ETen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting 23-24 November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN 29332 E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Henrik Nore, Project Manager E-vote2011project Norway COE workshop observation - Oslo
Advertisements

IST E-POLL Electronic Polling System for remote voting operation
PART 11 - ELECTION DAY. Electoral Officer  shall not be allowed to vote in the election. Candidate’s Agent  Only 2 scrutineers at polling station 
Professional Certificate in Leadership and Management - Certificate in Electoral Processes 9 th – 13 th July 2012 Guide to Planning for Electoral Management.
Internet Voting in Estonia Tarvi Martens Project Manager National Electoral Committee.
The Italian Academic Community’s Electronic Voting System Pierluigi Bonetti Lisbon, May 2000.
Lesson 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was fair?
ICT IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED Susanne Caarls International Electoral Affairs Symposium May 2012.
Charlie Daniels Arkansas Secretary of State HAVA Compliant Voting Systems Security Considerations General Recommendations to Enhance Security and Integrity.
Chancellerie fédérale Section des droits politiques Voting observation in the context of the Swiss internet voting projects Workshop on the "Observation.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Lesson 7: The Voting Process
Respecting Privacy in Global Networks/ Guernsey, Wednesday 11 th April, Paula Ortiz López Spanish Data Protection Agency.
Observation of e-enabled elections Jonathan Stonestreet Council of Europe Workshop Oslo, March 2010.
Lesson 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was fair?
Why do social workers care about politics? Obtaining power and producing results!
Electronic Voting (E-Voting) An introduction and review of technology Written By: Larry Brachfeld CS591, December 2010.
Innovative Policy 2015 on Political Participation Voting and Participation in the Electoral Process in Spain ZERO PROJECT IV CONFERENCE ON INDEPENDENT.
Ballot Processing Systems February, 2005 Submission to OASIS EML TC and True Vote Maryland by David RR Webber.
Author: Michał Rajkowski Tutor: prof. dr hab. inż. Zbigniew Kotulski.
Lesson 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was fair?
Lesson 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was fair?
Central Electoral Commission of The Republic of Lithuania THE LITHUANIAN CONCEPT OF VOTING VIA INTERNET FOR ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA Approved by the Seimas.
Copyright OASIS, 2001 OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee John Borras Office of e-Envoy Cabinet Office UK Government May 2002.
An Internet Voting System Manager Yonghua Li Kansas State University October 19, 2001 MSE Project - Phase I.
Council of Europe e-voting meeting Progress Report – Austria Andreas Ehringfeld INSO - Industrial Software Institute of Computer Aided Automation | Vienna.
Secure Information Technology Center - Austria Workshop on the certification of e-voting systems Council of Europe Strasbourg, 26 November 2009 Certification.
TOWARDS OPEN VOTE VERIFICATION METHOD IN E-VOTING Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari17’th July2012 Sec Vote 2012.
International Election Observation Jacques Drouin September 8, 2011.
E-participation and transparency in the decision making process Rauna Nerelli Ministry of Justice, Finland.
Chapter 23 Internet Authentication Applications Kerberos Overview Initially developed at MIT Software utility available in both the public domain and.
GENERAL ELECTION COMMISSION OF MONGOLIA LEGAL FRAMEWORK 1992The Сonstitution of Mongolia 2006Law on the central electoral body 2011Law on the automated.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM. election period pre-election period post-election period period in-between elections pre-election period electoral.
6. Esoteric Protocols secure elections and multi-party computation Kim Hyoung-Shick.
Audit Trail
UK LEADS THE ADOPTION OF E-VOTING STANDARDS John Borras Chair Election & Voter Services Technical Committee
Georgia Electronic Voting System Testing and Security Voting Systems Testing Summit November 29, 2005.
Strasbourg – How to create trust-1 © G. Skagestein November 2006 How to create trust in electronic voting over an untrusted platform A possible solution.
Online voting: a legal perspective
Standards for e-Enabled Elections: The work of the OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee John Borras Chair Technical Committee
How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
Political Process 3.6 Politics and Government. E- voting Electronic voting systems for electorates have been in use since the 1960s when punched card.
Electronic Voting R. Newman. Topics Defining anonymity Need for anonymity Defining privacy Threats to anonymity and privacy Mechanisms to provide anonymity.
Transmission and Tabulation of Election Results in Kenya 6 th EISA ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM Ahmed Issack Hassan – Chairman, IEBC.
Election Observation Missions Vania Anguelova, Independent Electoral Consultant London, November 28 th 2011.
Lesson 3: The Voting Process. Elections Newfoundland and Labrador Elections Newfoundland and Labrador is a non- partisan office of the House of Assembly.
Internet2 Base CAMP Topics in Middleware: Authentication.
Election Assistance Commission 1 Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting Post-HAVA Voting System Requirements – Federal Perspective February.
PowerPoint 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was.
PowerPoint 7: The Voting Process. Opening Discussion Have you ever voted for something before? How was the winner decided? Did you think the process was.
Promoting Sustained Professional Development in Electoral Management Bodies: Towards an International ISO Electoral Standard Tyler Finn Department of Electoral.
2017 SCHOOL BOARD GENERAL ELECTIONS AND BY-ELECTIONS Alberta Education Lavonne Adams and Alexander Blyth May 9, 2016.
PowerPoint 7: The Voting Process. How to become a candidate How does a person become a candidate? First, he or she has to be nominated (or chosen) by.
LEVERAGING TECHNOLOGY FOR TRANSPARENT AND CREDIBILE ELECTIONS.
Domestic Election Observation and Reporting
Observation of Internet voting: Estonian case
The Electoral Modernisation Programme in the United Kingdom
European Citizens’ Initiative, Commission regulation proposal Focus on IT aspects Jérôme Stefanini DIGIT.B.2 05/06/2018.
Election Security Best Practices
Slide Deck 13: The Voting Process
Slide Deck 8: The Voting Process
Legal Framework for Civil Registration, Vital Statistics
eVoting System Proposal
SUSTAINABLE ELECTORAL PROCESSES TO STRENGTHEN DEMOCRACY
Slide Deck 9: The Voting Process
Election Security Best Practices
Secondary PowerPoint 5: The Voting Process
The Italian Academic Community’s Electronic Voting System
Slide Deck 10: The Voting Process
Slide Deck 9: The Voting Process
Presentation transcript:

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg November 2006 Fabio Perossini

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 2 E-Poll objectives  Definition of a Pan-European approach to e-voting services covering the entire process of running a electoral event, specifying technologies and procedures to fit needs coming from all European countries in order to allow European citizen to vote everywhere.  Run large scale pilots to validate specifications defined and to test requirements.

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 3 Legal standards  Universal suffrage: E-Poll has been designed to facilitate the use to all citizen categories independently by their abilities, culture, language and location;  Equal suffrage: To facilitate the cultural change E-Poll implemented the most flexible mechanism to support full electronic voting as well as printing votes and/or prove of vote during its operation and counting;  Free suffrage: E-Poll system has been designed by institutions having in mind the “genuinity of vote” providing extensive information to voters as well as a clear voting process  Secret suffrage: Two separated networks to support one side authentication of voters and on the side casting of votes, while the concept of “observer” has been included in the process. Principles E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 4 Legal standards  Transparency: Communication to voters, testing of systems, comment collection in the E-Poll project are supported at different levels: voters, operators, politicians.  Verifiability and accountability: E-poll project bases all development on a full “open source” platform and all source codes are completely opened to external verifications. In each country national institutions are providing the proper certification for each single event (adaptation).  Reliability and security: All the system is centralised in the electoral authority, central and on field operation are managed only by electoral officers and ballot box could be opened only when operations are closed and two people are involved. The presence of printed votes on paper secure a possible re-counting. Procedural safeguards E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 5 Operational Standards  Notification: communication to all stakeholders a priority in the E-Poll project while the process is entirely covered by the system.  Voters: E-Poll can manage centralised and distributed voters lists providing electronic and traditional authentication  Candidates: each voter with the E-Poll system can see his constituency candidates and the proper ballot paper. Operational safeguards E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 6 Operational Standards  Voting: Genuinity of vote a priority in E-Poll; each voter can see the ballot paper related to his constituency and vote using his traditional procedure. E-Poll could provide the citizen with a vote expression receipt without copy of the vote cast.  Results: E-Poll counting process can start only if all voting stations have been closed and must be started by two separated people. Re-counting of paper votes caste in constituencies ballot boxes is still possible.  Audit: The E-Poll system provides full access for audit operations. The software is public domain. Operational safeguards E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 7 Technical requirements  Accessibility: Pininfarina designed a voting station accessible for all. E- Poll consortium collected requirements before and after each test directly from citizens, administrators and politicians.  Interoperability: E-Poll last system full compliant with EML (Election Markup Language), while the whole software has been developed in “open source” environment for free and democratic access.  System operation: E-Poll software could be published excluding data protection software. Redundancy of systems is a key requirement while clients are designed in order to boot directly from a “memory card” provided by the institution. E-Poll approach is oriented to provide attended vote on VPNs or Internet depending from the level of security required. E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 8 Technical requirements  Security:  Two separated networks one for authentication one for voting to maintain privacy of individuals;  Voting stations are remotely monitored. Locally only the officer can operate.  E-Poll can perform remote e-voting providing the proper candidates list and ballot papers for elections running in different countries (e.g. European Parliament)  The voting grant in E-Poll is given only after the voter authentication on a smart card and it is removed after the vote  The vote is sealed and will be open only during the counting after the closure of all voting stations  Shuffling of votes is done before counting in order to increase anonymity of votes  A printed vote (on paper) is going in a real ballot box in the citizen constituency while the votes receive a receipt (on paper) stating he expressed his right  Inside the voting station a complementary copy is printed to cope with potential claims E-Poll compared with Rec (2004)11

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 9 E-Poll ergonomics

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 10 E-POLL looping workplan  Three working groups are going to be established to address in each country issues related to:  Regulations  Technologies and Security  Organisation at local level  These groups will define a specification document that will be consolidated after pilots in each country

eTen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 11 E-Poll enlarging approach  The E-Poll project is based on a dynamic approach so to involve new stakeholders during its 36 months duration. Each actor can decide to participate one or more of the working groups  Those (both institutions, industrials or associations),who are interested to join the E-Poll working team will be able to send a request to: