions related to enhancements and new development requests for Trnsport Ballot Process

User input on the value and benefits of requested enhancements contributes to the TTF decision process Ballot Process

This user input is facilitated through a ballot process conducted each fiscal year as defined and administered by the Trnsport User’s Group (TUG) Ballot Process

The purpose of the ballot process is to ensure that end users have a voice in the on-going and strategic direction of the Trnsport product Ballot Process

Through an Automated Ballot System (ABS) on Cloverleaf, each member agency is given the opportunity to vote for improvements the agency regards as most important Ballot Process

The results of the voting are forwarded to the TUG Chairperson for review, then to the TTF to be considered for inclusion in the AASTHO Trnsport Long Range Work Plan (LRWP) Ballot Process

As the enhancements are submitted throughout the year, the TMR tracking system that supports the ABS is regularly updated to reflect the most current status of each request Ballot Process

During the fiscal year users, Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) and Info Tech product experts review and comment on requested enhancements prior to the official ballot process Ballot Process

The current year’s ballot is a combination of newly reported enhancement items and the open ballot items from the previous year Ballot Process

This information is available throughout the year in theTrnsport Pre-Ballot on Cloverleaf. The pre-ballot is a replica of the ‘live’ ballot, without the functionality to cast a vote Ballot Process

The “live” ballot is activated once a year, immediately following the TUG conference Ballot Process

Each agency assigns one person to represent the agency during the TUG conference and the voting process.

Why VOTE?????? 2005 Ballot Process

REMEMBER - The purpose of the ballot process is to ensure that end users have a voice in the on-going and strategic direction of the Trnsport product Ballot Process

With the rewrite of the current Trnsport product to Next Generation Trnsport (NGT), some of the pending enhancements could be included into the rewrite Ballot Process

It is up to the Trnsport Users Group to let the TTF know which enhancements are important to us. We do this by voting!!!!!! 2005 Ballot Process

With the help of the TAGs and Info Tech, we have made changes to the ballot process based on alignment with NGT, Trnsport business areas and TTF directives Ballot Process

The 2005 Ballot Categories have been realigned based on business functionality. In the past they were based on Trnsport modules Ballot Process Summary of Changes

Alignment Matrix 2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes

Note - Civil Rights Category and TAG anticipated for Ballot Process Summary of Changes

You will still get 100 points per each ballot category to vote with. This year, those points may span across modules Ballot Process Summary of Changes

The “Scope” column has been replaced by a “Complexity” column. Prior to the TUG, Info Tech assigned Complexity values based on anticipated business intricacy and NGT development aspects 2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes

We will no longer be using the <30% rule. In the past, items not receiving 30% of the vote over a two year period were dropped from the ballot Ballot Process Summary of Changes

All items submitted will remain on the ballot and be considered for the NGT product backlog unless removed by the reporting Agency or deemed obsolete Ballot Process Summary of Changes

Long Range Work Plan Reference removed Multiple Organizations 2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes

TAGs and Info Tech reviewed Active Pending Enhancements for 2005 Ballot. – Removed Obsolete – Already Delivered – Aligned Ballot Items with new categories 2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes

Example of Obsolete TMR # 7880 LAS - Could not correct bid within the application through the tabbed folder 2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes

2005 Ballot Process 2004 System Edits

2005 Ballot Process Summary of Changes System Edits

Nothing is etched in stone……… 2005 Ballot Process