Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Florida Association of MIS June 12, 2012 Susie Lee, Director of Test.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRODUCTION TO SPRING 2013 COMPUTER-BASED TESTING GRADE 5 FCAT 2.0 MATHEMATICS 1.
Advertisements

041 DnA Implementation Update1 DnA Implementation Update Prepared by the Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department October 4, 2011.
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Certification Tool (FSA, FCAT/FCAT 2.0, and EOC) Maria C. Bruguera, Director 1 Mara C. Ugando, Staff Specialist Assessment,
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Technology.
Technology Readiness “Preparing for Online Testing” May 22, 2014.
Winter 2014 Florida Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments Training Materials for School Technology Coordinators.
Spring 2013 End-of-Course Assessments Training Materials Technology Coordinator Algebra 1 EOC Assessment Biology 1 EOC Assessment Geometry EOC Assessment.
Online Testing: Transitioning from Paper to Computer‐Based Testing Florida Association of MIS June 14, 2011 Bo Elzie, Project Manager, Computer-Based Testing.
COMPUTER-BASED TESTING (CBT) CERTIFICATION TOOL (FSA, FCAT/FCAT 2.0, AND EOC) Maria C. Bruguera, Director 1 Mara C. Ugando, Staff Specialist Assessment,
Infrastructure Trial Training September 15, Infrastructure Trial.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Fall 2014 Reading & Mathematics Retake Training Materials.
Welcome Florida Standards Assessments Regional Trainings January 26 ­­­­ – February 5,
SBAC: UPDATE, RESOURCES, BEST PRACTICES OCTOBER 6, 2014.
Test Administration Training 2 Test Management Functionality for TestNav 8.
The Death of Windows XP End of the line for venerable operating system Dr. Jan Vanderpool
Online Testing TAKS – XL Retest 2008 – 2009 Online Testing Opportunities October 21 st – 24 th 2008 March 3 rd – 6 th 2009 April 28 th –
Online Assessment Update Region 6 February 24, 2012.
Lessons from the Field: Making the Transition to Computer-Based Testing October 2011.
[Presentation by] [Date] [INSERT DISTRICT LOGO]. Table of Contents Big Picture: How Does It All Connect? Keystone Exams: The 33% Option Keystone Exams:
Introduction to LHDT 526 Website and Education Software Evaluation Instructor Candace Chou, Ph.D.
Computer-Based Testing Update Tara Gardner, Computer-Based Testing Coordinator Jenny Black, K-12 Assessment.
Computer-Based Testing Update Tara Gardner, Computer-Based Testing Coordinator.
Technology Coordinator Training FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Computer-Based Testing.
WINDOWS XP PROFESSIONAL Bilal Munir Mughal Chapter-1 1.
PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Spring 2011 Computer-Based Testing for Grade 10 Mathematics and Reading & Mathematics Retakes February 15, 16, and 17, 2011.
2012 FCAT and YOU … the TVI! Suzanne A Dalton, Supervisor/FIMC-VI 01/30/12
Spring 2013 Computer-Based Testing Training Materials Technology Coordinator Grades 6, 7, 9, and 10 FCAT 2.0 Reading Grade 5 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics FCAT.
K-12 Assessment Administration Updates Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting September 8-9, 2010.
Questions? Type in Q&A Computer Based Testing Best Practices November 28 & 29, 2012 Grade 5 FCAT 2.0 Computer Based Testing Best Practices.
Fall 2013 End-of-Course Assessments Training Materials for School Technology Coordinators Algebra 1 Biology 1 Geometry U.S. History 1.
Questions? Type in Q&A Computer Based Testing Best Practices 2012 January 25 & 26, 2012 Grades 6 & 10 FCAT 2.0 Computer Based Testing Best Practices.
Winter 2013 End-of-Course Assessments Training Materials for School Technology Coordinators U.S. History Biology 1 Algebra 1 Geometry 1.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
Edward G. Rendell, Governor ▪ Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Educationwww.pde.state.pa.us Classroom Diagnostic Tools IU Educational Technology Coordinators.
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Division of Assessment and Student Information Online MSP Testing Orientation November 15, 2013.
Session 1 Achievement Testing Pre-Test Training
Technical requirements The Test – testNAV 8 – As soon as the number of students and particular devices are known, these devices should be tested against.
1 Fall 2012 Reading & Mathematics Retake Training Materials.
COMPUTER-BASED TESTING (CBT) CERTIFICATION TOOL (FSA, FCAT 2.0, AND NGSSS) MARIA C. BRUGUERA, DIRECTOR 1 MARA C. UGANDO, STAFF SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT, RESEARCH,
DAC Legislative Update September 2010 Sharon Koon Policy Coordinator Office of Assessment Senate Bill 4 & House Bill 105.
Fall 2013 Reading Retake Training Materials. Technology Coordinator Before Testing Checklist  Read the test administration manual and the 2013–2014 Technology.
Infrastructure trial test Test Nav & TestHear. Single point of installation and configuration changes Test Nav is installed on the local file server and.
Spring 2014 RMS/EOC Infrastructure Trial Training.
Monitor Training 2013 FCAT/FCAT 2.0; SAT-10; and EOC Assessments.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee January 11, 2016.
Smarter Balanced Assessments: Chromebooks and Tablets and More, Oh My! [Handouts, PPT, and links posted.
Statewide Assessment Update Florida Organization of Instructional Leaders May 7-8, 2014 Vince Verges Assistant Deputy Commissioner Accountability, Research.
Federal Programs Q &A’s Presented by: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs and School Improvement.
Technical Changes and Preparation SLA3 Pilot 2 Fall 2015.
MEDISOFT V20 Technical Requirements (Remember That There is No More Support for Windows XP) Call us at or
Federal Programs Q &A’s Presented by: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs and School Improvement.
TestNav Functionality and Support Devices/Browsers August 2016 TestNav |1.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
K-12 Student Assessment Test Administration Updates
Computer-Based Testing
Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Certification Tool
DTC Spring Kick-Off January 8th 2015.
Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) Regional DTC Meetings
Updates on Next-Generation MCAS and Planning for the High School Competency Determination Standard Meeting of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Certification Tool
Spring 2004 May 19, 2004 Lorraine Frost, Director, CMS
Presentation transcript:

Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Computer-Based Testing FCAT/FCAT 2.0/EOC Florida Association of MIS June 12, 2012 Susie Lee, Director of Test Administration, K-12 Bo Elzie, Project Director, Computer-Based Testing Certification Department of Education

Background The DOE began a certification process for determining CBT readiness in using an online tool. All participating schools certified readiness and 500,000 computer-based assessments were successfully administered. The certification process continued in , and over one million assessments were successfully administered. The Department created and has maintained a 15 member Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Advisory Committee which meets regularly via conference call to provide input on all readiness activities for computer-based testing. The committee is comprised of district assessment, MIS, and technology staff. The Department also maintains an ongoing cross-division communications team that meets regularly to discuss and take action on CBT issues.

Background: 4 Certifications in Fall Certification FCAT Mathematics Retakes FCAT Reading Retakes (CBT optional) FCAT 2.0 Reading Retakes Winter Certification December/January Algebra 1 EOC Assessment Spring Certification (FCAT and FCAT 2.0) FCAT Mathematics Retakes FCAT Reading Retakes (CBT optional) FCAT 2.0 Reading Retakes Grade 6 FCAT 2.0 Reading Grade 10 FCAT 2.0 Reading Spring Certification (EOCs) Algebra 1 Biology 1 Geometry U.S. History field Test (sampled high schools only)

Spring 2012 FCAT/FCAT 2.0 ◦ FCAT 2.0 Reading Retake: 51,539 ◦ FCAT Mathematics Retake: 32,525 ◦ FCAT Reading Retake: 11,307 ◦ FCAT 2.0 Grade 6 Reading: 200,109 ◦ FCAT 2.0 Grade 10 Reading: 185,668 ◦ Total: 481,148

Spring 2012 EOC Assessments ◦ Algebra 1: 202,146 ◦ Biology 1: 190,687 ◦ Geometry: 188,362 ◦ U.S. History: 54,883 ◦ Total: 636,078 Total Number of Spring CBT Assessments: 1,117,226

Most Common Issues Student submits test or is marked complete early (requires FDOE action) Student tests using wrong authorization ticket Technical problems resulting in students getting kicked out of a test ◦ Local issues – in almost all cases, problems discovered and resolved quickly ◦ Other issues – bad weather, internet service went down, etc.

Summer 2012 Algebra 1: July 23 – August 10 (districts select administration week) No Certification process for summer Infrastructure Trial is recommended for workstations that will be used for testing

Transition

New Computer-based tests: ◦ Grade 5 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics ◦ Grade 7 FCAT 2.0 Reading ◦ Grade 9 FCAT 2.0 Reading ◦ Civics Field Test The FCAT Reading Retake is no longer administered

TestNav 6.9 TestNav 6.9 will continue to be the computer-based testing platform ◦ Requires software download ◦ Secure, locked-down browser ◦ Runs on tablets (except for iPads) but not recommended ◦ Fall all schools will need to download updated software

How do we ensure that schools are ready for the continued transition to CBT?  Stakeholder feedback indicated that the DOE certification process to determine CBT readiness should continue in with some modifications.  An infrastructure trial will still be required for each computer that will be used for CBT, and this will be managed locally.  Superintendent certification of CBT readiness will still be required.

Certification Process Certification Process Section I (Computer Inventory), Section II (scheduling) and Section III (Checklist) of the online certification tool will remain essentially the same. However, there will only be two certification periods: fall/winter and spring. The Fall/Winter Computer-Based Assessments are: October 8-12, 2012 or October 15-19, 2012 (Districts decide) FCAT Mathematics Retakes and FCAT 2.0 Reading Retakes November 28 – December 19, 2012 Algebra1, Biology 1, Geometry EOC Assessments

The Spring Computer-Based Assessments are: April 8-19, 2013 FCAT Mathematics Retakes FCAT 2.0 Reading Retakes April 15-26, 2013 FCAT 2.0 Reading, Grades 6,7,9, and 10 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics, Grade 5 April 22-May 10, 2013 U.S. History EOC Assessment April 29-May 17, 2013 Algebra 1, Biology 1, and Geometry EOC Assessments April 29- June 7, 2013 Civics EOC Field Test Certification Process, Continued

Critical Dates Critical Dates DPS memo goes out August 6, 2012 Tool opens for fall/winter certification August 27, 2012 Tool closes for fall/winter certification September 21, 2012 Tool opens for spring certification February 18, 2013 Tool closes for spring certification March 22, 2013

Educator Equipment / Hardware Student Equipment / Hardware Professional Development ProgramComments XXXTitle I, Part A These funds may only be used in schools designated as Title I schools. Use of Title I funds for computer-based assessment is more likely to be compliant with federal regulations in school wide programs rather than targeted assistance programs XTitle II, Part AThese funds may be used only for professional development in core subject areas X Title II, Part B, Math and Science Partnerships This is a competitive program from the state to the sub-recipients. XXX Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) For the most part, these funds can be used only to benefit students with disabilities; so for example, use of these funds for professional development would be limited to educators serving students with disabilities. XXX School Improvement Grants (1003a and 1003g) The extent to which these funds can be used to support computer-based assessment will depend on the state’s approved plans for use of the funds. XXX Race to the Top (RTTT) State Grant Funds can be used consistent with approved state/local scopes of work. XXX Title VI, Part A, Grants for State Assessments and Related Activities Generally available for any purpose which supports the development and/or administration of state assessments and standards at the discretion of the state (may include the costs of working in partnerships with other states).. The following table delineates several potential federal fund sources for supporting computer-based assessments. In determining applicability to any particular situation, care must be taken to ensure that proposed allocations and expenditures do not violate federal requirements related to supplanting. In particular, note that supplanting is presumed to occur when federal funds are used to implement a state-level requirement or federal funds are use to provide a benefit to an eligible population while non-federal funds are used to provide the same benefit to other populations that are not eligible for the federal program. Each situation must be individually analyzed to determine whether proposed uses of funds are compliant with federal requirements. Note: Title III is not included in this listing because USED has interpreted the supplement/not supplant provision to specifically preclude use of Title III funds for assessment purposes. Potential Federal Grant Resources for Funding Computer- Based Assessment

General Specifications (Windows/PC and Apple/Macintosh) Each computer must meet or exceed the following General Specifications in addition to the applicable Operating System Specifications below:  500 MB available disk space  1024x768 screen resolution  Keyboard and mouse (or other pointing device)  High-speed internet connection Operating System Specifications Windows/PC Windows XP (Service Pack 3)  Pentium III 733 MHz processor  512 MB RAM Windows (Service Pack 1)  Pentium III 1 GHz processor  1 GB RAM Windows 7  Pentium III 1 GHz processor  1 GB RAM Apple/MacintoshMac OS X 10.4  G3, G4, G5 500 MHz processor  512 MB RAM Mac OS X 10.5  Intel, G4, G5 867 MHz processor  512 MB RAM Mac OS X 10.6  Intel processor  1 GB RAM 2012–2013 Computer-Based Testing System Minimum Specifications

Additional Specifications for TestHear (Accommodated Forms)  TestHear will operate on Windows PC workstations and on Macintosh workstations that have Mac OS 10.5 or later installed and are running Windows (e.g., via Boot Camp). TestHear will not work on Mac OS X 10.4 or on Macs that cannot also run Windows.  For students requiring the screen reader, the computer must be equipped with an audio card and headphones. Updated 9/2/ –2013 Computer-Based Testing System Minimum Specifications (Cont’d) For an optimal student experience, any computer that takes a noticeably long period of time (e.g., more than 10 seconds) to start and run applications, even computers which meet the requirements above, should not be used for high-stakes computer-based testing, if possible. The testing platform does not permit access to other applications during testing. This means that any applications that may automatically launch during testing will interrupt the student’s testing session, logging the student out of the test. Applications such as antivirus updates, power management software (laptops), screen savers, and with automatic message notifications should be configured so they do not launch during test sessions.

The Future “It is a simple fact that access to high-speed broadband is now as vital a component of K-12 school infrastructure as electricity, air conditioning and heating.” SETDA, Recommendations: An external Internet connection to the ISP – At least 100 Mbps per 1,000 students/staff WAN connections from the district to each school and among schools – At least 1 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff Recommendations: An external Internet connection to the ISP – At least 1 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff WAN connections from the district to each school and among schools – At least 10 Gbps per 1,000 students/staff

Questions or Comments?