9104/1 Ballot RMC Report Long Beach, California 14 Sept 2011 Mike Roberts – Team Leader.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Balloting/Handling Negative Votes. General Overview of Different Levels of Balloting Subcommittee New Standards Major Revisions Provisional Standards.
Advertisements

WECC-0100 Drafting Team Orientation TPL-001-WECC-RBP-2.1 System Performance Drafting Team Meeting.
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Project Management Project #54 AIR5359 Update Team Reported by: Vince May Date of Report:
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, AS9104/2 Oversight Process.
1 Compliance Guidance for Initial Compliance Review Dates Lew Folkerth 2Q2010 Webinar June 22, 2010.
IAQG 9110:2012 Revision Overview Prepared by IAQG 9110 Team Please contact Jeff Wood at with any questions or
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting Preparing for the Second Ballot Atlanta, GA July 20, 2010 Michael.
HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Consolidated CDA Templates for Clinical Notes, Release 2 – US Realm HL7 Balloting Process August 12, 2013.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 Boston, MA July 22,
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 7
Reviewing Technical Papers Online Information for Paper Reviewers.
Company Confidential Rewrite Team Proposal Tim Lee - OPMT.
AAQG Project Report Out Each Team Leader / Project Champion:Each Team Leader / Project Champion: –Use the Project Plate as part of their project folder.
+ A Crash Course on Parliamentary Procedure and Resolution Writing.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
IEEE /r3 Submission September 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Parliamentary Procedures Presented by: Suzy Schares, CMC City of Waterloo City Clerk.
Networking the World TM IEEE: Networking the World.
9104/1 Rewrite Team Report / Review to the AAQG-RMC 11 March 2009 Michael C Roberts Boeing, Technical Fellow.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Project #56 Harmonized Oversight Process AS91XX.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop /1 Boston, MA July 20, 2011 Michael Roberts Boeing RMC Meeting Boston,
DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
AAQG Project # 56 Harmonized Process/Standard Oversight / Surveillance Prepared by: Tim Lee The Boeing Company The Boeing Company June 7, 2005 June 7,
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/2A Oversight Standard Revision Report Tim Lee Project Chair September 11, 2012.
Rewrite Team Report to the RMC RMC Annual Meeting January 2008.
Company Confidential Oversight Revision Report Long Beach 14 Sept 2011 Tim Lee Project Chair.
Dual Logo Procedures Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 November 2004.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida AS/EN/SJAC Oversight Process Tim Lee The.
Doc.: IEEE /0792r0 Submission July 2008 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGn Editor Report July 2008 Date: Authors:
Company Confidential /1 Status Mike Roberts 14 Sept
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential /2 Oversight Revision Report San Diego, CA 19 Jan 2011 Tim Lee Project Chair.
The IEEE-SA Standards Process Dr. Bilel Jamoussi IEEE Standards Education Committee.
Tim Lee The Boeing Company September 17, ICOP Oversight Revision Status.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
Company Confidential Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC) Private Web Based on SAE Standard Works September 28, 2015 The.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission Sept 2004 Tom Siep, TMS Assoicates, LLCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Oversight Revision Report
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Project Management
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Project Management
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
AS9104/2 Oversight Revision Report
‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1
Mike Roberts Boeing Fort Worth Spring Meeting 6 April 2011
AS9104/2 Oversight Revision Report
9104/2 Oversight Revision Report
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
TG3 Review Procedure Proposal
AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Specification on float equipment
IAQG 9110:2012 Revision Overview
IAQG 9110:2012 Revision Overview
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
P55 – AIR 5493 Rewrite Team Members
SAE Standards Works Training Module - Useful Tabs
Presentation transcript:

9104/1 Ballot RMC Report Long Beach, California 14 Sept 2011 Mike Roberts – Team Leader

Confusing Ballot Results 2011 Re-ballot of 9104/1 –Clearly and cleanly passed in the Americas –Comments sent by Asia-Pacific, but no ballot results – not in compliance with IAQG 106 –It appears that there were three ballots taken in Europe. Germany voted Disapprove in one ballot Rolls Royce voted both Disapprove and Approve in a second ballot Unclear of CEN ballot results –48 pages of comments provided by Gunter Lessmann – IAQG Standards Manager

Current Situation 9104/1 team has been working on the rewrite of this standard for 4 1/2 years –Most comments came from persons/entities not involved on the rewrite team or OPMT. –We cannot keep re-discussing issues that have been previously accepted/adopted. –We cannot accept technical changes to the ballot draft without causing another ballot, which will probably delay another year. –We can accept non-technical improvements or typo corrections, within reason.

IAQG 106 Requirements The resolution of comments is the responsibility of the: –IDR –The 3 SDRs –The writing team leader Comments must be reviewed, but there is no requirement for acceptance Sectors have different ballot accept/reject criteria. –Nothing presented to Gunter Lessmann indicates a ballot failure in any Sector –Re-balloting required for technical changes.

The Plan Comments will be separated by document chapters, and addressed by the chapter book- boss teams. All comments will be separated into Categories We will use the Comments (.doc) template provided by Gunter Lessmann as the official response sheet. The 9104/1 team leader will maintain the official draft of the document and comment sheets. We will try to comply with the IAQG day review cycle.

Schedule Re-verify book boss assignments. Completed Validated 5 categories for disposition. Completed Book bosses will have 14 calendar days to address, categorize, and recommend disposition for all comments in their respective chapter(s). (Sept 27 th 2011) Book bosses will route their dispositions to all 9104/1 team members, who will provide immediate comments. 9104/1 Team Lead to consolidate chapter comment dispositions into single draft document and comments template. (Oct 7 th 2011) Team Lead will route final paperwork to book bosses and 9104/1 team for final review (Oct 17 th 2011), before sending to SDRs (Oct 20 th 2011), and then to Gunter Lessmann (Oct 26 th 2011 at IAQG Meeting). Possibility of publishing by end of 2011.

Team Lead Comments It is time to complete this project. This project will have taken 5 years if we are successful now. Not everyone will be happy. We can’t keep re-hashing previously approved or dispositioned topics. Significant technical changes will postponed until the next revision of the standard. Failure to publish by the end of the year will significantly impact the ICOP process, and will damage any credibility that we still may have with our customer base.

Questions